Effect of Size of Stem Segment and Plug on Overwintering Seedlings of Leaf-vegetable Sweet Potato in North China

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0737

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the overwintering plug seedlings of leaf-vegetable sweet potato in North China, 4 stem sizes (D1, D2, D3, D4 for 4, 6, 8, 10 cm) and 5 plug sizes (32, 50, 72, 105, 128 holes) were set to match 14 treatments, to study the effects of different combinations on seedling survival rate, growth (stem diameter, plant height, etc.) and fresh weight, etc. The results indicated that under the same plug, with the increase of stem segment, the survival rate of seedlings, the number of leaves, stem diameter of the base region and plant height of seedlings showed an increasing trend, and then the fresh weight of the aboveground part and the whole plant also increased, and the highest value was under the treatment of D4. Under the same stem segment, as the number of holes in the plug increased, the number of leaves, stem diameter of the base region, plant height, fresh weight above the ground and fresh weight of the whole plant decreased, due to the effect of the plug size on the underground part, with the treatment of 32 holes being the highest. Under different stem segments and plug sizes, the growth of D4-32 treatment was the best. In mid-March, for the fresh weight of the aboveground part, the treatment of D2-72 achieved the same effect as the treatment of D4-32(no significant difference between the two treatments), with the number of leaves, stem diameter of the base region, plant height and other indexs of seedlings meeting the transplanting conditions; for the fresh weight of the whole plant, the treatment of D2-105 treatment (10.21 g) achieved the same effect as the treatment of D4-32, which could save 228.1% of the seedling area. According to its weight, in mid-January, the fresh weight of the aboveground part and the whole plant under the treatment of D3-72 was close to the level of the above two treatments, which could save 125.0% of the seedling area. Considering the growth and economic benefits of seedlings, D2-105 is recommended when transplanted in mid-March, that is, the combination of stem segment with 2 axillary buds and 105-hole plug. If there is condition for transplanting in mid-January, D3-72 is recommended, that is, the combination of stem segment with 3 axillary buds and 72-hole plug.

Key words: leaf-vegetable sweet potato, North China, overwintering seedlings, stem segment size, plug size

MAO Sishuai, PEI Zhichao, LI Renkun, SUN Dan, CAO Yue, YANG Liguo. Effect of Size of Stem Segment and Plug on Overwintering Seedlings of Leaf-vegetable Sweet Potato in North China[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(21): 45-51.

Figures/Tables 9

References 28

[1]	曹清河, 刘义峰, 李强, 等. 菜用甘薯国内外研究现状及展望[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2007(10):41-43.
[2]	欧行奇, 任秀娟, 杨国堂. 甘薯茎尖与常见蔬菜的营养成分分析[J]. 西南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 27(5):630-633.
[3]	曹清河, 魏猛, 唐君, 等. 菜用型甘薯多酚含量的测定及其基因型差异[J]. 江西农业学报, 2013, 25(4):24-26,29.
[4]	望宇洪, 杨新笋, 姚国新, 等. 菜用甘薯的特征特性与研究现状[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2011, 50(10):2028-2030.
[5]	王家才, 杨爱梅, 胡中好. 菜用甘薯的开发利用及生产规程[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(22):6748.
[6]	王建玲, 林祖军, 辛国胜, 等. 不同用途的甘薯栽培方式综述[J]. 作物杂志, 2011(3):104-106.
[7]	罗启燕, 张光列, 胡康, 等. 八个食用型甘薯新品种农艺性状及经济性状鉴定评价[J]. 南方农艺, 2018, 12(10):24-26.
[8]	宋吉轩, 李云, 李标, 等. 贵州紫心甘薯种质资源ISSR遗传多样性分析[J]. 种子, 2013, 36(12):17-19.
[9]	谢一芝, 郭小丁, 贾赵东, 等. 中国食用甘薯育种现状及展望[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2018, 34(6):1419-1424.
[10]	杨汉, 黄志谋, 刘伟, 等. 中国菜用甘薯开发利用现状与展望[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(17):3201-3204.
[11]	苏一钧, 董玲霞, 王娇, 等. 菜用和观赏甘薯种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19(1):57-64.
[12]	毛思帅, 李仁崑, 周继华, 等. 不同叶用甘薯品种在北京地区种植的比较评价[J]. 中国种业, 2020(10):47-50.
[13]	江苏省农业科学院, 山东省农业科学院. 中国甘薯栽培学[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1984:50-52.
[14]	罗晓锋, 涂前程, 乔锋, 等. 优质菜用型甘薯新品种“福菜薯18号”露地越冬栽培技术[J]. 福建农业科技, 2014(7):44-45.
[15]	徐茜, 黎华, 宗洪霞, 等. 叶菜型甘薯薯苗越冬密度、种苗、底肥及栽插期的优化[J]. 作物杂志, 2016(6):142-147.
[16]	李建国, 朱德雄, 肖义芳, 等. 保护地叶用薯越冬保苗栽培技术[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2012(11):28-29.
[17]	白银, 潘凯, 石林. 穴盘基质育苗技术的应用及发展趋势[J]. 北方园艺, 2008(9):60-62.
[18]	何道根, 刘伟明, 何晓彪. 西兰花穴盘育苗技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(2):171-175.
[19]	李传勇, 黄聪丽, 杨强, 等. 花椰菜穴盘育苗技术研究[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2004(6):28-29.
[20]	张海利, 孙娟, 庞子千. 不同穴盘规格对番茄幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜(学术版), 2012(8):42-43.
[21]	赵瑞, 陈俊琴. 番茄穴盘育苗苗龄和营养面积的研究[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2004(4):19-21.
[22]	杨洪强, 李林光, 接玉玲. 园艺植物的根系限制及其应用[J]. 园艺学报, 2001, 28(S1):705-710.
[23]	周加翔, 伍玲利, 吴健平, 等. 不同穴盘孔径对蔬菜幼苗壮苗指数、光合电子传递和根系生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(10):52-57. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17120016
[24]	狄文伟, 赵冰. 不同规格穴盘对甜玉米幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 上海蔬菜, 2017(2):28-30.
[25]	杨暹, 陈玉娣, 李德明. 育苗容器大小对青花菜幼苗生长及产量的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2000(3)19-21.
[26]	缪晓玲. 叶用甘薯高产高效栽培技术[J]. 上海蔬菜, 2013(5):46-47.
[27]	陈杰, 戴丹丽, 寿伟林, 等. 不同穴盘规格对青菜幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2004, 16(1):7-11.
[28]	梁芳, 董爱香, 李子敬, 等. 穴盘规格对5种苔草属植物育苗的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2015, 32(10):1625-1630.

