
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 38-47.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0533
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Dongdong(
), ZHANG Benqiang, FENG Junxi, ZHANG Yang, ZHAO Hongdong, WEI Cheng, LIU Shuwei, DONG Xiaowei, LI Xikun(
)
Received:2025-06-30
Revised:2026-01-15
Online:2026-04-15
Published:2026-04-15
ZHANG Dongdong, ZHANG Benqiang, FENG Junxi, ZHANG Yang, ZHAO Hongdong, WEI Cheng, LIU Shuwei, DONG Xiaowei, LI Xikun. Effects of Water Supply on Leaf Physical Characteristics of ‘Honghua Dajinyuan’ in High Altitude Tobacco Growing Areas[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 38-47.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0533
| 时期 | 处理 | 会东 | 会理 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 栅栏组织 | 海绵组织 | 总厚度 | 栅栏组织 | 海绵组织 | 总厚度 | |||
| 发生期 | CK | — | — | 73.48±3.96b | — | — | 73.35±7.95a | |
| S1 | — | — | 86.51±8.52a | — | — | 76.44±3.30a | ||
| S2 | — | — | 74.73±6.54ab | — | — | 76.05±4.38a | ||
| S3 | — | — | 78.7±7.49ab | — | — | 76.01±3.07a | ||
| 1/2定长期 | CK | 48.32±6.02b | 67.39±8.34b | 134.13±10.91b | 47.48±3.89b | 50.49±2.03c | 122.58±8.50b | |
| S1 | 50.64±2.61b | 70.03±2.24ab | 143.86±14.39b | 58.05±2.99a | 66.72±4.70a | 149.36±10.80a | ||
| S2 | 61.48±5.29a | 75.16±10.66ab | 162.15±15.56a | 54.62±5.15a | 52.94±4.51bc | 135.78±18.61ab | ||
| S3 | 63.8±11.24a | 78.38±9.38a | 163.03±15.15a | 58.96±4.36a | 59.80±7.23ab | 146.57±28.04a | ||
| 定长期 | CK | 89.7±15.85a | 98.56±14.39ab | 229.54±21.97ab | 85.26±3.32a | 83.23±8.92a | 190.31±13.73b | |
| S1 | 85.34±12.11a | 83.68±8.95b | 198.67±20.52b | 83.46±6.13a | 90.61±9.68a | 210.97±12.99a | ||
| S2 | 91.89±0.04a | 106.12±13.21a | 232.26±21.58ab | 82.18±7.37a | 92.98±7.15a | 201.02±18.49ab | ||
| S3 | 100.92±11.89a | 106.11±11.67a | 246.95±29.89a | 82.76±4.06a | 95.77±6.14a | 202.92±10.43ab | ||
| 成熟期 | CK | 113.32±19.80ab | 136.21±31.82a | 281.66±48.60b | 95.51±5.13a | 90.05±8.83b | 199.66±14.15c | |
| S1 | 88.25±2.12c | 90.45±19.72b | 219.40±6.56c | 93.84±9.40a | 99.56±9.81ab | 222.12±13.26ab | ||
| S2 | 94.61±12.67bc | 122.02±23.02ab | 253.97±23.60bc | 93.64±4.74a | 96.28±6.70ab | 212.51±5.51bc | ||
| S3 | 134.69±7.78a | 155.24±17.48a | 328.02±39.71a | 97.71±7.94a | 105.30±8.94a | 230.01±15.14a | ||
| 时期 | 处理 | 会东 | 会理 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 栅栏组织 | 海绵组织 | 总厚度 | 栅栏组织 | 海绵组织 | 总厚度 | |||
| 发生期 | CK | — | — | 73.48±3.96b | — | — | 73.35±7.95a | |
| S1 | — | — | 86.51±8.52a | — | — | 76.44±3.30a | ||
