
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (20): 88-97.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0821
Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Jianfeng(
), PANG Yuwan, WU Zhaoyun, ZHANG Mu(
), HUANG Qiaoyi, HUANG Xu, FU Hongting, LI Ping, WU Yongpei
Received:2025-09-29
Revised:2026-01-11
Online:2026-10-25
Published:2026-10-26
CLC Number:
HUANG Jianfeng, PANG Yuwan, WU Zhaoyun, ZHANG Mu, HUANG Qiaoyi, HUANG Xu, FU Hongting, LI Ping, WU Yongpei. Effects of Different Rice Straw Mulching Amounts on Pepper Growth and Soil Bacterial Community[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(20): 88-97.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0821
| 处理 | 株高/ cm | 茎粗/mm | 辣椒素/(mg/kg) | 粗纤维/% | 果长/cm | 鲜果重/g | 果径/mm | 果肉厚/mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 44.5±1.22c | 10.0±0.45bc | 22.4±1.80d | 1.53±0.115a | 14.3±0.13c | 34.1±0.33c | 24.9±0.48b | 3.31±0.037c |
| DM | 41.7±0.91c | 9.2±0.36c | 25.9±0.61c | 1.47±0.058ab | 14.3±0.10c | 34.0±0.14c | 24.8±0.49b | 3.33±0.039c |
| JG3 | 54.2±4.31ab | 11.1±0.71ab | 26.1±1.00c | 1.37±0.115ab | 15.0±0.13a | 36.9±0.20a | 26.3±0.56a | 3.47±0.043b |
| JG6 | 55.5±3.82a | 11.9±0.72a | 36.7±0.15a | 1.43±0.115ab | 14.9±0.12ab | 37.2±0.42a | 26.5±0.26a | 3.56±0.059a |
| JG9 | 50.2±0.45b | 11.2±0.62ab | 33.4±0.96b | 1.20±0.100b | 14.7±0.15b | 36.2±0.23b | 25.9±0.45a | 3.37±0.038c |
| 处理 | 株高/ cm | 茎粗/mm | 辣椒素/(mg/kg) | 粗纤维/% | 果长/cm | 鲜果重/g | 果径/mm | 果肉厚/mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 44.5±1.22c | 10.0±0.45bc | 22.4±1.80d | 1.53±0.115a | 14.3±0.13c | 34.1±0.33c | 24.9±0.48b | 3.31±0.037c |
| DM | 41.7±0.91c | 9.2±0.36c | 25.9±0.61c | 1.47±0.058ab | 14.3±0.10c | 34.0±0.14c | 24.8±0.49b | 3.33±0.039c |
| JG3 | 54.2±4.31ab | 11.1±0.71ab | 26.1±1.00c | 1.37±0.115ab | 15.0±0.13a | 36.9±0.20a | 26.3±0.56a | 3.47±0.043b |
| JG6 | 55.5±3.82a | 11.9±0.72a | 36.7±0.15a | 1.43±0.115ab | 14.9±0.12ab | 37.2±0.42a | 26.5±0.26a | 3.56±0.059a |
| JG9 | 50.2±0.45b | 11.2±0.62ab | 33.4±0.96b | 1.20±0.100b | 14.7±0.15b | 36.2±0.23b | 25.9±0.45a | 3.37±0.038c |
| 处理 | 酸性磷酸酶/[μmol/(d·g)] | 脲酶/[μg/(d·g)] | 蔗糖酶/[mg/(d·g)] | 脱氢酶/[μg/(d·g)] | 过氧化氢酶/[mL/(g·20min)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 14.8±0.46c | 127.3±2.01c | 2.40±0.032d | 36.2±0.23d | 0.49±0.023d |
| DM | 17.0±0.24b | 126.8±3.21c | 2.66±0.042c | 36.7±0.24c | 0.53±0.065cd |
| JG3 | 18.3±0.39a | 177.0±1.85b | 2.76±0.030b | 37.4±0.13b | 0.57±0.025bc |
| JG6 | 17.6±0.33ab | 178.0±0.71ab | 2.93±0.067a | 38.0±0.12a | 0.62±0.047ab |
| JG9 | 17.1±0.38b | 182.7±2.13a | 2.90±0.050a | 37.9±0.16a | 0.66±0.063a |
