Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 112-120.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0478
Previous Articles Next Articles
FENG Yongxin1(), TAN Hongxiang1(
), GUAN Hui1, JIN Yanfeng1, XU Wei1, WANG Jie2
Received:
2021-05-07
Revised:
2021-09-27
Online:
2022-04-05
Published:
2022-05-23
Contact:
TAN Hongxiang
E-mail:fyxman@163.com;zjkthx@163.com
CLC Number:
FENG Yongxin, TAN Hongxiang, GUAN Hui, JIN Yanfeng, XU Wei, WANG Jie. The Passivation Effect of Yiduling on TMV in Tobacco Seedling Stage[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(10): 112-120.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0478
基因 | 引物序列 | NCBI登录号 |
---|---|---|
β-actin | F:5′-TCTTGACTACGAGCAGGAGC-3′ | GQ339768.1 |
R:5′-ATCAGCAATACCAGGGAACA-3′ | ||
TMVCP | F:5′-CCATCACAGTTCGTGTTCTTG-3′ | EF183504.1 |
R:5′-TAGCGTCTAACGTTTCGGCAG-3′ | ||
PR1-a | F:5′-TAACTCGGTTCGTGTTGGAT-3′ | X12485.1 |
R:5′-TTAGTATGGACTTTCGCCTCT-3′ | ||
PR1-b | F:5′-TTTGGATGCCCATAACACA-3′ | X12486.1 |
R:5′-AATCGCCACTTCCCTGA-3′ | ||
NPR1 | F:5′-TGGAGCAAGCAGAAAGAAG-3′ | KY402167.1 |
R:5′-GCCAGTGGGAACTCAGAAG-3′ | ||
PAL | F:5′-GTGAAGGCGGCTCAGAAG-3′ | AB008199.1 |
R:5′-GTTGCCACCGTGTAATGC-3′ |
基因 | 引物序列 | NCBI登录号 |
---|---|---|
β-actin | F:5′-TCTTGACTACGAGCAGGAGC-3′ | GQ339768.1 |
R:5′-ATCAGCAATACCAGGGAACA-3′ | ||
TMVCP | F:5′-CCATCACAGTTCGTGTTCTTG-3′ | EF183504.1 |
R:5′-TAGCGTCTAACGTTTCGGCAG-3′ | ||
PR1-a | F:5′-TAACTCGGTTCGTGTTGGAT-3′ | X12485.1 |
R:5′-TTAGTATGGACTTTCGCCTCT-3′ | ||
PR1-b | F:5′-TTTGGATGCCCATAACACA-3′ | X12486.1 |
R:5′-AATCGCCACTTCCCTGA-3′ | ||
NPR1 | F:5′-TGGAGCAAGCAGAAAGAAG-3′ | KY402167.1 |
R:5′-GCCAGTGGGAACTCAGAAG-3′ | ||
PAL | F:5′-GTGAAGGCGGCTCAGAAG-3′ | AB008199.1 |
R:5′-GTTGCCACCGTGTAATGC-3′ |
处理 | 稀释倍数 | 混合1 min | 混合3 min | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
枯斑数/个 | 抑制率/% | 枯斑数/个 | 抑制率/% | |||
抑毒灵 | 500倍 | 3.00 | 99.08±1.08a | 0.00 | 100.00±0.00 a | |
800倍 | 79.40 | 75.60±2.79b | 42.60 | 86.71±3.25 b | ||
1000倍 | 98.90 | 69.62±3.15c | 80.50 | 74.89±2.14 c | ||
PBS+TMV | 325.50 | 320.60 | ||||
PBS | 0 | 0 |
处理 | 稀释倍数 | 混合1 min | 混合3 min | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
枯斑数/个 | 抑制率/% | 枯斑数/个 | 抑制率/% | |||
抑毒灵 | 500倍 | 3.00 | 99.08±1.08a | 0.00 | 100.00±0.00 a | |
800倍 | 79.40 | 75.60±2.79b | 42.60 | 86.71±3.25 b | ||
1000倍 | 98.90 | 69.62±3.15c | 80.50 | 74.89±2.14 c | ||
PBS+TMV | 325.50 | 320.60 | ||||
PBS | 0 | 0 |
处理 | 稀释倍数 | 发病率/% | 相对防效/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 min | 5 min | 10 min | 3 min | 5 min | 10 min | |||
抑毒灵 | 500倍 | 6.35±0.25d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 77.30±0.07a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | |
800倍 | 10.79±0.53c | 5.59±0.07c | 1.24±0.04c | 65.43±0.03b | 86.34±0.02b | 91.32±0.10b | ||
