Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 159-164.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0487
ZHU Peican(), LIU Yi'an, ZHOU Fangyu, LIU Bo(
)
Received:
2024-07-19
Revised:
2024-11-05
Online:
2025-02-25
Published:
2025-02-24
ZHU Peican, LIU Yi'an, ZHOU Fangyu, LIU Bo. Toxic Effects of Salt-alkali Interaction on Corbicula fluminea[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(6): 159-164.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0487
处理时间/h | Probit-盐度回归方程 | Pearson拟合度检验P值 | Probit-碱度回归方程 | Pearson拟合度检验P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
24 | Probit=-2.106+0.03X | 0.951 | Probit=-1.987+0.006X | 0.942 |
48 | Probit=-1.437+0.032X | 0.999 | Probit=-1.115+0.006X | 0.994 |
72 | Probit=-0.791+0.035X | 0.912 | Probit=-0.556+0.006X | 0.981 |
96 | Probit=-0.532+0.054X | 0.848 | Probit=-0.371+0.1X | 0.98 |
处理时间/h | Probit-盐度回归方程 | Pearson拟合度检验P值 | Probit-碱度回归方程 | Pearson拟合度检验P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
24 | Probit=-2.106+0.03X | 0.951 | Probit=-1.987+0.006X | 0.942 |
48 | Probit=-1.437+0.032X | 0.999 | Probit=-1.115+0.006X | 0.994 |
72 | Probit=-0.791+0.035X | 0.912 | Probit=-0.556+0.006X | 0.981 |
96 | Probit=-0.532+0.054X | 0.848 | Probit=-0.371+0.1X | 0.98 |
处理时间/h | 死亡率/% | 半致死浓度LC50 | 安全浓度/(g/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 盐度/(g/L) | |||||||
15 | 19.14 | 24.43 | 31.19 | 40 | ||||
24 | 0a | 3.33ab | 6.67±2.72bc | 10.00±2.72cd | 13.33de | 16.67±4.71e | 70.22 | 5.5 |
48 | 0a | 16.67±2.72b | 20.00b | 26.67±2.72c | 33.33±2.72d | 43.33±2.72e | 44.86 | |
72 | 0a | 40.00±2.72b | 43.33±4.71b | 50.00±2.72c | 66.67±5.44d | 70.00±2.72d | 22.87 | |
96 | 0a | 56.67±4.71b | 70.00±5.44c | 83.33±5.44d | 86.67±2.72de | 93.33±2.72e | 9.92 |
处理时间/h | 死亡率/% | 半致死浓度LC50 | 安全浓度/(g/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 盐度/(g/L) | |||||||
15 | 19.14 | 24.43 | 31.19 | 40 | ||||
24 | 0a | 3.33ab | 6.67±2.72bc | 10.00±2.72cd | 13.33de | 16.67±4.71e | 70.22 | 5.5 |
48 | 0a | 16.67±2.72b | 20.00b | 26.67±2.72c | 33.33±2.72d | 43.33±2.72e | 44.86 | |
72 | 0a | 40.00±2.72b | 43.33±4.71b | 50.00±2.72c | 66.67±5.44d | 70.00±2.72d | 22.87 | |
96 | 0a | 56.67±4.71b | 70.00±5.44c | 83.33±5.44d | 86.67±2.72de | 93.33±2.72e | 9.92 |
处理时间/h | 死亡率/% | 半致死浓度LC50 | 安全浓度/ (mmol/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 碱度/(mmol/L) | |||||||
50 | 67 | 89.5 | 120 | 160 | ||||
24 | 0a | 3.33ab | 6.67±2.72bc | 10.00c | 10.00±2.72c | 16.67±2.72d | 309.56 | 20.81 |
48 | 0a | 20.00±2.72b | 23.33±5.44b | 30.00±5.44c | 33.33±4.71c | 43.33±2.72d | 188.03 | |
72 | 0a | 40.00±4.71b | 43.33±2.72b | 53.33±5.44c | 60.00±5.44d | 66.67±2.72e | 86.44 | |
96 | 0a | 56.67±2.72b | 60.00±4.71b | 73.33±2.72c | 80.00±5.44d | 90.00±5.44e | 35.97 |
处理时间/h | 死亡率/% | 半致死浓度LC50 | 安全浓度/ (mmol/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 碱度/(mmol/L) | |||||||
50 | 67 | 89.5 | 120 | 160 | ||||
24 | 0a | 3.33ab | 6.67±2.72bc | 10.00c | 10.00±2.72c | 16.67±2.72d | 309.56 | 20.81 |
48 | 0a | 20.00±2.72b | 23.33±5.44b | 30.00±5.44c | 33.33±4.71c | 43.33±2.72d | 188.03 | |
72 | 0a | 40.00±4.71b | 43.33±2.72b | 53.33±5.44c | 60.00±5.44d | 66.67±2.72e | 86.44 | |