| 处理 | 酸性磷酸酶/[μmol/(d·g)] | 脲酶/[μg/(d·g)] | 蔗糖酶/[mg/(d·g)] | 脱氢酶/[μg/(d·g)] | 过氧化氢酶/[mL/(g·20min)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 14.8±0.46c | 127.3±2.01c | 2.40±0.032d | 36.2±0.23d | 0.49±0.023d |
| DM | 17.0±0.24b | 126.8±3.21c | 2.66±0.042c | 36.7±0.24c | 0.53±0.065cd |
| JG3 | 18.3±0.39a | 177.0±1.85b | 2.76±0.030b | 37.4±0.13b | 0.57±0.025bc |
| JG6 | 17.6±0.33ab | 178.0±0.71ab | 2.93±0.067a | 38.0±0.12a | 0.62±0.047ab |
| JG9 | 17.1±0.38b | 182.7±2.13a | 2.90±0.050a | 37.9±0.16a | 0.66±0.063a |
| 处理 | pH | 总有机碳/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 4.77±0.070b | 8.40±0.175d | 0.87±0.081a | 70.0±6.49ab | 80.7±5.25c | 44.0±3.48b |
| DM | 4.60±0.059c | 8.39±0.091d | 0.88±0.017a | 61.7±2.19b | 125.0±2.24b | 43.9±4.16b |
| JG3 | 4.86±0.057b | 8.98±0.100c | 0.85±0.081a | 69.8±1.70ab | 122.0±6.62b | 50.5±5.24ab |
| JG6 | 4.80±0.084b | 9.83±0.087a | 0.95±0.033a | 71.3±1.41ab | 181.9±8.48a | 56.6±4.20a |
| JG9 | 5.10±0.044a | 9.43±0.020b | 0.90±0.020a | 75.8±3.46a | 192.5±4.25a | 44.3±1.25b |
| 处理 | pH | 总有机碳/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 4.77±0.070b | 8.40±0.175d | 0.87±0.081a | 70.0±6.49ab | 80.7±5.25c | 44.0±3.48b |
| DM | 4.60±0.059c | 8.39±0.091d | 0.88±0.017a | 61.7±2.19b | 125.0±2.24b | 43.9±4.16b |
| JG3 | 4.86±0.057b | 8.98±0.100c | 0.85±0.081a | 69.8±1.70ab | 122.0±6.62b | 50.5±5.24ab |
| JG6 | 4.80±0.084b | 9.83±0.087a | 0.95±0.033a | 71.3±1.41ab | 181.9±8.48a | 56.6±4.20a |
| JG9 | 5.10±0.044a | 9.43±0.020b | 0.90±0.020a | 75.8±3.46a | 192.5±4.25a | 44.3±1.25b |
| 处理 | OTU | Shannon | Chao1 | ACE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 2362±92.34c | 9.79±0.107bc | 2367±158.96bc | 2388±159.29bc |
| DM | 2287±77.12c | 9.70±0.130c | 2266±103.05c | 2285±102.27c |
| JG3 | 2782±69.58a | 10.15±0.079a | 2785±130.17a | 2804±130.07a |
| JG6 | 2625±92.50b | 9.99±0.102ab | 2631±130.35a | 2655±128.20a |
| JG9 | 2543±69.57b | 9.90±0.060bc | 2546±70.83ab | 2565±73.99ab |
| 处理 | OTU | Shannon | Chao1 | ACE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 2362±92.34c | 9.79±0.107bc | 2367±158.96bc | 2388±159.29bc |
| DM | 2287±77.12c | 9.70±0.130c | 2266±103.05c | 2285±102.27c |
| JG3 | 2782±69.58a | 10.15±0.079a | 2785±130.17a | 2804±130.07a |
| JG6 | 2625±92.50b | 9.99±0.102ab | 2631±130.35a | 2655±128.20a |
| JG9 | 2543±69.57b | 9.90±0.060bc | 2546±70.83ab | 2565±73.99ab |
| 指标 | 产量 | 株高 | 茎粗 | 辣椒素 | 粗纤维 | 果长 | 鲜果重 | 果径 | 果肉厚 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTU | 0.033* | 0.019* | -0.234 | 0.499 | -0.438 | 0.005** | 0.024* | 0.025* | 0.124 |
| Shannon | 0.061 | 0.031* | -0.228 | 0.602 | -0.534 | 0.013* | 0.045* | 0.044* | 0.139 |
| Chao1 | 0.033* | 0.017* | -0.204 | 0.496 | -0.441 | 0.003** | 0.024* | 0.024* | 0.125 |