| S2 | — | — | 74.73±6.54ab | — | — | 76.05±4.38a | ||
| S3 | — | — | 78.7±7.49ab | — | — | 76.01±3.07a | ||
| 1/2定长期 | CK | 48.32±6.02b | 67.39±8.34b | 134.13±10.91b | 47.48±3.89b | 50.49±2.03c | 122.58±8.50b | |
| S1 | 50.64±2.61b | 70.03±2.24ab | 143.86±14.39b | 58.05±2.99a | 66.72±4.70a | 149.36±10.80a | ||
| S2 | 61.48±5.29a | 75.16±10.66ab | 162.15±15.56a | 54.62±5.15a | 52.94±4.51bc | 135.78±18.61ab | ||
| S3 | 63.8±11.24a | 78.38±9.38a | 163.03±15.15a | 58.96±4.36a | 59.80±7.23ab | 146.57±28.04a | ||
| 定长期 | CK | 89.7±15.85a | 98.56±14.39ab | 229.54±21.97ab | 85.26±3.32a | 83.23±8.92a | 190.31±13.73b | |
| S1 | 85.34±12.11a | 83.68±8.95b | 198.67±20.52b | 83.46±6.13a | 90.61±9.68a | 210.97±12.99a | ||
| S2 | 91.89±0.04a | 106.12±13.21a | 232.26±21.58ab | 82.18±7.37a | 92.98±7.15a | 201.02±18.49ab | ||
| S3 | 100.92±11.89a | 106.11±11.67a | 246.95±29.89a | 82.76±4.06a | 95.77±6.14a | 202.92±10.43ab | ||
| 成熟期 | CK | 113.32±19.80ab | 136.21±31.82a | 281.66±48.60b | 95.51±5.13a | 90.05±8.83b | 199.66±14.15c | |
| S1 | 88.25±2.12c | 90.45±19.72b | 219.40±6.56c | 93.84±9.40a | 99.56±9.81ab | 222.12±13.26ab | ||
| S2 | 94.61±12.67bc | 122.02±23.02ab | 253.97±23.60bc | 93.64±4.74a | 96.28±6.70ab | 212.51±5.51bc | ||
| S3 | 134.69±7.78a | 155.24±17.48a | 328.02±39.71a | 97.71±7.94a | 105.30±8.94a | 230.01±15.14a | ||
| 时期 | 处理 | 会东 | 会理 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 栅栏组织 | 海绵组织 | 总厚度 | 栅栏组织 | 海绵组织 | 总厚度 | |||
| 发生期 | CK | — | — | 78.67±6.48a | — | — | 59.67±4.47b | |
| S1 | — | — | 81.65±18.05a | — | — | 56.67±4.83b | ||
| S2 | — | — | 82.15±15.98a | — | — | 63.06±6.85b | ||
| S3 | — | — | 94.77±19.57a | — | — | 76.55±7.27a | ||
| 1/2定长期 | CK | 54.81±10.56a | 74.46±4.56b | 153.36±12.04b | 52.19±2.87a | 66.72±9.61a | 142.73±15.02a | |
| S1 | 59.1±5.71a | 94.35±16.56a | 180.58±26.43a | 51.17±4.09a | 65.08±10.13a | 141.11±12.31a | ||
| S2 | 65.34±9.96a | 78.37±5.00ab | 165.18±12.59ab | 48.47±3.35a | 60.57±11.74a | 136.26±12.19a | ||
| S3 | 69.78±13.62a | 74.98±14.90b | 175.98±18.02ab | 46.22±3.58a | 67.26±7.23a | 141.20±10.75a | ||
| 定长期 | CK | 105.61±9.58a | 110.73±21.26a | 250.56±15.37a | 71.64±31.96a | 85.51±12.50b | 195.04±10.46ab | |
| S1 | 111.44±19.88a | 117.49±14.19a | 264.76±29.33a | 73.14±7.15a | 83.60±2.93b | 187.01±13.30b | ||
| S2 | 110.39±16.18a | 122.74±19.33a | 263.62±11.71a | 80.97±12.02a | 87.48±9.68ab | 200.00±18.01ab | ||
| S3 | 103.65±2.17a | 119.19±30.31a | 256.35±20.79a | 84.60±8.87a | 98.99±9.71a | 216.20±23.28a | ||
