照片样线法大豆植被覆盖度测量精度分析

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1111

中国农学通报 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (32): 111-118.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1111

所属专题：生物技术；油料作物

照片样线法大豆植被覆盖度测量精度分析

汪欢欢¹(), 杨琴¹, 蒲红梅¹, 何进², 程华³, 韩敏⁴, 赵学春¹, 王志伟⁵, 金宝成¹()

¹贵州大学动物科学学院,贵阳550025
²贵州大学农学院,贵阳550025
³兰州大学生命科学学院,兰州730000
⁴贵州省自然资源勘测规划研究院,贵阳550004
⁵贵州省草业研究所,贵阳550006

收稿日期:2021-11-18 修回日期:2022-01-07 出版日期:2022-11-15 发布日期:2022-11-09
通讯作者: 金宝成
作者简介:汪欢欢,男,1995年出生,甘肃环县人,硕士研究生,研究方向：草地生态学研究。通信地址：550025 贵州省贵阳市花溪区贵州大学西校区,E-mail： 1768184350@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“基于土壤击实试验的山羊牧道形成过程研究”(31700390);贵州省普通高等学校科技拔尖人才支持计划“毛花雀稗无融合生殖机理研究”(黔教合KY字[2017]059);贵州省草地生态畜牧业人才基地开放基金“基于地理信息系统的贵州省草地空间分布分析”(RCJD2018-13);“斯特山区草地生产力提升关键技术集成与示范”(700352202103);贵州省科技计划项目“喀斯特山区草地生产力提升关键技术集成与示范”(黔科合支撑[2020]1Y076号)

Accuracy Analysis of Soybean Vegetation Coverage Measurement by Photo Line Transect Method

WANG Huanhuan¹(), YANG Qin¹, PU Hongmei¹, HE Jin², CHENG Hua³, HAN Min⁴, ZHAO Xuechun¹, WANG Zhiwei⁵, JIN Baocheng¹()

¹College of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025
²College of Agriculture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025
³School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000
⁴Guizhou Institute of Natural Resources Survey and Planning, Guiyang 550004
⁵Guizhou Institute of Pratacultural, Guiyang 550006

Received:2021-11-18 Revised:2022-01-07 Online:2022-11-15 Published:2022-11-09
Contact: JIN Baocheng

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

植被覆盖度是单位面积内植被垂直投影面积占总面积的百分比,它是重要的生态学参数,同时也是大豆等农作物的重要农艺参数。理想的覆盖度测量耗时短,工具简单,结果准确,受人为因素影响小。本文以‘黔豆3号’、‘川豆16’和大黑豆等24个品种为研究对象,以照相法测量值作为参考,分析目估法、实地样线法和照片样线法测定大豆植被覆盖度的精度和适用性。结果表明：目估法测量的植被覆盖度误差最大,平均为7.8%,目估误差随株高的增高呈现出先增加后降低的趋势。实地样线法测量精度较高,误差小于3% (2.8%),但耗时最长,每个1 m×1 m样方需用时6.2 min。照片样线法误差小于3%,几乎不需要消耗野外采样时间,室内每个样方照片处理需耗时约3.0 min。相较于目估法,照片样线法具有更高的测量精度,相较于实地样线法,照片样线法能够节省野外采样时间,提高工作效率。因此推荐照片样线法作为大豆和类似植物覆盖度的测量方法,同时两条样线（样线长度合计为2.8 m）即可满足测量误差小于5%的精度要求。未来应进一步探索照片样线法在其他作物覆盖度测量中的适用性。

关键词: 照片样线法, 植被覆盖度, 精度分析, 大豆, 株高

Abstract:

Vegetation coverage is the percentage of the total ground area covered by the vertical projected area of vegetation. It is an important parameter in ecology and an important agronomic index of crops such as soybean. The ideal coverage measurement is less time consuming, requires simple tools, provides accurate results, and is less influenced by human factors. In this study, 24 soybean varieties, such as ‘Qiandou 3’, ‘Chuandou 16’ and ‘Daheidou’, were used for assessment. Different methods, including visual estimation, field line transect method and photo line transect method, were used to estimate soybean vegetation coverage and identify one with the maximum accuracy and applicability, using the measured values of the photography method as the reference. The results showed that visual estimation produced the largest error in vegetation coverage measurement, with an average of 7.8%. The error increased first and then decreased with the increase of plant height. The field line transect method displayed higher accuracy, the error was less than 3% (2.8%), but it took the longest time of 6.2 min for a 1 m × 1 m quadrat. The error of the photo line transect method was less than 3%, and it consumed less time for field sampling; processing the photos of each quadrat took only 3 min. Compared with visual estimation, the photo line transect method showed higher measurement accuracy. Besides, it saved the sampling time and improved work efficiency compared with the field line transect method. Therefore, the present study proposed the photo line transect method as the ideal method for vegetation coverage measurement of soybean and similar plant species. Two line-transects (the total length of the line transect was 2.8 m) via this method could meet the accuracy requirements, with an error of less than 5%. However, the applicability of the photo line transect method in measuring the coverage of other crops should be further explored.

Key words: photo line transect method, vegetation coverage, accuracy analysis, soybean, plant height

中图分类号:

S566.1

汪欢欢, 杨琴, 蒲红梅, 何进, 程华, 韩敏, 赵学春, 王志伟, 金宝成. 照片样线法大豆植被覆盖度测量精度分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(32): 111-118.

WANG Huanhuan, YANG Qin, PU Hongmei, HE Jin, CHENG Hua, HAN Min, ZHAO Xuechun, WANG Zhiwei, JIN Baocheng. Accuracy Analysis of Soybean Vegetation Coverage Measurement by Photo Line Transect Method[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 111-118.