| ACE | 0.032* | 0.016* | -0.201 | 0.490 | -0.446 | 0.225 | 0.023* | 0.023* | 0.121 |
| Proteobacteria | 0.778 | 0.517 | -0.923 | 0.900 | 0.260 | 0.586 | 0.624 | 0.580 | 0.215 |
| Acidobacteriota | 0.405 | 0.348 | 0.015* | 0.570 | -0.476 | 0.509 | 0.418 | 0.413 | 0.717 |
| Actinobacteriota | -0.070 | -0.023* | 0.303 | -0.140 | 0.742 | -0.075 | -0.038* | -0.029* | -0.007** |
| Chloroflexi | -0.227 | -0.095 | -0.015* | -0.665 | 0.813 | -0.181 | -0.179 | -0.163 | -0.269 |
| Gemmatimonadota | 0.693 | 0.542 | -0.161 | 0.463 | -0.990 | 0.828 | 0.651 | 0.622 | 0.652 |
| unclassified_Bacteria | -0.678 | -0.797 | -0.824 | -0.078 | 0.701 | -0.918 | -0.703 | -0.703 | -0.570 |
| Myxococcota | 0.370 | 0.154 | -0.184 | 0.620 | 0.707 | 0.284 | 0.265 | 0.232 | 0.134 |
| Firmicutes | -0.692 | -0.472 | -0.054* | 0.742 | -0.923 | -0.587 | -0.632 | -0.610 | -0.788 |
| Bacteroidota | 0.029* | 0.050* | -0.435 | 0.450 | -0.321 | 0.007** | 0.032* | 0.037* | 0.149 |
| Patescibacteria | -0.699 | -0.409 | 0.148 | -0.838 | -0.561 | -0.636 | -0.582 | -0.537 | -0.436 |
| Others | 0.223 | 0.123 | -0.196 | 0.962 | -0.791 | 0.101 | 0.181 | 0.175 | 0.289 |
| 指标 | 产量 | 株高 | 茎粗 | 辣椒素 | 粗纤维 | 果长 | 鲜果重 | 果径 | 果肉厚 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTU | 0.033* | 0.019* | -0.234 | 0.499 | -0.438 | 0.005** | 0.024* | 0.025* | 0.124 |
| Shannon | 0.061 | 0.031* | -0.228 | 0.602 | -0.534 | 0.013* | 0.045* | 0.044* | 0.139 |
| Chao1 | 0.033* | 0.017* | -0.204 | 0.496 | -0.441 | 0.003** | 0.024* | 0.024* | 0.125 |
| ACE | 0.032* | 0.016* | -0.201 | 0.490 | -0.446 | 0.225 | 0.023* | 0.023* | 0.121 |
| Proteobacteria | 0.778 | 0.517 | -0.923 | 0.900 | 0.260 | 0.586 | 0.624 | 0.580 | 0.215 |
| Acidobacteriota | 0.405 | 0.348 | 0.015* | 0.570 | -0.476 | 0.509 | 0.418 | 0.413 | 0.717 |
| Actinobacteriota | -0.070 | -0.023* | 0.303 | -0.140 | 0.742 | -0.075 | -0.038* | -0.029* | -0.007** |
| Chloroflexi | -0.227 | -0.095 | -0.015* | -0.665 | 0.813 | -0.181 | -0.179 | -0.163 | -0.269 |
| Gemmatimonadota | 0.693 | 0.542 | -0.161 | 0.463 | -0.990 | 0.828 | 0.651 | 0.622 | 0.652 |
| unclassified_Bacteria | -0.678 | -0.797 | -0.824 | -0.078 | 0.701 | -0.918 | -0.703 | -0.703 | -0.570 |
| Myxococcota | 0.370 | 0.154 | -0.184 | 0.620 | 0.707 | 0.284 | 0.265 | 0.232 | 0.134 |
| Firmicutes | -0.692 | -0.472 | -0.054* | 0.742 | -0.923 | -0.587 | -0.632 | -0.610 | -0.788 |
| Bacteroidota | 0.029* | 0.050* | -0.435 | 0.450 | -0.321 | 0.007** | 0.032* | 0.037* | 0.149 |
| Patescibacteria | -0.699 | -0.409 | 0.148 | -0.838 | -0.561 | -0.636 | -0.582 | -0.537 | -0.436 |
| Others | 0.223 | 0.123 | -0.196 | 0.962 | -0.791 | 0.101 | 0.181 | 0.175 | 0.289 |
| [1] |
方智远. 中国蔬菜育种学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2017:1113-1157.
