Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (14): 47-51.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0014
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Yonghong1(), XIE Wei2, CHEN Xiang2, ZHANG Zelin1, NI Zhongying2(
)
Received:
2024-12-26
Revised:
2025-03-06
Online:
2025-05-15
Published:
2025-05-14
LIU Yonghong, XIE Wei, CHEN Xiang, ZHANG Zelin, NI Zhongying. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Slow (Controlled) Release Fertilizers on Rice Production and Soil Nutrients[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(14): 47-51.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0014
处理 | 肥料 种类 | 面积/ hm2 | 肥料施用数量 与方法 | 折氮磷钾/(kg/hm2) | 节肥率/ % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | 总量 | |||||
CK(空白处理) | 不施肥 | 0.333 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
CF(常规施肥) | 复合肥+尿素+氯化钾 | 0.333 | 基肥:44%复合肥450 kg/hm2;追肥:尿素300 kg/hm2 (其中分蘖肥10 kg、穗肥10 kg)+氯化钾5 kg(穗肥) | 204 | 36 | 126 | 366 | |
T1 | 缓控释肥 | 0.333 | 基肥:40%绿聚能525 kg/hm2; 追肥:33%绿聚能300 kg/hm2 | 189 | 36.75 | 83.25 | 309 | 15.5 |
T2 | 有机肥+缓控释肥 | 0.333 | 基肥:有机肥4500 kg/hm2+40%绿聚能450 kg/hm2; 追施33%绿聚能300 kg/hm2 | 174 | 31.5 | 73.5 | 279 | 23.7 |
处理 | 肥料 种类 | 面积/ hm2 | 肥料施用数量 与方法 | 折氮磷钾/(kg/hm2) | 节肥率/ % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | 总量 | |||||
CK(空白处理) | 不施肥 | 0.333 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
CF(常规施肥) | 复合肥+尿素+氯化钾 | 0.333 | 基肥:44%复合肥450 kg/hm2;追肥:尿素300 kg/hm2 (其中分蘖肥10 kg、穗肥10 kg)+氯化钾5 kg(穗肥) | 204 | 36 | 126 | 366 | |
T1 | 缓控释肥 | 0.333 | 基肥:40%绿聚能525 kg/hm2; 追肥:33%绿聚能300 kg/hm2 | 189 | 36.75 | 83.25 | 309 | 15.5 |
T2 | 有机肥+缓控释肥 | 0.333 | 基肥:有机肥4500 kg/hm2+40%绿聚能450 kg/hm2; 追施33%绿聚能300 kg/hm2 | 174 | 31.5 | 73.5 | 279 | 23.7 |
处理 | 株高/cm | 旗叶长/cm | 有效穗数/(个/丛) | 穗数/(万穗/hm2) | 穗实粒数/粒 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 理论产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 106a | 39a | 10.1a | 186.96a | 158a | 78.3a | 21.85a | 6465a |
CF | 112b | 42ab | 14.0b | 259.22c | 175a | 82.2a | 22.52b | 10215b |
T1 | 120c | 46bc | 11.7a | 216.64ab | 226b | 89.2b | 23.0c | 11265c |
T2 | 113b | 48c | 13.7b | 253.67bc | 214b | 89.1b | 22.35ab | 12135d |
处理 | 株高/cm | 旗叶长/cm | 有效穗数/(个/丛) | 穗数/(万穗/hm2) | 穗实粒数/粒 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 理论产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 106a | 39a | 10.1a | 186.96a | 158a | 78.3a | 21.85a | 6465a |
CF | 112b | 42ab | 14.0b | 259.22c | 175a | 82.2a | 22.52b | 10215b |
T1 | 120c | 46bc | 11.7a | 216.64ab | 226b | 89.2b | 23.0c | 11265c |
T2 | 113b | 48c | 13.7b | 253.67bc | 214b | 89.1b | 22.35ab | 12135d |
处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 与常规施肥比增产率/% | 产值/(元/hm2) | 成本/(kg/hm2) | 利润/(元/hm2) | 投入产出比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 5940d | — | 19005 | 12750 | 6255 | 1:1.49 |
CF | 9000c | — | 28800 | 15750 | 13050 | 1:1.828 |
T1 | 10095b | 12.2 | 32295 | 15900 | 16395 | 1:2.031 |
T2 | 10425a | 15.8 | 33360 | 18600 | 14760 | 1:1.794 |
处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 与常规施肥比增产率/% | 产值/(元/hm2) | 成本/(kg/hm2) | 利润/(元/hm2) | 投入产出比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 5940d | — | 19005 | 12750 | 6255 | 1:1.49 |
CF | 9000c | — | 28800 | 15750 | 13050 | 1:1.828 |
T1 | 10095b | 12.2 | 32295 | 15900 | 16395 | 1:2.031 |
T2 | 10425a | 15.8 | 33360 | 18600 | 14760 | 1:1.794 |
处理 | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.08a | 57.4a | 12.4a | 78a | 15.2a | 5.2a |
CF | 1.15b | 75.3b | 12.2a | 74a | 16.9b | 5.55b |
T1 | 1.08a | 93.4c | 22.7b | 99b | 17.6bc | 5.97c |
T2 | 1.09a | 94.4c | 38.5c | 114c | 18.0c | 5.82c |
处理 | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.08a | 57.4a | 12.4a | 78a | 15.2a | 5.2a |
