玉米根系分泌碳、氮动态及与根系特征的关系

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0517

中国农学通报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (24): 31-38.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0517

所属专题：玉米；烟草种植与生产

玉米根系分泌碳、氮动态及与根系特征的关系

万一兵(), 唐岚岚, 展茗(), 尚春辉, 袁嘉仪, 秦明广

华中农业大学植物科学技术学院/农业农村部长江中游作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,武汉 430070

收稿日期:2020-09-29 修回日期:2020-12-18 出版日期:2021-08-25 发布日期:2021-08-27
通讯作者: 展茗
作者简介:万一兵,男,1997年出生,重庆人,学士,研究生,研究方向：不同种植制度农田碳、氮循环调控。通信地址：100081 北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号25号楼,Tel：15207113903,E-mail： ww1332009@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“旱作类型及秸杆还田对水旱轮作土壤碳氮耦合循环及氮素利用的影响机制”(31871579);国家自然科学基金项目“玉-稻复种替代双季稻后根-土过程变化对土壤有机碳与碳排放的影响”(31571622)

Dynamics of Carbon and Nitrogen in Root Exudation and Their Relations with Root Traits in Maize

Wan Yibing(), Tang Lanlan, Zhan Ming(), Shang Chunhui, Yuan Jiayi, Qin Mingguang

MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070

Received:2020-09-29 Revised:2020-12-18 Online:2021-08-25 Published:2021-08-27
Contact: Zhan Ming

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为深入认识玉米根系分泌碳、氮规律及其与根系特征的关系,以玉米品种‘迪卡653’为材料,采用土培-水培相结合的方法,测定了玉米根系形态指标和根系分泌物中碳、氮的含量。结果表明,玉米根系碳、氮分泌比强度(EI_root-C、EI_root-N)在生育前期高于生育后期,与比根长、比根表面积、比根体积呈显著正线性相关,而与根系C/N比呈显著负线性相关;玉米单株碳、氮分泌强度(EI_plant-C、EI_plant-N)在生育期内呈先升高后降低的趋势,累积分泌碳15.71 g/plant,累积分泌氮0.75 g/plant;EI_plant-C与根长、根表面积、根体积、根干重、根冠比、叶面积之间均存在极显著二次曲线关系,而EI_plant-N仅与根冠比之间有显著二次曲线关系。依据玉米根系特征与根系分泌碳、氮的定量关系,可为估算大田种植下玉米根系分泌碳、氮量提供参考。

关键词: 玉米, 根系分泌, 碳, 氮, 根系特征

Abstract:

The aims are to study the law about root exuding carbon and nitrogen in maize and their relationships with root traits. The maize variety ‘Dika 653’ was used as material, the method of soil-hydroponic-hybrid was used to determine the morphological indicators of root, carbon and nitrogen contents in root exudation. The results showed that the specific root carbon and nitrogen exudation (EI_root-C, EI_root-N) were higher at the early growth stage than those at the late growth stage. EI_root-C and EI_root-N had a significantly positive linear correlation with specific root length, specific root surface area and specific root volume, but had a significantly negative linear correlation with C/N ratio in root. The carbon exudation per plant (EI_plant-C) and nitrogen exudation per plant (EI_plant-N) increased first and then decreased during the growth period. The accmulated root carbon and nitrogen exdation reached 15.71 g/plant and 0.75 g/plant during the maize plant growth period, respectively. There was a significant quadratic relationship between EI_plant-C and root length, root surface area, root volume, root dry weight, root shoot ratio and leaf area, while EI_plant-N only had a significant quadratic curve relationship with root shoot ratio. The carbon and nitrogien in root exudations in maize field could be estimated accroding to the relationship between root traits and root exuding carbon and nitrogien.

Key words: maize, root exudation, carbon, nitrogen, root traits

中图分类号:

S513
S31

万一兵, 唐岚岚, 展茗, 尚春辉, 袁嘉仪, 秦明广. 玉米根系分泌碳、氮动态及与根系特征的关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(24): 31-38.

Wan Yibing, Tang Lanlan, Zhan Ming, Shang Chunhui, Yuan Jiayi, Qin Mingguang. Dynamics of Carbon and Nitrogen in Root Exudation and Their Relations with Root Traits in Maize[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(24): 31-38.

