Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (13): 121-128.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0387
Previous Articles Next Articles
GAN Yangguang1(), YE Lefu2, LI Zhenyu1, WANG Liqing1, CHI Yang1, XU Zhen1, FU Xue1(
)
Received:
2023-05-24
Revised:
2023-08-18
Online:
2024-04-28
Published:
2024-04-28
GAN Yangguang, YE Lefu, LI Zhenyu, WANG Liqing, CHI Yang, XU Zhen, FU Xue. Non-Specific Effects of Apricot Shell Wood Vinegar Solution on Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(13): 121-128.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0387
浓度/(mL/L) | 24 h | 48 h | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
取食面积/cm2 | 非选择性拒食/% | 取食面积/cm2 | 非选择性拒食/% | |||
CK | 3.02±0.28a | 0d | 5.87±0.45a | 0d | ||
1 | 2.15±0.21b | 28.89±7.05c | 4.06±0.39b | 30.89±6.67c | ||
2 | 1.63±0.15c | 45.78±5.92b | 2.94±0.41c | 49.95±6.88b | ||
5 | 1.32±0.16c | 56.18±5.19b | 2.32±0.34c | 60.53±5.74b | ||
10 | 0.66±0.08d | 78.11±2.76a | 1.30±0.17d | 77.85±2.84a | ||
20 | 0.43±0.12d | 85.65±3.84a | 0.71±0.13d | 87.87±2.20a | ||
50 | 0.42±0.10d | 86.06±3.38a | 0.79±0.22d | 86.58±3.71a | ||
100 | 0.28±0.06d | 90.62±1.94a | 0.48±0.09d | 91.90±1.61a | ||
回归方程 | y=0.9432x+4.5908 | y=0.9326x+4.6690 | ||||
拒食中浓度AFC50/(mL/L) | 2.72 | 2.26 | ||||
R2 | 0.9370 | 0.9371 |
浓度/(mL/L) | 24 h | 48 h | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
取食面积/cm2 | 非选择性拒食/% | 取食面积/cm2 | 非选择性拒食/% | |||
CK | 3.02±0.28a | 0d | 5.87±0.45a | 0d | ||
1 | 2.15±0.21b | 28.89±7.05c | 4.06±0.39b | 30.89±6.67c | ||
2 | 1.63±0.15c | 45.78±5.92b | 2.94±0.41c | 49.95±6.88b | ||
5 | 1.32±0.16c | 56.18±5.19b | 2.32±0.34c | 60.53±5.74b | ||
10 | 0.66±0.08d | 78.11±2.76a | 1.30±0.17d | 77.85±2.84a | ||
20 | 0.43±0.12d | 85.65±3.84a | 0.71±0.13d | 87.87±2.20a | ||
50 | 0.42±0.10d | 86.06±3.38a | 0.79±0.22d | 86.58±3.71a | ||
100 | 0.28±0.06d | 90.62±1.94a | 0.48±0.09d | 91.90±1.61a | ||
回归方程 | y=0.9432x+4.5908 | y=0.9326x+4.6690 | ||||
拒食中浓度AFC50/(mL/L) | 2.72 | 2.26 | ||||
R2 | 0.9370 | 0.9371 |
浓度/(mL/L) | 24 h | 48 h | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
取食面积/cm2 | 非选择性拒食/% | 取食面积/cm2 | 非选择性拒食/% | ||
CK | 8.09±0.38a | 0f | 15.02±0.59a | 0e | |
1 | 5.64±0.33b | 30.30±4.08e | 10.17±0.45b | 32.28±3.05d | |
2 | 5.33±0.20b | 34.16±2.52e | 9.54±0.38b | 36.47±2.56d | |
5 | 4.47±0.30c | 44.75±3.66d | 7.71±0.58c | 48.70±3.87c | |
10 | 2.94±0.22d | 63.60±2.76c | 5.10±0.41d | 66.07±2.73b | |
20 | 2.61±0.18de | 67.71±2.20bc | 4.40±0.34d | 70.73±2.27b | |
50 | 2.06±0.23ef | 74.59±2.90ab | 3.01±0.40e | 79.93±2.65a | |
100 | 1.62±0.20f | 80.02±2.50a | 2.72±0.49e | 81.91±2.65a | |
回归方程 | y=0.7232x+4.4567 | y=0.7509x+4.5166 | |||
拒食中浓度AFC50/(mL/L) | 5.64 | 4.4 | |||
R2 | 0.9694 | 0.9718 |
浓度/(mL/L) | 24 h | 48 h | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
取食面积/cm2 | 非选择性拒食/% | 取食面积/cm2 | 非选择性拒食/% | ||
CK | 8.09±0.38a | 0f | 15.02±0.59a | 0e | |
1 | 5.64±0.33b | 30.30±4.08e | 10.17±0.45b | 32.28±3.05d | |
