富氮控氧法对三种虫态烟草甲杀灭效果

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17020051

中国农学通报 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (31): 112-116.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17020051

所属专题：烟草种植与生产

富氮控氧法对三种虫态烟草甲杀灭效果

彭琛,林锐峰,任胜超,金保锋,杨庆

广东中烟工业有限责任公司,广东中烟工业有限责任公司,广东中烟工业有限责任公司,广东中烟工业有限责任公司,广东中烟工业有限责任公司

收稿日期:2017-02-15 修回日期:2017-04-07 接受日期:2017-04-18 出版日期:2017-11-27 发布日期:2017-11-27
通讯作者: 任胜超
基金资助:
广东中烟工业有限责任公司资助项目“物理气调片烟智能养护系统的开发与设计”（粤烟工[2015]科字第012 号）。

Mortality of Three Stages of Lasioderma serricorne in Low Oxygen Environment Controlled by Nitrogen

Received:2017-02-15 Revised:2017-04-07 Accepted:2017-04-18 Online:2017-11-27 Published:2017-11-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 富氮控氧法是一种环保、高效的新型烟叶养护方法，该方法通过充氮气方式调节贮烟密闭空间内的氧气浓度，从而实现杀灭烟虫和烟叶养护的目的。为探明富氮控氧法对烟草甲的控制效果，对烟叶养护过程中不同低氧浓度对卵、幼虫和成虫三种不同虫态烟草甲的致死效果运用probit法进行了分析。结果表明，富氮控氧法杀灭三种不同虫态烟草甲所需时间均大大短于化学气调法；1.5%~2%低氧浓度环境对三种虫态烟草甲综合致死效果较好。富氮控氧法在烟叶养护过程中能够有效杀灭烟草甲。

关键词: 遥感, 遥感, 城市化, 湿地, 小气候效应, 城市热岛效应

Abstract: The new technology which modified oxygen concentration of an enclosed space by nitrogen was safe and effective for tobacco storage. Eggs, larva, and adults of Lasioderma serricorne were exposed in different low oxygen environment, and Probit analysis was used to determine the LT99 values. The results indicated that the time to reach LT99 of eggs, larvae and adults of L. serricorne in low oxygen environment produced by nitrogen generating equipment were much shorter than that in low oxygen environment produced by chemical method. Generally, low oxygen concentration between 1.5% and 2% was more effective to control eggs, larvae and adults of L. serricorne. The low oxygen environment produced by nitrogen could kill L. serricorne effectively during tobacco storage.

彭琛,林锐峰,任胜超,金保锋,杨庆. 富氮控氧法对三种虫态烟草甲杀灭效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(31): 112-116.

参考文献

[1]罗梅浩, 马淑健, 殷花娥, 等. 烟草甲Lasioderma serricorne Fabricius对储存烟叶危害损失的初步研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2003, 37(3): 249-252.Luo M H, Ma S J, Yin H E, et al. A preliminary study on the loss of stored tobacco leaves caused by Lasioderma serricorne Fabricius[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2003, 37(3): 249-252.
[2]张小霞, 梁振普, 邱立友, 等. 烟仓害虫的生物防治[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 223(2): 379-383.Zhang X X, Liang Z P, Qiu L Y, et al. Biocontrol of Tobacco storage pests[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 223(2): 379-383.
[3]汤朝起, 张俊, 陆益敏. 烟草甲和烟草粉螟的防治研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2000, (4): 46-48.Tang C Q, Zhang J, Lu Y M. Prevention and cure research of L.Serricorne and E.elutella[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2000(4): 46-48.
[4]柳琼友, 顾丁, 陈文龙. 烟草甲的防治研究进展[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2007, 46(5): 841-844.Liu Q Y, Gu D, Chen W L. Progress on the control of lasioderma serricorne[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 46(5): 841-844.
[5]汤朝起, 姚衡洲, 张俊, 等. 储烟害虫防治过程中减少磷化氢使用量和排放量的措施[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 31(1): 16-21.Tang C Q, Yao H Z, Zhang J, et al. Reducing phosphine usage and atmospheric emission during insect control process in tobacco storage[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2011, 31(1): 16-21.
[6]杨庆, 常勇, 王文, 等. 烟叶物理气调法密封降氧工艺研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2013, 34(3): 79-83.Yang Q, Chang Y, Wang W, et al. De-oxygenation technology in sealed tobacco stack with physical modified atmosphere method[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2013, 34(3): 79-83.
[7]沈禄恒. 片烟仓储方式概述[J].现代农业科技, 2011, 23: 44-48.Shen L H. Overview on the storage modes of tobacco[J].Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2011, 23: 44-48.
[8]莫敏, 卢佐昌, 王广, 等. 富氮低氧储粮防虫试验[J]. 粮油仓储科技通讯, 2010, 26(5): 32-34.Mo M, Lu Z C, Wang G, et al. Experiment of prevention and control of pests under rich nitrogen and low oxygen atmosphere in grain stocking[J].Liang You Cang Chu Ke Ji Tong Xun, 2010, 26(5): 32-34.
[9]李森. 富氮低氧储粮系统的研发及应用[J]. 粮食加工, 2011, 36(6): 69-72.Li S. Research and application of the grain stocking system under rich nitrogen and low oxygen atmosphere[J].Grain Processing, 2011,36(6): 69-72.
[10]徐徜徉, 曹义鸣, 赵勇, 等. 膜分离技术与变压吸附技术结合制取高浓度氧的研究[J]. 化工进展, 2003, 22: 137-140.Xu C Y, Cao Y M, Zhao Y, et al. Research on producing high concentration oxygen through combined process of membrane separation and pressure swing adsorption[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2003, 22: 137-140.
[11]ShlomoSN. The use of modified and controlled atmospheres for the disinfestation of stored products[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2012, 85(3): 301-322.
[12]Toshihiro I, Naoto F. Susceptibility of the cigarette beetle Lasioderma serricorne (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) to hypoxia[J]. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 2012, 47(4): 429-432.
[13]Jeremy R A. The biology ofSLasioderma serricorne[J]. Journal of Stored Products Research, 1993, 29(4): 291-303.
[14]Ryan L. Postpharvest tobacco infestation control[M]. New York: Springer US, 1999: 93-109.
[15]Rajendran S, Narasimhan K S. Phosphine resistance in the cigarette beetle Lasioderma serricorneS(Coleoptera: Anobiidae) and overcoming control failures during fumigation of stored tobacco[J]. International Journal of Pest Management, 1994, 40(2): 207-210.
[16]Adler C, Corinth H G, Reichmuth C. Alternatives to Pesticides in Stored-Product IPM[M]. New York: Springer US, 2000: 105-146.
[17]Eliabetta C, Paola M, Piero C. Mortality of Tribolium confusum J. du Val (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in controlled atmospheres at different oxygen percentages[J]. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2009, 45(1): 10-13.
[18]Conyers S T, Bell C H. The effect of modified atmospheres on the survival of the eggs of four storage mite species[J]. Experimental Applied Acarology, 2003, 31(1): 115-130.
[19]Mbata G N, Mario J, Phillips T W, et al. Mortality of Life Stages of Cowpea Weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) Exposed to Low Pressure at Different Temperatures[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2005, 98(3): 1070-1075.
[20]Cheng W N,Lei J X,Ahn J E,et al. Effects of decreased O2Sand elevated CO2Son survival, development, and gene expression in cowpea bruchids[J]. Journal of Insect Physiology, 2012, 58(6): 792-800.

