
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (14): 63-68.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0888
• Original article • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Min1(
), WANG Menglan1(
), SU Shun1, NING Yunwang2
Received:2025-10-14
Revised:2026-05-14
Online:2026-07-25
Published:2026-07-24
CLC Number:
ZHANG Min, WANG Menglan, SU Shun, NING Yunwang. Effects of Simplified Application of New Fertilizers on Rice Yield, Profits and Nitrogen Fertilizer Efficiency[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(14): 63-68.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0888
| 处理 | 基肥配方(N-P2O5-K2O) | 施肥次数/次 | 施氮量/(kg N/hm2) | 氮肥运筹 (基肥-分蘖肥-穗肥-粒肥) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 不施肥 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0-0-0 |
| 习惯施肥 | 15-15-15 | 4 | 300 | 4-2-2-2 |
| 普通高氮复合肥 | 28-6-6 | 2 | 255 | 6-0-4-0 |
| 炭基复合肥 | 26-10-12 | 2 | 255 | 6-0-4-0 |
| 腐殖酸复合肥 | 26-10-12 | 2 | 255 | 6-0-4-0 |
| 聚氨酯包膜掺混肥 | 25-10-13 | 2 | 255 | 6-0-4-0 |
| 脲醛复合肥 | 22-8-15 | 2 | 255 | 6-0-4-0 |
| 稳定性复合肥 | 24-10-14 | 2 | 255 | 6-0-4-0 |
| 处理 | 基肥配方(N-P2O5-K2O) | 施肥次数/次 | 施氮量/(kg N/hm2) | 氮肥运筹 (基肥-分蘖肥-穗肥-粒肥) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 不施肥 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0-0-0 |
| 习惯施肥 | 15-15-15 | 4 | 300 | 4-2-2-2 |
| 普通高氮复合肥 | 28-6-6 | 2 | 255 | 6-0-4-0 |
| 炭基复合肥 | 26-10-12 | 2 | 255 | 6-0-4-0 |
| 腐殖酸复合肥 | 26-10-12 | 2 | 255 | 6-0-4-0 |
| 聚氨酯包膜掺混肥 | 25-10-13 | 2 | 255 | 6-0-4-0 |
| 脲醛复合肥 | 22-8-15 | 2 | 255 | 6-0-4-0 |
| 稳定性复合肥 | 24-10-14 | 2 | 255 | 6-0-4-0 |
| 处理 | 单位面积穗数/(万/hm2) | 穗粒数/粒 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比不施肥增产/% | 比习惯施肥增产/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 不施肥 | 234.15c | 98.41c | 97.7a | 25.8a | 5808.0d | — | — |
| 习惯施肥 | 288.45b | 112.0ab | 97.2a | 25.6a | 8004.0c | 37.8 | — |
| 普通高氮复合肥 | 320.25ab | 110.4b | 97.5a | 24.7a | 8527.5bc | 46.8 | 6.5 |
| 炭基复合肥 | 322.05ab | 119.1ab | 94.3a | 24.8a | 8974.5ab | 54.5 | 12.1 |
| 腐殖酸复合肥 | 335.70a | 120.5a | 94.0a | 25.1a | 9295.5a | 60.0 | 16.1 |
| 聚氨酯包膜掺混肥 | 319.05ab | 113.1ab | 96.2a | 25.4a | 8751.0bc | 50.7 | 9.3 |
| 脲醛复合肥 | 329.25ab | 116.1ab | 94.3a | 26.3a | 9106.5ab | 56.8 | 13.8 |
| 稳定性复合肥 | 295.50b | 119.4ab | 96.2a | 25.9a | 8769.0b | 51.0 | 9.6 |
| 处理 | 单位面积穗数/(万/hm2) | 穗粒数/粒 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比不施肥增产/% | 比习惯施肥增产/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 不施肥 | 234.15c | 98.41c | 97.7a | 25.8a | 5808.0d | — | — |
| 习惯施肥 | 288.45b | 112.0ab | 97.2a | 25.6a | 8004.0c | 37.8 | — |