96 | 0a | 56.67±2.72b | 60.00±4.71b | 73.33±2.72c | 80.00±5.44d | 90.00±5.44e | 35.97 |
处理 | 盐度/(g/L) | 碱度/(mmol/L) | 处理数目 | 死亡率/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 96 h | ||||
对照组 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 90 | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00a |
S1A2 | 7.50 | 33.50 | 90 | 0.00a | 3.33a | 16.67b | 36.67±5.7b |
S2A4 | 9.57 | 60.00 | 90 | 13.33b | 26.67b | 40.00±2.72c | 86.67±2.72c |
S3A1 | 12.22 | 25.00 | 90 | 3.33a | 10.00c | 20.00b | 46.67d |
S4A3 | 15.60 | 44.75 | 90 | 13.33b | 30.00±2.72b | 46.67±2.72d | 80.00e |
S5A5 | 20.00 | 80.00 | 90 | 23.33±2.72c | 43.33±4.71d | 73.33±5.44e | 93.33±2.72f |
处理 | 盐度/(g/L) | 碱度/(mmol/L) | 处理数目 | 死亡率/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 96 h | ||||
对照组 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 90 | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00a |
S1A2 | 7.50 | 33.50 | 90 | 0.00a | 3.33a | 16.67b | 36.67±5.7b |
S2A4 | 9.57 | 60.00 | 90 | 13.33b | 26.67b | 40.00±2.72c | 86.67±2.72c |
S3A1 | 12.22 | 25.00 | 90 | 3.33a | 10.00c | 20.00b | 46.67d |
S4A3 | 15.60 | 44.75 | 90 | 13.33b | 30.00±2.72b | 46.67±2.72d | 80.00e |
S5A5 | 20.00 | 80.00 | 90 | 23.33±2.72c | 43.33±4.71d | 73.33±5.44e | 93.33±2.72f |
[1] |
刘永新, 方辉, 来琦芳, 等. 我国盐碱水渔业现状与发展对策[J]. 中国工程科学, 2016, 18(3):74-78.
doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2016.03.012 |
[2] |
高宝德, 王宪民, 徐丽, 等. 盐碱水培育抗病草鱼苗种试验[J]. 中国水产, 2023(2):70-72.
|
[3] |
陈学洲, 来琦芳, 么宗利, 等. 盐碱水绿色养殖技术模式[J]. 中国水产, 2020(9):61-63.
|
[4] |
冯建新, 高春生, 郭国军, 等. 河南省水产业可持续发展调研报告[J]. 河南水产, 2015(5):3-6.
|
[5] |
么宗利, 应成琦, 周凯, 等. 碳酸盐碱度胁迫下凡纳滨对虾基因的差异表达[J]. 中国水产科学, 2012, 19(1):1-12.
|
[6] |
王慧, 耿隆坤, 房文红, 等. 中国对虾往西北内陆咸水水域移植的生产性试养研究[J]. 海洋渔业, 1997, 19(1):9-12.
|
[7] |
肖国华, 刘丽杰, 张长未, 等. 盐碱地苦咸水养殖中国对虾试验[J]. 河北渔业, 2006(8):30,34.
|
[8] |
李朝霞. 中国食材辞典[M]. 太远: 山西科学技术出版社, 2012.
|
[9] |
张衡, 张瑛瑛, 刁山洲, 等. 长江口盐沼湿地不同亚生境的大型底栖动物群落组成和多样性差异[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(10):3102-3109.
|
[10] |
包锬, 刘一萌, 来琦芳, 等. 盐度胁迫对河蚬摄食率及鳃ATP酶活力变化研究[J]. 海洋渔业, 2021, 43(6):671-679.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
doi: 10.1007/s10126-023-10238-z pmid: 37651025 |
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
彭茂潇. 缢蛏对内陆水域重要水环境因子耐受性研究[D]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2020.
|
[17] |
陈小江, 左华丽, 李伟, 等. 四川华吸鳅对盐度的耐受性研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2021, 17(1):76-81.
|
[18] |
武鹏飞, 耿龙武, 姜海峰, 等. 三种鳅科鱼对NaCl盐度和NaHCO3碱度的耐受能力[J]. 中国水产科学, 2017, 24(2):248-257.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
杨建, 徐伟, 耿龙武, 等. 盐度对5种幼鱼的生存及鳃、肾组织的影响[J]. 淡水渔业, 2014, 44(4):7-12.
|
[22] |
郑伟刚, 张兆琪, 张美昭. 澎泽鲫幼鱼对盐度和碱度耐受性的研究[J]. 集美大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 9(2):127-130.
|
[23] |
周伟江, 常玉梅, 梁利群, 等. 氯化钠盐度和碳酸氢钠碱度对达里湖鲫毒性影响的初步研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2013, 28(4):340-346.
|
[24] |
杨建, 徐伟, 耿龙武, 等. NaHCO3碱度对5种幼鱼的生存及鳃、肾组织的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2014, 36(5):1115-1121.
|
[25] |
doi: 10.1002/etc.2452 pmid: 24504922 |
[26] |
doi: 10.1002/etc.2455 pmid: 24504936 |
[27] |
|
[28] |
张明, 王雷, 郭振宇, 等. 脂多糖和弧菌对中国对虾血清磷酸酶、超氧化物歧化酶和血蓝蛋白的影响[J]. 海洋科学, 2004(7):22-25.
