欢迎访问《中国农学通报》，
中国农学通报

中国农学通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (28): 17-23.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0886

• 林学·园艺·园林 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同变异类型魔芋光合特性的比较研究

颜惠芳1(), 王旭军2(), 彭翠英2, 朱临渊1, 张小军1, 杨鹏华3, 曹受金1()   

  1. 1 中南林业科技大学，长沙 410004
    2 湖南省林业科学院，长沙 410004
    3 新化县湘鑫农业综合开发有限公司，湖南新化 417600
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-25 修回日期:2024-05-15 出版日期:2024-10-05 发布日期:2024-09-29
  • 通讯作者:
    王旭军，男，1971年出生，湖南双峰人，副研究员，博士，主要研究方向为林下中药材良种选育与标准化栽培。通信地址：410004 湖南长沙天心区 湖南省林科院，E-mail：。
    曹受金，男，1972年出生，湖南常宁人，教授，博士，主要研究观赏植物栽培与育种。通信地址：410004 湖南长沙天心区韶山南路 中南林业科技大学，E-mail：。
  • 作者简介:

    颜惠芳，女，2000年出生，湖南娄底人，硕士研究生，研究方向为园艺。通信地址：410004 湖南长沙天心区韶山南路 中南林业科技大学，E-mail：。

  • 基金资助:
    欧洲投资银行贷款项目“杉木人工纯林近自然化改造经营模式研究”(OT-S-KTA2)

Comparison of Photosynthetic Characteristics of Different Variant Types of Amorphophallus konjac

YAN Huifang1(), WANG Xujun2(), PENG Cuiying2, ZHU Linyuan1, ZHANG Xiaojun1, YANG Penghua3, CAO Shoujin1()   

  1. 1 Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004
    2 Hunan Academy of Forestry, Changsha 410004
    3 Xinhua Xiangxin Agricultural Comprehensive Development Co., Ltd., Xinhua, Hunan 417600
  • Received:2023-12-25 Revised:2024-05-15 Published:2024-10-05 Online:2024-09-29

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

147

摘要：

比较不同变异类型魔芋的光合特性，为魔芋的遗传改良提供参考。以魔芋叶柄不同颜色变异类型（叶柄颜色分别为黑色、白色、红色和青色，以下以黑杆魔芋、白杆魔芋、红杆魔芋和青杆魔芋代称）为材料，并以白魔芋和‘鄂魔芋1号’为对照，运用Li-6400便携式光合测定仪比较其光合特性差异。结果表明，不同变异类型魔芋的光合能力存在一定差异。魔芋的净光合速率(Pn)日变化曲线呈单峰型和双峰型，黑杆魔芋和白魔芋存在“光合午休”现象，其中黑杆魔芋的Pn日均值最大，红杆魔芋的Pn日均值最小。魔芋的Pn-PAR和Pn-CO2响应曲线变化趋势整体较一致但变化程度有所不同，根据响应曲线求得6份魔芋材料的光饱和点为955~1191 μmol/(m2·s)，光补偿点为1.51~47.05 μmol/(m2·s)，表观量子效率为0.0235~0.0415；CO2饱和点为1528~1948 μmol/mol，CO2补偿点为35.20~96.67 μmol/mol，羧化效率为0.0203~0.0340。‘鄂魔芋1号’、黑杆魔芋和青杆魔芋光合表现更佳。

关键词: 魔芋, 变异类型, 光合特性, 日变化, 响应曲线

Abstract:

To compare the photosynthetic characteristics of different variation types of konjac and provide reference for its genetic improvement, different color petioles variation types of Amorphophallus konjac(black, white, red and cyan, referred to as black, white, red and green konjac) were used as materials, A. albus and ‘E konjac No.1’ as control, to compare their photosynthetic differences using Li-6400 portable photosynthetic apparatus. The results showed that there were some differences in photosynthetic capacity of different konjac materials. Pn-PAR and Pn-CO2 response curves of konjac were consistent on the whole, but the degree was different. The light saturation point and light compensation point of the 6 konjac materials were obtained from the response curves ranging from 955 to 1191 μmol/(m2·s), and the light compensation point ranged from 1.51 to 47.05 μmol/(m2·s). The apparent quantum efficiency ranged from 0.0235 to 0.0415. The CO2 saturation point was 1528-1948 μmol/mol, the CO2 compensation point (CCP) was 35.20-96.67 μmol/mol, and the carboxylation efficiency was 0.0203-0.0340. The photosynthetic performances of ‘E konjac No.1’, black konjac and green konjac were better.

Key words: Amorphophallus konjac, variation types, photosynthetic characteristics, daily variation, response curve