Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (21): 29-34.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0137
Previous Articles Next Articles
YAN Hao(), ZHANG Wei, WANG Guan, JIA Zhengrong, WANG Lei, ZHAO Weijun, GUO Ruifeng(
)
Received:
2023-02-23
Revised:
2023-05-15
Online:
2024-07-25
Published:
2024-07-11
YAN Hao, ZHANG Wei, WANG Guan, JIA Zhengrong, WANG Lei, ZHAO Weijun, GUO Ruifeng. Physiological Response of Sweet Sorghum Under Drought Stress and Comparison of Drought Resistance[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(21): 29-34.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0137
PEG浓度 | 品种编号 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种1 | 品种2 | 品种3 | 品种4 | 品种5 | 品种6 | 品种7 | 品种8 | |
CK | 85.6±4.8 a | 96.7±1.9 a | 95.6±2.2 a | 96.7±0.0 a | 98.9±1.1 a | 98.9±1.1 a | 100.0±0.0 a | 95.6±2.2 a |
50 g/L | 68.9±2.9 b | 95.6±1.1 a | 96.7±0.0 a | 81.1±6.2 b | 100.0±0.0 a | 100.0±0.0 a | 100.0±0.0 a | 94.4±2.9 a |
100 g/L | 53.3±3.8 c | 97.8±1.1 a | 88.9 ±2.2 ab | 78.9±4.4 b | 93.3±3.3 ab | 75.6±18.2 ab | 98.9±1.1 a | 84.4±5.9 ab |
150 g/L | 47.8±6.7 c | 97.8±1.1 a | 83.3±1.9 b | 62.2±4.9 c | 84.4±5.9 b | 71.1±2.2 b | 97.8±2.2 a | 75.6±8.0 b |
200 g/L | 3.3±0.0 d | 81.6±1.1 b | 65.6±2.9 c | 12.2±5.9 d | 10.0±3.3 c | 5.6±1.1 c | 82.2±9.1 b | 27.8±4.9 c |
PEG浓度 | 品种编号 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种1 | 品种2 | 品种3 | 品种4 | 品种5 | 品种6 | 品种7 | 品种8 | |
CK | 85.6±4.8 a | 96.7±1.9 a | 95.6±2.2 a | 96.7±0.0 a | 98.9±1.1 a | 98.9±1.1 a | 100.0±0.0 a | 95.6±2.2 a |
50 g/L | 68.9±2.9 b | 95.6±1.1 a | 96.7±0.0 a | 81.1±6.2 b | 100.0±0.0 a | 100.0±0.0 a | 100.0±0.0 a | 94.4±2.9 a |
100 g/L | 53.3±3.8 c | 97.8±1.1 a | 88.9 ±2.2 ab | 78.9±4.4 b | 93.3±3.3 ab | 75.6±18.2 ab | 98.9±1.1 a | 84.4±5.9 ab |
150 g/L | 47.8±6.7 c | 97.8±1.1 a | 83.3±1.9 b | 62.2±4.9 c | 84.4±5.9 b | 71.1±2.2 b | 97.8±2.2 a | 75.6±8.0 b |
200 g/L | 3.3±0.0 d | 81.6±1.1 b | 65.6±2.9 c | 12.2±5.9 d | 10.0±3.3 c | 5.6±1.1 c | 82.2±9.1 b | 27.8±4.9 c |
PEG浓度 | 品种编号 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种1 | 品种2 | 品种3 | 品种4 | 品种5 | 品种6 | 品种7 | 品种8 | ||
CK | 88.9±2.9 a | 96.7± 1.9 a | 95.6±2.2 a | 96.7±0.0 a | 98.9± 1.1 a | 98.9± 1.1 a | 100.0± 0.0 a | 97.8± 1.1 a | |
50 g/L | 76.7±1.9 b | 96.7± 0.0 a | 95.6±1.1 a | 86.7± 5.1 a | 100.0± 0.0 a | 100.0± 0.0 a | 100.0± 0.0 a | 96.7± 1.9 a | |