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
王尧, 曹善茂. 盐度对岩扇贝Na+/K+-ATP酶活性的影响[J]. 科技风, 2019(7):241-243,245.
|
[34] |
杜鑫鑫. 不同缢蛏群体应对高盐环境的行为和生理响应能力[D]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2023.
|
[35] |
赵磊, 龙晓文, 吴旭干, 等. 水体盐度对中华绒螯蟹成体雄蟹渗透压调节和生理代谢的影响[J]. 水生生物学报, 2016, 40(1):27-34.
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[1] | ZHOU Bo, TANG Jinchi, LI Jianlong, CHEN Yiyong, ZHANG Man, CUI Yingying, HUANG Xiuxin. Physiological Response of Tea Tree Leaves to Drought Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 67-74. |
[2] | DUAN Yongqiang, LIU Hongyan, WANG Minghua, ZHONG Liqiang, SU Chaofan, LIU Ju, CHEN Xiaohui, ZHANG Shiyong. Effects of Salt Stress on Growth and Tissue Enzyme Activity of Juvenile Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(5): 143-150. |
[3] | GUO Hao, LI Guangning, LIU Tao, WANG Pu, WEN Panlai, LAI Ming, LYU Xingna. Responses of Morphological Characteristics and Physiological and Biochemical Index of Marigold Seedlings to Drought Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 69-75. |
[4] | XIAO Wenli, WANG Hanrui, WANG Mengliang, WANG Junhong. Mechanisms of Plant Response to Saline-alkali Stress: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(33): 78-85. |
[5] | ZHANG Honglei, DENG Xin, JIANG Yanfang, LI Siqin, LIU Zefa, DANG Jiancheng, WANG Yanan. Effects of Antimony on Seed Germination and Seedling Physiology of Cucumis melo [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(31): 23-29. |
[6] | ZHANG Jiao, CHEN Pengjun, CUI Shiyou, JIANG Xiaye, HAN Jijun, LONG Xien, MIAO Yuanqing. Effects of Different Planting Years and Planting Methods on Soil Characteristics and Wheat Yield in Tidal Flat Cultivation Reclamation Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(29): 45-51. |
[7] | ZHONG Liqiang, ZHOU Liying, ZHANG Shiyong, LIU Hongyan, CHEN Xiaohui, WANG Minghua. Study on Relationship Between Odor Material Geosmin and Environmental Factors in Aquaculture Ponds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(27): 159-164. |
[8] | HOU Mingyong, TAO Zhiying, CHEN Wenjing, XU Xiandong, RAO Yi. Effect Analysis of Different Concentration of Quicklime on Pond Plankton [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(17): 158-164. |
[9] | SHEN Jianguo, SU Guijun, LOU Ling, HE Linhai, HU Kangying. Effects of Salt Washing Methods on Soil Salinity and Nutrient Content and Vegetable Growth in Facility Agriculture [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 69-73. |
[10] | YAN Jie, GU Haibin, WU Hongqi, ZHANG Li, YAN An, SHENG Jiandong. Modeling of Soil Salinity Interpretation in Manas County Based on EM38 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 69-75. |
[11] | ZHOU Fangfang, YAGN Ce, CAI Xianjie, DONG Pingping, MA Aiguo, LIU Wenrui, NONG Zhengbin, LI Weifu, WANG Liyuan, YAN Ding. Effects of Previous Crops on Nutrients in Tobacco Planting Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(36): 83-88. |
[12] | ZHANG Yu, FENG Di, SUN Xiaoan, ZHANG Jingmin, ZHU Haiyan, WANG Zhihe, QI Na. Effect of Biochar Amount on the Composition of Soil Aggregates and Degree of Saline-alkality with the Saline Water Irrigation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(27): 75-80. |
[13] | SONG Ge, SHI Feng. Humic Substances Involved in Plant Abiotic Stress Response: A Review on the Mechanism [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(15): 59-68. |
[14] | ZHOU Wenchuan, WANG Yun, DUAN Yafei, WANG Jun, ZHOU Chuanpeng, HUANG Zhong. Effects of Dietary Rhodiola rosea on Antioxidant System Function and Salinity Sudden Change Adaptation of Litopenaeus vannamei [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(14): 144-151. |
[15] | JIA Yechun, CHEN Runyi, HE Zelin, NI Hongtao. Abiotic Stress on Sugar Beet: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 33-40. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||