1000倍 | 15.66±0.79b | 11.56±0.09b | 4.64±0.09b | 51.42±0.12c | 65.24±0.11c | 88.05±0.12c | ||
二氧化氯 | 800倍 | 10.05±0.75c | 6.03±0.12c | 1.57±0.10c | 60.49±0.13b | 79.77±0.12b | 85.66±0.19c | |
PBS+TMV | 35.62±1.23a | 35.79±1.05a | 35.65±0.98a | |||||
PBS | 0 | 0 | 0 |
处理 | 稀释倍数 | 发病率/% | 相对防效/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 min | 5 min | 10 min | 3 min | 5 min | 10 min | |||
抑毒灵 | 500倍 | 6.35±0.25d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 77.30±0.07a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | |
800倍 | 10.79±0.53c | 5.59±0.07c | 1.24±0.04c | 65.43±0.03b | 86.34±0.02b | 91.32±0.10b | ||
1000倍 | 15.66±0.79b | 11.56±0.09b | 4.64±0.09b | 51.42±0.12c | 65.24±0.11c | 88.05±0.12c | ||
二氧化氯 | 800倍 | 10.05±0.75c | 6.03±0.12c | 1.57±0.10c | 60.49±0.13b | 79.77±0.12b | 85.66±0.19c | |
PBS+TMV | 35.62±1.23a | 35.79±1.05a | 35.65±0.98a | |||||
PBS | 0 | 0 | 0 |
处理 | 发病率/% | 相对防效/% | 基质中TMV拷贝数/(个/g) |
---|---|---|---|
1:500 抑毒灵 | 8.49±0.42d | 85.45±2.44a | 2506.49±10.82d |
1:800 抑毒灵 | 17.19±1.12c | 70.53±4.19b | 4753.16±17.15c |
1:1000抑毒灵 | 26.35±2.37b | 54.83±2.58c | 6671.24±18.53b |
宁南霉素(0.16 µg/mL) | 19.33±1.95c | 66.87±3.72b | 5574.62±21.52c |
PBS缓冲液(空白对照) | 58.34±5.31a | 25754.43±30.17a |
处理 | 发病率/% | 相对防效/% | 基质中TMV拷贝数/(个/g) |
---|---|---|---|
1:500 抑毒灵 | 8.49±0.42d | 85.45±2.44a | 2506.49±10.82d |
1:800 抑毒灵 | 17.19±1.12c | 70.53±4.19b | 4753.16±17.15c |
1:1000抑毒灵 | 26.35±2.37b | 54.83±2.58c | 6671.24±18.53b |
宁南霉素(0.16 µg/mL) | 19.33±1.95c | 66.87±3.72b | 5574.62±21.52c |
PBS缓冲液(空白对照) | 58.34±5.31a | 25754.43±30.17a |
[1] | 刘勇, 李应金. 云南省烟草漂浮苗主要病毒病种类的检测[J]. 烟草科技, 2006, 11:58-61. |
[2] | 刘勇, 江红甲, 布云红, 等. 烟草漂浮苗花叶病毒病重要初侵染源的探讨[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2008, 4:483-485. |
[3] | 刘勇, 杨宇虹, 陈学军, 等. 烟草漂浮育苗中剪叶工具消毒剂评价[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2007, 13(1):41-43. |
[4] | 刘勇. 漂浮育苗池水中烟草花叶病毒消毒剂的筛选[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2008, 42(1):40-45. |
[5] | 曹毅, 郭玉双, 陆宁, 等. 3种消毒剂对烟草漂浮育苗中TMV的钝化效果[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51(19):4280-4283. |
[6] | 袁莲莲, 王凤龙, 杨金广, 等. 蒙氏假单胞菌3A菌株对烟草漂浮育苗中TMV的钝化效果[J]. 植物保护, 2017, 43(2):37-42. |
[7] | 于银霞, 张飞云, 田兆丰, 等. 微生物源抗植物病毒物质及其抗病毒机理的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2009(2):54-58. |
[8] |
SITOHY M, TAHA S, OSMAN A, et al. Antiviral action of native and methylated Lactoferrin and β-Lactoglobulin against Potato Virus Y (PVY) infected into potato plants grown in an open field[J]. Antibiotics, 2020, 9(7):430.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9070430 URL |
[9] |
SITOHY M, CHOBERT J M, GAUDIN J C, et al. Esterified milk proteins inhibit DNA replication in vitro[J]. International journal of biology macromolecular, 2001, 29(4-5):259-266.