100 g/L | 65.6±2.9 b | 97.8± 1.1 a | 90.0±1.9 ab | 90.0± 1.9 a | 98.9± 1.1 a | 100.0± 0.0 a | 98.9± 1.1 a | 97.8± 2.2 a | |
150 g/L | 50.0±5.8 c | 98.9± 1.1 a | 83.3±1.9 b | 83.3± 3.3 a | 97.8± 1.1 a | 90.0± 3.3 b | 97.8± 2.2 a | 83.3± 6.7 a | |
200 g/L | 13.3±3.3 d | 81.1± 7.3 b | 66.7±3.3 c | 47.8± 13.9 b | 14.4±9.9 b | 16.7± 1.9 c | 94.4± 4.0 a | 52.2± 9.5 b |
PEG浓度 | 品种编号 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种1 | 品种2 | 品种3 | 品种4 | 品种5 | 品种6 | 品种7 | 品种8 | ||
CK | 88.9±2.9 a | 96.7± 1.9 a | 95.6±2.2 a | 96.7±0.0 a | 98.9± 1.1 a | 98.9± 1.1 a | 100.0± 0.0 a | 97.8± 1.1 a | |
50 g/L | 76.7±1.9 b | 96.7± 0.0 a | 95.6±1.1 a | 86.7± 5.1 a | 100.0± 0.0 a | 100.0± 0.0 a | 100.0± 0.0 a | 96.7± 1.9 a | |
100 g/L | 65.6±2.9 b | 97.8± 1.1 a | 90.0±1.9 ab | 90.0± 1.9 a | 98.9± 1.1 a | 100.0± 0.0 a | 98.9± 1.1 a | 97.8± 2.2 a | |
150 g/L | 50.0±5.8 c | 98.9± 1.1 a | 83.3±1.9 b | 83.3± 3.3 a | 97.8± 1.1 a | 90.0± 3.3 b | 97.8± 2.2 a | 83.3± 6.7 a | |
200 g/L | 13.3±3.3 d | 81.1± 7.3 b | 66.7±3.3 c | 47.8± 13.9 b | 14.4±9.9 b | 16.7± 1.9 c | 94.4± 4.0 a | 52.2± 9.5 b |
PEG浓度 | 品种编号 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种1 | 品种2 | 品种3 | 品种4 | 品种5 | 品种6 | 品种7 | 品种8 | |
CK | 100.9±8.4a | 68.9±7.4 a | 81.9±7.5 a | 79.4±3.1 a | 118.1±1.2 a | 81.3±9.0 a | 63.4±1.0 a | 87.8±4.9 a |
50 g/L | 90.8±10.9a | 56.6±3.6 ab | 78.7±5.5 a | 81.3±11.4 a | 97.6±3.3 b | 78.1±5.1 a | 62.5±3.7 a | 79.4±5.3 a |
100 g/L | 37.0±2.0b | 50.1±4.2 ab | 70.3±4.6 a | 70.9±8.8 a | 91.5±1.5 b | 87.3±2.0 a | 56.7±3.6 ab | 74.9±6.2 a |
150 g/L | 35.2±1.8b | 40.1±5.2 b | 74.9±9.0 a | 65.3±13.4 a | 57.3±10.2 c | 87.1±2.9 a | 50.8±4.4 b | 41.6±4.2 b |
200 g/L | -- | 47.3±12.4ab | 74.4±10.7 a | -- | -- | -- | 39.2±4.1 c | 32.9±1.2 b |
PEG浓度 | 品种编号 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种1 | 品种2 | 品种3 | 品种4 | 品种5 | 品种6 | 品种7 | 品种8 | |
CK | 100.9±8.4a | 68.9±7.4 a | 81.9±7.5 a | 79.4±3.1 a | 118.1±1.2 a | 81.3±9.0 a | 63.4±1.0 a | 87.8±4.9 a |
50 g/L | 90.8±10.9a | 56.6±3.6 ab | 78.7±5.5 a | 81.3±11.4 a | 97.6±3.3 b | 78.1±5.1 a | 62.5±3.7 a | 79.4±5.3 a |
100 g/L | 37.0±2.0b | 50.1±4.2 ab | 70.3±4.6 a | 70.9±8.8 a | 91.5±1.5 b | 87.3±2.0 a | 56.7±3.6 ab | 74.9±6.2 a |
150 g/L | 35.2±1.8b | 40.1±5.2 b | 74.9±9.0 a | 65.3±13.4 a | 57.3±10.2 c | 87.1±2.9 a | 50.8±4.4 b | 41.6±4.2 b |
