小麦地上部吸收的镉向根系转运及对营养元素吸收的影响研究

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0059

中国农学通报 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (27): 1-10.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0059

• 农学·农业基础科学 • 下一篇

小麦地上部吸收的镉向根系转运及对营养元素吸收的影响研究

赵林林¹(), 刘朋坤²^,³^,⁴, 邢维芹²^,³^,⁴, 王丽萍²^,³^,⁴, 杨永强²^,³^,⁴, 黄新君²^,³^,⁴, 邱坤艳¹(), 李立平²^,³^,⁴()

¹ 河南省济源生态环境监测中心，河南济源 459000
² 河南工业大学环境工程学院，郑州 450001
³ 河南省环境污染修复与粮食质量安全国际联合实验室，郑州 450001
⁴ 河南工业大学碳中和研究院，郑州 450001

收稿日期:2025-01-24 修回日期:2025-04-25 出版日期:2025-09-25 发布日期:2025-10-07
通讯作者:
邱坤艳，女，1982年出生，河南济源人，正高级工程师，博士，研究方向：环境科学。通信地址：459000 河南省济源市汤帝路868号，Tel：0391-6963368，E-mail：kunyanq@126.com；
李立平，男，1972年出生，甘肃灵台人，教授，博士，研究方向：环境土壤学，主持完成国家级项目2项，发表学术论文100余篇。通信地址：450001 河南省郑州市高新区莲花街100号，Tel：0371-67756982，E-mail：lilp@haut.edu.cn。
作者简介:
赵林林，男，1989年出生，河南济源人，工程师，本科，学士，研究方向：环境监测。通信地址：459000 河南省济源市汤帝路868号，Tel：0391-6963368，E-mail：15138809559@163.com。
基金资助:
河南省教育厅河南省高等学校重点科研项目“小麦地上部吸收镉的机理研究”(23A610005); 国家自然科学基金项目“机械碾压剪切过程对土壤孔隙及水、气传输影响机理研究”(42207366)

Transfer of Shoot Absorbed Cd to Root and Its Effect on Nutrient Elements Absorption in Hydroponic Wheat

ZHAO Linlin¹(), LIU Pengkun²^,³^,⁴, XING Weiqin²^,³^,⁴, WANG Liping²^,³^,⁴, YANG Yongqiang²^,³^,⁴, HUANG Xinjun²^,³^,⁴, QIU Kunyan¹(), LI Liping²^,³^,⁴()

¹ Jiyuan Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center of Henan Province, Jiyuan, Henan 459000
² School of Environmental Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001
³ Henan International Joint Laboratory of Environmental Pollution, Remediation and Grain Quality Security, Zhengzhou 450001
⁴ Institute of Carbon Neutrality, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001

Received:2025-01-24 Revised:2025-04-25 Published:2025-09-25 Online:2025-10-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究旨在探究小麦地上部所吸收的镉是否能够运输至根系，以及这种运输对植株吸收铜、锰和锌所产生的影响，同时考察叶片剪口是否能够促进叶片对镉的吸收。将小麦幼苗地上部浸没于不同浓度（0、50、100 mg/L）的镉溶液中24 h，针对50 mg/L浓度的处理，同时设置剪去叶尖1/3的实验组。在镉处理后的第1、3、7、14天分别进行采样，对小麦地上部和根系的长度、生物量以及镉、铜、锰和锌的含量与积累量展开分析。研究结果显示，施镉处理后，小麦地上部镉含量范围为216~614 mg/kg，根系镉含量范围为3.24~13.2 mg/kg。在4个采样时期，施镉处理的根系镉含量均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。根系镉积累量占植株总积累量的比例介于0.164%~0.487%之间。施镉处理的根系镉积累量在4个采样时间点之间未呈现显著差异。在镉浓度为50 mg/L的两个处理组（完整叶片组和剪口叶片组）之间，镉含量或积累量均无显著差异(P>0.05)。仅在第14天采样时，100 mg/L处理组的地上部镉含量显著高于50 mg/L处理组(P<0.05)。在部分采样时间，施镉处理的地上部和根系锌含量以及根系铜含量显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。综上所述，地上部施用的镉在处理后的第1天即可转运至根部，但施镉结束后，地上部积累的镉无法继续向根部转运；叶片剪口并不能促进小麦地上部对镉的吸收；地上部吸收的镉转运至根系后，会抑制根系对锌和铜的吸收。