图/表 8

参考文献 30

[1]	BONHAM C D. Measurements for terrestrial vegetation[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
[2]	杨琴, 蒲红梅, 赵学春, 等. 3种人工草地不同植被覆盖度实地测量方法比较[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(1):220-227.
[3]	张云霞, 李晓兵, 陈云浩. 草地植被盖度的多尺度遥感与实地测量方法综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(1):85-93. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2003.01.0085
[4]	秦伟, 朱清科, 张学霞, 等. 植被覆盖度及其测算方法研究进展[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 34(9):163-170.
[5]	DE L, OVANDO G, BRESSANINI L, et al. Soybean crop coverage estimation from NDVI images with different spatial resolution to evaluate yield variability in a plot[J]. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 2018, 146:531-547. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.10.018 URL
[6]	KOOL D, AGAM N, LAZAROVITCH N, et al. A review of approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning[J]. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 2014, 184:56-70. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.09.003 URL
[7]	PASSIOURA J B, ANGUS J F. Improving productivity of crops in water-limited environments[J]. Advances in agronomy, 2010, 106(10):37-75.
[8]	PATRIGNANI A, OCHSNER T E. Canopeo: A powerful new tool for measuring fractional green canopy cover[J]. Agronomy journal, 2015, 107(6):2312-2320. doi: 10.2134/agronj15.0150 URL
[9]	PURCELL L C. Soybean canopy coverage and light interception measurements using digital imagery[J]. Crop Science, 2000, 40(3):834-837. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.403834x URL
[10]	PURCELL L C, BALL R A, REAPER J D, et al. Radiation use efficiency and biomass production in soybean at different plant population densities[J]. Crop science, 2002, 42(1):172-177. pmid: 11756269
[11]	RAES D, STEDUTO P, HSIAO T C, et al. Aquacrop -the fao crop model to simulate yield response to water: II. main algorithms and software description[J]. Agronomy journal, 2009, 101(3):438-447. doi: 10.2134/agronj2008.0140s URL
[12]	LUSCIER J D, THOMPSON W L, WILSON J M, et al. Using digital photographs and object-based image analysis to estimate percent ground cover in vegetation plots[J]. Frontiers in ecology the environment, 2006, 4(8):408-413. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[408:UDPAOI]2.0.CO;2 URL
[13]	VANHA-MAJAMAA I, SALEMAA M, MIKKOLA S T. Digitized photographs in vegetation analysis: a comparison of cover estimates[J]. Applied vegetation science, 2000, 3(1):89-94. doi: 10.2307/1478922 URL
[14]	金宝成, 陈家胜, 黄华, 等. 多层随机拟合法测量样方植被覆盖度[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 45(3):23-26.
[15]	KLIME L. Scale-dependent variation in visual estimates of grassland plant cover[J]. Journal of vegetation science, 2003, 14(6):815-821. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02214.x URL
[16]	HATTON T J, JOHNSON W P S. Relationships of the error associated with ocular estimation and actual total cover[J]. Journal of range management, 1986, 39(1):91-92. doi: 10.2307/3899697 URL
[17]	ANDERSON F J E. A comparison of three methods for estimating plant cover[J]. Journal of ecology, 1987, 75(1):221-228. doi: 10.2307/2260547 URL
[18]	CANFIELD R H. Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation[J]. Journal of forestry, 1941, 39(4):388-394.
[19]	ZHOU Q, ROBSON M, PILESJO P. On the ground estimation of vegetation cover in australian rangelands[J]. International journal of remote sensing, 1998, 19(9):1815-1820. doi: 10.1080/014311698215261 URL
[20]	ZHOU G, LIU S. Estimating ground fractional vegetation cover using the double-exposure method[J]. International journal of remote sensing, 2015, 36(24):6085-6100. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2015.1110638 URL
[21]	路炳军, 刘洪鹄, 符素华, 等. 照相法结合数字图像技术计算植被覆盖度精度研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2007, 27(1):78-85.
[22]	随金明, 宋乃平, 薛毅, 等. 基于照相法的荒漠草原植被覆盖度测定方法[J]. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(2):58-64.
[23]	章超斌, 李建龙, 张颖, 等. 基于RGB模式的一种草地盖度定量快速测定方法研究[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(4):220-226.
[24]	章文波, 刘宝元, 吴敬东. 小区植被覆盖度动态快速测量方法研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2001, 21(6):60-63.
[25]	宋雪峰, 董永平, 单丽燕, 等. 用数码相机测定草地盖度的研究[J]. 内蒙古草业, 2004, 16(4):1-6.
[26]	章文波, 符素华, 刘宝元. 目估法测量植被覆盖度的精度分析[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 37(3):402-408.
[27]	ZHOU Q, ROBSON M. Automated rangeland vegetation cover and density estimation using ground digital images and a spectral-contextual classifier[J]. International journal of remote sensing, 2001, 22(17):3457-3470. doi: 10.1080/01431160010004504 URL
[28]	邢龙, 王志泰, 涂燕茹. 黔中喀斯特城市遗存自然山体景观格局时空演变--以安顺市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(4):1291-1302.
[29]	向杏信, 黄宗胜, 王志泰. 喀斯特多山城市空间形态结构与植物群落物种多样性的耦合关系--以安顺市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(2):575-587.
[30]	张亚娟, 叶雪均, 杨勇. 贵州安顺市不同土地利用类型土壤养分特征研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2015, 42(18):56-62.

方法	误差/%	耗时/min
目估法	7.8±10.7↓^*	—
实地样线法	2.8±14.4↑^*	6.2
照片样线法(两条样线)	3.7±12.7↓^*	1.9
照片样线法(四条样线)	2.1±13.4↓^*	3.0

方法	误差/%	耗时/min
目估法	7.8±10.7↓^*	—
实地样线法	2.8±14.4↑^*	6.2
照片样线法(两条样线)	3.7±12.7↓^*	1.9
照片样线法(四条样线)	2.1±13.4↓^*	3.0

