等碳量不同有机物料添加对风沙土团聚体及有机碳含量的影响

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0752

中国农学通报 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (18): 130-137.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0752

• 资源·环境·生态·土壤 • 上一篇下一篇

等碳量不同有机物料添加对风沙土团聚体及有机碳含量的影响

李源¹(), 彭波², 吴连霞³, 夏伟新⁴, 李青军¹()

¹ 新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所，乌鲁木齐 830091
² 新疆林业学校，乌鲁木齐 830023
³ 新疆叶核农业科技有限公司，乌鲁木齐 830028
⁴ 新疆仕永达农业科技发展有限公司，乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2024-12-02 修回日期:2025-05-13 出版日期:2025-06-25 发布日期:2025-07-06
通讯作者:
李青军，男，1979年出生，河南新乡人，研究员，博士研究生，主要从事植物营养研究。通信地址：830091 新疆乌鲁木齐市沙依巴克区南昌路403号，Tel：0991-4501264，E-mail：1494347066@qq.com。
作者简介:
李源，男，1987年出生，新疆乌鲁木齐人，博士研究生，主要从事作物水肥一体化研究。通信地址：830091 新疆乌鲁木齐市沙依巴克区南昌路403号，Tel：0991-4501264，E-mail：liyuan586287@126.com。
基金资助:
南疆重点产业创新发展支撑计划项目“南疆光伏大棚农业关键技术研究与示范”(2022DB010)

Influence of Adding Different Organic Materials with Equal Carbon Content on Aggregates and Organic Carbon Content of Sandy Soil

LI Yuan¹(), PENG Bo², WU Lianxia³, XIA Weixin⁴, LI Qingjun¹()

¹ Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091
² Xinjiang Forestry School, Urumqi 830023
³ Xinjiang Yehe Agricultural Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Urumqi 830028
⁴ Xinjiang Shiyongda Agricultural Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Urumqi 830091

Received:2024-12-02 Revised:2025-05-13 Published:2025-06-25 Online:2025-07-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对新疆南疆地区风沙土土壤贫瘠问题，开展土壤固碳培肥试验。于2022—2024年在和田地区皮山农场开展大棚试验，一年种植春提早和秋延后两茬番茄，设置氮磷钾化肥+鸡粪(NPKJ)、氮磷钾化肥+牛粪(NPKN)、氮磷钾化肥+猪粪(NPKP)、氮磷钾化肥+玉米秸秆堆肥(NPKY)、氮磷钾化肥+沼渣(NPKZ) 和未添加有机物料的对照处理氮磷钾化肥(NPK)共6个处理，研究等碳量投入下不同有机物料对土壤团聚体、有机碳及其活性组分的影响。试验结果表明：各处理土壤以<0.053 mm粒级的微团聚体为主，对>0.25 mm团聚体影响不显著；施入有机物料各处理0~40 cm土层有机碳含量显著高于NPK处理，各处理间无显著性差异；各处理0~40 cm土壤活性有机碳含量显著高于NPK处理，其中NPKJ处理0~20 cm的土壤活性有机碳含量显著高于其他各处理，较NPK提高了110.42%，20~40 cm各处理无显著差异；有机物料投入后显著增加0~40 cm土壤微生物量碳含量，0~20 cm土层NPKJ处理显著高于其他各处理，较NPK提高202.78%，20~40 cm各处理土壤微生物量碳含量无显著差异；鸡粪处理下番茄产量显著高于其他处理，较NPK增产12.45%。综合有机物料对土壤固碳增产效果，鸡粪处理最优。

关键词: 有机物料, 有机碳, 微生物量碳, 团聚体, 活性有机碳, 风沙土土壤, 南疆地区

Abstract:

Aiming to solve the problem of poor sandy soil in southern Xinjiang, soil carbon sequestration and fertilization experiments were carried out. Six groups of control treatments were set up, including NPK fertilizer without organic materials, NPK fertilizer+chicken manure (NPKJ), NPK fertilizer+cow manure (NPKN), NPK fertilizer+pig manure (NPKP), NPK fertilizer+corn straw compost (NPKY) and NPK fertilizer+biogas residue (NPKZ), and the effects of different organic materials with equal carbon content on soil aggregates, organic carbon and their active components were studied. The results for two consecutive years showed that the micro-aggregates with a particle size of <0.053 mm were the main ones in each treatment, and the effect on the aggregates of >0.25 mm were not significant. In 0-40 cm, the organic carbon in treatments with organic materials had no significant differences, but they were significantly higher than that of the NPK treatment. The soil active organic carbon content of each treatment was significantly higher than that of NPK treatment at 0-40 cm, particularly in NPKJ treatment at 0-20 cm, which increased by 110.42% compared to NPK, and there was no significant difference between treatments of 20-40 cm. After the input of organic materials, the soil microbial biomass carbon content at 0-40 cm of each treatment was significantly increased as well, and the NPKJ treatment of 0-20 cm soil layer was much higher than that of other treatments, which was 202.78% higher than that of NPK, and no significant differences were witnessed among treatments at 20-40 cm. The yield of tomato under chicken manure treatment was significantly better than that of other treatments, which was 12.45% higher than that of NPK. Based on the experiments, chicken manure treatment had the best effect on soil carbon sequestration and yield increase.