关键词: 小麦, 镉, 地上部, 吸收, 根系, 剪口

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to investigate whether Cd absorbed by wheat shoot can be transported to the roots, and its effects on the uptake of Cu, Mn, and Zn by the plant, and whether leaf-tip cutting could promote Cd absorption by the leaves. Wheat seedling shoots were immersed in Cd solutions (0, 50, and 100 mg/L) for 24 hours, and an additional treatment with one-third of the leaf tips cut for the 50 mg/L treatment was set up. Wheat samples were collected at 1, 3, 7, and 14 days after Cd exposure to analyze shoot and root length, biomass, as well as the concentration and accumulation of Cd, Cu, Mn, and Zn in the shoots and roots. The results showed that, under Cd treatments, Cd concentrations in shoots and roots ranged from 216-614 mg/kg and 3.24-13.2 mg/kg, respectively. On all four sampling dates, Cd concentrations in roots under Cd treatments were significantly higher than the control (P<0.05). The proportion of Cd accumulated in roots relative to total plant accumulation ranged from 0.164% to 0.487%, and no significant differences were observed across the four sampling times for root Cd accumulation. No significant differences (P>0.05) in Cd concentration or accumulation of shoot and root were found between the two 50 mg/L treatments (intact vs. cut leaves). Only on 14^th day, the Cd concentration of the 100 mg/L treatment was significantly greater than the 50 mg/L treatment (P<0.05). At certain sampling times, Zn concentration in shoots and roots, as well as Cu concentration in roots of the Cd treatments were significantly lower than the control (P<0.05). These results indicated that Cd applied to wheat shoot was transported to the roots as early as on 1^st day after the exposure. However, after the Cd exposure ended, Cd accumulated in the shoots was no longer transported to the roots. Leaf-tip cutting did not enhance Cd absorption in the shoots. Moreover, Cd transported from shoots to roots inhibited Zn and Cu uptake by the roots.

Key words: wheat plant, cadmium, shoot, absorption, root, cut

赵林林, 刘朋坤, 邢维芹, 王丽萍, 杨永强, 黄新君, 邱坤艳, 李立平. 小麦地上部吸收的镉向根系转运及对营养元素吸收的影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(27): 1-10.

ZHAO Linlin, LIU Pengkun, XING Weiqin, WANG Liping, YANG Yongqiang, HUANG Xinjun, QIU Kunyan, LI Liping. Transfer of Shoot Absorbed Cd to Root and Its Effect on Nutrient Elements Absorption in Hydroponic Wheat[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(27): 1-10.

