Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (34): 73-78.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0963
Previous Articles Next Articles
LU Yusheng(), CHANG Xiaoxiao, CHEN Huiqiong, CHEN Zhe, QIU Jishui, MENG Xiangchun, PENG Cheng(
)
Received:
2022-11-23
Revised:
2023-10-11
Online:
2023-12-05
Published:
2023-11-30
LU Yusheng, CHANG Xiaoxiao, CHEN Huiqiong, CHEN Zhe, QIU Jishui, MENG Xiangchun, PENG Cheng. Correlation Analysis of Characteristics of the Fruit-bearing Mother Shoots and Fruit Characteristics of Clausena lansium[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(34): 73-78.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0963
性状 | 结果母枝长度/ cm | 结果母枝粗度/ mm | 复叶数/ 片 | 小叶数/ 片 | 果穗长度/ cm | 果穗质量/ g | 穗粒数 | 单果质量/ g | 果实纵径/ mm | 果实横径/ mm | 可溶性固形物/ % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值 | 4.0 | 4.88 | 3 | 7 | 11.0 | 15.4 | 2 | 3.78 | 23.45 | 17.63 | 9.88 |
最大值 | 70.0 | 13.18 | 29 | 271 | 36.5 | 391.6 | 43 | 12.18 | 31.55 | 32.25 | 15.82 |
平均值 | 26.20 | 8.12 | 9.18 | 75.77 | 25.46 | 136.19 | 17.60 | 8.28 | 27.58 | 22.42 | 12.93 |
标准差 | 14.50 | 1.70 | 5.09 | 48.5 | 4.98 | 76.15 | 8.4 | 1.66 | 1.82 | 1.9 | 1.01 |
变异系数/% | 55.43 | 20.95 | 55.45 | 64.01 | 19.58 | 55.91 | 47.69 | 20.00 | 6.60 | 8.50 | 7.79 |
性状 | 结果母枝长度/ cm | 结果母枝粗度/ mm | 复叶数/ 片 | 小叶数/ 片 | 果穗长度/ cm | 果穗质量/ g | 穗粒数 | 单果质量/ g | 果实纵径/ mm | 果实横径/ mm | 可溶性固形物/ % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值 | 4.0 | 4.88 | 3 | 7 | 11.0 | 15.4 | 2 | 3.78 | 23.45 | 17.63 | 9.88 |
最大值 | 70.0 | 13.18 | 29 | 271 | 36.5 | 391.6 | 43 | 12.18 | 31.55 | 32.25 | 15.82 |
平均值 | 26.20 | 8.12 | 9.18 | 75.77 | 25.46 | 136.19 | 17.60 | 8.28 | 27.58 | 22.42 | 12.93 |
标准差 | 14.50 | 1.70 | 5.09 | 48.5 | 4.98 | 76.15 | 8.4 | 1.66 | 1.82 | 1.9 | 1.01 |
变异系数/% | 55.43 | 20.95 | 55.45 | 64.01 | 19.58 | 55.91 | 47.69 | 20.00 | 6.60 | 8.50 | 7.79 |
结果母枝粗度 | 复叶数 | 小叶数 | 果穗长度 | 果穗质量 | 穗粒数 | 单果质量 | 果实纵径 | 果实横径 | 可溶性固形物 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
结果母枝长度 | 0.820** | 0.860** | 0.836** | 0.391** | 0.620** | 0.628** | 0.321** | 0.204* | 0.328** | 0.383** |
结果母枝粗度 | 0.847** | 0.841** | 0.485** | 0.789** | 0.786** | 0.450** | 0.343** | 0.432** | 0.287** | |
复叶数 | 0.955** | 0.410** | 0.641** | 0.666** | 0.297** | 0.224* | 0.262** | 0.344** | ||
小叶数 | 0.389** | 0.652** | 0.661** | 0.331** | 0.255** | 0.280** | 0.328** | |||
果穗长度 | 0.424** | 0.455** | 0.244** | 0.132 | 0.186* | 0.251** | ||||
果穗质量 | 0.955** | 0.558** | 0.469** | 0.440** | 0.308** | |||||
穗粒数 | 0.438** | 0.340** | 0.355** | 0.326** | ||||||
单果质量 | 0.861** | 0.813** | 0.194* | |||||||
果实纵径 | 0.676** | 0.032 | ||||||||
