Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (18): 150-156.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0645
Previous Articles Next Articles
GUAN Xin(), ZHANG He, QI Kexiang, LI Wanru, JIANG Shuo, ZHENG Chunying(
)
Received:
2023-09-12
Revised:
2024-01-15
Online:
2024-06-18
Published:
2024-06-18
GUAN Xin, ZHANG He, QI Kexiang, LI Wanru, JIANG Shuo, ZHENG Chunying. Effects of Endophytic Fungus RP4 Fermentation on Contents of Three Major Cannabinoids in Cannabis sativa L.[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(18): 150-156.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0645
仪器 | 型号规格 | 生产厂家 |
---|---|---|
电子精密天平 | PL303 | 梅特勒-托利多仪器有限公司 |
超净工作台 | SZX | 南通科学仪器有限公司 |
空气浴振荡器 | HZQ-C | 哈尔滨市东联电子技术开发有限公司 |
旋转蒸发仪 | R-201 | 上海申胜生物技术有限公司 |
超声波清洗器 | KQ-100DE | 昆山市超声仪器有限公司 |
紫外可见波长检测器 | FL2000 | 浙江温岭福立分析仪器有限公司 |
高效液相色谱仪 | FL2000 | 浙江温岭福立分析仪器有限公司 |
400MH固体超导核磁共振波谱仪 | AVANCE Ⅲ | 美国Thermo Fisher公司 |
仪器 | 型号规格 | 生产厂家 |
---|---|---|
电子精密天平 | PL303 | 梅特勒-托利多仪器有限公司 |
超净工作台 | SZX | 南通科学仪器有限公司 |
空气浴振荡器 | HZQ-C | 哈尔滨市东联电子技术开发有限公司 |
旋转蒸发仪 | R-201 | 上海申胜生物技术有限公司 |
超声波清洗器 | KQ-100DE | 昆山市超声仪器有限公司 |
紫外可见波长检测器 | FL2000 | 浙江温岭福立分析仪器有限公司 |
高效液相色谱仪 | FL2000 | 浙江温岭福立分析仪器有限公司 |
400MH固体超导核磁共振波谱仪 | AVANCE Ⅲ | 美国Thermo Fisher公司 |
参数 | 设置条件 |
---|---|
色谱柱 | Venusil XBP-C18柱(4.6 mm×250 mm,5 μm,USA) |
流动相 | ①乙腈-水-0.1%甲酸溶液(75:25),②甲醇-乙腈-水-0.1%磷酸溶液(40:30:30) |
波长 | ①220 nm,②254 nm |
流速 | 1 mL/min |
柱温 | 25℃ |
进样量 | 10 μL |
参数 | 设置条件 |
---|---|
色谱柱 | Venusil XBP-C18柱(4.6 mm×250 mm,5 μm,USA) |
流动相 | ①乙腈-水-0.1%甲酸溶液(75:25),②甲醇-乙腈-水-0.1%磷酸溶液(40:30:30) |
波长 | ①220 nm,②254 nm |
流速 | 1 mL/min |
柱温 | 25℃ |
进样量 | 10 μL |
组分 | 回归方程 | 相关系数r | 线性范围/(mg/mL) |
---|---|---|---|
CBD | Y=6×106X+264482 | 0.9998 | 0.0625~1.0000 |
CBDA | Y=2×107X-5841 | 0.9996 | 0.0625~1.0000 |
THC | Y=8.5206×105X+47649 | 0.9998 | 0.0625~1.0000 |
组分 | 回归方程 | 相关系数r | 线性范围/(mg/mL) |
---|---|---|---|
CBD | Y=6×106X+264482 | 0.9998 | 0.0625~1.0000 |
CBDA | Y=2×107X-5841 | 0.9996 | 0.0625~1.0000 |
THC | Y=8.5206×105X+47649 | 0.9998 | 0.0625~1.0000 |
样品 | 产地 | 发酵前CBD含量 | 发酵后CBD含量 | 发酵前THC含量 | 发酵后THC含量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶1 | 孙吴县 | 1.8176±0.0055 | 3.4287±0.0739** | 0.1562±0.0036 | 0.2668±0.0119* |
