马铃薯致病疫霉拮抗细菌研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0546

中国农学通报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (14): 136-140.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0546

所属专题：植物保护；马铃薯

马铃薯致病疫霉拮抗细菌研究进展

高梦颖¹^,²^,³(), 付海燕¹^,²^,³^,⁴(), 孙丛¹^,²^,³, 王颜波¹^,²^,³, 刘春光¹^,²^,³, 马玉堃¹^,²^,³, 杨峰山¹^,²^,³()

¹黑龙江大学农业微生物技术教育部工程研究中心,哈尔滨 150500
²黑龙江大学生命科学学院,黑龙江省寒地生态修复与资源利用重点实验室,哈尔滨 150080
³黑龙江大学生命科学学院,黑龙江省普通高校分子生物学重点实验室,哈尔滨 150080
⁴东北林业大学盐碱地生物资源环境研究中心150040

收稿日期:2020-10-13 修回日期:2020-12-29 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-05-19
通讯作者: 付海燕,杨峰山
作者简介:高梦颖,女,1995年出生,山东滨州人,研究生,主要从事作物害虫防治和农田土壤修复研究。通信地址:150080 黑龙江省哈尔滨市学府路74号黑龙江大学生命科学学院,E-mail: 1729252512@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目“马铃薯化肥农药减施技术集成研究与示范”(2018YFD0200800)

Antagonistic Bacteria of Phytophthora infestans in Potato: A Review

Gao Mengying¹^,²^,³(), Fu Haiyan¹^,²^,³^,⁴(), Sun Cong¹^,²^,³, Wang Yanbo¹^,²^,³, Liu Chunguang¹^,²^,³, Ma Yukun¹^,²^,³, Yang Fengshan¹^,²^,³()

¹Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Microbiology Technology, Ministry of Education, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150500
²Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration and Resource Utilization for Cold Region, School of Life Sciences, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080
³Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, College of Heilongjiang, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080
⁴Alkali Soil Natural Environmental Science Center, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040

Received:2020-10-13 Revised:2020-12-29 Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-05-19
Contact: Fu Haiyan,Yang Fengshan

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了解决马铃薯致病疫霉侵染马铃薯导致其死亡,进而造成马铃薯单位种植产量低的问题。本文从拮抗菌入手,归纳分析细菌类拮抗菌中的主要拮抗菌中芽孢杆菌、假单胞菌和粘细菌对马铃薯致病疫霉的抑制作用。同时,在总结前人研究的基础上,笔者认为在拮抗菌应用方面,可以采用多对一的新型平板对峙筛菌模式来模拟复杂条件下拮抗菌的拮抗作用,以期得到稳定的拮抗菌;并指出应从定植能力和根际微生物影响方面对拮抗菌实际应用的可行性进行研究;此外,提出未来对拮抗菌抑制马铃薯致病疫霉的探究应从表型层面的研究深入到分子层面,以期能成功从源头找寻抑制马铃薯致病疫霉的答案。

关键词: 拮抗细菌, 马铃薯, 致病疫霉, 防治, 措施

Abstract:

The aim is to solve the problem of death caused by Phytophthora infestans and low yield per unit in potato planting. In this paper, we started with antagonistic bacteria, summarized and analyzed the inhibitory effects of Bacillus, Pseudomonas and myxobacteria on Phytophthora infestans in potato. At the same time, based on the previous studies, in the application of antagonistic bacteria, we used the new many-to-one plate confrontation sieve model to simulate the antagonistic action of antagonistic bacteria, in order to get stable antagonistic bacteria. We pointed out that the feasibility of practical application of antagonistic bacteria should be studied from colonization ability and influence of rhizospheric microorganisms. In addition, we proposed that the future exploration of antagonistic antibacterial inhibition of potato Phytophthora infestans should go from the phenotypic level to the molecular level, in order to successfully find the answer from the source to inhibit Phytophthora infestans in potato.