200 g/L | -- | 47.3±12.4ab | 74.4±10.7 a | -- | -- | -- | 39.2±4.1 c | 32.9±1.2 b |
PEG浓度 | 品种编号 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种1 | 品种2 | 品种3 | 品种4 | 品种5 | 品种6 | 品种7 | 品种8 | |
CK | 46.4±1.1 a | 81.6±3.7 a | 70.5±7.5 a | 80.7±0.4 a | 91.9±4.4 a | 68.5±1.5 a | 63.9±4.7 a | 69.2±7.4 a |
50 g/L | 35.4±2.4 b | 70.5±4.5 a | 52.7±0.6 b | 78.1±6.3 a | 57.3±3.8 b | 58.8±10.5 a | 62.9±0.9 a | 57.5±0.8 b |
100 g/L | 18.8±2.0 c | 65.5±2.7 ab | 60.5±5.9 ab | 65.1±5.6 b | 46.5±1.8 b | 38.1±2.7 b | 47.6±3.0 b | 40.1±1.3 c |
150 g/L | 14.4±0.9 c | 46.8±6.6 b | 50.3±3.0 b | 53.5±1.9 b | 29.1±7.6 c | 28.0±1.0 c | 37.8±3.3 c | 22.7±2.0 d |
200 g/L | -- | 47.2±9.5 b | 31.3±1.4 c | -- | -- | -- | 13.3±1.5 d | 14.1±0.6 d |
PEG浓度 | 品种编号 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种1 | 品种2 | 品种3 | 品种4 | 品种5 | 品种6 | 品种7 | 品种8 | |
CK | 46.4±1.1 a | 81.6±3.7 a | 70.5±7.5 a | 80.7±0.4 a | 91.9±4.4 a | 68.5±1.5 a | 63.9±4.7 a | 69.2±7.4 a |
50 g/L | 35.4±2.4 b | 70.5±4.5 a | 52.7±0.6 b | 78.1±6.3 a | 57.3±3.8 b | 58.8±10.5 a | 62.9±0.9 a | 57.5±0.8 b |
100 g/L | 18.8±2.0 c | 65.5±2.7 ab | 60.5±5.9 ab | 65.1±5.6 b | 46.5±1.8 b | 38.1±2.7 b | 47.6±3.0 b | 40.1±1.3 c |
150 g/L | 14.4±0.9 c | 46.8±6.6 b | 50.3±3.0 b | 53.5±1.9 b | 29.1±7.6 c | 28.0±1.0 c | 37.8±3.3 c | 22.7±2.0 d |
200 g/L | -- | 47.2±9.5 b | 31.3±1.4 c | -- | -- | -- | 13.3±1.5 d | 14.1±0.6 d |
相对发势 | 相对发芽率 | 相对胚根长 | 相对胚芽长 | 相对干物质运转率 | 相对根干重 | 相对芽干重 | 平均值 | 排名 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种1 | 0.930 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -- | -- | -- | 0.133 | 8 |
品种2 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.322 | 0.654 | 0.682 | 0.717 | 0.000 | 0.482 | 5 |
品种3 | 0.122 | 0.672 | 0.785 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.797 | 1 |
品种4 | 0.535 | 0.651 | 0.657 | 0.874 | 0.711 | 0.867 | 0.136 | 0.633 | 3 |
品种5 | 0.663 | 0.926 | 0.188 | 0.015 | 0.174 | 0.239 | 0.715 | 0.417 | 6 |
品种6 | 0.150 | 0.755 | 1.000 | 0.246 | 0.193 | 0.652 | 0.939 | 0.562 | 4 |
品种7 | 0.151 | 0.902 | 0.628 | 0.698 | 0.487 | 0.652 | 0.939 | 0.637 | 2 |
品种8 | 1.000 | 0.629 | 0.173 | 0.043 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.358 | 0.315 | 7 |
相对发势 | 相对发芽率 | 相对胚根长 | 相对胚芽长 | 相对干物质运转率 | 相对根干重 | 相对芽干重 | 平均值 | 排名 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种1 | 0.930 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -- | -- | -- | 0.133 | 8 |