叶2 | 双城区 | 2.1666±0.0106 | 4.8739±0.0234** | 0.0331±0.0002 | 0.0672±0.0039* |
叶3 | 绥化市 | 1.7158±0.0185 | 7.0649±0.0329** | 0.0402±0.0040 | 0.3428±0.0168** |
叶4 | 江北区 | 1.5426±0.0515 | 2.6338±0.0101** | 0.3477±0.0030 | 0.5332±0.0386* |
叶5 | 五常市 | 3.2467±0.0188 | 6.6672±0.0189** | 0.3008±0.0236 | 0.5051±0.0045* |
根1 | 绥化市 | 0.5261±0.0365 | 1.7242±0.0055** | - | - |
根2 | 江北区 | 0.8487±0.0402 | 1.8243±0.0238** | - | - |
茎1 | 绥化市 | 0.5998±0.0083 | 2.0650±0.0449** | - | - |
茎2 | 江北区 | 0.4473±0.0026 | 1.9766±0.0105** | - | - |
样品 | 产地 | 发酵前CBD含量 | 发酵后CBD含量 | 发酵前THC含量 | 发酵后THC含量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶1 | 孙吴县 | 1.8176±0.0055 | 3.4287±0.0739** | 0.1562±0.0036 | 0.2668±0.0119* |
叶2 | 双城区 | 2.1666±0.0106 | 4.8739±0.0234** | 0.0331±0.0002 | 0.0672±0.0039* |
叶3 | 绥化市 | 1.7158±0.0185 | 7.0649±0.0329** | 0.0402±0.0040 | 0.3428±0.0168** |
叶4 | 江北区 | 1.5426±0.0515 | 2.6338±0.0101** | 0.3477±0.0030 | 0.5332±0.0386* |
叶5 | 五常市 | 3.2467±0.0188 | 6.6672±0.0189** | 0.3008±0.0236 | 0.5051±0.0045* |
根1 | 绥化市 | 0.5261±0.0365 | 1.7242±0.0055** | - | - |
根2 | 江北区 | 0.8487±0.0402 | 1.8243±0.0238** | - | - |
茎1 | 绥化市 | 0.5998±0.0083 | 2.0650±0.0449** | - | - |
茎2 | 江北区 | 0.4473±0.0026 | 1.9766±0.0105** | - | - |
[1] |
国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典2020年版(一部)[S]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020:81.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
关昕, 祁可香, 李宛儒, 等. 工业大麻发酵后其CBD及CBDA含量的动态变化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(21):144-150.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0993 |
[13] |
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0119 pmid: 30956228 |
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
doi: 10.4149/BLL_2020_012 pmid: 31950844 |
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
罗粤鹏, 杨远帆, 于洋君, 等. 乳酸菌发酵茶花粉对α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制率的影响[J]. 食品与机械, 2022, 38(9):29-33,39.
|
[23] |
杨金梅, 李云嵌, 何霞红, 等. 4种真菌发酵对三七叶化学成分及药理活性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2023, 44(20):198-211.
|
[24] |
吴映梅, 徐龙泉, 王瑶佳, 等. 薏苡仁乳酸菌发酵工艺优化及活性成分变化分析[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2022, 43(17):127-133.
|
[25] |
李保珍, 刘琪, 樊金华, 等. 沼泽红假单胞菌发酵提高黄芪多糖含量的条件优化[J]. 中国兽药杂志, 2022, 56(7):68-74.