图/表 6

参考文献 33

[1]	孟自力, 贾斌, 尹海燕, 等. 镉胁迫对小麦生长发育的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(23):26-32. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18040027
[2]	LI L, ZHANG Y, IPPOLITO J A, et al. Cadmium foliar application affects wheat Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn accumulation[J]. Environmental pollution, 2020, 262:114329.
[3]	MA C, LIU F, XIE P, et al. Mechanism of Pb absorption in wheat grains[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2021,415:125618.
[4]	MA C, XIE P, YANG J, et al. Evaluating the contributions of leaf organ to wheat grain cadmium at the filling stage[J]. Science of the total environment, 2022,833:155217.
[5]	QIAO Y, HOU H, CHEN L, et al. Comparison of Pb and Cd in wheat grains under air-soil-wheat system near lead-zinc smelters and total suspended particulate introduced modeling attempt[J]. Science of the total environment, 2022,839:156290.
[6]	KABATA-PENDIAS A. Trace elements in soils and plants[M]. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. 2010:275-303.
[7]	SARWAR N, ISHAQ W, FARID G, et al. Zinc-cadmium interactions: impact on wheat physiology and mineral acquisition[J]. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2015,122:528-536.
[8]	HUI X, LUO L, CHEN Y, et al. Zinc agronomic biofortification in wheat and its drivers: a global meta-analysis[J]. Nature communications, 2025,16:3913.
[9]	KANNAN S, CHARNEL A. Foliar absorption and transport of inorganic nutrients[J]. Critical reviews in plant sciences, 2008,4:341-375.
[10]	HASLETT B S, REID R J, RENGEL Z. Zinc mobility in wheat: uptake and distribution of zinc applied to leaves or roots[J]. Annals of botany, 2001,87:379-386.
[11]	DE SOUZA G A, DE CARVALHO J G, RUTZKE M, et al. Evaluation of germplasm effect on Fe, Zn and Se content in wheat seedlings[J]. Plant science, 2013,210:206-213.
[12]	NIAZKHANI M, NAVVABI A. Interactions between Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn in various organs of bread wheat at deficiency and adequate of absorbable zinc[J]. American journal of plant sciences, 2025,16: 232-244.
[13]	RIESEN O, FELLER U. Redistribution of nickel, cobalt, manganese, zinc, and cadmium via the phloem in young and maturing wheat[J]. Journal of plant nutrition, 2005,28:421-430.
[14]	HARRIS N S, TAYLOR G J. Cadmium uptake and partitioning in durum wheat during grain filling[J]. BMC plant bioogy, 2013,13:103.
[15]	RENGEL Z, CAKMAK I, WHITE P J. Marschner's mineral nutrition of plants[M]. London, UK: Academic Press, 2023:73-104.
[16]	HARRIS N S, TAYLOR G J. Remobilization of cadmium in maturing shoots ofnear isogenic lines of durum wheat that differ in grain cadmium accumulation[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2001,52:1473-1481.
[17]	TAVAREZ M, MACRI A, SANKARAN R P. Cadmium and zinc partitioning and accumulation during grain filling in two near isogenic lines of durum wheat[J]. Plant physiology and biochemistry, 2015,97:461-469.
[18]	CHAN D Y, HALE B A. Differential accumulation of Cd in durum wheat cultivars: uptake and retranslocation as sources of variation[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2004,55:2571-2579.
[19]	UR REHMAN M Z, RIZWAN M, HUSSAIN A, et al. Alleviation of cadmium (Cd) toxicity and minimizing its uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum) by using organic carbon sources in Cd-spiked soil[J]. Environmental pollution, 2018,241:557-565.
[20]	ERENOGLU B, NIKOLIC M, RÖMHELD V, et al. Uptake and transport of foliar applied zinc (65Zn) in bread and durum wheat cultivars differing in zinc efficiency[J]. Plant and soil, 2022,241:251-257.
[21]	ZHANG Y, SHI R, REZAUL K M, et al. Iron and zinc concentrations in grain and flour of winter wheat as affected by foliar application[J]. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2010,58:12268-12274.
[22]	LIU P, LI L, IPPOLITO J A, et al. Heavy metal distribution in wheat plant components following foliar Cd application[J]. Chemosphere, 2023,322:138177.
[23]	GIELEN H, VANGRONSVELD J, CUYPERS A. Cd-induced Cu deficiency responses in Arabidopsis thaliana: are phytochelatins involved[J]. Plant, cell and environment, 2017,40:390-400.
[24]	PEARSON J N, RENGEL Z. Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 1994,45:1829-835.
[25]	FREY B, KELLER C, ZIEROLD K. Distribution of Zn in functionally different leaf epidermal cells of the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens[J]. Plant, cell and environment, 2000,23:675-687.
[26]	SARRET G, SAUMITOU-LAPRADE P, BERT V, et al. Forms of zinc accumulated in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri[J]. Plant physiology, 2002,130:1815-1826.
[27]	SHI G, LIU H, ZHOU D, et al. Sulfur reduces the root-toshoot translocation of arsenic and cadmium by regulating their vacuolar sequestration in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2002,13:1032681.
[28]	ZENG X, MA L Q, QIU R L, et al. Effects of Zn on plant tolerance and non-protein thiol accumulation in Zn hyperaccumulator Arabis paniculata Franch[J]. Environmental and experimental botany, 2011,70:227-232.
[29]	PENG J S, GONG J M. Vacuolar sequestration capacity and long-distance metal transport in plants[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2014,5:19-23.
[30]	LIU Y, LU M, TAO Q, et al. A comparative study of root cadmium radial transport in seedlings of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes differing in grain cadmium accumulation[J]. Environmental pollution, 2020,266:115235.
[31]	SHAHID M, DUMAT C, KHALID S, et al. Foliar heavy metal uptake, toxicity and detoxification in plants: a comparison of foliar and root metal uptake[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2017,325:36-58.
[32]	BONDADA B R, TU S, MA L Q. Absorption of foliar-applied arsenic by the arsenic hyperaccumulating fern (Pteris vittata L.)[J]. Science of the total environment, 2004,332:61-70.
[33]	SCHREIBER L. Polar paths of diffusion across plant cuticles: new evidence for an old hypothesis[J]. Annals of botany, 2005,95:1069-1073.