品种2 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.322 | 0.654 | 0.682 | 0.717 | 0.000 | 0.482 | 5 |
品种3 | 0.122 | 0.672 | 0.785 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.797 | 1 |
品种4 | 0.535 | 0.651 | 0.657 | 0.874 | 0.711 | 0.867 | 0.136 | 0.633 | 3 |
品种5 | 0.663 | 0.926 | 0.188 | 0.015 | 0.174 | 0.239 | 0.715 | 0.417 | 6 |
品种6 | 0.150 | 0.755 | 1.000 | 0.246 | 0.193 | 0.652 | 0.939 | 0.562 | 4 |
品种7 | 0.151 | 0.902 | 0.628 | 0.698 | 0.487 | 0.652 | 0.939 | 0.637 | 2 |
品种8 | 1.000 | 0.629 | 0.173 | 0.043 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.358 | 0.315 | 7 |
[1] |
陈爱萍, 隋晓青, 王玉祥, 等. 干旱胁迫及复水对伊犁绢蒿幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5):1216-1225.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.005 |
[2] |
高士杰, 李继洪, 张岩, 等. 作物的抗旱性及抗旱品种选育[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2007, 13(1):80-81.
|
[3] |
孙志强, 罗撄宁, 熊乙, 等. 甜高粱作为优质饲草在中国草牧业发展中的潜力分析[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(3):104-112.
|
[4] |
刘公社, 周庆源, 宋松泉, 等. 能源植物甜高粱种质资源和分子生物学研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2009, 44(3):253-261.
|
[5] |
景海春, 刘智全, 张丽敏, 等. 饲草甜高粱分子育种与产业化[J]. 科学通报, 2018, 63(17):1664-1676.
|
[6] |
王艳秋, 朱翠云, 卢峰, 等. 甜高粱的用途及其发展前景[J]. 杂粮作物, 2004(1):55-56.
|
[7] |
杨帆, 魏晓岑, 张士超, 等. 不同甜高粱品种萌发期抗盐和抗旱性比较[J]. 植物生理学报, 2015, 51(10):1604-1610.
|
[8] |
崔江慧, 李霄, 常金华. PEG模拟干旱胁迫对高粱幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(9):160-165.
|
[9] |
穆心愿, 夏来坤, 谷利敏, 等. 花期干旱胁迫对不同夏玉米品种花后干物质积累运转及产量的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(4):931-941.
|
[10] |
程鹏飞, 史雨刚, 李宁, 等. 小麦碳氮物质积累转运相关性状与抗旱性的相关性分析[J]. 山西农业科学, 2021, 49(5):572-578.
|
[11] |
王平, 王春语, 丛玲, 等. PEG-6000模拟干旱胁迫下高粱种子萌发期抗旱、敏感材料筛选、鉴定[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 40(3):30-36.
|
[12] |
王春语, 张丽霞, 王平, 等. 高粱种子萌发期耐盐材料的筛选与鉴定[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(11):2229-2234.
|
[13] |
李云, 杨梦涵, 王健, 等. PEG胁迫下谷子品种(系)萌发期耐旱性鉴定及评价[J]. 种子, 2022, 41(4):29-35.
|
[14] |
黄爱花, 邹成林, 苏义成, 等. 玉米种子萌发特性对不同浓度PEG-6000的响应[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(12):2628-2633.
|
[15] |
尚金程, 王铭凡, 戴思文, 等. PEG-6000模拟干旱胁迫对三种苜蓿种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2021(7):92-96.
|
[16] |
杨丹. PEG-6000渗透胁迫锻炼对黄花白芨和紫花白芨抗旱性的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2022.
