设施菜田土壤氮素淋溶特征及阻控措施的研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0331

中国农学通报 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (23): 82-87.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0331

所属专题：生物技术；农业工程

• 资源·环境·生态·土壤·气象 • 上一篇下一篇

设施菜田土壤氮素淋溶特征及阻控措施的研究进展

谢洪宝¹(), 关诗洋¹, 陈一民², 隋跃宇², 彭博¹, 汤博宇¹, 焦晓光¹()

¹黑龙江大学现代农业与生态环境学院,哈尔滨 150080
²中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所,哈尔滨 150081

收稿日期:2022-04-20 修回日期:2022-06-08 出版日期:2022-08-15 发布日期:2022-08-08
通讯作者: 焦晓光
作者简介:谢洪宝,男,1996年出生,黑龙江伊春人,硕士,主要从事土壤生态的研究。通信地址：150080 黑龙江省哈尔滨施南岗区学府路74号黑龙江大学,Tel：0451-86609034,E-mail： 2018026@hlju.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目“冻融作用下秸秆还田后氮转化对农田黑土氮库更新机制的研究”(42077081);科技基础资源调查专项“中国东北黑土区农田土壤资源与健康状况调查”(2021FY100400)

Characteristics of Soil Nitrogen Leaching in Facility Vegetable Fields and the Control Measures: A Review

XIE Hongbao¹(), GUAN Shiyang¹, CHEN Yimin², SUI Yueyu², PENG Bo¹, TANG Boyu¹, JIAO Xiaoguang¹()

¹College of Modern Agriculture and Eco-Environment, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080
²Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081

Received:2022-04-20 Revised:2022-06-08 Online:2022-08-15 Published:2022-08-08
Contact: JIAO Xiaoguang

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

设施菜田在蔬菜作物生产中占据重要比例,土壤氮素作为设施菜田生产中需求量最高的营养元素,在保证设施菜田品质与产量中发挥着不可替代的作用。但由于设施菜田土壤一直处于高度集约、高度施肥、土地利用率高,使得土壤氮素利用率偏低,淋溶损失严重。本文基于2001—2021年来国内外对于设施菜田土壤氮素淋溶特征研究成果,从概述设施菜田土壤氮素损失途径及淋溶特性着手,分析设施菜田土壤氮素淋溶影响机制。总结出设施菜田氮素淋溶损失主要受到施肥、灌水、土壤质地及种植年限影响,采取减氮控水、调节土壤碳氮比、施用土壤抑制剂以及运用填闲作物等措施,能够在保证设施菜田作物品质条件下,降低土壤氮素淋溶损失。探讨针对设施菜田氮素淋溶损失今后进一步研究方向,以期为设施菜田的合理管控与生态可循环利用提供理论依据。

关键词: 土壤氮素, 设施菜田, 氮素损失, 影响机制, 阻控措施

Abstract:

Facility vegetable fields occupy an important proportion in the production of vegetable crops. As the nutrient element with the highest demand in the production of facility vegetables, soil nitrogen plays an irreplaceable role in ensuring the quality and yield of facility vegetables. However, due to the facts that the soil in the facility vegetable fields has always been in a state of being highly intensive and highly fertilized, and has high land utilization rate, the soil nitrogen utilization rate is low and the leaching loss is serious. Based on the research results of soil nitrogen leaching characteristics in facility vegetable fields from 2001 to 2021 at home and abroad, this paper started with an overview of soil nitrogen loss pathways and leaching characteristics in facility vegetable fields, and analyzed the impact mechanism of soil nitrogen leaching in facility vegetable fields. It is concluded that nitrogen leaching loss in facility vegetable fields is mainly affected by fertilization, irrigation, soil texture and planting years. Measures such as reducing nitrogen and controlling water, adjusting soil carbon and nitrogen ratio, applying soil inhibitors, and using idle crops could ensure crop quality in the facility vegetable fields and reduce the loss of soil nitrogen leaching. This paper discusses the future research direction of nitrogen leaching loss in facility vegetable fields, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for the rational management and ecological recycling of facility vegetable fields.

Key words: soil nitrogen, facility vegetable field, nitrogen loss, influence mechanism, control measures

中图分类号:

S158.5

谢洪宝, 关诗洋, 陈一民, 隋跃宇, 彭博, 汤博宇, 焦晓光. 设施菜田土壤氮素淋溶特征及阻控措施的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(23): 82-87.

XIE Hongbao, GUAN Shiyang, CHEN Yimin, SUI Yueyu, PENG Bo, TANG Boyu, JIAO Xiaoguang. Characteristics of Soil Nitrogen Leaching in Facility Vegetable Fields and the Control Measures: A Review[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 82-87.

