稻瘟病菌与水稻互作研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190800517

中国农学通报 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (24): 125-131.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190800517

所属专题：水稻

稻瘟病菌与水稻互作研究进展

李珊¹^,²(), 杜春梅¹^,²()

¹黑龙江大学农业微生物技术教育部工程研究中心,哈尔滨 150500
²黑龙江大学生命科学学院,黑龙江省普通高校微生物重点实验室,哈尔滨 150080

收稿日期:2019-08-10 修回日期:2019-09-19 出版日期:2020-08-25 发布日期:2020-08-20
通讯作者: 杜春梅
作者简介:李珊,女,1996年出生,黑龙江哈尔滨人,研究生,研究方向：微生物资源挖掘与利用。通信地址：150080 黑龙江省哈尔滨市南岗区学府路74号黑龙江大学生命科学学院501室,Tel：0451-86609134,E-mail：328737154@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目子课题“枯草芽孢杆菌脂肽高产菌株的选育及发酵条件优化”(2017YFD0201101);国家自然科学基金“侧孢短芽孢杆菌与枯草芽孢杆菌共培养抗菌活性增强的生态学机理”(31370511)

The Interaction Between Magnaporthe oryzae and Rice: Research Progress

Li Shan¹^,²(), Du Chunmei¹^,²()

¹Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Microbiology Technology, Ministry of Education, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150500
²Key Laboratory of Microbiology, College of Heilongjiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080

Received:2019-08-10 Revised:2019-09-19 Online:2020-08-25 Published:2020-08-20
Contact: Du Chunmei

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了更好的防控稻瘟病的发生,为水稻育种工作和新药研发提供科学依据,深入了解稻瘟病菌(Magnaporthe oryzae)与水稻相互作用的机制是非常必要的。本文归纳了稻瘟病菌侵染水稻的机制、水稻对稻瘟病菌侵染的信号识别及其下游反应以及识别后诱导水稻产生的防御反应机制,分析了水稻防御相关基因的表达调控以及利用分子育种手段提高水稻抗病性的相关策略。稻瘟病菌侵染水稻后,植株会通过细胞壁加厚、病程相关蛋白表达以及病原菌侵入位点细胞程序性死亡等系统免疫反应来抵御稻瘟病菌的侵染;因此指出通过基因工程手段诱导植物发生免疫反应来抵御稻瘟病菌的危害具有重要的现实意义,也是防治病害最有效和最经济的方法;而且,作为研究病原菌—植物互作的模式系统,深入了解稻瘟病菌与水稻的互作机制,也为通过诱导水稻防御基因的表达来防治其他重要真菌性病害提供了科学依据。

关键词: 免疫反应, 互作, 稻瘟病菌, 水稻, 育种

Abstract:

To better prevent and control the occurrence of rice blast and provide the scientific basis for rice breeding and drug discovery, it is very necessary to explore the mechanism of interaction between Magnaporthe oryzae and rice. In this paper, the mechanism of M. oryzae infecting rice, the signal recognition and downstream response of rice to M. oryzae infection and the defense response mechanism induced by the fungi were summarized, and the expression and regulation of defense-related genes in rice and the molecular breeding strategies for improving rice disease resistance were analyzed. After M. oryzae infection, rice plant could resist the infection by self-defensive systemic response, such as thickening cell wall, expression of pathogenesis-related proteins and programmed cell death at the invasion site of M. oryzae, etc. It is pointed out that using genetic engineering means to induce plant immune response to resist the harm of M. oryzae has important practical significance, and it is also the most effective and cost-optimal method to control rice blast. Moreover, as a model system to study the pathogen-plant interaction, deeply understand the interaction mechanism between M. oryzae and rice can provide a scientific basis for the prevention and control of other important fungal diseases by inducing the expression of rice defense genes.

Key words: immune response, interaction, Magnaporthe oryzae, rice, breeding

中图分类号:

Q-31

李珊, 杜春梅. 稻瘟病菌与水稻互作研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(24): 125-131.

Li Shan, Du Chunmei. The Interaction Between Magnaporthe oryzae and Rice: Research Progress[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(24): 125-131.