果实横径 | 0.162 |
结果母枝粗度 | 复叶数 | 小叶数 | 果穗长度 | 果穗质量 | 穗粒数 | 单果质量 | 果实纵径 | 果实横径 | 可溶性固形物 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
结果母枝长度 | 0.820** | 0.860** | 0.836** | 0.391** | 0.620** | 0.628** | 0.321** | 0.204* | 0.328** | 0.383** |
结果母枝粗度 | 0.847** | 0.841** | 0.485** | 0.789** | 0.786** | 0.450** | 0.343** | 0.432** | 0.287** | |
复叶数 | 0.955** | 0.410** | 0.641** | 0.666** | 0.297** | 0.224* | 0.262** | 0.344** | ||
小叶数 | 0.389** | 0.652** | 0.661** | 0.331** | 0.255** | 0.280** | 0.328** | |||
果穗长度 | 0.424** | 0.455** | 0.244** | 0.132 | 0.186* | 0.251** | ||||
果穗质量 | 0.955** | 0.558** | 0.469** | 0.440** | 0.308** | |||||
穗粒数 | 0.438** | 0.340** | 0.355** | 0.326** | ||||||
单果质量 | 0.861** | 0.813** | 0.194* | |||||||
果实纵径 | 0.676** | 0.032 | ||||||||
果实横径 | 0.162 |
级别 | 结果母枝粗度/mm | 果穗质量/g | 果穗长度/cm | 穗粒数 | 单果质量/g | 果实纵径/mm | 果实横径/mm | 可溶性固形物/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | [0,6.0) | 56.52±23.28d | 8.86±4.62d | 21.67±5.35b | 6.97±1.13c | 26.24±1.14c | 20.84±1.20c | 12.52±0.81b |
II | [6.0,7.5) | 89.36±37.43d | 11.88±4.53d | 23.09±3.98b | 7.96±1.85c | 27.41±1.90bc | 22.08±1.66bc | 12.71±0.88b |
III | [7.5,9.0) | 129.05±44.13 c | 17.26±5.35c | 25.85±5.14b | 8.27±1.37bc | 27.61±1.69bc | 22.49±2.00bc | 12.85±1.18ab |
IV | [9.0,10.5) | 198.61±62.83b | 24.68±6.71b | 27.52±3.80a | 8.93±1.55ab | 28.13±1.66ab | 22.99±1.51ab | 13.43±0.83a |
V | [10.5,+∞) | 255.87±87.77a | 30.17±6.94a | 29.44±4.80a | 9.41±1.78a | 28.47±2.12a | 23.80±2.25a | 13.28±0.72a |
级别 | 结果母枝粗度/mm | 果穗质量/g | 果穗长度/cm | 穗粒数 | 单果质量/g | 果实纵径/mm | 果实横径/mm | 可溶性固形物/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | [0,6.0) | 56.52±23.28d | 8.86±4.62d | 21.67±5.35b | 6.97±1.13c | 26.24±1.14c | 20.84±1.20c | 12.52±0.81b |
II | [6.0,7.5) | 89.36±37.43d | 11.88±4.53d | 23.09±3.98b | 7.96±1.85c | 27.41±1.90bc | 22.08±1.66bc | 12.71±0.88b |
III | [7.5,9.0) | 129.05±44.13 c | 17.26±5.35c | 25.85±5.14b | 8.27±1.37bc | 27.61±1.69bc | 22.49±2.00bc | 12.85±1.18ab |
IV | [9.0,10.5) | 198.61±62.83b | 24.68±6.71b | 27.52±3.80a | 8.93±1.55ab | 28.13±1.66ab | 22.99±1.51ab | 13.43±0.83a |
V | [10.5,+∞) | 255.87±87.77a | 30.17±6.94a | 29.44±4.80a | 9.41±1.78a | 28.47±2.12a | 23.80±2.25a | 13.28±0.72a |
性状 | 结果母枝长度/ cm | 结果母枝粗度/ mm | 复叶数/ 片 | 小叶数/ 片 | 果穗长度/ cm | 果穗质量/ g | 穗粒数 | 单果质量/ g | 果实纵径/ mm | 果实横径/ mm | 可溶性固形物/ % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值 | 4.9 | 3.57 | 2 | 5 | 8.5 | 23.2 | 3 | 4.30 | 21.35 | 16.79 | 10.24 |
最大值 | 89.0 | 15.17 | 22 | 179 | 42.2 | 547.0 | 80 | 10.96 | 34.54 | 25.81 | 23.38 |
平均值 | 15.64 | 7.15 | 5.36 | 39.36 | 19.53 | 119.08 | 18.01 | 7.72 | 29.35 | 20.69 | 16.82 |