参考文献 62

[1]	KIANPOOR K Y, HUANG B, HU W Y, et al. Environmental soil quality and vegetable safety under current greenhouse vegetable production management in China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2021, 307: 107230. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107230 URL
[2]	KALKHAJEH Y K, HUANG B, SØRENSEN H, et al. Phosphorus accumulation and leaching risk of greenhouse vegetable soils in Southeast China[J]. Pedosphere, 2021, 31(5):683-693. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(21)60029-2 URL
[3]	SHEN H J, ZHANG Q Q, ZHU S, et al. Organic substitutions aggravated microbial nitrogen limitation and decreased nitrogen-cycling gene abundances in a three-year greenhouse vegetable field[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 288:112379. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112379 URL
[4]	GENG Y J, WANG J Y, SUN Z R, et al. Soil N-oxide emissions decrease from intensive greenhouse vegetable fields by substituting synthetic N fertilizer with organic and bio-organic fertilizers[J]. Geoderma, 2021, 383:114730. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114730 URL
[5]	YANG L Q, HUANG B, MAO M C, et al. Sustainability assessment of greenhouse vegetable farming practices from environmental, economic, and socio-institutional perspectives in China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23(17):17287-17297. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6937-1 URL
[6]	王耀, 张蕾, 焦晓光, 等. 添加生物炭对设施菜田土壤氮迁移的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(16):91-95.
[7]	ZOTARELLI L, DUKES M D, SCHOLBERG J M S, et al. Tomato nitrogen accumulation and fertilizer use efficiency on a sandy soil, as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2009, 96(8):1247-1258. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.03.019 URL
[8]	高莹, 孙喜军, 吕爽, 等. 西安市设施菜地土壤养分状况分析[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2021, 67(6):50-56.
[9]	孙晓姝, 王立革, 郭珺, 等. 山西曲沃设施蔬菜施肥现状及土壤氮磷累积与分配特征[J]. 生态科学, 2019, 38(6):149-155.
[10]	石生伟, 刘衎, 郭利娜, 等. 天津市设施菜地施肥现状及减施潜力和对策[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(6):1091-1105.
[11]	丁武汉, 雷豪杰, 徐驰, 等. 我国设施菜地表观氮平衡分析及其空间分布特征[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(3):353-360.
[12]	LU J, BAI Z H, WU Z G, et al. Accumulation and leaching of nitrate in soils in wheat-maize production in China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 212:407-415. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.08.039 URL
[13]	ZHANG J, LI H, DENG J, et al. Assessing impacts of nitrogen management on nitrous oxide emissions and nitrate leaching from greenhouse vegetable systems using a biogeochemical model[J]. Geoderma, 2021, 382:114701. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114701 URL
[14]	杨治平, 陈明昌, 张强, 等. 不同施氮措施对保护地黄瓜养分利用效率及土壤氮素淋失影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007(2):57-60.
[15]	ZHANG Y J, WANG H, MAUCIERI C, et al. Annual nitric and nitrous oxide emissions response to biochar amendment from an intensive greenhouse vegetable system in southeast China[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, 246:879-886. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.070 URL
[16]	XU Y H, MA Y, CAYUELA M L, et al. Compost biochemical quality mediates nitrogen leaching loss in a greenhouse soil under vegetable cultivation[J]. Geoderma, 2020, 358:113984. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113984 URL
[17]	PEI Z Q, LU S C, WANG X, et al. Study on greenhouse soil nitrogen absorption and soil layer transport of different summer catch crops with different planting density in North China[J]. E3S Web of Conferences, 2020, 143:02023. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202014302023 URL
[18]	ZHAO Y J, LU C Y, SHI Y, et al. Soil fertility and fertilization practices affect accumulation and leaching risk of reactive N in greenhouse vegetable soils[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2016, 96(3):281-288. doi: 10.1139/cjss-2015-0058 URL
[19]	柯英, 郭鑫年, 冀宏杰, 等. 宁夏灌区不同类型农田土壤氮素累积与迁移特征[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2014, 31(1):23-31.
[20]	王洪媛, 李俊改, 樊秉乾, 等. 中国北方主要农区农田氮磷淋溶特征与时空规律[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021, 29(1):11-18.
[21]	唐珧, 李丽君, 刘平, 等. 减肥减水对温室黄瓜养分吸收、产量及土壤质量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(1):77-82.
[22]	王伟, 梁斌, 康凌云, 等. 氮素供应与秸秆还田对设施菜田土壤硝态氮淋溶的动态影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(4):61-65.
[23]	董章杭, 李季, 孙丽梅. 集约化蔬菜种植区化肥施用对地下水硝酸盐污染影响的研究——以“中国蔬菜之乡”山东省寿光市为例[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2005(6):1139-1144.
[24]	巨晓棠, 张福锁. 中国北方土壤硝态氮的累积及其对环境的影响[J]. 生态环境, 2003(1):24-28.
[25]	DUAN P P, ZHOU J, FENG L, et al. Pathways and controls of N2O production in greenhouse vegetable production soils[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2019, 55(3):285-297. doi: 10.1007/s00374-019-01348-9 URL
[26]	QIN S Q, QUAN Z, MA J, et al. Regulating nitrate excess in lettuce-planted greenhouse soil with available carbon addition through irrigation.[J]. Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019, 26(19):19241-19249. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05125-x URL
