井冈霉素A协同下37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC对小麦赤霉病及DON毒素的防治效果

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2026-0089

中国农学通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (21): 181-187.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2026-0089

井冈霉素A协同下37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC对小麦赤霉病及DON毒素的防治效果

朱凤¹(), 张海波², 周晨², 张新建³, 侯毅平⁴, 陈宏州⁵()

¹ 江苏省绿色食品办公室，南京 210017
² 江苏省植物保护植物检疫站，南京 210036
³ 扬州市苏灵农药化工有限公司，江苏扬州 225231
⁴ 南京农业大学植物保护学院，南京 210095
⁵ 江苏丘陵地区镇江农业科学研究所，江苏句容 212400

收稿日期:2026-01-23 修回日期:2026-03-20 出版日期:2026-11-10 发布日期:2026-11-10
通讯作者:
陈宏州，男，1984年出生，广西宜州人，副研究员，硕士，主要从事杀菌剂抗药性监测与治理及作物病害绿色防控技术研究。通信地址：212400 江苏省句容市弘景路1号江苏丘陵地区镇江农业科学研究所，Tel：0511-80978079，E-mail：hongzc_2006@126.com。
作者简介:
朱凤，女，1979年出生，江苏宝应人，推广研究员，硕士，主要从事绿色优质农产品全产业链建设工作。通信地址：210017 江苏省南京市建邺区南湖路97号江苏省绿色食品办公室（江苏省农产品质量安全中心），Tel：025-86263340，E-mail：jszbczf@163.com。
基金资助:
江苏省现代农业关键技术集成推广项目“小麦赤霉病等重大病虫精准防控关键技术集成与示范推广”(JCTG[2025]03-2); 句容市社会发展科技计划“基于小麦耐毒素积累的DON毒素防控技术研究与应用”(ZA42407)

Control Efficacy of 37% Bemystrobin Tebuconazole SC against Fusarium Head Blight and DON Mycotoxins in Wheat with Synergistic Action of Jinggangmycin A

ZHU Feng¹(), ZHANG Haibo², ZHOU Chen², ZHANG Xinjian³, HOU Yiping⁴, CHEN Hongzhou⁵()

¹ Green Food Office of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210017
² Plant Protection and Quarantine Station of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210036
³ Yangzhou Suling Pesticide Chemical Co., Ltd, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225231
⁴ College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095
⁵ Zhenjiang Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Hilly Area of Jiangsu Province, Jurong, Jiangsu 212400

Received:2026-01-23 Revised:2026-03-20 Published:2026-11-10 Online:2026-11-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了提升对小麦赤霉病及其毒素脱氧雪腐镰刀菌烯醇(DON)的防治效果，本研究于2024年和2025年采用24%井冈霉素A SL与37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC进行协同施药，探究了不同施药频次与协同剂量对赤霉病发病指数及籽粒DON含量的影响。结果表明，2次施药对赤霉病及DON毒素的防治效果均显著高于1次，但与3次施药差异不显著。单独使用37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC（375 mL/hm² 1~3次施药）时，对赤霉病的病指防效为62.94%~89.89%，对DON毒素的防效为46.09%~72.26%。24%井冈霉素A SL对DON毒素防效显著高于其对赤霉病的病指防效，显示出减少籽粒DON积累的潜力。24%井冈霉素A SL协同施药后，病指防效和DON防效均进一步提高，且随井冈霉素A剂量增加，增效作用更显著。本研究证明，合理采用24%井冈霉素A SL与37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC协同施药2次，可有效控制小麦赤霉病和DON毒素污染，为提升小麦品质安全提供了技术支撑。

关键词: 小麦赤霉病, 脱氧雪腐镰刀菌烯醇, 井冈霉素, 苯醚菌酯, 戊唑醇, 防治效果

Abstract:

To enhance the control efficacy against fusarium head blight (FHB) and deoxynivalenol (DON) mycotoxins in wheat, field experiments were conducted in 2024 and 2025 by combined application of 24% Jinggangmycin A soluble concentrate (SL) and 37% bemystrobin·tebuconazole suspension concentrate (SC), and the control efficacy of different application frequencies and combined dosages on FHB and grain DON content were investigated. The results showed that two times of applications provided significantly higher control efficacy against both FHB and DON mycotoxins than one time, but no significant difference was observed between two and three times of applications. When applied alone at 375 mL/hm² for 1-3 times, 37% bemystrobin·tebuconazole SC achieved a disease index control efficacy of 62.94%-89.89% against FHB and a DON mycotoxins control efficacy of 46.09%-72.26%. The control efficacy of 24% Jinggangmycin A SL against DON mycotoxins was significantly higher than its control efficacy against the disease index of FHB, demonstrating its potential to reduce DON accumulation in grains. After combined application of 24% Jinggangmycin A SL, both the disease index control efficacy and DON control efficacy were further improved, and the synergistic effect became more pronounced with the increase of Jinggangmycin A dosage. Reasonable combined application of 24% Jinggangmycin A SL and 37% bemystrobin·tebuconazole SC twice can effectively control FHB and DON contamination, providing technical support for improving wheat quality and safety.

Key words: fusarium head blight, deoxynivalenol (DON), Jinggangmycin, bemystrobin, tebuconazole, control efficacy

中图分类号:

S435.121

朱凤, 张海波, 周晨, 张新建, 侯毅平, 陈宏州. 井冈霉素A协同下37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC对小麦赤霉病及DON毒素的防治效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(21): 181-187.

ZHU Feng, ZHANG Haibo, ZHOU Chen, ZHANG Xinjian, HOU Yiping, CHEN Hongzhou. Control Efficacy of 37% Bemystrobin Tebuconazole SC against Fusarium Head Blight and DON Mycotoxins in Wheat with Synergistic Action of Jinggangmycin A[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(21): 181-187.