Key words: organic materials, organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, aggregate, active organic carbon, aeolian sandy soil, southern Xinjiang

李源, 彭波, 吴连霞, 夏伟新, 李青军. 等碳量不同有机物料添加对风沙土团聚体及有机碳含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(18): 130-137.

LI Yuan, PENG Bo, WU Lianxia, XIA Weixin, LI Qingjun. Influence of Adding Different Organic Materials with Equal Carbon Content on Aggregates and Organic Carbon Content of Sandy Soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(18): 130-137.

图/表 10

参考文献 32

[1]	苏雪玲. 极端干旱对亚热带森林土壤团聚体、土壤酶活性及细菌群落结构的影响[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2020.
[2]	PANDEY C B, RAI R B, SINGH L. Seasonal dynamics of mineral N pools and N- mineralization in soils under homegarden trees in South Andaman, India[J]. Agroforestry systems, 2007, 71(1):57-66.
[3]	HE M, DI F A. Drought effect on plant nitrogen and phosphorus:a meta analysis[J]. New phytologist, 2014, 204(4):924-931.
[4]	李新鸽, 韩广轩, 朱连奇, 等. 降雨引起的干湿交替对土壤呼吸的影响:进展与展望[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(2):567-575.
[5]	刘传云, 管西林, 邹春琴, 等. 不同有机物料对设施黄瓜生长及土壤性状的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(2):360-368.
[6]	陈艺文, 李红丽, 董智, 等. 3种固沙材料与风沙土复配后土壤改良效应及其质量评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(5):48-54.
[7]	朱晓月, 方燕, 上官周平. 黄土风沙区土壤培肥机理与技术研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(7):95-101. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0252
[8]	NINH H T, GRANDY A S, WI K, et al. Organic amendment effects on potato productivity and quality are related to soil microbial activity[J]. Plant and soil, 2015(386):223-236.
[9]	张济世, 于波涛, 张金凤, 等. 不同改良剂对滨海盐渍土土壤理化性质和小麦生长的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(3):704-711.
[10]	董文, 张青, 罗涛, 等. 不同有机肥连续施用对土壤质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(28):106-110. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190900660
[11]	范围, 吴景贵, 李建明, 等. 秸秆均匀还田对东北地区黑钙土土壤理化性质及玉米产量的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(4):835-846.
[12]	蔺芳, 邢晶鑫, 任思敏, 等. 鸡粪与化肥配施对饲用小黑麦/玉米轮作土壤团聚体分形特征与碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(5):183-189.
[13]	于锐, 王其存, 朱平, 等. 长期不同施肥对黑土团聚体及有机碳组分的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2013, 44(3):594-600.
[14]	QIAN X, ZHU L X, SHEN Y F, et al. Sensitivity of soil water retention and availability to biochar addition in rainfed semiarid farmland during a three-year field experiment[J]. Field crops res, 2016, 196:284-293.
[15]	白小艳, 窦森. 施玉米秸秆生物质炭对土壤腐殖质组成和结构特征的影响[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2019, 41(3):330-335.
[16]	GHOSH B N, MEENA V S, SINGH R J, et al. Effects of fertilization on soil aggregation, carbon distribution and carbon management index of maize-wheat rotation in the north-western Indian Himalayas[J]. Ecological indicators, 2018, 16(8):117-128.
[17]	陈雯雯, 申卫收, 韩成, 等. 施用不同配比菇渣、熟牛粪对酸性土壤质量和花生产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2014(1):69-74.
[18]	黄殿男, 谭杰, 傅金祥, 等. 城市污水处理厂污泥对沙漠化土壤的改良效果[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(1):323-327.
[19]	韩明钊, 赵雨森, 翟国庆, 等. 有机物料添加对黑土团聚体稳定性及有机碳影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2021, 49(5):109-114.
[20]	CHEN S, XU C, YAN J, et al. The influence of the type of crop residue on soil organic carbon fractions: an 11-year field study of rice-based cropping systems in southeast China[J]. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2016, 223:261-269.
[21]	李新华, 郭洪海, 朱振林, 等. 不同秸秆还田模式对土壤有机碳及其活性组分的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(9):130-135.
[22]	CAMBARDELLA C A, ELLIOTT E T. Carbon and nitrogen distri-bution in aggregates from cultivated and native grassland soils[J]. Soil science society of America journal, 1993, 57(4):1071-1076.
[23]	LIANG B C, MACKENZIE A F, SCHITIZER M, et al. Management-induced change in labile soil organic matter under continuous corn in eastern Canadian soils[J]. Biology and fertility of soils, 1997, 26(2):88-94.
[24]	BLAIR G J, LEFROY R, LISLE L. Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation, and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems[J]. Australian journal of agricultural research, 1995, 46(7):1459.
[25]	吴金水, 林启美, 黄巧云, 等. 土壤微生物生物量测定方法及其应用[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2006.
[26]	NGUYEN T T, MARSCHNER P. Addition of a fine-textured soil to compost to reduce nutrient leaching in a sandy soil[J]. Soil research, 2013, 13(2):953-968.
[27]	刘晓林. 不同有机物料改良剂对川西北高寒沙地土壤改良效果研究[D]. 绵阳: 四川农业大学, 2019.
[28]	BERTRAND I, CHABBERT B, KUREK B, et al. Can the biochemical features and histology of wheat residues explain their decomposition in soil[J]. Plant and soil, 2006, 281(2):291-307.
[29]	赵晶晶, 郭颖, 陈欣, 等. 有机物料对土壤有机磷组分及其矿化进程的影响[J]. 土壤, 2006, 38(6):740-744.
[30]	荀卫兵, 王伯仁, 冉炜, 等. 不同施肥制度对南方早地红壤微生物组结构和功能影响研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(4):537-544.
[31]	徐英德, 汪景宽, 王思引, 等. 玉米残体分解对不同肥力棕壤团聚体组成及有机碳分布的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(7):1029-1037.
[32]	MAILLARD E, ANGERS D A. Animal manure application and soil organic carbon stocks: a meta-analysis[J]. Global change biology, 2014, 20(2):666-679. pmid: 24132954