|
[17] |
蔺豆豆, 赵桂琴, 琚泽亮, 等. 15份燕麦材料苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(11):108-121.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2021219 |
[1] | LIU Aijie, HU Huabing, WANG Ronghua, WANG Maoqian. Effects of Salt Stress on Germination Characteristics of Different Sugar Beet Seeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(21): 20-28. |
[2] | SUN Sainan, MIAO Penghui, QUAN Yuewei, MU Guojun, GUO Liguo, YANG Xinlei. Effect of Exogenous Melatonin on Germination and Resistance Ability of Peanut Seeds Under Drought Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(18): 38-44. |
[3] | ZHAO Xinyu, SU Junyu, YANG Wei, YANG Jianning, TONG Kairong, YANG Zhiqing. Amomun tsao-ko Germplasm Resources in Different Origins: Cold Resistance Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(15): 73-79. |
[4] | WEN Yujie, ZHAO Yajie, ZHU Kongyan, ZHAO Rong, WANG Meng, QIAO Yimin, BAO Haizhu, GAO Julin. Information Mining of SNP Sites in the Leaf Transcriptome of Sunflower Drought-resistant Inbred Lines [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 106-114. |
[5] | YANG Xiaoxia, YAN Jiakun. Effects of Drought Stress on Root Phenotype of Foxtail Millet Seedlings of Varieties of Different Decades [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 24-32. |
[6] | ZHAO Zhixin, FU Mengmeng, LI Shuguang, WANG Yaqi, YU Xiwen, ZHANG Hongmei, CHEN Huatao, XU Haifeng. Shading-Tolerant Spring Soybean: Genotypes Screening and Identification of Shade Tolerance Indexes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(33): 25-32. |
[7] | GUO Wenlei, ZHANG Chun, ZHANG Taijie, TIAN Xingshan. Physiological Responses to Drought Stress in Glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible Biotypes of Eleusine indica [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(29): 123-128. |
[8] | XU Chunhao, JING Tianxing, YANG Yizhong. Study on the Mechanism of Aphid Adaptation to Drought [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(29): 109-115. |
[9] | WANG Meng, LIU Wenjun, LU Xueli, CHEN Qingshan, YANG Mingliang, LV Bo, XU Zongchang. Soybean Germplasm Resources at Germination: Salt Tolerance Evaluation and Mechanism Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(26): 8-16. |
[10] | JIANG Bing, WANG Songtao, SUN Zengbing, ZHANG Hairui, WANG Jian, LIU Yang. Evaluation of Cultivated Land Soil Fertility Based on Membership Function and Principal Component Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 22-27. |
[11] | CHEN Xue, JI Chunrong, BAKE Batur, HU Qirui, YANG Mingfeng, GUO Yanyun, LIU Ailin. Response of Photosynthetic Characteristic Parameters of Cotton at Flower and Boll Stages to Drought Stress Under Mulched Drip Irrigation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(19): 1-8. |
[12] | WANG Yang, YU Senmiao, WANG Jingyang, SONG Hailong, LEI Yaodong, ZHANG Haiyan, LIU Bo. Effects of Drought Stress and Rehydration on Physiological Characteristics of Hemerocallis fulva [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(19): 58-64. |
[13] | FU Ying, ZHANG Liankui, LI Wurijimusi, GUO Longyu, WANG Jingyu, GAO Xinmei, WANG Wei, XU Xingjian, WANG Ying, ZHANG Mingwei, WURILIGE, WANG Yingjie. 20 Sorghum Varieties Introduced in Hinggan League: The Evaluation by Membership Function Model [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(18): 19-25. |
[14] | GUO Huihui, LIN Congfa, JIANG Yuanbin, XU Shaoxiang, LIN Zeyu, PAN Xianghua. Identification of Salt Tolerance for Sweet Potato Tissue Culture Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(12): 21-27. |
[15] | LU Lilan, WANG Yuping, YIN Xinxing, HUANG Yingkai, FAN Haikuo. Investigation and Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Fruit Coconut Orchards in Hainan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 72-80. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||