参考文献 54

[1]	Dean R, Kan J A L V, Pretorius Z A, et al. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology[J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2012,13(4):414-430. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x URL
[2]	袁军海. 中国稻瘟病菌有性世代的研究进展[J]. 河北北方学院学报, 1999(3):48-50.
[3]	郭晓宇, 李玲, 董波, 等. 利用荧光蛋白标记研究稻瘟病菌有性世代的细胞结构[J]. 中国细胞生物学学报, 2018,40(7):1138-1145.
[4]	孙国昌. 关于水稻稻瘟病病原菌学名的正确使用[J]. 真菌学报, 1994,13(2):158-159.
[5]	李成云, 李家瑞, 沈锐, 等. 几种寄主植物上分离的梨孢菌研究—云南省稻瘟病菌有性世代研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016(2):83-87.
[6]	刘永锋, 俞文渊, 陈志谊, 等. 水稻稻瘟病菌孢子萌发特性及其分泌蛋白质研究[C]. 中国植物病理学会学术年会, 2010.
[7]	Skamnioti P, Gurr S J. Against the grain: safeguarding rice from rice blast disease[J]. Trends in Biotechnology, 2009,27(3):141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.12.002 URL
[8]	Pooja K, Katoch A. Past, present and future of rice blast management[J]. Plant Science Today, 2014,1(3):165-173. doi: 10.14719/pst URL
[9]	Kawahara Y, Bastide M D L, Hamilton J P, et al. Improvement of the Oryza sativa Nipponbare reference genome using next generation sequence and optical map data[J]. Rice, 2013,6(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1939-8433-6-4 URL pmid: 24280374
[10]	Bogdanove A J. Protein-protein interactions in pathogen recognition by plants[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2002,50(6):981-989. doi: 10.1023/A:1021263027600 URL
[11]	Ma S, Song Q, Tao H, et al. Prediction of protein-protein interactions between fungus (Magnaporthe grisea) and rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2017, 1-9. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbm058 URL pmid: 18083722
[12]	Wilson R A, Talbot N J. Under pressure: investigating the biology of plant infection by Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2009,7(3):185-195. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2032 URL pmid: 19219052
[13]	Silipo A, Erbs G, Shinya T, et al. Glyco-conjugates as elicitors or suppressors of plant innate immunity[J]. Glycobiology, 2010,20(4):406-419. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwp201 URL pmid: 20018942
[14]	Skamnioti P, Gurr S J. Magnaporthe grisea cutinase2 mediates appressorium differentiation and host penetration and is required for full virulence[J]. Plant Cell, 2007,19(8):2674-2689. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.051219 URL pmid: 17704215
[15]	Van V B, Itoh K, Nguyen Q B, et al. Cellulases belonging to glycoside hydrolase families 6 and 7 contribute to the virulence of Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Molecular plant-microbe interactions: MPMI, 2012,25(9):1135. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-02-12-0043-R URL pmid: 22852807
[16]	Nguyen Q B, Itoh K, Vu B V, et al. Simultaneous silencing of endo-β-1,4 xylanase genes reveals their roles in the virulence of Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Molecular Microbiology, 2011,81(4):1008-1019. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07746.x URL
[17]	Howard R J, Ferrari M A, Roach D H, et al. Penetration of hard substrates by a fungus employing enormous turgor pressures[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1991,88(24):11281-11284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.24.11281 URL
[18]	Foster A J, Ryder L S, Kershaw M J, et al. The role of glycerol in the pathogenic lifestyle of the rice blast fungusr, Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2017,19(3):1008-1016. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13688 URL pmid: 28165657
[19]	Wu J G, Wang Y M, Park S Y, et al. Secreted alpha-N-arabinofuranosidase B protein is required for the full virulence of Magnaporthe oryzae and triggers host defences[J]. Plos One, 2016,11(10):e0165149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165149 URL pmid: 27764242
[20]	Mentlak T A, Kombrink A, Shinya T, et al. Effector-mediated suppression of chitin-triggered immunity by Magnaporthe oryzae is necessary for rice blast disease[J]. The Plant Cell, 2012,24(1):322-335. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.092957 URL pmid: 22267486
[21]	Liu B, Li J F, Ao Y, et al. Lysin motif-containing proteins LYP4 and LYP6 play dual roles in peptidoglycan and chitin perception in rice innate immunity[J]. The Plant Cell, 2012,24(8):3406-3419. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.102475 URL pmid: 22872757
[22]	Nasir F, Tian L, Chang C, et al. Current understanding of pattern-triggered immunity and hormone-mediated defense in rice (Oryza sativa) in response to Magnaporthe oryzae infection[J]. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 2017,11. doi: 10.1006/scdb.2000.0182 URL pmid: 11105902
[23]	Azizi P, Rafii M Y, Abdullah S N, et al. Toward understanding of rice innate immunity against Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2016,36(1):165-174. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2014.946883 URL pmid: 25198435
[24]	Gust A A, Biswas R, Lenz H D, et al. Bacteria-derived peptidoglycans constitute pathogen-associated molecular patterns triggering innate immunity in Arabidopsis[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2007,282(44):32338-32348. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704886200 URL pmid: 17761682
[25]	Liu W, Liu J, Ning Y, et al. Recent progress in understanding PAMP- and Effector-Triggered Immunity against the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Molecular Plant, 2013,6(3):605-620. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst015 URL
[26]	Chen X, Ronald P C. Innate immunity in rice[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2011,16(8):1360-1385.
[27]	Kaku H, Nishizawa Y, Ishii Minami N, et al. Plant cells recognize chitin fragments for defense signaling through a plasma membrane receptor[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006,103(29):11086-11091. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508882103 URL
[28]	Shimizu T, Nakano T, Takamizawa D, et al. Two LysM receptor molecules, CEBiP and OsCERK1, cooperatively regulate chitin elicitor signaling in rice[J]. The Plant Journal, 2010,64(2):204-214. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04324.x URL pmid: 21070404