doi: 10.1016/S0141-8130(01)00176-3 URL |
[10] |
WANG J, WANG H Y, XIA X M, et al. Inhibitory effect of esterifed lactoferin and lactoferin against tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) in tobacco seedlings[J]. Pesticide biochemistry physiology, 2013, 105(1):62-68.
doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2012.11.009 URL |
[11] |
LEWANDOWSKI D J, HAYES A J, ADKINS S. Surprising results from a search for effective disinfectants for tobacco mosaic virus- contaminated tools[J]. Plant disease, 2010, 94:542-550.
doi: 10.1094/PDIS-94-5-0542 URL |
[12] |
QIN Y, WANG J, WANG F, et al. Purification and characterization of a secretory alkaline metalloprotease with highly potent antiviral activity from Serratia marcescens strain S3[J]. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2019, 67(11):3168-3178.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06909 URL |
[13] |
MCGRATH K C, THOMAS-HALL S R, CHENG Chuting, et al. Isolation and analysis of mRNA from environmental microbial communities[J]. Journal of microbiological methods, 2008, 75(2):172-176.
doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.05.019 URL |
[14] | GOODING G V Jr, HEBERT T T. A simple technique for purification of tobacco mosaic virus in large quantities[J]. Phytopathology, 1967, 57:1285. |
[15] | 王凤龙. 烟草病毒病综合防治技术[J]. 烟草科技, 2002, 4:43-45. |
[16] |
KAMENOVA I, ADKINS S. Transmission, in planta distribution, and management of Hibiscus latent Fort Pierce virus, a novel tobamovirus isolated from Florida hibiscus[J]. Plant disease, 2004, 88:674-679.
doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.6.674 URL |
[17] |
COUTTS B A, KEHOE M, JONES R. Zucchini yellow mosaic virus: contact transmission, stability on surfaces, and inactivation with disinfectants[J]. Plant disease, 2013, 97:765-771.
doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-12-0769-RE URL |
[18] |
MATSUURA S, MATSUSHITA Y, USUGI T, et al. Disinfection of tomato chlorotic dwarft viroid by chemical and biological agents[J]. Crop protection, 2010, 29:1157-1161.
doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2010.05.018 URL |
[19] | WINTERMANTEL W M. A comparison of disinfectants to prevent spread of potyviruses in greenhouse tomato production[J]. Plant health progress, 2011, 12(1). |
[20] |
ZHAO L, FENG C, WU K, et al. Advances and prospects in biogenic substances against plant virus: A review[J]. Pesticide biochemistry and physiology, 2017, 135:15-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2016.07.003 URL |
[21] | 毕建华, 杨金广, 欧阳明安, 等. 黏质沙雷氏菌次生代谢物对TMV的抑制机理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(5):912-922. |
[22] | LI X, HAO G, WANG Q, et al. Ningnanmycin inhibits tobacco mosaic virus virulence by binding directly to its coat protein discs[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 47(8):82446-82458. |
[23] |
HAN Y, LUO Y, QIN S, et al. Induction of systemic resistance against tobacco mosaic virus by Ningnanmycin in tobacco[J]. Pesticide biochemistry physiology, 2014, 111:14-18.
doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.04.008 URL |
[24] |
AN M, ZHAO X, ZHOU T, et al. A novel biological agent Cytosinpeptidemycin inhibited the pathogenesis of tobacco mosaic virus by inducing host resistance and stress response[J]. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2019, 67(27):7738-7747.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b02662 URL |
[1] | WANG Jiaqi, ZHANG Zixuan, LIU Naixin. Mineral Accumulation Characteristics of Red Beet Seedlings Under Exogenous Selenium Treatment [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 1-5. |
[2] | FAN Xian, QUAN Yiji, YANG Shaolin, LI Rudan, DENG Jun, ZHANG Yuebin. Identification and Evaluation of Drought Resistance in Sugarcane Seedling Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 17-24. |
[3] | Abdurishid RAHMAN, Yiliminuer , Talipujiang ABUDOUKEREMU, Haliguli AINI, Ruxianguli YIGANMU. Effects of Different Topdressing Measures on the Growth of Current-year Cutting Seedlings of Elaeagnus mooraroftii [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 39-48. |
[4] | LI Wangsheng, WANG Xueqian, YIN Xilong, SHI Yang, XING Wang. Drought Resistance of Sugar Beet Seedling: Identification and Index Screening [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 17-23. |
[5] | WANG Xiaochun, YANG Tianhui, WANG Chuan, YANG Weidi, GAO Ting. Effects of Mixed Saline-alkali Stress on Growth and Physiology of Alfalfa [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(19): 139-145. |
[6] | Yan Yan, Xu Lina, Li Lijie, Zhang Zhiyong. Response of Maize Seedling Growth and Development to Potassium Concentration [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(35): 1-6. |
[7] | Peng Jian, Wang Shushan, Xiao Xingcui, He Zhiran, Yang Binhao, Zhang Xinye. Seedling Growth Variation and Selection of Half Sib Toona ciliata Families [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(1): 39-44. |
[8] | Xiangwei Sun. Soil Hardening at Seedling Stage of Spring Maize in Hetao Irrigation District: Precipitation Index [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(9): 65-68. |
[9] | Junxiu Yao, Xueliang Liu, Shanwen Li, Fei Ren, Qinghua Li, Haitao Wu, Honglian Zhai, Dejun Wu. Sambucus williamsii Clones at Seedling Stage: Response to Drought Stress and Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(9): 75-81. |
[10] | Zhang Fuguo, Wang Huaiping. Drought Stress and Drought-resistant Maize Inbred Lines: Effects on Growth at Seedling Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(7): 6-10. |
[11] | Yin Shiping, Zhu Haixia, Zhao Huiying, Sun Anhui, Gong Lijuan, Li Baichao, Li Xiufen, Jiang Lixia. Breeding Traits and Yield Factors of Soybean: Response to Soil with Different Drought Grades [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(28): 111-117. |
[12] | Zhang Ziqiang, Bai Chen, Zhang Huizhong, Li Xiaodong, Fu Zengjuan, Zhao Shangmin, E Yuanyuan, Zhang Hui, Wang Liang, Zhang Bizhou. Evaluation and Screening of Salt Tolerance of Sugar Beet Germplasm Resources at Seedling Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(13): 23-28. |
[13] | . Evaluation of Cold Resistance in Bud and Seedling Stage of Main Tomato Cultivars in Ningxia [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(32): 42-45. |
[14] | . Resistance Evaluation of Sugarcane New Varieties to Borers in Sugarcane Seedling Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(20): 88-91. |
[15] | . Soil Temperature at Seedling Stage: Effect on Early Growth Process of Cotton [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(35): 13-16. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||