有机物料	有机碳/(g/kg)	全氮/(g/kg)	全磷/(g/kg)	全钾/(g/kg)	pH
NPKJ	240	10.2	4.3	6.1	6.94
NPKN	168	7.3	3.4	4.6	7.25
NPKZ	190	8.5	3.9	5.2	7.08
NPKY	185	7.4	3.8	5.1	6.98
NPKZ	155	6.7	3.2	4.5	7.2

有机物料	有机碳/(g/kg)	全氮/(g/kg)	全磷/(g/kg)	全钾/(g/kg)	pH
NPKJ	240	10.2	4.3	6.1	6.94
NPKN	168	7.3	3.4	4.6	7.25
NPKZ	190	8.5	3.9	5.2	7.08
NPKY	185	7.4	3.8	5.1	6.98
NPKZ	155	6.7	3.2	4.5	7.2

处理	有机物料	有机物料			无机化肥用量
处理	有机物料	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	N	P₂O₅	K₂O
NPK	—	—	—	—	226	105	147
NPKJ	21000	214.20	90.30	128.10	11.80	14.70	18.90
NPKN	30000	219.00	102.00	138.00	7.00	3.00	9.00
NPKZ	26520	225.42	121.99	114.04	0.58	1.57	9.10
NPKY	27240	201.58	103.51	138.92	24.42	1.49	8.08
NPKZ	32505	217.78	104.02	146.27	8.22	0.98	0.73

处理	有机物料	有机物料			无机化肥用量
处理	有机物料	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	N	P₂O₅	K₂O
NPK	—	—	—	—	226	105	147
NPKJ	21000	214.20	90.30	128.10	11.80	14.70	18.90
NPKN	30000	219.00	102.00	138.00	7.00	3.00	9.00
NPKZ	26520	225.42	121.99	114.04	0.58	1.57	9.10
NPKY	27240	201.58	103.51	138.92	24.42	1.49	8.08
NPKZ	32505	217.78	104.02	146.27	8.22	0.98	0.73