株高	株高
株高	0~20 cm	20~40 cm	40~60 cm	60~80 cm
20~40 cm	R²=0.26 ^* +	—	—	—
40~60 cm	R²=0.0002 +	R² = 0.09 ^* +	—	—
60~80 cm	R²=0.05 -	R² = 0.21 ^* -	R² = 0.21 ^* +	—
80~100 cm	R²=0.09 -	R² = 0.35 ^* -	R² = 0.09 +	R² = 0.20 +

株高	株高
株高	0~20 cm	20~40 cm	40~60 cm	60~80 cm
20~40 cm	R²=0.26 ^* +	—	—	—
40~60 cm	R²=0.0002 +	R² = 0.09 ^* +	—	—
60~80 cm	R²=0.05 -	R² = 0.21 ^* -	R² = 0.21 ^* +	—
80~100 cm	R²=0.09 -	R² = 0.35 ^* -	R² = 0.09 +	R² = 0.20 +

照片样线法大豆植被覆盖度测量精度分析

Accuracy Analysis of Soybean Vegetation Coverage Measurement by Photo Line Transect Method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	罗先富, 刘文强, 潘孝武, 董铮, 刘三雄, 刘利成, 阳标仁, 盛新年, 李小湘. 应用剩余杂合体衍生的近等基因系定位水稻株高QTL[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 1-5.
[2]	薛文瑞, 杨自辉, 张永, 郭树江, 王强强, 张剑挥. 民勤荒漠绿洲植被覆盖对地下水和降水变化的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 102-109.
[3]	田艺心, 高凤菊, 曹鹏鹏, 高祺. 黄淮海夏大豆干物质积累、转运及产量对播期的响应特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 20-25.
[4]	余忠浩, 周伟, 李志刚, 李资文, 贾娟霞, 周亚星. 2002—2021年内蒙古自治区大豆主要性状变化分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(34): 14-21.
[5]	朱喜霞, 郑玉珍, 王海红, 黄保, 平西栓, 刘天学, 赵霞, 李毓珍. 机械化条件下“豆玉”不同行距配置和减肥对作物产量及大豆光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(29): 16-21.
[6]	王敬东, 惠建, 白海波, 马斯霜, 李树华. 水稻萌发和幼苗生长对外源物质调节的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(29): 1-7.
[7]	郭文, 代希茜, 莫楠, 张应青, 余晨, 田江, 耿智德, 李露. 东盟国家大豆种植及其大豆产品进出口结构分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(23): 156-164.
[8]	重阳, 赵建凯, 马修才. 牧草观测自动化技术研究与系统设计[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(22): 126-133.
[9]	高中超, 孙磊, 王丽华, 杜春影, 张利国, 张久明, 王伟, 谷维. 土壤中不同含量Cd²⁺对大麻、大豆幼苗生育的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(22): 89-92.
[10]	孙锡鹏, 李琪, 乔云发, 胡正华, 张徐莹, 刘园园. 增温及干旱对海伦地区大豆生长发育的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(15): 27-33.
[11]	马文舟, 陈妍妍, 吴洪生, 王晓云, 孙倩, 丁军, 李妍慧, 刘政, 蔡云彤, 徐金益, 张金福, 殷文, 张绪美, 许建华. 利用热镀锌厂锌尘生产液体有机锌肥的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(15): 91-97.
[12]	赵如皓, 丁俊男, 于少鹏, 王慧, 史传奇, 张志, 孟博. NaCl胁迫对野生大豆幼苗生理及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(14): 23-29.
[13]	蒋龙刚, 任燕利, 史建硕, 郭丽, 王丽英, 李若楠, 王平. 不同大豆品种产量与养分吸收差异性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(10): 9-14.
[14]	赵晶晶, 周浓, 郑殿峰. 低温胁迫对大豆花期叶片蔗糖代谢及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(9): 1-8.
[15]	昝光敏, 张玲, 张延瑞, 盛英华, 周凯, 王贤智. 大豆籽粒脂肪酸组分气相色谱检测方法的建立[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(9): 118-124.