[27]	PENG Y T, SUN Y Q, FAN B Q, et al. Fe/Al (hydr)oxides engineered biochar for reducing phosphorus leaching from a fertile calcareous soil[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 279:123877. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123877 URL
[28]	LI Y K, WU X P, GUO W Z, et al. Characteristics of greenhouse soil N₂O emissions in cucumber-tomato rotation system under different nitrogen conditions[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(23):260-267.
[29]	ZHAO H, LI L Y, JIANG Y. Response of Nitrogen Losses to Excessive Nitrogen Fertilizer Application in Intensive Greenhouse Vegetable Production[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(6):1513. doi: 10.3390/su11061513 URL
[30]	张宏威, 康凌云, 梁斌, 等. 长期大量施肥增加设施菜田土壤可溶性有机氮淋溶风险[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(21):99-107.
[31]	杨荣全, 曹飞, 李迎春, 等. 不同施肥处理对华北露天菜地氮素淋溶的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(6):130-137.
[32]	亢龙飞, 王静, 朱丽娜, 等. 不同形态磷酸盐及施用方式对石灰性土壤磷移动性和有效性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(7):1179-1187.
[33]	石宁, 李彦, 宫志远, 等. 持续施用鸭粪和牛粪对山东设施菜田土壤氮、磷转化及迁移的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(11):1-8.
[34]	高伟, 李明悦, 高宝岩, 等. 有机无机肥料配合施用对设施黄瓜产量、氮素累积及硝酸盐淋溶的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2015, 30(4):188-193.
[35]	ZHANG Y J, LIN F, JIN Y G, et al. Response of nitric and nitrous oxide fluxes to N fertilizer application in greenhouse vegetable cropping systems in southeast China.[J]. Scientific reports, 2016, 6(1):1-11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8 URL
[36]	范凤翠, 李志宏, 张立峰, 等. 日光温室番茄灌水量与根层硝态氮淋溶特征及渗漏关系研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(5):1161-1169.
[37]	雷豪杰, 李贵春, 丁武汉, 等. 设施菜地土壤氮素运移及淋溶损失模拟评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021, 29(1):38-52.
[38]	董佩, 李阳, 孙颖, 等. 包气带黏性土层对氮素污染地下水的防污性能试验研究[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30(3):688-694.
[39]	石宁, 李彦, 井永苹, 等. 长期施肥对设施菜田土壤氮、磷时空变化及流失风险的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(11):2434-2442.
[40]	曹文超, 张运龙, 严正娟, 等. 种植年限对设施菜田土壤pH及养分积累的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2012(18):134-141.
[41]	伊田, 梁东丽, 王松山, 等. 不同种植年限对设施栽培土壤养分累积及其环境的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2010, 38(7):111-117.
[42]	张锦源, 徐欣, 陈一民, 等. 减水和减施化肥对设施黑土菜田茄子产量及水分利用率的影响[J]. 土壤与作物, 2018, 7(4):374-379.
[43]	WANG L, YIN X, WANG W, et al. Effects of Carbon Addition and Biochemical Control on N2O Emission from Facility Vegetable Soil[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2016, 33(5):416.
[44]	王凌, 张国印, 刘孟朝, 等. 硝化抑制剂和肥料减施对减少设施菜田氮源气体排放及与微生物功能基因的互作[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(02):196-203.
[45]	ZHANG H Y, HU K L, ZHANG L J, et al. Exploring optimal catch crops for reducing nitrate leaching in vegetable greenhouse in North China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 212:273-282. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.018 URL
[46]	郭佩秋, 李絮花, 王克安, 等. 氮肥用量对日光温室黄瓜和土壤硝态氮含量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2009, 24(1):185-188.
[47]	骆晓声, 李艳芬, 寇长林, 等. 减量施肥对河南省典型设施菜田硝态氮和总磷淋溶量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2018, 47(11):61-65.
[48]	樊耀, 申丽霞, 刘荣豪, 等. 微润灌溉下施氮水平对大棚辣椒生长的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2019(12):23-26.
[49]	魏欢, 姜长松, 冯煊, 等. 微润灌溉配合减量施肥阻控设施番茄土壤有效磷淋失效果研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2020, 43(4):62-67.
[50]	GAUNT J L, LEHMANN J. Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2008, 42(11):4152-4158. doi: 10.1021/es071361i URL
[51]	骆晓声, 吕宏伟, 寇长林. 有机肥替代氮肥及节水对设施番茄和辣椒菜田氮淋溶的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(2):96-101.
[52]	HAN L, LI Y S, YU X C, et al. Effects of vegetable residue compost returning to soil on soil properties and vegetable yield in solar greenhouse[J]. The journal of applied ecology, 2016, 27(5):1553-1559.
[53]	谢沂希, 杨婉俪, 刘慧, 等. 玉米秸秆炭对土壤中氮、磷淋溶的影响[J]. 四川农业科技, 2019(10):50-54.
[54]	陈庆华, 许卓, 汤计超, 等. 生物炭对土壤氮磷流失和油菜产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(11):130-137. doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2018.0585
[55]	李佳, 邓钧尹, 周伟, 等. 生物炭与硝化抑制剂对菜地综合温室效应的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2020, 36(5):1205-1211.
[56]	宋涛, 尹俊慧, 胡兆平, 等. 脲酶/硝化抑制剂减少农田土壤氮素损失的作用特征[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(4):585-597.
[57]	张春楠, 张瑞芳, 王鑫鑫, 等. 硝化抑制剂和微生物菌剂对甜瓜产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6):281-287,293.
[58]	李学文, 李树营, 王齐龙, 等. 减氮配施脲酶/硝化抑制剂对冬瓜品质、产量和土壤氮磷淋失的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021, 34(1):55-59.
[59]	周丹, 符明明, 魏金明, 等. 设施菜田不同施氮处理对硝酸盐迁移和积累的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2011, 42(2):407-411.
[60]	VOS J, VAN DER PUTTEN P E L, HASSAN H, et al. Field observations on nitrogen catch crops: II. Root length and root length distribution in relation to species and nitrogen supply[J]. Plant and Soil, 1998, 201(1):149-155. doi: 10.1023/A:1004367530320 URL
[61]	习斌, 张继宗, 翟丽梅, 等. 甜玉米作为填闲作物对北方设施菜地土壤环境及下茬作物的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011, 30(1):113-119.
[62]	范新, 李浩亮, 雷孝, 等. 南方设施菜地填闲苋菜筛选及其氮磷淋失阻控效果研究[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(2):285-290.