| 成熟期 | CK | 106.96±1.51a | 120.83±7.76a | 265.67±20.82a | 92.37±9.32a | 92.34±5.03b | 208.41±12.51a | |
| S1 | 111.51±7.36a | 132.84±21.17a | 279.39±18.02a | 90.91±7.97a | 93.19±8.29ab | 212.92±27.36a | ||
| S2 | 105.03±15.57a | 128.97±9.43a | 290.67±27.44a | 95.88±10.37a | 98.91±9.10ab | 214.61±15.51a | ||
| S3 | 107.46±8.71a | 130.63±23.93a | 289.75±11.49a | 95.99±7.15a | 105.70±11.78a | 230.40±10.25a | ||
| 时期 | 处理 | 会东 | 会理 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 栅栏组织 | 海绵组织 | 总厚度 | 栅栏组织 | 海绵组织 | 总厚度 | |||
| 发生期 | CK | — | — | 78.67±6.48a | — | — | 59.67±4.47b | |
| S1 | — | — | 81.65±18.05a | — | — | 56.67±4.83b | ||
| S2 | — | — | 82.15±15.98a | — | — | 63.06±6.85b | ||
| S3 | — | — | 94.77±19.57a | — | — | 76.55±7.27a | ||
| 1/2定长期 | CK | 54.81±10.56a | 74.46±4.56b | 153.36±12.04b | 52.19±2.87a | 66.72±9.61a | 142.73±15.02a | |
| S1 | 59.1±5.71a | 94.35±16.56a | 180.58±26.43a | 51.17±4.09a | 65.08±10.13a | 141.11±12.31a | ||
| S2 | 65.34±9.96a | 78.37±5.00ab | 165.18±12.59ab | 48.47±3.35a | 60.57±11.74a | 136.26±12.19a | ||
| S3 | 69.78±13.62a | 74.98±14.90b | 175.98±18.02ab | 46.22±3.58a | 67.26±7.23a | 141.20±10.75a | ||
| 定长期 | CK | 105.61±9.58a | 110.73±21.26a | 250.56±15.37a | 71.64±31.96a | 85.51±12.50b | 195.04±10.46ab | |
| S1 | 111.44±19.88a | 117.49±14.19a | 264.76±29.33a | 73.14±7.15a | 83.60±2.93b | 187.01±13.30b | ||
| S2 | 110.39±16.18a | 122.74±19.33a | 263.62±11.71a | 80.97±12.02a | 87.48±9.68ab | 200.00±18.01ab | ||
| S3 | 103.65±2.17a | 119.19±30.31a | 256.35±20.79a | 84.60±8.87a | 98.99±9.71a | 216.20±23.28a | ||
| 成熟期 | CK | 106.96±1.51a | 120.83±7.76a | 265.67±20.82a | 92.37±9.32a | 92.34±5.03b | 208.41±12.51a | |
| S1 | 111.51±7.36a | 132.84±21.17a | 279.39±18.02a | 90.91±7.97a | 93.19±8.29ab | 212.92±27.36a | ||
| S2 | 105.03±15.57a | 128.97±9.43a | 290.67±27.44a | 95.88±10.37a | 98.91±9.10ab | 214.61±15.51a | ||
| S3 | 107.46±8.71a | 130.63±23.93a | 289.75±11.49a | 95.99±7.15a | 105.70±11.78a | 230.40±10.25a | ||
| 地区 | 处理 | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 单叶重/g | 叶厚/μm | 叶面密度/(g/m2) | 含梗率/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 会东 | CK | 74.82±1.25a | 22.48±1.13ab | 15.58±0.51a | 65.31±3.95b | 60.96±7.69b | 38.49±3.10a |
| S1 | 76.06±1.50a | 21.69±1.12b | 15.37±1.94a | 71.10±3.95ab | 67.84±1.55ab | 35.59±3.73a | |
| S2 | 76.20±3.97a | 22.21±1.10ab | 15.83±0.74a | 76.34±4.72a | 70.20±2.07a | 37.12±2.39a | |
| S3 | 77.83±1.73a | 24.57±1.77a | 16.52±0.72a | 72.48±6.46a | 72.4±7.11a | 37.51±2.34a | |