| 普通高氮复合肥 | 320.25ab | 110.4b | 97.5a | 24.7a | 8527.5bc | 46.8 | 6.5 |
| 炭基复合肥 | 322.05ab | 119.1ab | 94.3a | 24.8a | 8974.5ab | 54.5 | 12.1 |
| 腐殖酸复合肥 | 335.70a | 120.5a | 94.0a | 25.1a | 9295.5a | 60.0 | 16.1 |
| 聚氨酯包膜掺混肥 | 319.05ab | 113.1ab | 96.2a | 25.4a | 8751.0bc | 50.7 | 9.3 |
| 脲醛复合肥 | 329.25ab | 116.1ab | 94.3a | 26.3a | 9106.5ab | 56.8 | 13.8 |
| 稳定性复合肥 | 295.50b | 119.4ab | 96.2a | 25.9a | 8769.0b | 51.0 | 9.6 |
| 处理 | 籽粒吸氮量/(kg/hm2) | 秸秆吸氮量/(kg/hm2) | 植株吸氮量/(kg/hm2) | 百公斤籽粒吸氮量/kg | 氮素收获指数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 不施肥 | 53.6c | 27.6e | 51.2c | 1.40d | 0.66c |
| 习惯施肥 | 109.4c | 45.9b | 155.3b | 1.94a | 0.70bc |
| 普通高氮复合肥 | 122.9ab | 38.9cd | 161.6b | 1.90ab | 0.76a |
| 炭基复合肥 | 119.6ab | 43.7bc | 163.2b | 1.82bc | 0.73ab |
| 腐殖酸复合肥 | 130.2a | 51.5a | 181.7a | 1.95a | 0.72ab |
| 聚氨酯包膜掺混肥 | 127.4a | 36.9cd | 164.3b | 1.88ab | 0.78a |
| 脲醛复合肥 | 121.8ab | 39.5c | 161.3b | 1.77c | 0.75a |
| 稳定性复合肥 | 113.0bc | 38.3cd | 151.2b | 1.72c | 0.75a |
| 处理 | 籽粒吸氮量/(kg/hm2) | 秸秆吸氮量/(kg/hm2) | 植株吸氮量/(kg/hm2) | 百公斤籽粒吸氮量/kg | 氮素收获指数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 不施肥 | 53.6c | 27.6e | 51.2c | 1.40d | 0.66c |
| 习惯施肥 | 109.4c | 45.9b | 155.3b | 1.94a | 0.70bc |
| 普通高氮复合肥 | 122.9ab | 38.9cd | 161.6b | 1.90ab | 0.76a |
| 炭基复合肥 | 119.6ab | 43.7bc | 163.2b | 1.82bc | 0.73ab |
| 腐殖酸复合肥 | 130.2a | 51.5a | 181.7a | 1.95a | 0.72ab |
| 聚氨酯包膜掺混肥 | 127.4a | 36.9cd | 164.3b | 1.88ab | 0.78a |
| 脲醛复合肥 | 121.8ab | 39.5c | 161.3b | 1.77c | 0.75a |
| 稳定性复合肥 | 113.0bc | 38.3cd | 151.2b | 1.72c | 0.75a |
| 处理 | 施氮量/ (kg N/hm2) | 氮肥利用率/% | 氮肥农学效率/ (kg/kg) | 氮肥偏生产力/ (kg/kg) | 氮素盈余/ (kg N/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 习惯施肥 | 300 | 24.7d | 7.3d | 26.7c | 144.0a |
| 普通高氮复合肥 | 255 | 31.6b | 10.7c | 33.4a | 93.0b |
| 炭基复合肥 | 255 | 32.2b | 12.4b | 35.2a | 91.5b |
| 腐殖酸复合肥 | 255 | 39.4a | 13.7a | 36.5a | 73.5c |
| 聚氨酯包膜掺混肥 | 255 | 32.6b | 11.5bc | 34.3a | 91.5b |
| 脲醛复合肥 | 255 | 31.4b | 12.9ab | 35.7a | 93.0b |
| 稳定性复合肥 | 255 | 27.4c | 11.6bc | 34.4a | 103.5b |
| 处理 | 施氮量/ (kg N/hm2) | 氮肥利用率/% | 氮肥农学效率/ (kg/kg) | 氮肥偏生产力/ (kg/kg) | 氮素盈余/ (kg N/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 习惯施肥 | 300 | 24.7d | 7.3d | 26.7c | 144.0a |
| 普通高氮复合肥 | 255 | 31.6b | 10.7c | 33.4a | 93.0b |
| 炭基复合肥 | 255 | 32.2b | 12.4b | 35.2a | 91.5b |
| 腐殖酸复合肥 | 255 | 39.4a | 13.7a | 36.5a | 73.5c |
| 聚氨酯包膜掺混肥 | 255 | 32.6b | 11.5bc | 34.3a | 91.5b |
| 脲醛复合肥 | 255 | 31.4b | 12.9ab | 35.7a | 93.0b |
| 稳定性复合肥 | 255 | 27.4c | 11.6bc | 34.4a | 103.5b |