[29]	Kishimoto K, Kouzai Y, Kaku H, et al. Perception of the chitin oligosaccharides contributes to disease resistance to blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in rice[J]. The Plant Journal, 2010,64(2):343-354. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04328.x URL pmid: 21070413
[30]	Akamatsu A, Wong H, Fujiwara M, et al. An OsCEBiP/OsCERK1-OsRacGEF1-OsRac1 module is an essential early component of chitin-induced rice immunity[J]. Cell Host & Microbe, 2013,13(4):465-476. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.03.007 URL pmid: 23601108
[31]	Petutschnig E K, Jones A M E, Serazetdinova L, et al. The lysin motif receptor-like kinase (LysM-RLK) CERK1 is a major chitin-binding protein in Arabidopsis thaliana and subject to chitin-induced phosphorylation[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2010,285(37):28902-28911. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.116657 URL pmid: 20610395
[32]	Willmann R, Lajunen H M, Erbs G, et al. Arabidopsis lysin-motif proteins LyM1 LyM3 CERK1 mediate bacterial peptidoglycan sensing and immunity to bacterial infection[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011,108(49):19824-19829. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112862108 URL
[33]	Yamaguchi K, Yamada K, Ishikawa K, et al. A receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase targeted by a plant pathogen effector is directly phosphorylated by the chitin receptor and mediates rice immunity[J]. Cell host & microbe, 2013,13(3):347-357. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.02.007 URL pmid: 23498959
[34]	Yamada K, Yamaguchi K, Yoshimura S, et al. Conservation of chitin-induced mapk signaling pathways in rice and arabidopsis[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2017,58(6):993-1002. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcx042 URL pmid: 28371870
[35]	Mapk G. Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plants: a new nomenclature[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2002,7(02):1360-1385.
[36]	Chujo T, Miyamoto K, Ogawa S, et al. Overexpression of phosphomimic mutated OsWRKY53 leads to enhanced blast resistance in rice[J]. Plos One, 2014,9(6):e98737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098737 URL pmid: 24892523
[37]	Rao K P, Richa T, Kumar K, et al. In silico analysis reveals 75 members of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase gene family in rice[J]. DNA Research, 2010,17(3):139-153. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsq011 URL pmid: 20395279
[38]	Tena G, Boudsocq M, Sheen J. Protein kinase signaling networks in plant innate immunity[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2011,14(5):519-529. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.05.006 URL
[39]	Zhang T, Chen S, Harmon A C. Protein-protein interactions in plant mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015,67(3):607. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv508 URL pmid: 26646897
[40]	Kishi Kaboshi M, Okada K, Kurimoto L, et al. A rice fungal MAMP-responsive MAPK cascade regulates metabolic flow to antimicrobial metabolite synjournal[J]. The Plant Journal, 2010,63(4):599-612. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04264.x URL pmid: 20525005
[41]	Shinya T, Yamaguchi K, Desaki Y, et al. Selective regulation of the chitin-induced defense response by the Arabidopsis receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase PBL27[J]. The Plant Journal, 2014,79(1):56-66. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12535 URL pmid: 24750441
[42]	Yamada K, Yamaguchi K, Shirakawa T, et al. The Arabidopsis CERK1-associated kinase PBL27 connects chitin perception to MAPK activation[J]. The EMBO Journal, 2016(35):2468-2483.
[43]	Rasmussen M W, Roux M, Petersen M, et al. Map kinase cascades in Arabidopsis innate immunity[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2012,3, 169. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00169 URL pmid: 22837762
[44]	Coll N S, Epple P, Dangl J L. Programmed cell death in the plant immune system[J]. Cell Death and Differentiation, 2011,18(8):1247-1256. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.37 URL
[45]	张红生, 吴云雨, 鲍永美. 水稻与稻瘟病菌互作机制研究进展[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2012,35(5):1-8.
[46]	Boller T, Felix G. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2009,60(1):379-406. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346 URL
[47]	Hogenhout S A, HogenhVan der Hoornout R A, Terauchi R, et al. Emerging concepts in effector biology of plant-associated organisms[J]. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 2009,22:115-122. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-2-0115 URL pmid: 19132864
[48]	Montesano M, Brader G, Palva E T. Pathogen derived elicitors: searching for receptors in plants[J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2003,4(1):73-79. doi: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00150.x URL pmid: 20569365
[49]	Leung H, Raghavan C, Zhou B, et al. Allele mining and enhanced genetic recombination for rice breeding[J]. Rice, 2015,8(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12284-014-0034-1 URL pmid: 26054238
[50]	Azizi P, Rafii M Y, Abdullah S N, et al. Toward understanding of rice innate immunity against Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2016,36(1):165-174. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2014.946883 URL pmid: 25198435
[51]	李智强, 王国梁, 刘文德. 水稻抗病分子机制研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2016,32(10):97-108. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2016.10.010 URL
[52]	Sadegh A, Rafii M Y, Mahmoodreza S, et al. Molecular Breeding Strategy and Challenges Towards Improvement of Blast Disease Resistance in Rice Crop[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2015,6:886. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00886 URL pmid: 26635817
[53]	Smith P J. The Pi40 gene for durable resistance to rice blast and molecular analysis of Pi40-advanced backcross breeding lines[J]. Phytopathology, 2009,99(3):243. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-3-0243 URL pmid: 19203276
[54]	郝鲲, 马建, 程治军, 等. 水稻抗稻瘟病基因资源与分子育种策略[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2013,14(3):479-485.