| 会理 | CK | 58.66±0.95a | 22.87±1.80a | 10.43±0.64a | 75.20±3.67c | 70.50±2.25b | 29.79±3.09a |
| S1 | 60.39±1.49a | 21.62±1.25a | 10.53±0.85a | 75.72±1.62bc | 70.66±4.86b | 29.48±3.29a | |
| S2 | 61.38±1.04a | 21.75±0.89a | 10.17±0.56a | 81.12±2.33a | 73.96±1.98ab | 28.75±2.50a | |
| S3 | 62.05±3.17a | 22.37±1.69a | 10.61±0.67a | 80.38±1.93ab | 76.23±0.81a | 28.22±1.86a |
| 地区 | 处理 | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 单叶重/g | 叶厚/μm | 叶面密度/(g/m2) | 含梗率/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 会东 | CK | 74.82±1.25a | 22.48±1.13ab | 15.58±0.51a | 65.31±3.95b | 60.96±7.69b | 38.49±3.10a |
| S1 | 76.06±1.50a | 21.69±1.12b | 15.37±1.94a | 71.10±3.95ab | 67.84±1.55ab | 35.59±3.73a | |
| S2 | 76.20±3.97a | 22.21±1.10ab | 15.83±0.74a | 76.34±4.72a | 70.20±2.07a | 37.12±2.39a | |
| S3 | 77.83±1.73a | 24.57±1.77a | 16.52±0.72a | 72.48±6.46a | 72.4±7.11a | 37.51±2.34a | |
| 会理 | CK | 58.66±0.95a | 22.87±1.80a | 10.43±0.64a | 75.20±3.67c | 70.50±2.25b | 29.79±3.09a |
| S1 | 60.39±1.49a | 21.62±1.25a | 10.53±0.85a | 75.72±1.62bc | 70.66±4.86b | 29.48±3.29a | |
| S2 | 61.38±1.04a | 21.75±0.89a | 10.17±0.56a | 81.12±2.33a | 73.96±1.98ab | 28.75±2.50a | |
| S3 | 62.05±3.17a | 22.37±1.69a | 10.61±0.67a | 80.38±1.93ab | 76.23±0.81a | 28.22±1.86a |
| 地区 | 处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 中上等烟比例/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 会东 | CK | 1820.55 | 70495.65 | 38.50 | 87.75 |
| S1 | 1935.30 | 74458.80 | 38.46 | 88.10 | |
| S2 | 1941.90 | 77169.60 | 39.62 | 88.79 | |
| S3 | 2095.35 | 82210.65 | 39.25 | 90.38 | |
| 会理 | CK | 2063.40 | 71188.95 | 34.48 | 80.42 |
| S1 | 1962.15 | 67034.55 | 34.13 | 79.64 | |
| S2 | 2123.55 | 72475.05 | 34.13 | 81.65 | |
| S3 | 2136.45 | 75527.70 | 35.27 | 83.38 |
| 地区 | 处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 中上等烟比例/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 会东 | CK | 1820.55 | 70495.65 | 38.50 | 87.75 |
| S1 | 1935.30 | 74458.80 | 38.46 | 88.10 | |
| S2 | 1941.90 | 77169.60 | 39.62 | 88.79 | |
| S3 | 2095.35 | 82210.65 | 39.25 | 90.38 | |
| 会理 | CK | 2063.40 | 71188.95 | 34.48 | 80.42 |
| S1 | 1962.15 | 67034.55 | 34.13 | 79.64 | |
| S2 | 2123.55 | 72475.05 | 34.13 | 81.65 | |
| S3 | 2136.45 | 75527.70 | 35.27 | 83.38 |
| 地区 | 处理 | 含量/% | 还原糖/总糖 | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 钾氯比 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 还原糖 | 总糖 | 总植物碱 | 总氮 | 钾 | 氯 | 硫 | 淀粉 | ||||||
| 会东 | CK | 27.1 | 31.7 | 1.53 | 2.11 | 1.95 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 3.03 | 0.85 | 17.67 | 1.37 | 10.85 |