穴盘规格/孔	穴盘深度/cm	口径/cm	单穴容积/cm³
128	3.6	3	20
105	4	3.5	25
72	4.5	4	40
50	5	4.8	55
32	5.3	5.8	110

穴盘规格/孔	穴盘深度/cm	口径/cm	单穴容积/cm³
128	3.6	3	20
105	4	3.5	25
72	4.5	4	40
50	5	4.8	55
32	5.3	5.8	110

穴盘规格/孔	茎段大小
穴盘规格/孔	D1	D2	D3	D4
128	83.6%
105	83.8%	92.4%
72	84.7%	94.4%	94.4%
50	84.0%	94.0%	94.0%	98.0%
32	84.4%	93.8%	96.9%	96.9%

穴盘规格/孔	茎段大小
穴盘规格/孔	D1	D2	D3	D4
128	83.6%
105	83.8%	92.4%
72	84.7%	94.4%	94.4%
50	84.0%	94.0%	94.0%	98.0%
32	84.4%	93.8%	96.9%	96.9%

茎段	穴盘/孔	日期
茎段	穴盘/孔	11月12日	12月12日	1月12日	2月12日	3月12日
D1	128	5.0 b	6.2 f	7.0 d	9.3 i	14.7 e
	105	5.2 b	7.3 ef	8.3 d	12.3 hi	26.0 d
	72	5.2 b	8.2 def	9.5 cd	13.0 ghi	27.7 d
	50	5.3 b	8.7 def	9.8 bcd	13.7 fgh	28.3 cd
	32	6.3 ab	9.5 bcde	10.7 bcd	14.7 efgh	29.7 cd
D2	105	5.3 b	9.2 cdef	10.6 bcd	15.7 defgh	32.7 cd
	72	6.3 ab	9.7 bcde	11.7 abcd	17.0 defg	34.0 cd
	50	6.5 ab	9.8 bcde	12.3 abcd	17.7 cedf	35.0 cd
	32	7.5 ab	10.8 abcd	13.5 abcd	18.7 cde	36.3 cd
D3	72	6.5 ab	10.7 abcd	13.5 abcd	19.3 cd	37.7 cd
	50	7.3 ab	11.5 abcd	14.0 abcd	21.3 bc	41.0 bc
	32	8.3 a	12.3 abc	16.0 abc	23.7 ab	49.3 ab
D4	50	7.5 ab	12.7 ab	17.0 ab	25.0 ab	50.7 ab
D4	32	8.7 a	13.8 a	18.0 a	26.7 a	57.3 a