标准差 | 9.64 | 1.53 | 2.59 | 19.82 | 5.22 | 74.69 | 11.19 | 1.35 | 1.85 | 1.45 | 1.84 |
变异系数/% | 61.68 | 21.34 | 48.37 | 50.35 | 19.58 | 62.72 | 62.11 | 17.47 | 62.9 | 7.01 | 10.94 |
性状 | 结果母枝长度/ cm | 结果母枝粗度/ mm | 复叶数/ 片 | 小叶数/ 片 | 果穗长度/ cm | 果穗质量/ g | 穗粒数 | 单果质量/ g | 果实纵径/ mm | 果实横径/ mm | 可溶性固形物/ % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值 | 4.9 | 3.57 | 2 | 5 | 8.5 | 23.2 | 3 | 4.30 | 21.35 | 16.79 | 10.24 |
最大值 | 89.0 | 15.17 | 22 | 179 | 42.2 | 547.0 | 80 | 10.96 | 34.54 | 25.81 | 23.38 |
平均值 | 15.64 | 7.15 | 5.36 | 39.36 | 19.53 | 119.08 | 18.01 | 7.72 | 29.35 | 20.69 | 16.82 |
标准差 | 9.64 | 1.53 | 2.59 | 19.82 | 5.22 | 74.69 | 11.19 | 1.35 | 1.85 | 1.45 | 1.84 |
变异系数/% | 61.68 | 21.34 | 48.37 | 50.35 | 19.58 | 62.72 | 62.11 | 17.47 | 62.9 | 7.01 | 10.94 |
结果母枝长度 | 复叶数 | 小叶数 | 果穗长度 | 果穗质量 | 穗粒数 | 单果质量 | 果实纵径 | 果实横径 | 可溶性固形物 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
结果母枝粗度 | 0.685** | 0.830** | 0.687** | 0.421** | 0.809** | 0.796** | 0.365** | 0.324** | 0.256** | -0.023 |
结果母枝长度 | 0.769** | 0.556** | 0.349** | 0.724** | 0.734** | 0.187* | 0.159* | 0.146* | -0.008 | |
复叶数 | 0.779** | 0.376** | 0.842** | 0.818** | 0.313** | 0.254** | 0.230** | 0.002 | ||
小叶数 | 0.408** | 0.693** | 0.674** | 0.230** | 0.156* | 0.204** | 0.012 | |||
果穗长度 | 0.452** | 0.487** | -0.056 | -0.016 | -0.116 | -0.221** | ||||
果穗质量 | 0.964** | 0.416** | 0.300** | 0.339** | 0.042 | |||||
穗粒数 | 0.282** | 0.178* | 0.238** | -0.009 | ||||||
单果质量 | 0.743** | 0.823** | 0.342** | |||||||
果实纵径 | 0.558** | 0.104 | ||||||||
果实横径 | 0.358** |
结果母枝长度 | 复叶数 | 小叶数 | 果穗长度 | 果穗质量 | 穗粒数 | 单果质量 | 果实纵径 | 果实横径 | 可溶性固形物 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
结果母枝粗度 | 0.685** | 0.830** | 0.687** | 0.421** | 0.809** | 0.796** | 0.365** | 0.324** | 0.256** | -0.023 |
结果母枝长度 | 0.769** | 0.556** | 0.349** | 0.724** | 0.734** | 0.187* | 0.159* | 0.146* | -0.008 | |
复叶数 | 0.779** | 0.376** | 0.842** | 0.818** | 0.313** | 0.254** | 0.230** | 0.002 | ||
小叶数 | 0.408** | 0.693** | 0.674** | 0.230** | 0.156* | 0.204** | 0.012 | |||
果穗长度 | 0.452** | 0.487** | -0.056 | -0.016 | -0.116 | -0.221** | ||||
果穗质量 | 0.964** | 0.416** | 0.300** | 0.339** | 0.042 | |||||
穗粒数 | 0.282** | 0.178* | 0.238** | -0.009 | ||||||
单果质量 | 0.743** | 0.823** | 0.342** | |||||||
果实纵径 | 0.558** | 0.104 | ||||||||
果实横径 | 0.358** |
级别 | 结果母枝粗度/mm | 果穗长度/cm | 果穗质量/g | 穗粒数 | 单果质量/g | 果实纵径/mm | 果实横径/mm | 可溶性固形物/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | [0,5.0) | 15.60±5.62c | 52.36±40.62d | 7.20±2.62d | 6.17±1.06c | 27.36±1.26c | 19.24±1.26c | 16.20±1.45a |