性状	处理	第1天	第3天	第7天	第14天
根长/cm	CK	10.2 ± 0.71	9.29 ± 1.36	9.46 ± 0.88	11.1 ± 1.14
	T50	9.13 ± 0.67	9.65 ± 1.49	10.2 ± 0.61	10.8 ± 1.25
	T100	9.44 ± 1.04	9.58 ± 0.61	10.1 ± 0.34	9.92 ± 0.28
株高/cm	CK	22.5 ± 3.42	26.4 ± 2.49	30.4 ± 1.80	33.9 ± 0.65
	T50	21.2 ± 2.02	25.7 ± 2.68	31.2 ± 1.92	34.3 ± 1.84
	T100	23.0 ± 1.96	26.9 ± 2.61	30.3 ±1.46	32.6 ± 0.88
根系干重/(g/pot)	CK	0.07 ± 0.01	0.06 ± 0.01	0.06 ± 0.00	0.07 ± 0.00b
	T50	0.06 ± 0.01	0.05 ± 0.01	0.07 ± 0.01	0.09 ± 0.01a
	T100	0.00 ± 0.01	0.06 ± 0.01	0.06 ± 0.02	0.07 ± 0.00b
地上部干重/(g/pot)	CK	0.26 ± 0.02	0.27 ±0.04	0.27 ± 0.03	0.45 ± 0.05b
	T50	0.26 ± 0.03	0.27 ±0.05	0.35 ± 0.07	0.54 ± 0.04a
	T100	0.28 ± 0.04	0.28 ± 0.05	0.32 ± 0.06	0.43 ± 0.03b