2 | 5.33±0.20b | 34.16±2.52e | 9.54±0.38b | 36.47±2.56d | |
5 | 4.47±0.30c | 44.75±3.66d | 7.71±0.58c | 48.70±3.87c | |
10 | 2.94±0.22d | 63.60±2.76c | 5.10±0.41d | 66.07±2.73b | |
20 | 2.61±0.18de | 67.71±2.20bc | 4.40±0.34d | 70.73±2.27b | |
50 | 2.06±0.23ef | 74.59±2.90ab | 3.01±0.40e | 79.93±2.65a | |
100 | 1.62±0.20f | 80.02±2.50a | 2.72±0.49e | 81.91±2.65a | |
回归方程 | y=0.7232x+4.4567 | y=0.7509x+4.5166 | |||
拒食中浓度AFC50/(mL/L) | 5.64 | 4.4 | |||
R2 | 0.9694 | 0.9718 |
浓度/(mL/L) | 处理 | 24 h | 48 h | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
取食面积/cm2 | 选择性拒食率/% | 取食面积/cm2 | 选择性拒食率/% | ||||||
1 | C | 3.30±0.25** | 35.75±5.26e | 6.16±0.38** | 34.51±2.73e | ||||
T | 1.56±0.16 | 2.99±0.19 | |||||||
2 | C | 2.92±0.21** | 39.38±5.06de | 4.88±0.30** | 38.85±4.53e | ||||
T | 1.30±0.17 | 2.19±0.22 | |||||||
5 | C | 2.44±0.25** | 49.84±4.31d | 3.91±0.24** | 54.00±2.55d | ||||
T | 0.83±0.12 | 1.18±0.11 | |||||||
10 | C | 2.25±0.24** | 63.97±3.46c | 3.22±0.26** | 67.54±2.05c | ||||
T | 0.50±0.09 | 0.64±0.09 | |||||||
20 | C | 1.53±0.23** | 72.86±2.92bc | 2.66±0.27** | 77.22±2.20b | ||||
T | 0.24±0.04 | 0.36±0.06 | |||||||
50 | C | 1.54±0.17** | 83.33±1.72ab | 2.66±0.27** | 83.40±2.01ab | ||||
T | 0.15±0.03 | 0.25±0.05 | |||||||
100 | C | 1.54±0.15** | 85.26±1.55a | 2.52±0.28** | 86.56±2.20a | ||||
T | 0.12±0.01 | 0.17±0.02 | |||||||
回归方程 | y=0.7794x+4.5558 | y=0.8251x+4.5458 | |||||||
拒食中浓AFC50/(mL/L) | 3.72 | 3.55 | |||||||
R2 | 0.9821 | 0.9751 |
浓度/(mL/L) | 处理 | 24 h | 48 h | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
取食面积/cm2 | 选择性拒食率/% | 取食面积/cm2 | 选择性拒食率/% | ||||||
1 | C | 3.30±0.25** | 35.75±5.26e | 6.16±0.38** | 34.51±2.73e | ||||
T | 1.56±0.16 | 2.99±0.19 | |||||||
2 | C | 2.92±0.21** | 39.38±5.06de | 4.88±0.30** | 38.85±4.53e | ||||
T | 1.30±0.17 | 2.19±0.22 | |||||||
5 | C | 2.44±0.25** | 49.84±4.31d | 3.91±0.24** | 54.00±2.55d | ||||
T | 0.83±0.12 | 1.18±0.11 | |||||||
10 | C | 2.25±0.24** | 63.97±3.46c | 3.22±0.26** | 67.54±2.05c | ||||
T | 0.50±0.09 | 0.64±0.09 | |||||||
20 | C | 1.53±0.23** | 72.86±2.92bc | 2.66±0.27** | 77.22±2.20b | ||||
T | 0.24±0.04 | 0.36±0.06 | |||||||
50 | C | 1.54±0.17** | 83.33±1.72ab | 2.66±0.27** | 83.40±2.01ab | ||||
T | 0.15±0.03 | 0.25±0.05 | |||||||
100 | C | 1.54±0.15** | 85.26±1.55a | 2.52±0.28** | 86.56±2.20a | ||||
T | 0.12±0.01 | 0.17±0.02 | |||||||
回归方程 | y=0.7794x+4.5558 | y=0.8251x+4.5458 | |||||||
拒食中浓AFC50/(mL/L) | 3.72 | 3.55 | |||||||
R2 | 0.9821 | 0.9751 |
浓度/(mL/L) | 处理 | 24 h | 48 h | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
取食面积/cm2 | 选择性拒食率/% | 取食面积/cm2 | 选择性拒食率/% | |||
1 | C | 6.34±0.28** | 12.74±2.22e | 12.83±0.55** | 14.24±1.43e | |
T | 4.89±0.20 | 9.61±0.36 | ||||
2 | C | 6.00±0.23** | 25.53±1.43d | 12.27±0.50** | 25.87±2.02d | |
T | 3.57±0.17 | 7.23±0.35 | ||||
5 | C | 5.25±0.32** | 40.11±2.79c | 10.29±0.85** | 39.88±2.36c | |
T | 2.23±0.15 | 4.45±0.45 | ||||