图/表 5

图1. 玉米单株根系碳、氮分泌强度与比根分泌强度动态

图2. 玉米比根碳、氮分泌强度的关系 **表示回归关系极显著(P<0.01)

图3. 玉米生育期内根系累积碳、氮分泌量(a)及其占植株干重的比例(b)的变化 **表示回归关系极显著(P<0.01)

图4. 玉米比根碳、氮分泌比强度与根系特征的关系 **表示回归关系极显著(P<0.01),*表示回归关系显著(P<0.05),ns表示回归关系不显著,下同

图5. 玉米单株碳、氮分泌强度与植株特征的关系

参考文献 46

[1]	Phillips R P, Finzi A C, Bernhardt E S. Enhanced root exudation induces microbial feedbacks to N cycling in a pine forest under long-term CO₂fumigation[J]. Ecology Letters, 2011, 14(2):187-194. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01570.x pmid: 21176050
[2]	Yin H, Li Y, Xiao J, et al. Enhanced root exudation stimulates soil nitrogen transformations in a subalpine coniferous forest under experimentalwarming[J]. Global Change Biology, 2013, 19(7):2158-2167. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12161 URL
[3]	Nieder R, Schollmayer G, Richter J. Denitrification in the rooting zone of cropped soils with regard to methodology and climate: A review[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1989, 8(3):219-226.
[4]	Kuzyakov Y, Domanski G. Carbon input by plants into the soil. Review[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2000, 163(4):421-431. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2624 URL
[5]	Kuzyakov Y, Schneckenberger K. Review of estimation of plant rhizodeposition and their contribution to soil organic matter formation[J]. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2004, 50(1):115-132. doi: 10.1080/03650340310001627658 URL
[6]	Wichern F, Mayer J, Joergensen R G, et al. Rhizodeposition of C and N in peas and oats after ¹³C-¹⁵N double labelling under field conditions[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2007, 39(10):2527-2537. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.04.022 URL
[7]	杨兰芳, 蔡祖聪. 玉米生长和施氮水平对土壤有机碳更新的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2006(02):280-286.
[8]	Wichern F, Eberhardt E, Mayer J, et al. Nitrogen rhizodeposition in agricultural crops: Methods, estimates and future prospects[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40(1):30-48. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.08.010 URL
[9]	鄢来斌, 马义兵, 张福锁. 根际中碳和氮的输入及转化[J]. 土壤, 1993(5):242-245.
[10]	Lynch J M, Whipps J M. Substrate flow in the rhizosphere[J]. Plant and Soil, 1990, 129(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00011685 URL
[11]	De Nobili M, Contin M, Mondini C, et al. Soil microbial biomass is triggered into activity by trace amounts of substrate[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2001, 33(9):1163-1170. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00020-7 URL
[12]	Fontaine S, Mariotti A, Abbadie L. The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition?[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2003, 35(6):837-843. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00123-8 URL
[13]	Kuzyakov Y. Priming effects: interactions between living and dead organic matter[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010, 42(9):1363-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.003 URL
[14]	Mayer J, Buegger F, Jensen E S, et al. Estimating N rhizodeposition of grain legumes using a ¹⁵N in situ stem labelling method[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2003, 35(1):21-28. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00212-2 URL
[15]	孙悦, 徐兴良, Yakov K. 根际激发效应的发生机制及其生态重要性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(01):62-75.
[16]	祝贞科, 沈冰洁, 葛体达, 等. 农田作物同化碳输入与周转的生物地球化学过程[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(19):5987-5997.
[17]	吴彩霞, 傅华. 根系分泌物的作用及影响因素[J]. 草业科学, 2009, 26(09):24-29.
[18]	Badri D V, Vivanco J M. Regulation and function of root exudates[J]. Plant Cell and Environment, 2008, 32(6):666-681. doi: 10.1111/pce.2009.32.issue-6 URL
[19]	Darwent M J, Paterson E, Mcdonald A J S, et al. Biosensor reporting of root exudation from Hordeum vulgare in relation to shoot nitrate concentration[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2003, 54(381):325-334. pmid: 12493860
[20]	Tuckmantel T, Leuschner C, Preusser S, et al. Root exudation patterns in a beech forest: Dependence on soil depth, root morphology, and environment[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 107:188-197. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.006 URL
[21]	Xiong D, Huang J, Yang Z, et al. The effects of warming and nitrogen addition on fine root exudation rates in a young Chinese-fir stand[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 458:117793. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117793 URL
[22]	De Graaff M, Six J, Van Kessel C. Elevated CO₂ increases nitrogen rhizodeposition and microbial immobilization of root-derived nitrogen[J]. New Phytologist, 2007, 173(4):778-786. doi: 10.1111/nph.2007.173.issue-4 URL