性状	处理	第1天	第3天	第7天	第14天
根长/cm	CK	10.2 ± 0.71	9.29 ± 1.36	9.46 ± 0.88	11.1 ± 1.14
	T50	9.13 ± 0.67	9.65 ± 1.49	10.2 ± 0.61	10.8 ± 1.25
	T100	9.44 ± 1.04	9.58 ± 0.61	10.1 ± 0.34	9.92 ± 0.28
株高/cm	CK	22.5 ± 3.42	26.4 ± 2.49	30.4 ± 1.80	33.9 ± 0.65
	T50	21.2 ± 2.02	25.7 ± 2.68	31.2 ± 1.92	34.3 ± 1.84
	T100	23.0 ± 1.96	26.9 ± 2.61	30.3 ±1.46	32.6 ± 0.88
根系干重/(g/pot)	CK	0.07 ± 0.01	0.06 ± 0.01	0.06 ± 0.00	0.07 ± 0.00b
	T50	0.06 ± 0.01	0.05 ± 0.01	0.07 ± 0.01	0.09 ± 0.01a
	T100	0.00 ± 0.01	0.06 ± 0.01	0.06 ± 0.02	0.07 ± 0.00b
地上部干重/(g/pot)	CK	0.26 ± 0.02	0.27 ±0.04	0.27 ± 0.03	0.45 ± 0.05b
	T50	0.26 ± 0.03	0.27 ±0.05	0.35 ± 0.07	0.54 ± 0.04a
	T100	0.28 ± 0.04	0.28 ± 0.05	0.32 ± 0.06	0.43 ± 0.03b

性状	采样时间	T50	TC50	T100
根系/(μg/pot)	第1天	0.194±0.043	0.187±0.085	0.306±0.089
	第3天	0.206±0.085	0.375±0.234	0.394±0.131
	第7天	0.494±0.211	0.394±0.051	0.512±0.224
	第14天	0.400±0.276	0.219±0.159	0.587±0.107
总量/(μg/pot)	第1天	122±18	104±20	167±18
	第3天	100±13	107±11	143±53
	第7天	99.3±27.5	117±17	117±41
	第14天	125±24	87.1±23.1	145±30
根系占比%	第1天	0.164±0.057	0.177±0.059	0.187±0.016
	第3天	0.190±0.075	0.352±0.216	0.279±0.043
	第7天	0.487±0.109	0.343±0.064	0.426±0.064
	第14天	0.300±0.195	0.290±0.271	0.420±0.123

性状	采样时间	T50	TC50	T100
根系/(μg/pot)	第1天	0.194±0.043	0.187±0.085	0.306±0.089
	第3天	0.206±0.085	0.375±0.234	0.394±0.131
	第7天	0.494±0.211	0.394±0.051	0.512±0.224
	第14天	0.400±0.276	0.219±0.159	0.587±0.107
总量/(μg/pot)	第1天	122±18	104±20	167±18
	第3天	100±13	107±11	143±53
	第7天	99.3±27.5	117±17	117±41
	第14天	125±24	87.1±23.1	145±30
根系占比%	第1天	0.164±0.057	0.177±0.059	0.187±0.016
	第3天	0.190±0.075	0.352±0.216	0.279±0.043
	第7天	0.487±0.109	0.343±0.064	0.426±0.064
	第14天	0.300±0.195	0.290±0.271	0.420±0.123

元素			处理	第1天	第3天	第7天	第14天
地上部	铜/(mg/kg)		CK	12.8±0.8	11.5±0.7	13.6±1.9	13.3±1.2
			T50	12.4±0.5	12.1±0.8	16.1±3.0	21.0±10.2
			TC50	11.9±0.4	12.3±1.0	20.9±9.0	16.8±1.7
			T100	12.7±0.6B	12.7±0.5B	15.6±1.5A	16.0±0.6A
	锰/(mg/kg)		CK	77.6±5.8B	81.2±8.0B	118±11A	134±14A
			T50	72.4±0.7B	80.1±7.2B	125±27A	150±15A
			TC50	71.3±3.1C	77.3±5.0C	109±7B	147±6A
			T100	74.7±5.6C	83.4±3.5C	120±13B	157±10A
	锌/(mg/kg)		CK	68.4±8.3	61.4±8.1	64.7±3.0	93.4±9.3a
			T50	69.1±5.4	69.5±9.6	59.9±14.6	71.2±19.6b
			TC50	71.3±9.9A	69.0±5.0A	53.2±2.5B	60.6±3.6bAB
			T100	63.8±8.0	68.9±5.0	53.4±8.0	65.8±9.0b
根系	铜/(mg/kg)	CK		42.8±12.8C	32.4±12.5C	109.4±11.9aB	141.0±13.4aA
		T50		50.9±9.7B	34.9±7.6B	94.5±12.6abA	102.0±16.0bA
		TC50		43.8±6.3C	38.0±7.4C	75.3±6.0bB	87.6±6.4bA
		T100		38.9±9.1C	52.0±7.6C	80.8±11.0bB	119.9±30.0aA
	锰/(mg/kg)	CK		175±21B	195±20B	309±64A	370±9A
		T50		180±20B	180±40B	414±71A	404±151A
		TC50		184±28B	185±25B	352±53A	438±140A
		T100		180±37B	201±26B	411±68A	402±45A
	锌/(mg/kg)	CK		192±20aB	255±44aB	506±114aA	607±76aA
		T50		166±23ab	160±25b	301±244ab	277±36b
		TC50		167±30ab	154±32b	170±76b	216±60b
		T100		139±30b	252±65a	138±22b	300±167b