| S1 | 27.1 | 31.0 | 1.28 | 2.12 | 1.58 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 3.14 | 0.87 | 21.12 | 1.65 | 9.29 | |
| S2 | 26.2 | 30.5 | 1.42 | 2.08 | 2.00 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 3.00 | 0.86 | 18.41 | 1.46 | 13.33 | |
| S3 | 26.5 | 31.3 | 1.39 | 2.02 | 1.72 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 3.05 | 0.85 | 18.97 | 1.44 | 10.14 | |
| 会理 | CK | 25.0 | 30.0 | 2.05 | 1.80 | 1.46 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 6.66 | 0.83 | 12.20 | 0.88 | 12.17 |
| S1 | 24.7 | 28.8 | 1.99 | 1.88 | 1.72 | 0.16 | 0.24 | 4.53 | 0.86 | 12.41 | 0.94 | 10.75 | |
| S2 | 23.9 | 28.6 | 2.02 | 1.85 | 1.70 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 5.27 | 0.84 | 11.83 | 0.92 | 15.45 | |
| S3 | 26.7 | 30.9 | 2.05 | 1.87 | 1.49 | 0.14 | 0.25 | 6.26 | 0.86 | 13.02 | 0.91 | 10.64 | |
| 地区 | 处理 | 含量/% | 还原糖/总糖 | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 钾氯比 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 还原糖 | 总糖 | 总植物碱 | 总氮 | 钾 | 氯 | 硫 | 淀粉 | ||||||
| 会东 | CK | 27.1 | 31.7 | 1.53 | 2.11 | 1.95 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 3.03 | 0.85 | 17.67 | 1.37 | 10.85 |
| S1 | 27.1 | 31.0 | 1.28 | 2.12 | 1.58 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 3.14 | 0.87 | 21.12 | 1.65 | 9.29 | |
| S2 | 26.2 | 30.5 | 1.42 | 2.08 | 2.00 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 3.00 | 0.86 | 18.41 | 1.46 | 13.33 | |
| S3 | 26.5 | 31.3 | 1.39 | 2.02 | 1.72 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 3.05 | 0.85 | 18.97 | 1.44 | 10.14 | |
| 会理 | CK | 25.0 | 30.0 | 2.05 | 1.80 | 1.46 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 6.66 | 0.83 | 12.20 | 0.88 | 12.17 |
| S1 | 24.7 | 28.8 | 1.99 | 1.88 | 1.72 | 0.16 | 0.24 | 4.53 | 0.86 | 12.41 | 0.94 | 10.75 | |
| S2 | 23.9 | 28.6 | 2.02 | 1.85 | 1.70 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 5.27 | 0.84 | 11.83 | 0.92 | 15.45 | |
| S3 | 26.7 | 30.9 | 2.05 | 1.87 | 1.49 | 0.14 | 0.25 | 6.26 | 0.86 | 13.02 | 0.91 | 10.64 | |
| [1] |
周萍, 方珂, 赵楠, 等. 保水剂施用量对西南紫色土水分和养分特征及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2024, 31(5):53-63.
|
| [2] |
谭玉娇, 徐兴阳, 张俊文, 等. 不同茄科砧木嫁接红花大金元对烟草青枯病的防控效果研究[J]. 昆明学院学报, 2019, 41(3):7-14.
|
| [3] |
刘慧, 刘博远, 金明珂, 等. 不同海拔对晾制后雪茄烟致香前体物质含量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022(5):118-123.
|
| [4] |
吴伟, 汪成勇, 陈鹏, 等. 不同调制工艺对盘州高海拔烟区烟叶的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2023(4):182-184.