|
| [2] |
李颖, 王恒明, 徐小万, 等. 华南地区辣椒品种选育及育种技术研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2020, 47(11):60-69.
|
| [3] |
李红霞, 张芮, 银敏华, 等. 秸秆与地膜覆盖对农田土壤环境的影响[J]. 农业工程, 2020, 10(10):34-39.
|
| [4] |
刘顺国, 付时丰, 汪景宽, 等. 长期地膜覆盖对棕壤水分含量和储量动态变化影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2006, 37(5):725-728.
|
| [5] |
周天美, 陆静, 李梦琳, 等. 不同类型农膜使用对温室土壤养分和辣椒产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(21):61-68.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0682 |
| [6] |
徐秋月, 董林林, 周天美, 等. 蔬菜地农用地膜残留及影响因素分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(26):109-115.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0777 |
| [7] |
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107740 URL |
| [8] |
樊志龙, 赵财, 刘畅, 等. 一膜两年用少耕轮作对水氮减投小麦产量形成的促进效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(19):3651-3662.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.19.003 |
| [9] |
洪涛, 王保, 陈正洪, 等. 不同颜色全生物降解地膜增温效果及对辣椒产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2024, 63(9):129-133.
|
| [10] |
张明明, 周迎鑫, 陈敬文, 等. 可降解地膜分类与研发应用现状[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(6):1278-1287.
|
| [11] |
吴健成, 田永超, 刘卿, 等. 秸秆还田与氮肥施用对稻田温室气体排放的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(12):5328-5339.
|
| [12] |
赵记军, 于显枫, 张绪成. 地膜源头减量化技术可行路径探讨[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(9):57-63.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0238 |
| [13] |
刘世平, 张洪程, 戴其根, 等. 免耕套种与秸秆还田对农田生态环境效应及小麦生长的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(2):393-396.
|
| [14] |
范重秀, 崔同霞, 姚友旭, 等. 秸秆覆盖量和覆盖时间对土壤水热状况及党参产量的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2022(21):82-88.
|
| [15] |
刘子涵, 黄方园, 黎景来, 等. 覆盖模式对旱作农田土壤微生物多样性及群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(7):2750-2760.
|
| [16] |
刘燕青, 王计磊, 李子忠. 秸秆覆盖对土壤水分和侵蚀的影响研究进展[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(6):429-436.
|
| [17] |
林刚云, 肖健, 吴银秀, 等. 秸秆覆盖还田对桑园土壤生物学性状及其细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(10):2339-2347.
|
| [18] |
胡燕芳, 章明奎. 长期地表秸秆覆盖对果园土壤理化性状及有机碳积累的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(7):37-43.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190400005 |
| [19] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
| [20] |
霍瑞春, 王国泽, 姚慧静, 等. 19种加工辣椒辣椒素提取、纯化及其含量测定[J]. 中国调味品, 2022, 47(4):167-172.