设施菜田土壤氮素淋溶特征及阻控措施的研究进展

Characteristics of Soil Nitrogen Leaching in Facility Vegetable Fields and the Control Measures: A Review

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 62

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	张梦佳, 文方芳, 张雪莲, 赵青春, 郭建明, 廖洪, 刘自飞, 朱文, 韩宝, 葛瑶科, 廖上强, 卢静. 田块尺度设施菜田土壤健康评价方法的初步构建与应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 74-79.
[2]	朱静平, 邓秋宏. 尿素深施后模拟水田系统中氮素的迁移转化途径[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(27): 66-73.
[3]	关诗洋, 王佳琪, 于贺, 焦晓光, 王耀, 徐欣, 陈一民, 隋跃宇. 减水减肥对设施黑土菜田土壤无机磷形态及分布的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(23): 89-93.
[4]	王耀, 张蕾, 焦晓光, 陈一民, 隋跃宇. 添加生物炭对设施菜田土壤氮迁移的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(16): 91-95.
[5]	颜芳,王胜涛,刘彬,王维瑞,吴文强,赵跃. 设施菜田土壤磷素累积特征与风险调控方法[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(33): 111-115.
[6]	赵宏,胡兴钢,张乃明,郝斐. 怒江中游流域土壤主要肥力指标分析与评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(5): 47-53.
[7]	朱新梦,董雯怡,王洪媛,严昌荣,刘宏斌,刘恩科. 堆肥方式对氮素损失和留存的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(16): 97-104.
[8]	张丽金,王林萍,蔡良玫. 农户的风险偏好对绿色水稻生产技术应用的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(32): 188-192.
[9]	李桢,王佳玮,雷利国,李睿,李增全,郝庆菊. 地膜覆盖对辣椒地土壤氮素的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(21): 134-140.
[10]	郭魏,齐学斌,李平,李中阳,周媛. 再生水灌溉对土壤氮素与生物有效性影响的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(35): 181-186.
[11]	李旭军. 土壤调理剂对设施菜田土壤及作物生产的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(33): 256-260.
[12]	韩晓飞郑文冉徐畅慈恩高明杨超马啸. 重庆市植烟区不同肥力植烟土壤氮素矿化特性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(24): 188-192.
[13]	赵赞. 基于PSR模型框架下旅游发展对民族传统文化影响机制分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(17): 416-421.
[14]	赵秋,鲍艳宇. 堆肥过程中氮素损失的控制[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(7): 375-375.
[15]	王山虎,金一红,孙宏俊. 用两室根箱系统法对土壤氮素转化的空间变异及N2O的产生之初探[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(11): 233-233.