[23]	Sun L, Ataka M, Kominami Y, et al. Relationship between fine-root exudation and respiration of two Quercus species in a Japanese temperate forest[J]. Tree Physiology, 2017, 37(8):1011-1020. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx026 URL
[24]	Bowsher A W, Evans S E, Tiemann L K, et al. Effects of soil nitrogen availability on rhizodeposition in plants: a review[J]. Plant and Soil, 2018, 423(1):59-85. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3497-1 URL
[25]	Xu J G, Juma N G. Relations of shoot C, root C and root length with root-released C of two barley cultivars and the decomposition of root-released C in soil[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 1994, 74(1):17-22. doi: 10.4141/cjss94-002 URL
[26]	Groleaurenaud V, Plantureux S, Guckert A. Influence of plant morphology on root exudation of maize subjected to mechanical impedance in hydroponic conditions[J]. Plant and Soil, 1998, 201(2):231-239. doi: 10.1023/A:1004316416034 URL
[27]	李淑娅, 田少阳, 袁国印, 等. 长江中游不同玉稻种植模式产量及资源利用效率的比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(10):1537-1547.
[28]	Szoboszlay M. Studies on the effects of plant variety and root exudate compounds on the soil microbial community[D]. University of Kentucky, 2015.
[29]	王学奎, 黄见良. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2015:202-204.
[30]	Weintraub M N, Scott-Denton L E, Schmidt S K, et al. The effects of tree rhizodeposition on soil exoenzyme activity, dissolved organic carbon, and nutrient availability in a subalpine forest ecosystem[J]. Oecologia, 2007, 154(2):327-338. pmid: 17657512
[31]	何敏毅, 孟凡乔, 史雅娟, 等. 用13C脉冲标记法研究玉米光合碳分配及其向地下的输入[J]. 环境科学, 2008,(02):2446-2453.
[32]	Meng F, Dungait J A J, Zhang X, et al. Investigation of photosynthate-C allocation 27 days after 13C-pulse labeling of Zea mays L. at different growth stages[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 373(1):755-764. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1841-7 URL
[33]	孙昭安, 陈清, 韩笑, 等. 13C脉冲标记法定量冬小麦光合碳分配及其向地下的输入[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(6):2837-2844.
[34]	申建波, 张福锁, 毛达如. 根际微生态系统中的碳循环[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2001(2):232-240.
[35]	Jensen E S. Rhizodeposition of N by pea and barley and its effect on soil N dynamics[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1996, 28(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(95)00116-6 URL
[36]	Jones D L, Hodge A, Kuzyakov Y. Plant and mycorrhizal regulation of rhizodeposition[J]. New Phytologist, 2004, 163(3):459-480. doi: 10.1111/nph.2004.163.issue-3 URL
[37]	Meier I C, Tuckmantel T, Heitkotter J, et al. Root exudation of mature beech forests across a nutrient availability gradient: the role of root morphology and fungal activity[J]. New Phytologist, 2020, 226(2):583-594. doi: 10.1111/nph.16389 pmid: 31868933
[38]	Paterson E, Sim A. Effect of nitrogen supply and defoliation on loss of organic compounds from roots of Festuca rubra[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2000, 51(349):1449-1457. pmid: 10944159
[39]	Ma Z, Guo D, Xu X, et al. Evolutionary history resolves global rganization of root functional traits[J]. Nature, 2018, 555(7694):94-97. doi: 10.1038/nature25783 URL
[40]	Karst J, Gaster J, Wiley E, et al. Stress differentially causes roots of tree seedlings to exude carbon[J]. Tree Physiology, 2016, 37(2):154-164.
[41]	Dilkes N B, Jones D L, Farrar J. Temporal dynamics of carbon partitioning and rhizodeposition in wheat[J]. Plant Physiology, 2004, 134(2):706-715. pmid: 14764904
[42]	Farrar J, Hawes M C, Jones D L, et al. How roots control the flux of carbon to the rhizosphere[J]. Ecology, 2003, 84(4):827-837. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0827:HRCTFO]2.0.CO;2 URL
[43]	郭婉玑, 张子良, 刘庆, 等. 根系分泌物收集技术研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(11):3951-3962.
[44]	Li X, Dong J, Chu W, et al. Adsorption efficiency of a continuous trapping system and its use for the collection of root exudates from cucumber[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2015, 178(6):963-975. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201500294 URL
[45]	Puschenreiter M, Wenzel W W, Wieshammer G, et al. Novel micro-suction-cup design for sampling soil solution at defined distances from roots[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2005, 168(3):386-391. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2624 URL
[46]	Wadhwa K, Narula N. A novel technique to collect root exudates from mustard (Brassica juncea)[J]. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 2012, 52(5):613-615. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201100407 pmid: 22144042