II | [5.0,7.0) | 18.59±5.30bc | 86.16±30.91c | 13.33±5.33c | 7.46±1.27b | 29.01±1.86b | 20.50±1.59b | 16.98±2.08a |
III | [7.0,9.0) | 20.03±3.80b | 128.52±43.01b | 19.49±7.36b | 7.94±1.24b | 29.67±1.67ab | 20.90±1.22ab | 16.75±1.72a |
IV | [9.0,+∞) | 24.23±7.58a | 280.01±133.35a | 41.07±19.03a | 8.88±1.26a | 30.69±1.55a | 21.48±1.22a | 16.78±1.33a |
级别 | 结果母枝粗度/mm | 果穗长度/cm | 果穗质量/g | 穗粒数 | 单果质量/g | 果实纵径/mm | 果实横径/mm | 可溶性固形物/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | [0,5.0) | 15.60±5.62c | 52.36±40.62d | 7.20±2.62d | 6.17±1.06c | 27.36±1.26c | 19.24±1.26c | 16.20±1.45a |
II | [5.0,7.0) | 18.59±5.30bc | 86.16±30.91c | 13.33±5.33c | 7.46±1.27b | 29.01±1.86b | 20.50±1.59b | 16.98±2.08a |
III | [7.0,9.0) | 20.03±3.80b | 128.52±43.01b | 19.49±7.36b | 7.94±1.24b | 29.67±1.67ab | 20.90±1.22ab | 16.75±1.72a |
IV | [9.0,+∞) | 24.23±7.58a | 280.01±133.35a | 41.07±19.03a | 8.88±1.26a | 30.69±1.55a | 21.48±1.22a | 16.78±1.33a |
[1] |
陆育生, 林志雄, 邱继水, 等. 黄皮种质资源果实性状多样性分析及其数量分类研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2016, 43(10):1903-1915.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0176;http://www. ahs. ac. cn |
[2] |
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.073 URL |
[3] |
胡雨卿, 杨应楷, 杨启财, 等. 黄皮的生物活性及其加工研究进展[J]. 中国果菜, 2022, 42(2):54-64.
|
[4] |
徐宁, 朱建华, 彭宏祥, 等. 不同荔枝品种结果母枝与果实性状的相关分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2010, 31(1):31-34.
|
[5] |
王令霞, 吴志祥, 麦爱丽, 等. 妃子笑荔枝果实性状与结果母枝的相关性[J]. 热带农业科学, 2004, 24(4):8-10.
|
[6] |
苏明华, 刘志成, 庄伊美, 等. 水涨龙眼结果母枝与果穗性状相关性的研究[J]. 亚热带植物通讯, 1988, 1:8-14.
|
[7] |
郑少泉, 蒋际谋, 刘友接, 等. 立冬本龙眼结果母枝性状与开花结果的关系[J]. 福建农业学报, 2000, 15(4):17-21.
|
[8] |
黄治远, 李隆华, 张义刚, 等. 蜀冠龙眼幼树结果母枝质量评价研究[J]. 西南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 27(4):530-533.
|
[9] |
郑文武, 朱建华, 欧世金, 等. 大乌圆龙眼结果母枝单元质量与开花坐果及果实性状的关系[J]. 热带作物学报, 2009, 30(12):1793-1797.
|
[10] |
蔡小林, 周煜棉, 潘介春, 等. 龙眼果实挂树期合适结果母枝的筛选[J]. 福建农业学报, 2017, 32(4):365-369.
|
[11] |
蔡盛华, 陆修闽, 卢新坤, 等. 红肉蜜柚结果枝径粗、长度、叶片数与成花的关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(1):78-81.
|
[12] |
周翡云, 何新华, 朱和明, 等. 融安金柑结果母枝质量与坐果果实品质的相关性分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(8):2258-2259,2266.
|
[13] |
苏受婷, 魏清江, 宁少君, 等. 结果母枝粗度对南丰蜜橘果实品质的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2018, 40(5):932-940.
|
[14] |
欧景莉, 叶维雁, 宁蕾, 等. ‘桂热1号’火龙果枝条与果实性状的相关性[J]. 中国南方果树, 2020, 49(2):54-60.
|
[15] |
doi: 10.17660/eJHS.2017/82.4.1 URL |
[16] |
李菊馨, 汤狄华, 黄桂香, 等. 蓝莓结果母枝性状与成花的相关性分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(3):465-469.
|
[17] |
金方伦, 岳宣, 黎明, 等. 樱桃不同结果母枝直径与其果实品质变化的相关性[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(4):12-19.
|
[18] |
章敏, 金方伦. 樱桃结果母枝长度与其开花习性的相关性[J]. 天津农业科学, 2017, 23(6):68-72,82.