CF | 1.15b | 75.3b | 12.2a | 74a | 16.9b | 5.55b |
T1 | 1.08a | 93.4c | 22.7b | 99b | 17.6bc | 5.97c |
T2 | 1.09a | 94.4c | 38.5c | 114c | 18.0c | 5.82c |
处理 | 肥料偏生产力 | 农学利用效率 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总养分量 | N | P2O5 | K2O | 总养分量 | N | P2O5 | K2O | ||
CK | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
CF | 24.59a | 44.12a | 250.00a | 71.43a | 8.36 a | 15.00a | 85.00a | 24.29a | |
T1 | 32.67b | 53.41b | 274.69b | 121.26b | 13.45b | 21.98b | 113.06b | 49.91b | |
T2 | 37.37c | 59.91c | 330.95c | 141.84c | 16.08c | 25.78c | 142.38c | 61.02c |
处理 | 肥料偏生产力 | 农学利用效率 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总养分量 | N | P2O5 | K2O | 总养分量 | N | P2O5 | K2O | ||
CK | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
CF | 24.59a | 44.12a | 250.00a | 71.43a | 8.36 a | 15.00a | 85.00a | 24.29a | |
T1 | 32.67b | 53.41b | 274.69b | 121.26b | 13.45b | 21.98b | 113.06b | 49.91b | |
T2 | 37.37c | 59.91c | 330.95c | 141.84c | 16.08c | 25.78c | 142.38c | 61.02c |
[1] |
张俊伶, 张江周, 申建波, 等. 土壤健康与农业绿色发展:机遇与对策[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(4):783-796.
|
[2] |
黄晶, 刘立生, 马常宝, 等. 近30年中国稻区氮素平衡及氮肥偏生产力的时空变化[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(6):987-998.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
张卫峰, 马林, 黄高强, 等. 中国氮肥发展、贡献和挑战[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(15):3161-3171.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.15.010 |
[5] |
杨东, 刘晓霞, 陈红金, 虞轶俊, 等. 定额制施肥对土壤及生态环境影响的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(32):91-98.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0384 |
[6] |
潘建清, 毛晓梅, 麻万诸. 基于肥料偏生产力的芦笋化肥定额制施肥技术模式探讨[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(5):937-939.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20200540 |
[7] |
邱子健, 申卫收, 林先贵. 化肥减量增效技术及其农学、生态环境效应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(4):237-248.
|
[8] |
何跃华, 薛占奎, 徐晶晶, 等. 不同缓释肥料用量及运筹方式对杂交晚稻农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(1):37-40.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20221095 |
[9] |
程爽, 车阳, 田晋钰, 等. 水稻缓控释氮肥应用研究现状与展望[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2020, 41(2):1-8.
|
[10] |
秦方锦, 葛超楠, 郑振浩, 等. 宁波市化肥减量增效技术集成模式及示范应用效果[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(4):981-984.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20220458 |
[11] |
沈兴连, 莫红华, 楼玲. 不同缓控释肥对新垦水田水稻生长和产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(6):122-124.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2022.06.025 |
[12] |
余贵龙, 刘祥臣, 张强, 等. 不同缓释肥组配对豫南再生稻生长及产量的影响[J], 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(36):22-27.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0024 |
[13] |
楼玲, 袁杭杰, 李丹, 等. 不同缓(控)释肥对水稻化肥减量增效和土壤肥力及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(20):73-77.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0673 |
[14] |
沈兴连, 莫红华, 楼玲, 等. 不同缓控释肥对新垦水田水稻生长和产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(6):122-124.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2022.06.025 |
[15] |
高静, 李建华, 张强, 等. 黄土高原北部典型县域耕地土壤碳氮时空变异特征及影响因素[J]. 土壤学报, 2024, 61(3):674-686.
|
[16] |
丛萍. 秸秆高量还田下东北黑土亚耕层的培肥效应与机制[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2019.
|
[17] |
公华锐, 李静, 马军花, 等. 秸秆还田配施有机无机肥料对冬小麦土壤水氮变化及其微生物群落和活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(6):2203-2214.
|
[18] |
邵士梅, 马丙菊, 常雨晴, 等. 水氮互作对水稻产量形成的影响研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(3):21-25.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2019.03.005 |
[19] |
彭术, 王华, 张文钊, 等. 长期氮肥减量深施对双季稻产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(6):999-1007.