Key words: antagonistic bacteria, potato, Phytophthora infestans, prevention, measures

中图分类号:

S567

高梦颖, 付海燕, 孙丛, 王颜波, 刘春光, 马玉堃, 杨峰山. 马铃薯致病疫霉拮抗细菌研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(14): 136-140.

Gao Mengying, Fu Haiyan, Sun Cong, Wang Yanbo, Liu Chunguang, Ma Yukun, Yang Fengshan. Antagonistic Bacteria of Phytophthora infestans in Potato: A Review[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(14): 136-140.

参考文献 39

[1]	Haverkort A, Boonekamp P, Hutten R, et al. Societal costs of late blight in potato and prospects of durable resistance through cisgenic modification[J]. Potato Research, 2008,51(1):47-57. doi: 10.1007/s11540-008-9089-y URL
[2]	Jahan S N, Sman A K, Corcoran P, et al. Plant-mediated gene silencing restricts growth of the potato late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015,66(9):2785-2794. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv094 URL
[3]	Han M, Liu G, Li J P, et al. Phytophthora infestans field isolates from Gansu province,China are genetically highly diverse and show a high frequency of self fertility[J]. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 2013,60(1):79-88. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12010 URL
[4]	Chmielaz M, Sobkowiak S. Diversity of phytoph-thora infestans from poland[J]. Plant pathotogy, 2014,63(1):203-211.
[5]	Arora R K. Late blight disease of potato and its management[J]. Potato Journal, 2014,41(1):16-40.
[6]	Cepedes M C, Cardenas M E, Vargas A M, et al. Physiological and molecular characterization of phytophthora infestans isolates from the Central colombian Andean Resion[J]. Revista lberoamericana de Micologia, 2013,30(2):81-87.
[7]	Vaibhav K S, Shailbala, Pundhir V S , et al. Forecasting models for potato late blight management-a review[J]. Agricultural Reviews, 2013,34(2):87-96.
[8]	丁海滨, 卢扬, 邓禄军. 马铃薯晚疫病发病机理及防治措施[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2006,34(5):78-81.
[9]	Anouk G, Mout D V, Denise B, et al. The anti-phytophthora effect of selected potato-associated Pseudomonas strains: from the laboratory to the field[J].Frontiers in Microbiology, 2015,27(6) 1309.
[10]	VJ Carrión, Perez-Jaramillo J, Cordovez V, et al. Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root microbiome[J]. Science, 2019,366(6465):606-612. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw9285 URL
[11]	Kroon L, Henk B, Decock A. The Phytophthora genus anno 2012[J]. Phytopathology, 2012,102(4):348-364. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-11-0025 URL
[12]	Wu Y G, Huang S L, Li W J, et al. Identification and mating type determination of Phytophthora strains causing blight on two cucurbit crops in South China[J]. Tropical Plant Pathology, 2016,41(1):24-32. doi: 10.1007/s40858-016-0066-8 URL
[13]	祝菊澧, 梁静思, 王伟伟, 等. 马铃薯致病疫霉研究进展[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020,47(3):952-966.
[14]	Wiphawee L, Vu A L, Ah-Fong A M V , et al. How Does Phytophthora infestans Evade Control Efforts? Modern Insight Into the Late Blight Disease[J]. Phytopathology, 2018,108(8):916-924. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-18-0130-IA URL
[15]	Damtewa E, Tafessea S, Lied R, et al. Leeuwis Diagnosis of management of bacterial wilt and late blight in potato in Ethiopia: A systems thinking perspective[J]. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 2018,86(87):12-27.
[16]	Ryu C M, Kim J, Choi O. Improvement of biological control capacity of Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 by seed pelleting on sesame[J]. Biological Control, 2006,39(3):282-289. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.04.014 URL
[17]	Keerthana U, Nagendran K, Raguchander T, et al. Deciphering the Role of Bacillus subtilis var. amyloliquefaciens in the Management of Late Blight Pathogen of Potato, Phytophthora infestans(Article)[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India Section B-Biological Sciences, 2018,88(3):1071-1080. doi: 10.1007/s40011-017-0842-3 URL