图/表 2

参考文献 29

[1]	GUO L J, MA M, WU L N, et al. Modified expression of TaCYP78A5 enhances grain weight with yield potential by accumulating auxin in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Plant biotechnology journal, 2022, 20(1):168-182. doi: 10.1111/pbi.v20.1 URL
[2]	ZHOU F, ZHOU X L, JIAO Y, et al. Baseline tebuconazole sensitivity and potential resistant risk in Fusarium graminearum[J]. BMC plant biology, 2024, 24(1):1-17. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04695-w
[3]	ZANG P, GAO Y, CHEN P, et al. Recent advances in the study of wheat protein and other food components affecting the gluten network and the properties of noodles[J]. Foods, 2022, 11(23):3824. doi: 10.3390/foods11233824 URL
[4]	SHAHRYARI Z, FAZAELIPOOR M H, GHASEMI Y, et al. Amylase and xylanase from edible fungus Neurospora intermedia: production and characterization[J]. Molecules, 2019, 24(4):721. doi: 10.3390/molecules24040721 URL
[5]	MARTIN-LOBERA C, ARANDA F, LOZANO-MARTINEZ P, et al. Bread as a valuable raw material in craft ale beer brewing[J]. Foods, 2022, 11(19):3013. doi: 10.3390/foods11193013 URL
[6]	YUAN Q S, YANG P, WU A B, et al. Variation in the microbiome, trichothecenes, and aflatoxins in stored wheat grains in Wuhan, China[J]. Toxins, 2018, 10(5):171. doi: 10.3390/toxins10050171 URL
[7]	MIELNICZUK E, SKWARYO-BEDNARZ B. Fusarium head blight, mycotoxins and strategies for their reduction[J]. Agronomy, 2020, 10(4):509. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10040509 URL
[8]	JAYAWARDANA M A, FERNANDO W G D. The mechanisms of developing fungicide resistance in Fusarium graminearum causing fusarium head blight and fungicide resistance management[J]. Pathogens, 2024, 13(11):1012. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13111012 URL
[9]	O’DONNELL K, WARD T J, GEISER D M, et al. Genealogical concordance between the mating type locus and seven other nuclear genes supports formal recognition of nine phylogenetically distinct species within the Fusarium graminearum clade[J]. Fungal genetics and biology, 2004, 41(6):600-623. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.03.003 pmid: 15121083
[10]	FOROUD N A, BAINES D, GAGKAEVA T Y, et al. Trichothecenes in cereal grains-an update[J]. Toxins, 2019, 11(11):634. doi: 10.3390/toxins11110634 URL
[11]	BUERSTMAYR M, STEINER B, BUERSTMAYR H. Breeding for fusarium head blight resistance in wheat—progress and challenges[J]. Plant breed, 2020, 139(3):429-454. doi: 10.1111/pbr.v139.3 URL
[12]	CZABAN J, WRÓBLEWSKA B, SULEK A, et al. Colonisation of winter wheat grain by Fusarium spp. and mycotoxin content as dependent on a wheat variety, crop rotation, a crop management system and weather conditions[J]. Food additives & contaminants, 2015, 32(6):874-910.
[13]	VAUGHAN M, BACKHOUSE D, PONTE E M D. Climate change impacts on the ecology of Fusarium graminearum species complex and susceptibility of wheat to fusarium head blight: a review[J]. World mycotoxin journal, 2016, 9(5):1-16. doi: 10.3920/WMJ2016.x001 URL
[14]	陈宏州, 张海波, 周晨, 等. 小麦籽粒DON积累动态及其影响因素相关性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(15):7-14. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0771
[15]	曾娟, 姜玉英. 2012年我国小麦赤霉病爆发原因分析及持续监控与治理对策[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2013(4):38-41.
[16]	史建荣, 刘馨, 仇剑波, 等. 小麦中镰刀菌毒素脱氧雪腐镰刀菌烯醇污染现状与防控研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(18):41-54.
[17]	FREIJE A N, WISE K A. Impact of Fusarium graminearum inoculum availability and fungicide application timing on fusarium head blight in wheat[J]. Crop protection, 2015, 77:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2015.07.016 URL
[18]	YOSHIDA M, NAKAJIMA T, TOMIMURA K, et al. Effect of the timing of fungicide application on fusarium head blight and mycotoxin contamination in wheat[J]. Plant disease, 2012, 96(6):845-851. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-10-11-0819 pmid: 30727359
[19]	国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 小麦赤霉病测报技术规范GB/T 15796-2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.
[20]	陈宏州, 王兵兵, 张新建, 等. 苯醚菌酯与戊唑醇混剂对小麦赤霉病菌的联合毒力及田间防效[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(30):132-137. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0893
[21]	陈宏州, 韩凯, 杨红福, 等. 不同杀菌剂在麦穗中的消解动态及对小麦赤霉病防效评估[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2022, 42(4):504-511.
[22]	徐飞, 宋玉立, 王俊美, 等. 不同侵染时期对小麦赤霉病发生和籽粒中DON积累的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(6):129-135.
[23]	谷春艳, 潘锐, 徐会永, 等. 小麦不同生育期施用丙硫菌唑及施用次数对小麦赤霉病及籽粒DON毒素的控制效果[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(4):328-333.
[24]	陈宏州, 吴佳文, 庄义庆, 等. 不同杀菌剂对小麦赤霉病及籽粒DON毒素的控制效果[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(6):307-317.
[25]	LI J, DUAN Y B, BIAN C H, et al. Effects of validamycin in controlling Fusarium head blight caused by Fusarium graminearum: Inhibition of DON biosynthesis and induction of host resistance[J]. Pesticide biochemistry and physiology, 2019, 153:152-160. doi: S0048-3575(18)30404-8 pmid: 30744889
[26]	黄慧, 张曼玉, 张承启, 等. 施药频次和间隔期对小麦赤霉病防效及病菌消长动态的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2025, 51(1):311-318.
[27]	卞康亚, 沈田辉, 朱展飞, 等. 小麦灌浆后期用药对赤霉病及其毒素防控效果的研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2020, 26(8):93-94,144.
[28]	江丰, 陆茸茸, 吴承东, 等. 48%氰烯∙戊唑醇对小麦灌浆后期赤霉病及其毒素水平防控效果试验[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2020(11):137-138.
[29]	BIAN C H, DUAN Y B, XIU Q, et al. Mechanism of validamycin A inhibiting DON biosynthesis and synergizing with DMI fungicides against Fusarium graminearum[J]. Molecular plant pathology, 2021, 22(7):769-785. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13060 pmid: 33934484