10 | C | 4.30±0.26** | 58.50±4.48b | 7.91±0.56** | 55.12±5.21b | |
T | 1.16±0.17 | 2.38±0.39 | ||||
20 | C | 3.94±0.35** | 67.71±3.46ab | 7.16±0.79** | 69.32±3.62a | |
T | 0.78±0.12 | 1.34±0.25 | ||||
50 | C | 3.62±0.34** | 74.83±4.42a | 7.00±0.68** | 75.42±3.22a | |
T | 0.53±0.13 | 1.00±0.19 | ||||
100 | C | 2.33±0.28** | 73.21±5.11a | 4.55±0.48** | 77.57±4.45a | |
T | 0.38±0.12 | 0.62±0.21 | ||||
回归方程 | y=0.9185x+4.0688 | y =0.9471x+4.0679 | ||||
拒食中浓度AFC50/(mL/L) | 10.32 | 9.64 | ||||
R2 | 0.9240 | 0.9608 |
浓度/(mL/L) | 处理 | 24 h | 48 h | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
取食面积/cm2 | 选择性拒食率/% | 取食面积/cm2 | 选择性拒食率/% | |||
1 | C | 6.34±0.28** | 12.74±2.22e | 12.83±0.55** | 14.24±1.43e | |
T | 4.89±0.20 | 9.61±0.36 | ||||
2 | C | 6.00±0.23** | 25.53±1.43d | 12.27±0.50** | 25.87±2.02d | |
T | 3.57±0.17 | 7.23±0.35 | ||||
5 | C | 5.25±0.32** | 40.11±2.79c | 10.29±0.85** | 39.88±2.36c | |
T | 2.23±0.15 | 4.45±0.45 | ||||
10 | C | 4.30±0.26** | 58.50±4.48b | 7.91±0.56** | 55.12±5.21b | |
T | 1.16±0.17 | 2.38±0.39 | ||||
20 | C | 3.94±0.35** | 67.71±3.46ab | 7.16±0.79** | 69.32±3.62a | |
T | 0.78±0.12 | 1.34±0.25 | ||||
50 | C | 3.62±0.34** | 74.83±4.42a | 7.00±0.68** | 75.42±3.22a | |
T | 0.53±0.13 | 1.00±0.19 | ||||
100 | C | 2.33±0.28** | 73.21±5.11a | 4.55±0.48** | 77.57±4.45a | |
T | 0.38±0.12 | 0.62±0.21 | ||||
回归方程 | y=0.9185x+4.0688 | y =0.9471x+4.0679 | ||||
拒食中浓度AFC50/(mL/L) | 10.32 | 9.64 | ||||
R2 | 0.9240 | 0.9608 |
[1] |
郭木娟, 陈诗敏, 庾家琪, 等. 马铃薯瓢虫与茄二十八星瓢虫SCAR标记的建立及应用[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2020, 42(2):434-440.
|
[2] |
李保同, 闫超, 平新亮, 等. 茄二十八星瓢虫对雷公藤和曼陀罗提取物的敏感性[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(4):495-500.
|
[3] |
符真, 胡兵, 涂小云, 等. 茄二十八星瓢虫产卵观察[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(33):16423-16499.
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
王波. 苏云金芽孢杆菌对茄二十八星瓢虫毒性测定[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2014, 60(7):4-5,29.
|
[6] |
王婧瑜, 王洪萱, 王在凌, 等. 茄二十八星瓢虫成虫对不同寄主植物的选择性研究[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2018, 15(22):1-4,101.
|
[7] |
丁新华, 阿尔孜姑丽·肉孜, 纪利, 等. 马铃薯瓢虫的发生与危害[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(4):983-989.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.04.024 |
[8] |
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.026 URL |
[9] |
赵淑蘅, 李卓洁, 刘晓锋, 等. 秸秆木醋液的制备及应用研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(1):1-10.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114193 URL |
[12] |
doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100755 URL |
[13] |
|
[14] |
doi: 10.1007/s12649-018-00545-1 |
[15] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2022.101971 URL |
[16] |
|
[17] |
马娟, 王容燕, 高波, 等. 木醋液与噻唑膦联合应用对甘薯茎线虫病防治效果[J]. 农药, 2022, 61(9):682-686.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
李小艳, 亓东明, 孙成仁, 等. 半夏乙醇提取物对茄二十八星瓢虫的拒食活性研究初报[J]. 西华师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2008(1):59-62.