|
[20] |
刘红江, 郑建初, 郭智, 等. 太湖地区氮肥减量对水稻氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(11):2960-2965.
|
[21] |
张璐, 黄晶, 高菊生, 等. 长期绿肥与氮肥减量配施对水稻产量和土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(5):106-112.
|
[22] |
许海敏, 虞鹏程, 冯敏谢. 不同化肥减量模式对甬优1540产量和肥料利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(6):1438-1441.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20220420 |
[23] |
赵秉强, 张福锁, 廖宗文, 等. 我国新型肥料发展战略研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2004(5):536-545..
|
[24] |
李泽丽, 刘之广, 张民, 等. 控释尿素配施黄腐酸对小麦产量及土壤养分供应的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(4):959-968.
|
[25] |
辛海滨, 杨绪清, 徐瑞衡, 等. 3种缓控释肥不同施肥模式对小麦产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(3):505-512.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230147 |
[26] |
邱子健, 申卫收, 林先贵, 等. 化肥减量增效技术及其农学、生态环境效应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(4):237-247.
|
[1] | WU Suxia, ZHAO Peng, FAN Hairong, SONG Shitao, CHEN Lina, JIN Changmin, CUI Yue. Effect of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Growth Trait of Millet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 19-24. |
[2] | TANG Chaochen, CHEN Diwen, ZHOU Wenling, YANG Yiling, AO Junhua, WANG Zhangying, HUANG Zhenrui. Effects of Liquid Fertilizers Compounded from Hydrothermal Cracking Products on Sweet Potato Growth and Nutrient Utilization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 39-49. |
[3] | WANG Lili, ZHU Shijun, LU Xiaohong, JIN Shuquan. Biological Effects of Trichoderma W1 Bio-organic Fertilizer on Coastal Tomato Planting [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 100-106. |
[4] | FENG Zhizhen, YAN Hong, CHEN Ni, SHEN Donghu, SU Haiyan, ZHANG Yingjun. Soil Nutrient Investigation and Fertility Assessment of Pomegranate Orchards with Different Ages in Lintong District [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(6): 109-117. |
[5] | LI Xianghua, FAN Caiying, XU Qin, HOU Jian, WANG Hui, LIU Yanyan, WANG Heng, LIU Guangya, HAN Wei. Effects of Different Maize and Soybean Planting Patterns on Crop Yield, Economic Benefit and Soil Nutrient [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(6): 22-28. |
[6] | QIN Huawei, CHEN Lulu, TIAN Changgeng, LIU Shanggang, ZHANG Wen, SUN Zhe. Effects of Different Organic Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Purple Sweet Potato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(6): 60-64. |
[7] | BIANBA Drolma, SONG Guoying, LIU Guoyi. Effect of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Part of Chemical Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer on Accumulation and Distribution of Dry Matter and Nutrients in Spring Highland Barley [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(5): 69-76. |
[8] | YOU Yu, LIN Xianfeng, JIANG Yun, ZHANG Liang, ZHANG Yunmei, TANG Dongmei, YU Hongjie, XIONG Zhongwei. Analysis of Fertilizer Use Efficiency and Economic Benefit of Planting Maize in Yanyuan of Sichuan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 17-22. |
[9] | CHEN Hailong, CHEN Zhaohui, WEI Tingbang. Regulation Mechanism of Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 7-16. |
[10] | HUANG Xin, GU Qingqing, WU Ling, CAO Fan, JIN Yuqing, CHEN Yan, GUO Cong, KE Peibei, LI Yujuan. Impact of Fermentation with Salt-tolerant Growth-promoting Bacteria on Composition and Application Effect of Black Soldier Fly Larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) Frass [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(11): 100-106. |
[11] | WANG Yuhao, MENG Yunfei, HE Nannan, WEI Guiwang, WEI Aijuan, WANG Shan, FENG Yungan. Effects of Planting Densities on Yield and Main Agronomic Traits of New Sweet-waxy Maize Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(10): 1-6. |
[12] | ZHANG Xueer, NIE Xiaohong, ZHANG Weifeng, QU Mingshan, SHI Yantong, LI Ting, LI Yunfei, NIE Qing. Study on Effect of Reducing Application of Special Slow-release Fertilizer for Head Lettuce in Beijing Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(10): 102-108. |
[13] | ZHENG Jianchao, LI Ming, DONG Fei. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer and Microbial Agent on Tomato Yield and Soil Microbial and Enzyme Activities [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 48-54. |
[14] | HE Guohe, CHEN Haibin, DU Jianjun, ZHANG Weili, GUO Lihua, HU Yibo, YAN Zhaohua, ZHANG Jing. Effects of Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Nutrient Utilization in Western Guangdong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 1-8. |
[15] | ZHANG Shijie, YANG Bo, WANG Bingang, LIU Yun, ZHANG Xifeng, WANG Wenli, WANG Zeli, LI Shan. Effect of Organic Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Weibei Loess Tableland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 38-46. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||