稻瘟病菌与水稻互作研究进展

The Interaction Between Magnaporthe oryzae and Rice: Research Progress

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 54

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	白玛仁增, 顿玉多吉, 德例归吉, 德吉央宗, 益西多吉, 边巴次仁. 星-地结合对水稻高温热害监测模型的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 133-141.
[2]	罗先富, 刘文强, 潘孝武, 董铮, 刘三雄, 刘利成, 阳标仁, 盛新年, 李小湘. 应用剩余杂合体衍生的近等基因系定位水稻株高QTL[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 1-5.
[3]	黄钰, 陈斌, 肖关丽. 云南哈尼族地方水稻‘月亮谷’对褐飞虱取食危害的生理反应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 123-129.
[4]	李兴华, 王欢, 张盛, 蔡星星, 周强, 周楠. 氮肥用量与运筹方式对晚籼稻产量及花后干物质积累与转运的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 6-13.
[5]	姚洁, 程磊, 周涛, 雷鹏堃, 朱月健, 马磊. 国内太子参种质资源与遗传育种研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 62-66.
[6]	王一凡, 劳晓璨, 余丽萍, 叶海龙. 水稻‘甬优15’分期播种的气象条件适宜性试验研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 106-109.
[7]	李雪枫, 王坚, 叶晓园, 张秀婷, 王丽学. 苦瓜植株水浸提液对水稻种子萌发和秧苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 1-7.
[8]	梁增基, 慕芳, 王楠. 渭北高原小麦育种的演变与展望[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 8-14.
[9]	闫蕴韬, 何兮, 张海清, 贺记外. 水稻种子耐贮性研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 1-8.
[10]	翟彩娇, 张蛟, 崔士友, 陈澎军. 盐逆境对耐盐水稻穗部性状及产量构成因素的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(4): 1-9.
[11]	李荣田, 时柳, 黄丽莹, 刘长华. 利用分子选择培育水稻‘吉粳88’(hd2/hd4)导入系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(33): 1-9.
[12]	伊嘉雯, 冯棣, 朱崴, 亓娜, 滕奉魁, 卢小引. 不同品种水稻发芽阶段耐盐性对比研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(33): 10-14.
[13]	张博, 石峰, 宋福强. AMF复合菌剂对寒地水稻光合作用和生长效应的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(33): 15-22.
[14]	许丹阳, 李虹颖, 孙义祥, 邬刚, 王家宝, 袁嫚嫚, 王佩旋, 张祥明, 束孝海. 不同比例有机无机肥配施对水稻产量与氮素利用率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 1-5.
[15]	王洋, 张瑞, 周雨晴, 刘永昊, 刘高生, 戴其根. 基于文献计量的国内水稻耐盐性研究态势分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 147-153.