处理编号	喷施药剂及剂量	施药次数/次	病情指数	籽粒DON含量/(ng/g)	防效/%
处理编号	喷施药剂及剂量	施药次数/次	病情指数	籽粒DON含量/(ng/g)	病指	DON毒素
1	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²	1	2.77 g	1240.02 e	62.94 c	49.71 j
2		2	0.95 i	709.98 j	87.36 a	71.21 e
3		3	0.87 i	696.88 j	88.41 a	71.73 e
4	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²+ 24%井冈霉素A SL 187.5 mL/hm²	1	2.55 gh	1121.32 f	65.96 bc	54.53 i
5		2	0.83 i	595.26 k	88.86 a	75.86 d
6		3	0.82 i	587.35 k	89.10 a	76.18 d
7	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²+ 24%井冈霉素A SL 375 mL/hm²	1	2.48 gh	1013.58 h	66.90 bc	58.89 g
8		2	0.73 i	556.72 kl	90.23 a	77.42 cd
9		3	0.72 i	514.67 lm	90.45 a	79.13 bc
10	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²+ 24%井冈霉素A SL 750 mL/hm²	1	2.28 h	950.81 i	69.45 b	61.43 f
11		2	0.62 i	492.32 mn	91.77 a	80.03 ab
12		3	0.57 i	454.83 n	92.44 a	81.55 a
13	24%井冈霉素A SL 187.5 mL/hm²	1	5.65 b	1615.36 b	24.54 h	34.46 m
14		2	4.72 cd	1333.81 d	36.92 fg	45.92 k
15		3	4.70 cd	1300.03 d	37.21 fg	47.28 k
16	24%井冈霉素A SL 375 mL/hm²	1	4.92 c	1434.06 c	34.24 g	41.85 l
17		2	4.25 e	1233.03 e	43.24 e	50.01 j
18		3	4.15 e	1218.69 e	44.59 e	50.58 j
19	24%井冈霉素A SL 750 mL/hm²	1	4.43 de	1334.49 d	40.96 ef	45.86 k
20		2	3.63 f	1078.51 fg	51.51 d	56.28 hi
21		3	3.52 f	1052.05 gh	52.93 d	57.36 gh
22	CK	-	7.50 a	2466.32 a	-	-

处理编号	喷施药剂及剂量	施药次数/次	病情指数	籽粒DON含量/(ng/g)	防效/%
处理编号	喷施药剂及剂量	施药次数/次	病情指数	籽粒DON含量/(ng/g)	病指	DON毒素
1	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²	1	2.77 g	1240.02 e	62.94 c	49.71 j
2		2	0.95 i	709.98 j	87.36 a	71.21 e
3		3	0.87 i	696.88 j	88.41 a	71.73 e
4	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²+ 24%井冈霉素A SL 187.5 mL/hm²	1	2.55 gh	1121.32 f	65.96 bc	54.53 i
5		2	0.83 i	595.26 k	88.86 a	75.86 d
6		3	0.82 i	587.35 k	89.10 a	76.18 d
7	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²+ 24%井冈霉素A SL 375 mL/hm²	1	2.48 gh	1013.58 h	66.90 bc	58.89 g
8		2	0.73 i	556.72 kl	90.23 a	77.42 cd
9		3	0.72 i	514.67 lm	90.45 a	79.13 bc
10	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²+ 24%井冈霉素A SL 750 mL/hm²	1	2.28 h	950.81 i	69.45 b	61.43 f
11		2	0.62 i	492.32 mn	91.77 a	80.03 ab
12		3	0.57 i	454.83 n	92.44 a	81.55 a
13	24%井冈霉素A SL 187.5 mL/hm²	1	5.65 b	1615.36 b	24.54 h	34.46 m
14		2	4.72 cd	1333.81 d	36.92 fg	45.92 k
15		3	4.70 cd	1300.03 d	37.21 fg	47.28 k
16	24%井冈霉素A SL 375 mL/hm²	1	4.92 c	1434.06 c	34.24 g	41.85 l
17		2	4.25 e	1233.03 e	43.24 e	50.01 j
18		3	4.15 e	1218.69 e	44.59 e	50.58 j
19	24%井冈霉素A SL 750 mL/hm²	1	4.43 de	1334.49 d	40.96 ef	45.86 k
20		2	3.63 f	1078.51 fg	51.51 d	56.28 hi
21		3	3.52 f	1052.05 gh	52.93 d	57.36 gh
22	CK	-	7.50 a	2466.32 a	-	-