[18]	Wang Y, Zhang C, Liang J, et al. Surfactin and fengycin B extracted from Bacillus pumilus W-7 provide protection against potato late blight via distinct and synergistic mechanisms[J]. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology, 2020,104:7467-7481. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10773-y URL
[19]	赵雅, 张岱, 杨志辉, 等. 贝莱斯芽胞杆菌HN-Q-8菌株发酵液稳定性测定及抑菌活性成分分析[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020,47(2):490-499.
[20]	Caulier S, Gillis A, Colau G, et al. Versatile Antagonistic Activities of Soil-Borne Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. against Phytophthora infestans and Other Potato Pathogens[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018,9(143):1-15. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00001 URL
[21]	吴艳清, 王游游, 王畅, 等. 枯草芽孢杆菌WL2脂肽粗提物对致病疫霉的抑制作用及其分离鉴定[J]. 河北大学学报:自然科学版, 2018,38(6):632-639.
[22]	Bhimanagoud K, Riaz Mahmood S N, Nagesha M S , et al. Mohan Chavan b Field application of Bacillus subtilis isolates for controlling late blight disease of potato caused by Phytophthora infestans[J]. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 2019,22(2019):101366. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101366 URL
[23]	Richter B S, Ivors K, Shi W, et al. Cellulase Activity as a Mechanism for Suppression of Phytophthora Root Rot in Mulches[J]. Phytopathology, 2011,101(2):223-230. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-10-0125 URL
[24]	Grenvillebriggs L J, Anderson V L, Fugelstad J, et al. Cellulose synjournal in Phytophthora infestans is required for normal appressorium formation and successful infection of potato[J]. Plant Cell, 2008 20(3):720-738. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.052043 URL
[25]	叶旻硕, 马艳, 黄有军. 生防芽孢杆菌防控辣椒疫病研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020,36(15):123-129.
[26]	张荷花, 蒋继志, 张红霞, 等. 拮抗菌W-7抑制马铃薯致病疫霉机理初步研究[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2019,39(9):5-20.
[27]	Lazazzara V, Perazzolli M, Pertot I, et al. Growth media affect the volatilome and antimicrobial activity against Phytophthora infestans in four Lysobacter type strains[J]. Microbiological Research, 2017,20(1):52-62.
[28]	卢美欢, 李利军, 马英辉, 等. 埃吉类芽孢杆菌SWL-W8的鉴定及其对白菜软腐病的生物防治效果[J]. 农药学学报, 2020,22(5):791-800.
[29]	Silby M W, Winstanley C, Godfrey S A C , et al. Pseudomonas genomes: diverse and adaptable[J]. Fems Microbiology Reviews, 2011,9(35):652-680.
[30]	MD Vrieze, Varadarajan A R, Schneeberger K, et al. Linking Comparative Genomics of Nine Potato-Associated Pseudomonas Isolates With Their Differing Biocontrol Potential Against Late Blight[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2020,11(30):857-877. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00857 URL
[31]	蓝希钳, 周泽杨, 胡军华, 等. 假单胞菌20#-5菌株代谢产物对马铃薯晚疫病菌的抑制作用[J]. 植物保护学报, 2003,30(3):300-304.
[32]	Anouk G, Mout D V, Denise B. The antiphytoph thoraeffect of selected potato-associated Pseudomonas strains: From the laboratory to the field[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2015,6:1295.
[33]	Hunziker L, Bonisch D, Groenhagen U, et al. Pseudomon as strains naturally associated with potato plant sproduce volatiles with high potential for inhibition of Phytophthora infestans[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2015,81(3):821-830. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02999-14 pmid: 25398872
[34]	Zegeye E D, Santhanam A, Gorfu D, et al. Biological activity of Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluores-cens against Phytophthora infestans under greenhouse conditions[J]. International journal of agricultural Techology, 2011,7(6):1589-1602.
[35]	王春玲, 冯广达, 姚青, 等. 粘细菌基因组学研究进展[J]. 微生物学通报, 2019,46(9):2394-2403.
[36]	武志华. 内蒙古中部地区粘细菌分离及其抑制马铃薯晚疫病的活性和成分研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2018.
[37]	任兴波, 武志华, 崔海辰, 等. 致病疫霉拮抗菌株YR-7的分离鉴定及其活性物质[J]. 微生物学通报, 2016,43(7):1513-1523.
[38]	任兴波, 张子良, 赵璞钰, 等. 马铃薯晚疫病菌拮抗粘细菌YR-35的分离鉴定及其代谢产物稳定性[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2016,32(3):379-387.
[39]	武志华, 李娜, 马秀枝, 等. 大兴安岭地区粘细菌资源的多样性及其生物活性[J]. 微生物学通报, 2018,45(2):266-283.