小麦地上部吸收的镉向根系转运及对营养元素吸收的影响研究

Transfer of Shoot Absorbed Cd to Root and Its Effect on Nutrient Elements Absorption in Hydroponic Wheat

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	田翠玲, 田家良. 不同生育期喷施海藻酸增效液对冬小麦光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(9): 25-31.
[2]	任庆国, 吴广俊, 林平, 张继雨, 张鑫, 张永珊, 海涛. 小麦新品种‘菏麦26’的产量及品质特性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(9): 32-37.
[3]	汪宝卿, 解备涛, 张立明. 不同耐旱性甘薯根系的转录组分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(9): 47-55.
[4]	黄文茵, 张白鸽, 常静静, 陈潇, 李静, 陈雷, 赵俊宏, 罗谋雄, 宋钊. 外源肌醇对盐胁迫下番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(9): 73-80.
[5]	张宇羽, 王香宁, 曾雪娇, 官洁, 张毅, 李冰, 蔡艳. 控释氮肥与尿素配施对川东套作春玉米氮素吸收与利用的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(8): 25-30.
[6]	薛远赛, 王锡久, 邹士国, 张守福, 刘光亚, 韩伟, 孙显. 复合寡糖对山东典型作物产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(8): 50-56.
[7]	马卓, 周韩冰, 赵满兴, 张霞, 王欣, 马丹妮. 黄腐酸钾对延安山地苹果养分吸收、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(8): 63-68.
[8]	董建梅, 胡江, 李晶, 刘红明, 付小猛, 赖新朴, 杜玉霞. 砧木对柠檬‘云柠1号’矿质养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(7): 47-54.
[9]	王鑫, 张欣欣, 米明, 李硕, 李好健, 马海林, 司东霞. 一次性施用氮肥对芍药生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(7): 61-66.
[10]	陶媛, 何亚玲, 张倩, 孙倩, 刘永亮, 李前荣. 调整播期对宁夏春小麦产量与品质性状的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(6): 10-21.
[11]	范华, 程敦公, 刘建军, 刘爱峰. 不同筋力小麦品种混播的理化品质特性变化及对面包面条品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(6): 148-152.
[12]	边巴卓玛, 宋国英, 刘国一. 有机肥替代部分化学氮肥、磷肥对春青稞干物质、养分积累分配的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(5): 69-76.
[13]	夏彦, 刘凯文, 叶佩, 邓艳君, 肖潇, 耿一风, 吴启侠. 基于优化播期的江汉平原冬小麦种植气象适宜性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(4): 102-107.
[14]	闫晓花, 曹甜, 张国斌. 水分胁迫对黄瓜幼苗根系生长及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(4): 31-38.
[15]	张新刚. 气候变暖对豫北地区冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响——以河南省沁阳市为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(3): 98-106.