|
| [21] |
林海龙, 李伟光, 闫险峰, 等. 中药废水污泥群落结构解析中PCR-DGGE引物的选择与评价[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(5):1505-1510.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604 pmid: 23955772 |
| [24] |
doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 pmid: 2231712 |
| [25] |
吴传万, 杜小凤, 顾大路, 等. 覆盖方式对温室红椒生长发育及土壤环境的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2015, 31(2):407-414.
|
| [26] |
杨帆, 董燕, 徐明岗, 等. 南方地区秸秆还田对土壤综合肥力和作物产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(11):3040-3044.
|
| [27] |
李圆宾, 李鹏, 王舒华, 等. 稻麦轮作体系下有机肥施用对作物产量和土壤性质影响的整合分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9):3231-3239.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202109.024 |
| [28] |
黄巧义, 于俊红, 黄建凤, 等. 广东省主要农作物秸秆养分资源量及替代化肥潜力[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(2):297-306.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.02.010 |
| [29] |
柴如山, 黄晶, 柳开楼, 等. 我国水稻秸秆钾资源分布及其还田对土壤钾平衡的重要性[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(10):1745-1754.
|
| [30] |
高金虎, 孙占祥, 冯良山, 等. 秸秆与氮肥配施对辽西旱区土壤酶活性与土壤养分的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(4):677-681.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906(2012)04-0677-05 |
| [31] |
许冬, 万鹏, 褚世海, 等. 小麦秸秆高量覆盖对棉花生长发育及产量形成的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(5):1191-1197.
|
| [32] |
赵静. 土壤酸化对土壤有效养分、酶活性及黄金梨品质的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2011.
|
| [33] |
孔雪静. 地膜覆盖和秸秆还田对玉米地与土壤氮素转化相关的土壤酶活性影响研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2016.
|
| [34] |
党昆, 陈伟, 张洪淇, 等. 秸秆还田和地膜覆盖对稻区土壤理化性质及水稻产量的影响[J]. 东北农业科学, 2021, 46(4):11-16.
|
| [35] |
王晓航, 耿艳秋, 金峰, 等. 秸秆还田和地膜覆盖对土壤环境和水稻生长的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2018, 39(5):1-7.
|
| [36] |
白雪, 周怀平, 解文艳, 等. 不同类型地膜覆盖对玉米农田土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2018, 35(4):381-388.
|
| [37] |
万欣, 董元华, 王辉, 等. 番茄温室土壤碳氮磷的生态化学计量学特征及其与土壤酶活性的关系[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(10):281-285.
|
| [38] |
doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00179-2 URL |
| [39] |
徐静, 张锡洲, 李廷轩, 等. 野生大麦对土壤磷吸收及其酸性磷酸酶活性的基因型差异[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(1):88-98.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20150112 |
| [40] |
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac456 URL |
| [41] |
周子军, 郭松, 陈琨, 等. 长期秸秆覆盖对免耕稻-麦产量、土壤氮组分及微生物群落的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(4):1148-1159.
|
| [42] |
沈鹏飞, 王威雁, 李彤, 等. 陕西洛川苹果园不同覆盖措施对土壤性质、细菌群落及果实产量和品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2019, 46(5):817-831.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0863 |
| [43] |
刘骁蒨, 涂仕华, 孙锡发, 等. 秸秆还田与施肥对稻田土壤微生物生物量及固氮菌群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(17):5210-5218.
|
| [44] |
张婷婷, 王丽芳, 张德健, 等. 不同小麦秸秆还田覆盖度对旱作农田土壤微生物群落多样性的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2021, 49(1):77-87.
doi: 10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2021.01.12 |
| [45] |
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.021 URL |
| [46] |
李明, 胡云, 黄修梅, 等. 生物炭对设施黄瓜根际土壤养分和菌群的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(11):172-178.
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
胡志娥, 肖谋良, 丁济娜, 等. 长期覆膜条件下农田土壤微生物群落的响应特征[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(10):4745-4754.