马铃薯致病疫霉拮抗细菌研究进展

Antagonistic Bacteria of Phytophthora infestans in Potato: A Review

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	胡帅, 罗立平, 孙猛, 杨禹, 温俊宝. 中华甲虫蒲螨和管氏肿腿蜂联合控制双条杉天牛初探[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 107-111.
[2]	吴佳佳, 朱佳红, 曹坳程, 颜冬冬, 王秋霞, 张春华, 李园. 云南省草果主要病原真菌鉴定及防治药剂筛选[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 121-128.
[3]	陈瑞英, 赵培荣, 刘宏金, 张雷, 郭晓宇. 可降解地膜在马铃薯上的应用效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 37-41.
[4]	曾端香, 余曦玥, 于敬文, 贾建平, 彭德良, 黄文坤. 松材线虫病的检测及综合防治技术[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(4): 86-91.
[5]	张晓晴, 李雅, 魏珊, 任大军, 张淑琴. 基于CiteSpace土壤重金属污染防治的知识图谱研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(4): 133-143.
[6]	闫芳芳, 孔垂旭, 张映杰, 毛敏, 简连均, 王蓉. 产紫青霉对烟草根结线虫病的生物防治研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(33): 103-108.
[7]	黄亚捷, 崔艳智, 贾小梅, 于奇. “十四五”期间宁夏畜禽养殖污染趋势与污染防治对策研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(32): 78-85.
[8]	申修贤, 田太安, 刘健锋, 于晓飞, 董祥立, 李治模, 杨茂发. 益蝽5龄若虫对不同龄期粘虫幼虫的捕食作用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(3): 116-120.
[9]	符慧娟, 李星月, 易军, 李其勇, 许秉智, 陈友华, 罗聪聪, 张鸿. 四川丘区旱作主要生物灾害防治策略与技术[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(3): 140-147.
[10]	王硕, 贾潇倩, 何璐, 李浩然, 王红光, 何建宁, 李东晓, 房琴, 李瑞奇. 作物对干旱胁迫的响应机制及提高作物抗旱能力的调控措施研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(29): 31-44.
[11]	宋晓兵, 黄峰, 罗小玲, 林培华, 彭埃天, 凌金锋, 崔一平. 吡唑醚菌酯对两种优稀水果病原菌的毒力测定及田间防治效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(27): 125-128.
[12]	蒋仕华, 池再香, 曾晓珊, 杨秀勋, 莫庆忠, 陈金梅, 雷瑛. 贵州省冬种马铃薯晚疫病发生的气象条件分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(27): 129-137.
[13]	崔燕华, 周婷婷, 沈煜洋, 陈利, 蔺国仓, 杨安沛, 张航, 雷钧杰, 李广阔, 高海峰. 小型植保无人机超低量喷雾对荒漠绿洲麦区小麦白粉病的防治效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(27): 147-150.
[14]	管宏友. 土壤污染防治研究的文献计量分析及可视化表达[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(26): 133-138.
[15]	李小艳, 倪畅, 刘旭. 不同防治方法对设施黄瓜根结线虫的防治效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(25): 130-133.