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-1145 pmid: 30472696 |
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
赵旭, 宋清晖, 王晓慧, 等. 几种有机肥对玉米光合特性及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(3):36-42.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0341 |
[33] |
杨新波, 张晓轩, 蔡亚南, 等. 微生物发酵中药的研究现状及其在养殖业中的应用[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(1):169-178.
doi: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2022.01.018 |
[34] |
肖日传, 王德勤, 张传平. 中药发酵研究现状及展望[J]. 广东药科大学学报, 2020, 36(6):897-902.
|
[1] | YU Wenna, YU Liansheng, WANG Shuo, ZHAO Dan, DU Renpeng. Exopolysaccharide Production by Pediococcus acidilactici J1: Fermentation Conditions Optimization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 143-151. |
[2] | HUANG Wenyin, LI Jiawei, SONG Zhao, CHANG Jingjing, CHEN Xiao, LI Jing, JIAO Jiabin, ZHANG Baige. Effects of Four Functional Fertilizers on Growth and Quality of Flowering Chinese Cabbage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 83-90. |
[3] | JIANG Kun, LI Yuguo, ZHANG Daozhi, XU Hengwei, FENG Danping, MENG Xiaoqian, ZHENG Chunying. Effects on Biosythesis of Flavonoids in Acanthopanax senticosus Leaves: Microbial Fermentation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 145-151. |
[4] | JU Yawen, XU Peng, CHEN Yali, FU Yousheng, CAO Kaige. Effects on Wheat Seed Germination and Seedling Growth under Salt Treatment: Endophytic Fungi Fermentation Broth [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 26-32. |
[5] | LV Zhenzhen, LIU Xiumei, JI Jianhua, LAN Xianjin, HOU Hongqian, FENG Zhaobin, LIU Yiren. Impact of Different Raw Material Ratio on Fermentation Effect of Asparagus Straw Compost [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(14): 70-75. |
[6] | LIU Naijia, HU Xiaolin, DING Yaling, SA Rula, SUN Guangtao, LI Zhilin. Effect of Exogenous Additives on Solid State Fermentation of Straw [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(14): 76-81. |
[7] | ZHOU Bosen, CAO Huiying, QI Xintong, YU Liansheng, YANG Yi, GE Jingping, SONG Gang, DU Renpeng. Exopolysaccharides from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum HDL-03: Synthesis Conditions Optimization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(11): 14-21. |
[8] | YANG Jie, WEI Suzhen. Study on Fermentation Parameters of Agricultural Waste Composting in Plateau Environment [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(10): 89-94. |
[9] | YANG Tai, YU Huiying, LU Liming, FU Haiyan, LI Guoliang, DAI Wenlong, LIU Chunguang, YANG Fengshan, MA Yukun. Endophytic Bacteria from Maize Seed with Growth-promoting Potential: Isolation, Identification and Optimization of Fermentation Conditions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 16-23. |
[10] | LI Yongli, YUAN Chunyan, ZHOU Zhou, WANG Chunsheng, LEI Zhenshan. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens P-r21: Broad-spectrum Antibacterial Effect and Control of Tomato Gray Mold [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 105-110. |
[11] | XUE Rui, SHEN Shaoyun, DENG Xizhou, CHEN Cong, PENG Yuejin, DU Guangzu, CHEN Bin. Metarhizium rileyi SL Strain Liquid Fermentation Conditions: Optimization by Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 135-143. |
[12] | CHEN Lulu, MENG Xianghe. Study on the Best Brewing Technology of Sweet Ferment Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 148-155. |
[13] | QI Kexiang, GUAN Xin, YOU Mengyao, ZHANG He, WANG Yuqing, CHENG Li, ZHENG Chunying. The Endophytic Bacterium HS8: Isolation of Secondary Metabolites Based on Flavonoids Biosynthesis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(27): 118-125. |
[14] | YANG Taoyang, SA Rula, YE Ruhan, YANG Hengshan, HAN Feng, WU Qingyun. Effects on Maize Stalk Fermentation: Straw Degrading Bacteria [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(27): 45-51. |
[15] | HE Mingyi, HUANG Mengmeng, LIU Yueyi, LING Hongzhi, GE Jingping. Optimization of Fermentation Technology and Quality of L- Lactic Acid Cucumber [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(26): 26-32. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||