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.07.009 URL |
| [1] | HUANG Yingmei, WU Jialong, LIANG Yongxin, LIANG Chunmei, ZHANG Juntao. Effects of Different Fish Protein Fertilizers on Growth of Bougainvillea and Soil Nutrients [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 48-58. |
| [2] | LING Jinfeng, HUANG Feng, WANG Yan, LIN Peihua, DONG Yizhi, SONG Xiaobing, CUI Yiping, LIN Jieying. Control Effect Evaluation of Five Fungicides Applicable for Green Food Production Against Litchi Pepper Spot Disease [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(6): 195-200. |
| [3] | LUO Guohui, YU Shikang, ZHAI Yangni, GU Huizhan, LI Fucheng, WANG Bin, WU Tao. Characteristics of Allelochemicals and Microbial Diversity in Soils with Different Types of Tobacco Continuous Cropping Obstacles [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(5): 101-108. |
| [4] | LI Jingru, LI Zhuoqing, XIANG Qingqing, LI Leifu, ZOU Ruijuan, LEI Ming. Effects of Combined Contamination of Cadmium and Arsenic in Soil on Growth of Industrial Peppers (Capsicum annuum) [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 117-125. |
| [5] | YE Xiaomei, NIU Xiaowei, WANG Peng, XUE Ruizhe, HAN Xia, XU Weizhou, CHEN Shujun. Soil Bacterial Community Characteristics of Different Forest Types in Rocky Mountain Area Along Yellow River in Northern Shaanxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(20): 54-63. |
| [6] | CHEN Baozhu, HUANG Jichuan, Xu Yanggui, PENG Yiping, Li Zhuxian, LIANG Jianyi, ZHONG Wenliang, YAN Yuwei, TU Yuting. Effects of Different Crop Rotation Patterns on Soil Microbial Ecology in Late Flowering Cabbage Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 93-102. |
| [7] | LIU Xiangting, WANG Xiaoping, HONG Ziqiang, WANG Wenxiu, ZHENG Guoqi, WU Hongliang, KANG Jianhong, YANG Juan. Effects of Mulching Treatments on Rhizosphere Microbial Communities of Lycium barbarum L. and Their Key Driving Factors [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(17): 97-105. |
| [8] | GAO Weiya, CHEN Xingbao, SA Rula, TAI Jicheng, ZHANG Yanting, WANG Huimiao. Effects of Different Land Use Types on Soil Properties in Horqin Sandy Land [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(13): 135-142. |
| [9] | MENG Jiaxu, XIE Qigan, LI Ruochen, XIAO Wendan, YE Xuezhu. Effect of Different Organic Fertilizers on Growth, Quality and Soil Properties of Ginger [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(10): 41-51. |
| [10] | LIU Runmei, ZHOU Guoping, WANG Fuzheng, SONG Ruihu, HU Xinggang, TANG Junyun. Effects of Soil Conditioners and Microbial Agents on Safe Utilization of Cadmium-Arsenic Co-contaminated Dryland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 128-135. |
| [11] | SUN Guangtao, BAO Guirong, TAI Jicheng, SA Rula, LIU Naijia, YU Miao, LI Anning. Effect of Maize and Peanut Intercropping on Crop and Soil Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(5): 7-12. |
| [12] | BAN Caixin, SA Rula, TAI Jicheng, ZHAO Tingchao, LI Anning, WU Chengcheng, ARUNTUYA. Effect of Kitchen Waste Compost on Soil Enzyme Activity and Physiological Characteristics of Maize and Peanut Interplanting [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(33): 74-80. |
| [13] | PENG Dingkun, GU Jun, TAN Yifan, ZHU Zhen, HAN Yongliang, PENG Jianwei. Effects of Application of Silicon Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Capsicum annuum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(31): 27-33. |
| [14] | LIU Naijia, SA Rula, YANG Hengshan, TAI Jicheng, WU Yunlong. Effect of Application Periods of Straw Composting Agent on Soil Fertility and Soil Enzyme Activity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(27): 79-84. |
| [15] | FANG Baihan, LIU Jingjing, GUO Xiaowen, YE Yang, YANG Maoqi, ZHANG Nan, GUO Huijuan, MIN Wei. Effects of Equal Carbon Amounts of Straw and Straw Charcoal Incorporation on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Enzyme Activity in Cotton Fields [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 69-82. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||