|
| [5] |
刘先超, 马君红, 刘健康, 等. 四川地区生态因素与烟叶化学成分的关系[J]. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27(6):2644-2649.
|
| [6] |
张丰收, 程传策, 陈雪, 等. 水分处理对毕节雨养烟区烟株农艺性状、生理生化指标及烟叶化学成分的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(5):34-39.
|
| [7] |
郭振升, 崔保伟, 陆引罡. 不同生育期水分胁迫对烤烟生长发育及化学品质的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2012, 39(6):41-44.
|
| [8] |
彭伟秀, 王文全, 梁海永, 等. 水分胁迫对甘草营养器官解剖构造的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2003(3):46-48.
|
| [9] |
李宙文, 宋瑞芳, 王芳, 等. 不同水分处理对湘西烟草叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2015, 21(22):29-31.
|
| [10] |
吴宗海, 戴永平. 不同供控水条件对烤烟农艺性状和经济性状的影响[J]. 福建农业, 2015(4):28-30.
|
| [11] |
孙建锋, 宫长荣, 许自成, 等. 河南烤烟主产区烟叶物理性状的分析评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2005(12):17-21.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2005.12.005 |
| [12] |
冯敏玉, 宫峰, 肖金香, 等. 土壤水分对烤烟生长的影响研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2008(6):5-9.
|
| [13] |
段淑辉, 杨亿军, 刘建利, 等. 烟草需水规律研究进展[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2012, 33(4):99-105.
|
| [14] |
孙梅霞, 汪耀富, 张全民, 等. 烟草生理指标与土壤含水量的关系[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2000(2):36-39.
|
| [15] |
崔光周, 史玉龙, 李宏伟. 优质烤烟需水特性及灌溉指标[J]. 安徽农学通报(上半月刊), 2009, 15(21):77-78.
|
| [16] |
庄晔, 葛嘉雪, 汪孝国, 等. 干旱胁迫后复水对烤烟生长及其生理特性的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2022, 28(4):48-58.
|
| [17] |
孙梅霞, 陈义红. 烤烟不同水分条件下成熟期叶片植物学特性[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2002(4):603-604.
|
| [18] |
陈振国, 李进平, 冯吉, 等. 不同水肥条件对烤烟产量和质量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(2):87-91.
|
| [19] |
言勇, 颜合洪. 气候因子对烟草品质影响的研究进展[J]. 作物研究, 2009, 23(5):339-344.
|
| [20] |
张晓海, 苏贤坤, 廖德智, 等. 不同生育期水分调控对烤烟烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2005(6):36-38.
|
| [21] |
唐明, 向金友, 谢冰, 等. 不同生育期水分调控对烟草生理指标及产量质量的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2015(7):113-116.
|
| [22] |
李进平, 陈振国, 杨艳华, 等. 水分条件对烤烟生理指标的影响及适宜土壤水分指标研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2007(1):93-96.
|
| [23] |
高梓峰, 乔鹏, 任昭辉, 等. 不同施肥与灌溉方法对烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 延边大学农学学报, 2021, 43(4):28-34.
|
| [24] |
薛如君, 李军营, 胡志明, 等. 不同滴灌定额对烤烟生长发育和水肥利用效率的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 36(2):291-298.