|
[20] |
孙琳琳, 张璇, 石佳敏, 等. 基于四臂嗅觉仪内轨迹跟踪的昆虫嗅觉行为分析体系[J]. 昆虫学报, 2021, 64(7):828-839.
|
[21] |
钟平生, 梁广文, 曾玲, 等. 非嗜食植物次生化合物对褐稻虱试验种群的控制作用[J]. 仲恺农业技术学院学报, 2004, 17(2):13-18
|
[22] |
doi: 10.1146/ento.2003.48.issue-1 URL |
[23] |
张钟宁, 方宇凌. 昆虫拒食剂蓼二醛的合成及其对害虫的拒食活性[J]. 昆虫知识, 2001(3):207-210.
|
[24] |
刘淑娟. 植物次生代谢物的分布及其应用[J]. 泰山学院学报, 2003(6):91-94.
|
[25] |
金党琴. 银杏酚酸与印楝素及其复合混配剂对小菜蛾的毒效[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(4):76-77.
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[1] | YU Zihui, ZHAO Chengjuan, ZHU Kunmiao, QU Zhaojie, HU Liyong, YUAN Baozhong. Effects of Spraying of Wood Vinegar on Growth and Sclerotinia Resistance of Radish and Cabbage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(34): 47-52. |
[2] | LIU Aijie, ZHANG Huizhong, XING Wang, WANG Maoqian. Effect on Seed Germination and Material Efficiency of Sugar Beet: Wood Vinegar Treatment [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(30): 28-35. |
[3] | ZHU Kunmiao, GU Sicheng, GENG Molin, PENG Xitian, SHEN Jing, HU Liyong. Effects of Foliar Spraying Wood Vinegar on Rice Agronomic Characters and Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(24): 6-12. |
[4] | LI Jiayue, HAN Yajing, WANG Xinyu, HUANG Qunyi, HAN Xinhua, YE Lefu, FU Xue. Homemade Fermented Bio-extracts: Effects on Soil Nematode Community Structure [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(11): 113-121. |
[5] | HAN Yajing, WANG Xinyu, LI Jiayue, HUANG Qunyi, WANG Hanting, YE Lefu, FU Xue. Effects of Two Types of Foliar Fertilizers on Cucumber-Thrips [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 113-119. |
[6] | WANG Lixue, HAN Jing, CHEN Longbin, YU Xinyue, LIU Jingxi, MA Yi, HUO Wenjuan. Effects of Formic Acid and Wood Vinegar on Bacterial Community Composition of Alfalfa Silage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(2): 92-101. |
[7] | REN Xuexiang, JING Maofeng, SU Xianyan, CHI Yu, CHEN Haoliang, ZHONG Yongzhi, YE Zhenghe. Repellent Effect of Rhizobium on Spodoptera frugiperda [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(19): 128-132. |
[8] | Lu Xincheng, Jiang Jianchun, He Jing, Sun Kang, Sun Yunjuan. Effects of Wood Vinegar on Seedling Growth, Antioxidant Activity and Endogenous Hormone Content of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(7): 7-13. |
[9] | Wang Yaqian, Zhang Shangkun, Li Dongbing. Effects of Wood Vinegar on the Growth and Development of Acer truncatum Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(25): 41-46. |
[10] | Yu Huiling, Ye Lefu, Wang Xue, Xu Zhen, Feng Xinyu, Ma Tianyuan, Fu Xue. Wood Vinegar: Acute and Chronic Effects on the Growth and Reproduction of Myzus persicae [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(18): 147-152. |
[11] | Liu Runyu, Ye Lefu, Wang Xue, Yu Huiling, Fu Xue. Wood Vinegar Application in Agricultural Diseases, Pests and Weeds Control: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(35): 113-118. |
[12] | Ouyang Wensen, Yu Kuai, Deng Xiaojun, Kong Xuanqing, Li Jianming, Ou Xiaoming. Metamitron: Growth Inhibition on 2 Freshwater Aquatic Plants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(18): 154-159. |
[13] | . Fumigation with Wood Vinegar: Effects on Soil and Watermelon Growth in Greenhouse [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(28): 85-89. |
[14] | Liang Fengchen,Zhang Lili,Li Yan,Zhao Lijing,Tang Xin,Fan Yuhong and Shao Changyong. Effect of Wood Vinegar on Seed Viability and Seedling Growth of Summer Squash [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(16): 51-55. |
[15] | . Research Progress of Source, Chemical Compositions and Application of Wood Vinegar [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(1): 28-32. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||