富氮控氧法对三种虫态烟草甲杀灭效果

Mortality of Three Stages of Lasioderma serricorne in Low Oxygen Environment Controlled by Nitrogen

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	白玛仁增, 顿玉多吉, 德例归吉, 德吉央宗, 益西多吉, 边巴次仁. 星-地结合对水稻高温热害监测模型的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 133-141.
[2]	薛文瑞, 杨自辉, 张永, 郭树江, 王强强, 张剑挥. 民勤荒漠绿洲植被覆盖对地下水和降水变化的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 102-109.
[3]	刘宏元, 周志花, 王娜娜, 王艳君. 黄河三角洲自然保护区湿地生态系统健康评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(27): 74-78.
[4]	麻磊, 黄晓君, Ganbat Dashzebegd, Mungunkhuyag Ariunaad, Tsagaantsooj Nanzadd, Altanchimeg Dorjsuren, 包刚, 佟斯琴, 包玉海, Enkhnasan Davaadorj. 不同遥感传感器监测森林虫害研究进展与展望[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(26): 91-99.
[5]	赵颖, 王飞. 白洋淀湿地CH₄和CO₂排放特征及其影响因素初探[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(2): 63-70.
[6]	付晓玲, 倪红伟, 刘赢男, 王建波, 王继丰. 不同氮素形态对湿地小叶章氮吸收和N₂O排放的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(11): 15-21.
[7]	柴春荣, 倪红伟, 刘赢男, 张荣涛, 杨基先. 模拟雪被变化下三江平原湿地土壤理化性质的动态响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(5): 31-37.
[8]	魏玉涛, 刘明欢, 刘可, 普薇如. 多尺度土壤水监测研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(26): 140-145.
[9]	游萍, 肖群英, 王丹, 尚桃, 杨敬义, 李亚梅, 薛晓辉. 草海湿地黑色沼泽土不同利用方式可培养微生物的多样性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(26): 74-79.
[10]	纪树志. 极旱荒漠区湿地植被动态变化监测——以甘肃敦煌阳关国家级自然保护区为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(26): 105-109.
[11]	李巧云, 廖菊阳, 胥雯, 刘艳, 廖鹏, 吴林世, 宋胤, 王玲, 张娟, 黄雅奇, 谭知虎. 松雅湖湿地公园水环境特征及富营养化评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(25): 85-91.
[12]	王利民, 刘佳, 季富华. 中国农业遥感技术应用现状及发展趋势[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(25): 138-143.
[13]	徐扬, 吴志, 刘晓荣, 陈金峰, 韩庆斌, 刘平, 王佳友, 王代容. 基于Web of Science的人工湿地研究计量分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(25): 20-21.
[14]	纪伟帅, 陈红艳, 王淑婷, 张玉婷. 基于无人机多光谱的华北平原花铃期棉花叶片SPAD建模方法研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(22): 143-150.
[15]	杨阳, 谌多. 西北半干湿地区雨水花园植物应用及适宜性评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(2): 54-60.