| 施肥处理 | 复合肥用量/ (kg/hm2) | 尿素用量/ (kg/hm2) | 施肥用工/ (h/hm2) | 施肥成本/ (元/hm2) | 其他成本/ (元/hm2) | 总成本/ (元/hm2) | 产量/ (kg/hm2) | 产值/ (元/hm2) | 净收益/ (元/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 习惯施肥 | 525.0 | 480.0 | 30.0 | 2968.5 | 14100.0 | 17068.5 | 8004.0c | 22411.5c | 5343.0c |
| 普通高氮复合肥 | 546.0 | 217.5 | 15.0 | 2307.0 | 14100.0 | 16407.0 | 8527.5bc | 23877.0bc | 7470.0bc |
| 炭基复合肥 | 588.0 | 217.5 | 15.0 | 2659.5 | 14100.0 | 16759.5 | 8974.5ab | 25128.0ab | 8368.5b |
| 腐殖酸复合肥 | 588.0 | 217.5 | 15.0 | 2836.5 | 14100.0 | 16936.5 | 9295.5a | 28128.0a | 11191.5a |
| 聚氨酯包膜掺混肥 | 612.0 | 217.5 | 15.0 | 3471.0 | 14100.0 | 17571.0 | 8751.0bc | 24502.5bc | 6931.5bc |
| 脲醛复合肥 | 696.0 | 217.5 | 15.0 | 3910.5 | 14100.0 | 18010.5 | 9106.5ab | 27598.5ab | 9588.0ab |
| 稳定性复合肥 | 637.5 | 217.5 | 15.0 | 3201.0 | 14100.0 | 17301.0 | 8769.0b | 24553.5b | 7252.5b |
| 施肥处理 | 复合肥用量/ (kg/hm2) | 尿素用量/ (kg/hm2) | 施肥用工/ (h/hm2) | 施肥成本/ (元/hm2) | 其他成本/ (元/hm2) | 总成本/ (元/hm2) | 产量/ (kg/hm2) | 产值/ (元/hm2) | 净收益/ (元/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 习惯施肥 | 525.0 | 480.0 | 30.0 | 2968.5 | 14100.0 | 17068.5 | 8004.0c | 22411.5c | 5343.0c |
| 普通高氮复合肥 | 546.0 | 217.5 | 15.0 | 2307.0 | 14100.0 | 16407.0 | 8527.5bc | 23877.0bc | 7470.0bc |
| 炭基复合肥 | 588.0 | 217.5 | 15.0 | 2659.5 | 14100.0 | 16759.5 | 8974.5ab | 25128.0ab | 8368.5b |
| 腐殖酸复合肥 | 588.0 | 217.5 | 15.0 | 2836.5 | 14100.0 | 16936.5 | 9295.5a | 28128.0a | 11191.5a |
| 聚氨酯包膜掺混肥 | 612.0 | 217.5 | 15.0 | 3471.0 | 14100.0 | 17571.0 | 8751.0bc | 24502.5bc | 6931.5bc |
| 脲醛复合肥 | 696.0 | 217.5 | 15.0 | 3910.5 | 14100.0 | 18010.5 | 9106.5ab | 27598.5ab | 9588.0ab |
| 稳定性复合肥 | 637.5 | 217.5 | 15.0 | 3201.0 | 14100.0 | 17301.0 | 8769.0b | 24553.5b | 7252.5b |
| [1] |
覃朝晖, 汪晓婉, 余威震, 等. 中国水稻种植要素配置效率测度与收敛性分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2025, 46(9):16-29.
|
| [2] |
蒋伟勤, 车阳, 李可, 等. 江苏省水稻栽培关键技术应用现状及展望[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2023, 39(2):567-575.
|
| [3] |
吴沛良. 提高江苏水稻产能的思考与对策[J]. 江苏农村经济, 2023(9):6-8.
|
| [4] |
宁运旺, 张辉, 王磊, 等. 基肥结合抽穗期追肥稳定稻麦产量并提高氮肥利用率及经济效益[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(8):1407-1419.
|
| [5] |
王少华, 李杰, 杨晓晨, 等. 一基一追对水稻产量效益及氮肥效率的影响[J]. 中国农技推广, 2021, 37(5):51-56.
|
| [6] |
陈文超, 张辉, 杨柳, 等. 基于缓释氮肥的稻季减次施肥技术研究[J]. 中国农技推广, 2024, 40(9):69-73.
|
| [7] |
陈贵, 纪涵博, 鲁晨妮, 等. 缓控释肥配施脲铵运筹对水稻产量、氮素利用效率和土壤养分的影响[J]. 土壤, 2024, 56(1):28-34.
|
| [8] |
王孟兰, 宁运旺, 邹建祥. “二替一减”肥料运筹在水稻上的推广应用试验[J]. 中国农技推广, 2024, 40(8):71-75.
|
| [9] |
赵秉强. 新型肥料[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013:7-8.
|
| [10] |
房娜娜, 于立宏, 卢宗云. 稳定性肥料在水稻减肥增效上的应用初探[J]. 中国农技推广, 2019, 35(8);65-67.
