乙醇脱氢酶基因家族在植物抵抗非生物胁迫过程中的作用研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14120001

中国农学通报 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 246-250.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14120001

所属专题：生物技术

乙醇脱氢酶基因家族在植物抵抗非生物胁迫过程中的作用研究进展

张计育,王刚,黄胜男,宣继萍,贾晓东,郭忠仁

(江苏省中国科学院植物研究所,南京 210014）

收稿日期:2014-12-01 修回日期:2015-03-17 接受日期:2015-01-23 出版日期:2015-05-05 发布日期:2015-05-05
通讯作者: 郭忠仁
基金资助:
江苏省自然科学基金项目“猕猴桃响应涝害胁迫的转录组分析及其相关基因的功能研究”(BK20140760)；国家自然科学基金项目“猕猴桃NPR1类似基因家族成员的克隆与抗病功能解析”(31401854)。

Functions of Alcohol Dehydrogenase Family in Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants

Zhang Jiyu, Wang Gang, Huang Shengnan, Xuan Jiping, Jia Xiaodong, Guo Zhongren

(Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210014)Abstract: Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) is highly conserved across species, from prokaryotes to fungi, plants, and animals. In this paper, the author summarized the distribution of ADH gene family, ADH protein structure, the role of ADH genes in resistance to waterlogging, chilling, and drought stress in plants, and ADH genes involvement in the anaerobic fermentation. Finally, the problems of study about ADH genes at the present stage were proposed, and the prospects were predicted as well.

Received:2014-12-01 Revised:2015-03-17 Accepted:2015-01-23 Online:2015-05-05 Published:2015-05-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 乙醇脱氢酶基因(ADH)在各物种中是高度保守的，包括原核生物、真菌、植物和动物。本研究系统综述了ADH基因家族的分布，ADH蛋白的结构、ADH基因在抵抗涝害、冷害、干旱和盐害胁迫中的作用以及参与的植物厌氧发酵途径。本研究提出了植物ADH基因现阶段研究中存在的问题，并对其研究前景进行了展望。

关键词: 紫甘薯, 紫甘薯, 组织培养, 外植体, 培养基

Abstract: Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) is highly conserved across species, from prokaryotes to fungi, plants, and animals. In this paper, the author summarized the distribution of ADH gene family, ADH protein structure, the role of ADH genes in resistance to waterlogging, chilling, and drought stress in plants, and join in the anaerobic fermentation. Finally, the problems of study about ADH genes at the present stage were proposed, and the prospects were predicted as well.

张计育,王刚,黄胜男,宣继萍,贾晓东,郭忠仁. 乙醇脱氢酶基因家族在植物抵抗非生物胁迫过程中的作用研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(10): 246-250.

Zhang Jiyu,Wang Gang,Huang Shengnan,Xuan Jiping,Jia Xiaodong and Guo Zhongren. Functions of Alcohol Dehydrogenase Family in Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(10): 246-250.