处理编号	喷施药剂及剂量	施药次数/次	病情指数	籽粒DON 含量/(ng/g)	防效/%
处理编号	喷施药剂及剂量	施药次数/次	病情指数	籽粒DON 含量/(ng/g)	病指	DON毒素
1	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²	1	1.72 g	1164.48 d	65.19 b	46.09 ij
2		2	0.53 h	606.29 h	89.25 a	71.93 e
3		3	0.50 h	599.12 h	89.89 a	72.26 e
4	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²+ 24%井冈霉素A SL 187.5 mL/hm²	1	1.65 g	1018.79 ef	66.77 b	52.83 gh
5		2	0.40 h	557.83 i	91.89 a	74.18 d
6		3	0.37 h	546.79 ij	92.61 a	74.68 cd
7	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²+ 24%井冈霉素A SL 375 mL/hm²	1	1.57 g	985.49 f	68.36 b	54.37 g
8		2	0.38 h	516.98 jk	92.28 a	76.06 bc
9		3	0.37 h	497.60 k	92.62 a	76.96 b
10	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²+ 24%井冈霉素A SL 750 mL/hm²	1	1.48 g	910.52 g	70.17 b	57.84 f
11		2	0.33 h	439.27 l	93.28 a	79.65 a
12		3	0.28 h	420.81 l	94.28 a	80.52 a
13	24%井冈霉素A SL 187.5 mL/hm²	1	3.63 b	1419.99 b	26.74 g	34.26 l
14		2	2.90 d	1174.29 d	41.45 e	45.62 j
15		3	2.87 d	1163.37 d	42.20 e	46.15 ij
16	24%井冈霉素A SL 375 mL/hm²	1	3.30 c	1297.99 c	33.33 f	39.91 k
17		2	2.60 e	1031.42 e	47.61 d	52.25 h
18		3	2.50 ef	994.62 ef	49.40 cd	53.95 g
19	24%井冈霉素A SL 750 mL/hm²	1	2.87 d	1133.66 d	42.07 e	47.52 i
20		2	2.35 f	942.12 g	52.49 cd	56.38 f
21		3	2.30 f	919.63 g	53.44 c	57.42 f
22	CK	-	4.97 a	2160.32 a	-	-

处理编号	喷施药剂及剂量	施药次数/次	病情指数	籽粒DON 含量/(ng/g)	防效/%
处理编号	喷施药剂及剂量	施药次数/次	病情指数	籽粒DON 含量/(ng/g)	病指	DON毒素
1	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²	1	1.72 g	1164.48 d	65.19 b	46.09 ij
2		2	0.53 h	606.29 h	89.25 a	71.93 e
3		3	0.50 h	599.12 h	89.89 a	72.26 e
4	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²+ 24%井冈霉素A SL 187.5 mL/hm²	1	1.65 g	1018.79 ef	66.77 b	52.83 gh
5		2	0.40 h	557.83 i	91.89 a	74.18 d
6		3	0.37 h	546.79 ij	92.61 a	74.68 cd
7	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²+ 24%井冈霉素A SL 375 mL/hm²	1	1.57 g	985.49 f	68.36 b	54.37 g
8		2	0.38 h	516.98 jk	92.28 a	76.06 bc
9		3	0.37 h	497.60 k	92.62 a	76.96 b
10	37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC 375 mL/hm²+ 24%井冈霉素A SL 750 mL/hm²	1	1.48 g	910.52 g	70.17 b	57.84 f
11		2	0.33 h	439.27 l	93.28 a	79.65 a
12		3	0.28 h	420.81 l	94.28 a	80.52 a
13	24%井冈霉素A SL 187.5 mL/hm²	1	3.63 b	1419.99 b	26.74 g	34.26 l
14		2	2.90 d	1174.29 d	41.45 e	45.62 j
15		3	2.87 d	1163.37 d	42.20 e	46.15 ij
16	24%井冈霉素A SL 375 mL/hm²	1	3.30 c	1297.99 c	33.33 f	39.91 k
17		2	2.60 e	1031.42 e	47.61 d	52.25 h
18		3	2.50 ef	994.62 ef	49.40 cd	53.95 g
19	24%井冈霉素A SL 750 mL/hm²	1	2.87 d	1133.66 d	42.07 e	47.52 i
20		2	2.35 f	942.12 g	52.49 cd	56.38 f
21		3	2.30 f	919.63 g	53.44 c	57.42 f
22	CK	-	4.97 a	2160.32 a	-	-