|
[19] |
易淑瑶, 刘青, 贾东峰, 等. 不同结果母枝粗度对“东红”猕猴桃果实品质的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2020, 49(4):122-126.
|
[20] |
冯建忠, 柴菊华, 鄢新民, 等. 葡萄结果母枝粗度与新梢结实力的关系[J]. 华北农学报, 2006, 21(增刊):151-155.
|
[21] |
杨瑞, 王玉安, 张坤, 等. 结果母枝粗度和芽位对葡萄杂交苗早期结实性的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2015, 44(2):106-108.
|
[22] |
陆斌, 邵则夏, 杨卫明, 等. 板栗新品种云丰结果母枝粗度、结苞量及坚果重量的研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2006, 21(4):77-79.
|
[1] | CHEN Shujian, CHEN Jingdu, YANG Chengqin, XU Meigang, GAO Jianbo. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Quality of Rice with Mechanical Sowing in Line Under Water [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 1-6. |
[2] | REN Haiying, ZHENG Jingmeng, SHI Wei, WU Haodi, WANG Kangqiang, YU Mingquan, WANG Zhenshuo, WANG Qi. Effects of Micro-ecology Preparation Improving Soil on the Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Twig Blight Diseased Bayberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 153-157. |
[3] | HU Baigeng, LI Xueyang, KONG Haiming, SUN Shasha, WANG Kexiu, HU Jianjun, HE Wei, TANG Mingxia. Different Calcium Concentrations Under Aeroponics: Effects on Growth and Yield of Potato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 33-39. |
[4] | QIAN Shuanghong, CAI Shikun, ZHU Hanyong, WANG Shaobin, LI Zhengrun, WANG Yingmei, LI Shaoyun. Maize Varieties (Strains) in Different Ecological Regions in Yunnan Province: Analysis of High Yield Potential, Yield Stability and Variety Adaptability [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 7-15. |
[5] | WU Chupeng, SHENG Jiandong, HU Yutong, CHENG Zhihui, YANG Pengfei. Soil Quality Evaluation of Oasis Cotton Fields in Shaya County of Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 71-78. |
[6] | LIAO Heting, ZHENG Yao, WANG Ning, AN Shuwei, Gu Lingling, CHEN Jiazhang. Analysis of Plankton Community Structure Characteristics of Lotus Root-Crayfish Culture Model in Different Areas of Northern Jiangsu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 156-164. |
[7] | ZHAO Shouping, XIAO Wendan, CHEN De, YE Xuezhu, ZHANG Qi, WU Shaofu, HU Jing, GAO Na, HUANG Miaojie. Evaluation of Heavy Metal Passivation in Contaminated Paddy Fields Based on Soil Quality and Rice Safety [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 51-62. |
[8] | LIU Yu, LI Ping, ZHAO Kaili, YAN Shi, LIU Jipei, LIU Lei, GUO Ning. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Application of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrients of Celery [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 63-68. |
[9] | JIANG Wanyue, HU Xiaohang, MA Yahuai, LI Yanli. GGE-biplot Based on R Language: Application in Regional Trial of Sugar Beet Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 7-14. |
[10] | ZHANG Zihao, LI Xiangcheng, WU Haotian, FU Penghao, GAO Chunbao, ZHANG Yunbo, ZOU Juan. The Appropriate Sowing Rate of Wheat Under the Climate Conditions of Jianghan Plain [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 1-9. |
[11] | JIA Limin, ZHAO Xiaoyu, WANG Xuejiao, SU Erhu, LI Qiang, GUO Jiahua. Changes of Agronomic Characters, Quality and Yield of Soybean Varieties Approved in Different Years in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 10-18. |
[12] | SHAO Xuehua, KUANG Shizi, HUANG Jianhui, OUYANG Jiamin, WAN Yan, LAI Duo. Effects of On-tree Storage on the Fruit Quality of Phyllanthus emblica [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 140-145. |
[13] | NIU Xianqian, JIANG Li, LIN Qiujin, LIN Xiuxiang, LI Yongyu, SHI Qing. Division of Planting Areas for Superior Quality Passion Fruits in Fujian [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 40-45. |
[14] | ZUO Hongjuan, CAO Hui, ZHANG Hongrui, WANG Feng, ZHANG Xiaoshen. Effects of Planting Date and Number of Topping Times on the Yield of Chrysanthemum morifolium ‘Gongju’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 51-54. |
[15] | LI Yali, BAI Jing, WU Zhenghu, HALIHASH Yibati, LI Qingjun. Effects of N, P and K Application Time on Yield, Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Processing Tomato Under Chemical Fertilizer Reduction [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 58-63. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||