参考文献

[1] Strommer J. The plant ADH gene family[J]. The Plant Journal, 2011, 66(1):128-142.
[2] Fukuda T, Yokoyama J, Nakamura T, et al. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) genes in legumes[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2005, 5(1):6.
[3] Komatsu S, Thibaut D, Hiraga S, et al. Characterization of a novel flooding stress-responsive alcohol dehydrogenase expressed in soybean roots[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2011, 77(3):309-322.
[4] Garabagi F, Duns G, Strommer S. Selective recruitment of Adh genes for distinct enzymatic functions in Petunia hybrida[J]. Plant Mol Biol, 2005(58):283-294.
[5] Garabagi F, Strommer J. Distinct genes produce the alcohol dehydrogenases of pollen and maternal tissues in Petunia hybrida[J]. Biochem Genet, 2004, 42:199-208.
[6] Liu Z, Adams K L. Expression partitioning between genes duplicated by polyploidy under abiotic stress and during organ development[J]. Current Biology, 2007, 17(19):1669-1674.
[7] Perry D, Furnier G. Pinus banksiana has at least seven expressed alcohol dehydrogenase genes in two linked groups[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996,93(23):13020-13023.
[8] Komatsu S, Ahsan N. Soybean proteomics and its application to functional analysis[J]. J Proteomics, 2009(72):325-336.
[9] Jackson M, Colmer T. Response and adaptation by plants to flooding stress[J]. Ann Bot (Lond), 2005(96):501-505.
[10] Newman K, Vantoai T. Molecular characterization of the soybean alcohol dehydrogenase gene family amplified in vitro by the polymerase chain reaction[J]. Plant Physiol, 1992(100):489-495.
[11] Komatsu S, Yamamoto R, Nanjo Y, et al. A comprehensive analysis of the soybean genes and proteins expressed under flooding stress using transcriptome and proteome techniques[J]. J Proteome Res, 2009(8):4766-4778.
[12] Komatsu S, Sugimoto T, Hoshino T, et al. Identification of flooding stress responsible cascades in root and hypocotyl of soybean using proteome analysis[J]. Amino Acids, 2010, 38:729-738.
[13] Nanjo Y, Skultety L, Ashraf Y, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of early-stage soybean seedlings responses to flooding by using gel and gel-free techniques[J]. J Proteome Res, 2010, 9:3989-4002.
[14] Komatsu S, Kobayashi Y, Nishizawa K, et al.Comparative proteomics analysis of differentially expressed proteins in soybean cell wall during flooding stress[J]. Amino Acids, 2010, 39:1435-1449.
[15] Ismond K, Dolferus R, Pauw M, et al. Enhanced low oxygen survival in arabidopsis through increased metabolic flux in the fermentative pathway[J]. Plant Physiol, 2003, 132:1292-1302.
[16] Tougou M, Hashiguchi A, Yukawa K, et al. Responses to flooding stress in soybean seedlings with the alcohol dehydrogenase transgene[J]. Plant Biotechnology, 2012, 29:301-305.
[17] Noguchi H, Yasuda Y. Effect of low temperature on ethanolic fermentation in rice seedlings[J]. J Plant Physiol, 2007, 164:1013-1018.
[18] 严建萍,梁燕,谭湘陵.淹涝和低温胁迫对小麦幼根ADH与BADH表达的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2011,39(6):153-154.
[19] Davik J, Koehler G, From B, et al. Dehydrin, alcohol dehydrogenase, and central metabolite levels are associated with cold tolerance in diploid strawberry (Fragaria spp.) [J]. Planta,2013, 237:265-277.
[20] Peters J, Frenkel C. Relationship between alcohol dehydrogenase activity and low-temperature in two maize genotypes, Silverado F₁and Adh1 – Adh2 – doubly null[J]. Plant Physiol Bioch, 2004, 42:841-846.
[21] Dolferus R, Jacobs M, Peacock W, et al. Differential interactions of promoter elements in stress responses of the Arabidopsis Adh gene[J]. Plant Physiol, 1994, 105:1075-1087.
[22] Senthil-Kumar M, Hema R, Suryachandra T, et al. Functional characterization of three water deficit stress-induced genes in tobacco and Arabidopsis: An approach based on gene down regulation.[J]. Plant Physiol Bioch, 2010, 48:35-44.
[23] Diab A, Kantety R, Ozturk N, et al. Drought-inducible genes and differentially expressed sequence tags associated with components of drought tolerance in durum wheat[J]. Sci Res Essays, 2008, 3:9-26.
[24] 梁燕,严建萍,谭湘陵.盐胁迫对水稻幼根乙醇脱氢酶和乙醛脱氢酶基因表达的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2012,51:2870-2872.
[25] Hwang S Y, Van Toai T. Abscisic acid induces anaerobiosis tolerance in corn[J]. Plant Physiol, 1991, 97: 593-597.
[26] Dolferus R, Ellis M, Bruxelles de G, et al. Strategies of gene action in Arabidopsis during hypoxia[J]. Annal Bot, 1997,79:21-31.
[27] Bruxelles de G, Peacock W, Dennis E, et al. Abscisic acid induces the alcohol dehydrogenase gene in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Physiol, 1996,111:381-391.
[28] Freeling M. Simultaneous induction by anaerobiosis or 2,4-D of multiple enzymes specified by two unlinked genes: Differential ADH1-ADH2 expression in maize[J]. Mol Gen Genet, 1973, 127:215-227.
[29] Kato-Noguchi H. Induction of alcohol dehydrogenase by plant hormones in alfalfa seedlings[J]. Plant Growth Regulation 2000, 30:1-3.
[30] Wolyn D, Jelenkovic G. Nucleotide sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase gene in octoploid strawberry (Fragaria Ananassa Duch.) [J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 1990, 14:855-857.

乙醇脱氢酶基因家族在植物抵抗非生物胁迫过程中的作用研究进展

Functions of Alcohol Dehydrogenase Family in Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	段青, 蔡晶晶, 杜文文, 杨楠, 王祥宁, 贾文杰, 马璐琳. 大丽花花粉活力及离体萌发研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 52-61.
[2]	李露, 包欣怡, 陈智勇. 非洲紫罗兰离体快繁体系的建立[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 58-62.
[3]	李佳欢, 王晓慧, 姜明国, 宋福强, 常伟. 基于响应面法优化印度梨形孢培养基[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(3): 102-109.
[4]	马思琦, 李畅, 樊阳, 孙莹, 尹紫良, 林宜萌, 葛菁萍. 产油单针藻的最适培养基筛选及产油特性提升[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(27): 157-164.
[5]	白艳荣, 蒋亚莲, 王进英. 腊花组培快繁体系研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(16): 46-50.
[6]	杨晓燕, 叶伟伟, 魏善强, 张龙, 黄俊. 一株巨大芽孢杆菌发酵培养基的优化及解磷效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(15): 105-112.
[7]	朱海云, 马瑜, 柯杨, 李勃. 抗猕猴桃细菌性溃疡病蜡样芽孢杆菌MA23培养基及发酵条件优化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(7): 112-118.
[8]	白一苇, 张世壮, 王雁楠, 高晓茹, 牛金彪, 何绍贞. 植物组织培养中抗污染培养基新配方的探索[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(6): 89-96.
[9]	杨颖, 康兰, 耿新, 陈玉珍, 卢存福. 植物原生质体再生细胞壁研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(4): 25-30.
[10]	董鲁浩, 李晓慧, 宋语宁, 王贺, 李兴国, 别晓敏. 5-氮杂胞嘧啶核苷降低小麦成熟胚再生频率[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(3): 26-30.
[11]	贾小霞, 齐恩芳, 刘石, 黄伟, 吕和平, 文国宏, 马胜. MS培养基不同成分对马铃薯脱毒试管苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(18): 25-30.
[12]	黄蒙蒙, 何剑波, 石会玲, 凌宏志, 葛菁萍. Chlorella vulgar HDA04生长条件的初步确立[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(12): 79-85.
[13]	王春芳, 刘晶晶, 李伟, 栾素荣, 史慎奎, 刘国庆. 糜子愈伤诱导及再分化最适条件研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(9): 94-99.
[14]	古瑜, 刘艳军, 韩启厚, 于海龙, 孙德岭. 荚用菜豆松散型胚性愈伤组织保持体系的诱导方法[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(33): 114-119.
[15]	刘志新, 姚娜, 刘灵芝. 2株可培养细菌氮代谢特性的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(30): 106-111.