井冈霉素A协同下37%苯醚菌酯·戊唑醇SC对小麦赤霉病及DON毒素的防治效果

Control Efficacy of 37% Bemystrobin Tebuconazole SC against Fusarium Head Blight and DON Mycotoxins in Wheat with Synergistic Action of Jinggangmycin A

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	凌金锋, 黄峰, 王燕, 林培华, 董易之, 宋晓兵, 崔一平, 林接英. 5种绿色食品生产适用药剂对荔枝麻点病的防效评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(6): 195-200.
[2]	姜洪雪, 姚丹丹, 林思亮, 冯志勇, 秦萌, 秦姣. 0.005%溴鼠灵小麦毒饵实验室及现场适口性与灭鼠效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(15): 189-193.
[3]	张海婷, 叶建蓉, 许秉智, 曾铄程, 符慧娟, 李星月, 李其勇, 张鸿, 易军. 越西县苹果黑星病菌鉴定、生物学特性及田间防效研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(7): 115-120.
[4]	冉永正, 冉东升. 解淀粉芽孢杆菌与咯菌腈复配防治番茄灰霉病[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(35): 103-109.
[5]	肖山, 柴伟纲, 刘健, 刘围围, 谌江华. 2种纳米生物农药对水稻主要害虫的田间防治效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(31): 137-142.
[6]	刘燕, 韩伟. 不同药剂处理对马铃薯晚疫病的田间防治效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(2): 117-122.
[7]	潘连富, 林珊宇, 黄开航, 李战波, 李明伦. 7种复配杀菌剂对番荔枝叶斑病的田间防效评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(19): 126-131.
[8]	陈宏州, 张海波, 周晨, 朱友理, 杨红福, 徐超, 郭晓萌, 朱凤. 小麦籽粒DON积累动态及其影响因素相关性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(15): 7-14.
[9]	刘大欣, 金岩, 张国福, 李志勇, 苗旺, 刘震, 高兴祥, 李玉凤. 大豆玉米带状复合种植病虫草害防治技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(15): 131-137.
[10]	郭皓祯, 周华众, 邓春林, 李艳, 杨立军, 龚双军. Glarea lozoyensis P1的分离鉴定及其对小麦赤霉病抑菌降毒效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(12): 107-112.
[11]	李永丽, 陈磊, 周洲, 耿书宝, 乔利, 张方梅, 陈利军, 王丽娟. 哥斯达黎加链霉菌A-m1对小麦赤霉病的防治作用研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(30): 128-134.
[12]	袁梦蕾, 崔明悦, 张子通, 刘亚钰, 刘方春, 马海林, 刘幸红, 燕丽萍. 丹参根腐病病原菌及其生防菌的筛选[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(30): 119-127.
[13]	迟美丽, 陆凯文, 蒋文枰, 潘凌洁, 程顺, 郑建波, 孙健, 李飞. 红螯螯虾幼虾对4种水稻农药耐受性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(3): 152-157.
[14]	林接英, 黄峰, 崔一平, 凌金锋, 郭斌, 宋晓兵. 40%吡唑萘菌胺·戊唑醇悬浮剂对柑橘沙皮病的防治效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(28): 143-147.
[15]	赵小明, 张雪慧, 代快, 李江舟, 曹海龙, 徐爽, 张翠萍, 薛勐, 崔永和, 尹恒. 寡糖联合淡紫紫孢菌对化学杀线剂防治烤烟根结线虫病效果的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(24): 133-142.