|
| [11] |
彭碧琳, 李妹娟, 胡香玉, 等. 轻简氮肥管理对华南双季稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7):1424-1438.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.07.009 |
| [12] |
朱德进, 宁运旺, 王会方, 等. 江苏单季粳稻对新型氮肥减量减次施用的适宜性分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(16):46-50.
|
| [13] |
俞巧钢, 殷建祯, 马军伟, 等. 硝化抑制剂DMPP应用研究进展及其影响因素[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(6):1057-1066.
|
| [14] |
张鹏, 俄胜哲, 袁金华, 等. 腐殖酸肥料研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(25):102-108.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0758 |
| [15] |
金永旭. 人工腐殖酸尿素肥料的合成及其对土壤氮素转化的影响研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2023.
|
| [1] | GAO Hongxia, LIU Yang, SUN Rongyu, YU Zhihong. Zoning of Rice Frost Disasters During Rice Maturity Period in Xing'an League of Inner Mongolia [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 117-123. |
| [2] | LU Ping, CHEN Yujia, WANG Zhanfu, ZHANG Yiming, JIANG Hangfeng, WANG Chaofan, ZHANG Rong, QIU Hanying. Effects of One-time Basal Application of a Newly Formulated Controlled-release Blended Urea on Traits, Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Rice (Oryza sativa L. 'Nanjing 46') [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 95-103. |
| [3] | ZHANG Jie, SHAO Wenqi, Ma Hongbo, CHEN Chuan, ZHANG Ankang, LI Chuanzhe. Effect of Slow-release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Fertilizer Utilization Efficiency in Jiangsu Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 104-109. |
| [4] | YU Linchuang, CHEN Qingming, LU Yun, SHEN Guanwang, QI Yuliang, FU Ding, YU Xinchun, CHANG Xingyuan, SHEN Guanghui. Preliminary Molecular Characterization and Allelic Profiling of Blast Resistance Genes in 93 Core Parental Lines of Oryza sativa L [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 38-43. |
| [5] | SHANG Xiaolan, LI Dan, FANG Wenying, XU Zhu, WANG Qiang, CHEN Zhaoming. Effect of Machine-Transplanting Synchronized with Side-deep Fertilization on Rice Yield, Nitrogen Fertilizer Utilization and Soil Nitrogen Content [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 1-7. |
| [6] | WEN Jianchuan, LAI Zhengrong, WU Lyu, RUAN Lingli, WU Biliang, LIANG Ping. Meteorological Forecast of Rice Blast Risk Level in Qiandongnan Prefecture [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 171-175. |
| [7] | YE Pei, FENG Dehao, YANG Jun, LIU Kaiwen, CHEN Sicheng. Study on Vulnerability and Meteorological Disaster Thresholds of High-Temperature and Drought Combined Stress During Heading and Flowering Stage of Mid-season Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(6): 120-126. |
| [8] | ZHANG Qiming, GUO Shuilian, OUYANG Dongmei. Variation Analysis of Climate Condition for Double-cropping Rice in Yichun Based on GIS [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 133-143. |
| [9] | HUANG Wei, PAN Huixiao, WU Xuanke, HE Yan, TAN Mengxiang, LIU Yongyu. Analysis of Risk Zoning and Meteorological Factors of Double Cropping Rice Yield Disaster in Guangxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 144-154. |
| [10] | XU Junhui, CHEN Lini, HUANG Fang, LIAN Cong, MO Bocheng. Effects of Two Foliar Inhibitors on Absorption and Accumulation of Cd in Rice and Related Health Risk Assessment [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 113-119. |
| [11] | WANG Jingwen, YUAN Hangjie, LOU Ling, ZHANG Xiumei, YANG Wenye, WANG Zhong. Influence of Different Fallowing Methods on Soil Quality of Degraded Vegetable Fields [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 146-152. |
| [12] | YANG Xin, YE Shuifeng. Effects of Controlled-release Urea Combined with Straw Biochar on Rice Yield and Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(14): 57-62. |
| [13] | WU Zhifeng, ZHOU Yinuo, WANG Wenjing, YANG Yuhui, WANG Jianguo, LIU Guanhua. Impacts of Climate Change on Rice Yield in Zhalaite Banner [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(14): 75-83. |
| [14] | LI Xinghua, TU Junming, ZHANG Wenchao, CAO Zhigang, WANG Huan, CHEN Jie, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, DENG Qiuyu, LIU Daole. Screening of Ratoon Rice Varieties and Evaluation of Ratooning Ability in Eastern Hubei [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(14): 1-6. |
| [15] | SUN Jianquan, YIN Chunyuan, HUANG Jinhua, LIU Hemei, HU Xiuming, WANG Hele, ZHANG Jinxia, ZHANG Qianqian, TIAN Fanghui, WANG Shuyu. A Comparative Study on Flag Leaf Photosynthetic Characteristics, Yield and Quality of High-quality Japonica Rice Between China and Japan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(13): 1-5. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||