玉米根系分泌碳、氮动态及与根系特征的关系

Dynamics of Carbon and Nitrogen in Root Exudation and Their Relations with Root Traits in Maize

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 46

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	周冬冬, 张军, 葛梦婕, 刘忠红, 朱晓欢, 李春燕. 不同氮肥处理对稻茬晚播小麦‘淮麦36’产量、氮素利用率和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 1-7.
[2]	段青青, 韩梅梅, 谭月强, 张自坤. 补光时间和光质对温室甜椒叶片生长、碳代谢的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 37-44.
[3]	王绍新, 王宝宝, 李中建, 许洛, 冯健英. 中国鲜食玉米的研究脉络和趋势探析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 8-15.
[4]	王福玉, 陈贵菊, 孙雷明, 黄玲, 邵敏敏, 赵凯, 杨本洲, 张玉丹, 闫璐, 王霖. 耕作方式与施氮量互作对小麦生长、产量与品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 20-26.
[5]	纪坤, 王彬, 赵博文, 薛浩, 吴建民, 朱晓建, 王依欣, 赵海军, 韩赞平. 不同玉米种质材料植株与穗粒性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 27-32.
[6]	洪波, 张泽, 张强, 马怡茹, 易翔, 吕新. 基于数码图像的棉花叶片氮含量估测研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 49-55.
[7]	李兴华, 王欢, 张盛, 蔡星星, 周强, 周楠. 氮肥用量与运筹方式对晚籼稻产量及花后干物质积累与转运的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 6-13.
[8]	黄浩, 谢晋, 袁文彬, 王初亮, 陈坤华, 曾繁东, 梁增发, 苏诏, 王维. 不同有机物料对烤烟根系特征及氮磷钾积累量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 51-57.
[9]	赵双梅, 刘宪斌, 李红梅, 董文彩, 沈健萍, 包金美, 梁芳, 鲁美. 云南哀牢山湿性常绿阔叶林土壤碳分布特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 88-95.
[10]	付焱焱, 李云峰, 韩冬, 马树庆. 吉林省粮食主产区玉米生长季水分盈亏及其对产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 99-105.
[11]	张洪芬, 杨丽杰, 赵玉娟, 张峰. 陇东2020年“强凉夏”气候特征及对农业影响分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 117-123.
[12]	白苇, 胡杨, 胡卿卿, 崔金丽, 张宝英, 杨素梅. 冀北油葵主要栽培因素对产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 17-22.
[13]	王彦, 朱凯迪, 孙洪仁, 张吉萍, 吕玉才, 王剑. 中国苹果土壤养分丰缺指标与适宜施肥量初步研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 69-78.
[14]	朱小聪. 汾河流域植被生产力时空变异特征分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 86-93.
[15]	李锐, 尚霄, 尚春树, 常利芳, 闫蕾, 白建荣. SSR荧光检测解析224份山西玉米自交系的遗传结构与遗传关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 9-16.