年限	团聚体大小	<0.053 mm		0.053~0.25 mm		>0.25 mm
年限	土壤层次	0~20 cm	20~40 cm	0~20 cm	20~40 cm	0~20 cm	20~40 cm
2023	NPKJ	59.7^a	61.9^a	39.2^a	37.3^a	1.1^a	0.8^a
	NPKN	64.6^a	66.3^a	33.9^a	33.4^a	1.5^a	0.3^a
	NPKP	57.6^a	57.2^a	39.9^a	42.2^a	2.5^a	0.6^a
	NPKY	61.6^a	64.7^a	36.3^a	33.7^a	2.1^a	1.6^a
	NPKZ	65.2^a	55.7^a	33^a	43.5^a	1.8^a	0.8^a
	NPK	60.5^a	65.4^a	38.4^a	33.4^a	1.1^a	1.2^a
2024	NPKJ	58.2^a	64.3^a	40.3^a	33.3^a	1.5^a	1.4^a
	NPKN	56.3^a	67.1^a	42.8^a	31.6^a	0.7^a	1.3^a
	NPKP	60.5^a	59.6^a	38.5^a	39.6^a	1^a	0.8^a
	NPKY	52.8^a	63.5^a	46.6^a	35.1^a	0.8^a	1.4^a
	NPKZ	60.2^a	61.2^a	38.4^a	37.9^a	1.4^a	0.9^a
	NPK	63.5^a	59.8^a	35.8^a	39.3^a	0.7^a	0.9^a

等碳量不同有机物料添加对风沙土团聚体及有机碳含量的影响

Influence of Adding Different Organic Materials with Equal Carbon Content on Aggregates and Organic Carbon Content of Sandy Soil

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	董林林, 严凯, 盛雪雯, 陆长婴, 施林林, 王海候, 吴正贵. 耕作方式影响下水稻生育期土壤水溶性有机碳的光谱特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(9): 99-106.
[2]	汤营营, 唐贤, 赵建荣. 基于Meta分析的长期施肥对中国农田土壤团聚体稳定性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(9): 117-126.
[3]	宋凯, 高宇, 左雨田, 刘杨. 生物炭改良模式下农田土壤总有机碳的Meta分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(9): 125-131.
[4]	于丽萍, 王丽君, 梁孟菊, 王璐, 孙金阳, 张俊鹏, 侯翔皓. 基施有机肥对冬小麦产量及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(18): 8-16.
[5]	顾嘉诚, 王家平, 张增成, 蒋贵菊, 李鲁华, 程志博. 耕作方式对土壤团聚体稳定性、土壤质量和玉米产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(17): 78-87.
[6]	张学科, 李惠霞, 张天一, 马兰兰, 严海霞, 田学霞. 绿肥及其他物料对宁夏枸杞园土壤中碳氮转化的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(12): 67-73.
[7]	徐建明, 王艳红, 刘忠珍, 郑小东. 有机物料还田对稻田土壤温室气体排放及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(36): 95-101.
[8]	李廷宇, 申毅, 童俊飞, 路顺凤, 李琴, 郭颂, 杨卫君. 施用生物炭并减少灌水量对麦田土壤团聚结构及冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(36): 110-116.
[9]	郭树芳, 翟丽梅, 刘宏斌, 雷宝坤. 不同有机物料对洱海流域农田土壤温室气体排放的短期影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(33): 68-77.
[10]	张蛟, 崔士友, 陈澎军, 韩继军, 张瑞. 沿海滩涂不同青贮种植模式下土壤盐分、养分及碳库变化特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(32): 56-61.
[11]	赵凯丽, 郭宁, 李权辉, 李萍, 王艳平, 陈娟, 颜芳, 王维瑞. 京郊低肥力粮田快速培肥和高产施肥技术及应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(30): 61-65.
[12]	廖益民, 郑铭洁, 章明奎. 地形部位与利用方式对紫色土性状的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(3): 81-86.
[13]	王宁, 张仁政, 刘振, 吕金玲, 沈莹, 杨乾, 李耕, 宁堂原. 长期深松耕作结合秸秆还田对土壤团聚体固碳能力与无机稳定机制的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(28): 83-93.
[14]	卓丽芳, 黄继川, 李珠娴, 梁健仪, 钟文亮, 韦秋芳, 涂玉婷. 有机碳源添加剂对酚酸胁迫下番茄幼苗生长及根际土理化性质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(28): 102-111.
[15]	宋鸽, 胥智强, 孙静思, 赵雪宁. 不同开垦条件下土壤腐殖质光谱和热重特征分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(27): 60-68.