|
| [25] |
doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2025.126306 URL |
| [1] | ZHAN Lei, YANG Weibin, YUAN Yanhua, DU Ting, WANG Xi, XIAO Lu, ZHOU Jintao, CHEN Wenle, YANG Yan, QI Liang, HUANG Lei. Research on Rapid Aging Process of Tobacco Lamina in Guangdong Region Based on Temperature Control Optimization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 190-203. |
| [2] | GAO Qin, CHEN Huanhuan, ZHU Qifa, XIA Hao, YU Fei, SHEN Jia, JIANG Chaoqiang. Study on Relationship Between Chemical Composition and Sensory Quality of Tobacco Middle Leaves in Southern Anhui Tobacco Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 204-209. |
| [3] | YANG Xin, ZHANG Mingjin, LI Bin, ZHANG Yonghui, XIE Qiang, WANG Jian’an. Effect of Different Harvesting Methods with Stems on Curing Quality of Upper Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 210-218. |
| [4] | ZHAO Chengkun, CHEN Liang, SHI Xiangdong, LI Mengxu, LYU Shangju, CAO Chanhua, DING Songshuang, YANG Zhanwei. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rates on Growth and Development of Cigar Wrapper Tobacco and Quality of Tobacco Leaves in Greenhouse Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 48-54. |
| [5] | LUO Guohui, YU Shikang, ZHAI Yangni, GU Huizhan, LI Fucheng, WANG Bin, WU Tao. Characteristics of Allelochemicals and Microbial Diversity in Soils with Different Types of Tobacco Continuous Cropping Obstacles [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(5): 101-108. |
| [6] | YUAN Yanhua, LAN Jun, YANG Mengmeng, LIU Yingjie, YANG Xiaodong, ZHAO Li, ZHANG Jiasheng, YANG Yan, ZHOU Jintao, XIAO Lu, QI Liang, HUANG Lei, WANG Jianwei. Effects of Sealed Hypoxia and Summer Temperature Control in Warehouse on Key Chemical Components During Tobacco Lamina Aging [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 193-203. |
| [7] | LIU Yiming, ZOU Zongqing, XU Zhiqiang, WANG Qiye, CHEN Xiangdeng, HAO Xianwei, WU Xiaoping, MENG Lin. Study on Optimal Aging Period of Tobacco Lamina ‘CB-1’ Under Northern Climatic Conditions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 204-209. |
| [8] | XIONG Ying, YANG Junjie, JIANG Jiazhu, LI Qiang, WANG Yong, ZHANG Yang, DONG Xiaowei, ZHANG Dongdong. Analysis of Differences and Usability of Chemical Components in Flue-cured Tobacco from Different Production Areas of Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 210-218. |
| [9] | LI Xinjian, LEI Ting, WEI Xingqi, YOU Andi, ZHOU Yangheng, LUO Mingquan, MO Zegang, LIU Xiaoang, ZHU Yinghua, TANG Xinggui. Influence of Leaf Pruning on Key Indicators of Cellar Transplanting Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 46-51. |
| [10] | LU Xinyuan, QIAN Pin, XU Yongxian, WANG Yiliu, WANG Huoyan, LU Dianjun, ZHENG Le. Effects of Machinery Application in Integrated Ridging and Root-zone Fertilization on Tobacco Yield and Nutrient Uptake in Fuxian Lake Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 52-58. |
| [11] | LI Yuan, KANG Huiru, PENG Bo, WU Lianxia, XIA Weixin, BI Haiyan. Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Rates on Growth, Yield and Quality of Walnut Trees in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 75-82. |
| [12] | YANG Lei, HAO Huanhuan, HU Xinyu, YI Ke, JING Yongfeng, HUANG Wenkun. Biological Control Technology of Tobacco Pests and Diseases: Current Research Status and Future Prospects [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 163-170. |
| [13] | PAN Dongzan, LIAO Yu, SHAO Xiuhong, LI Jiqin, MA Zhuwen, ZOU Mingmin, GAO Sanji, PAN Xiaoying, HUANG Zhenrui. Research Progress on Physiological, Molecular, and Genetic Improvement of Nitrogen Nutrition in Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 37-47. |
| [14] | HUANG Jinli, HUO Jiaohan, QIU Rongwei, LIN Fang, LU Caiyun, XU Weifeng, LIU Jianping. Research Progress on Role of Glycine-rich Proteins in Plant Response to Abiotic Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 57-64. |
| [15] | LI Hongchen, YANG Junjie, CHANG Jianbo, XIA Zongliang. Curing Characteristics and Curing Process of Middle Leaves of New Flue-cured Tobacco Variety ‘YM2020’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 194-199. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||