汾河流域植被生产力时空变异特征分析

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0264

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

植被生产力(GPP、NPP)和碳利用效率(CUE)是监测和评估生态系统的重要指标,能够有效反应生态系统环境变化。汾河流域是黄土高原典型生态脆弱区的重要流域,是全国水土流失治理和生态保护的重点区域。本研究以流域尺度为出发点,基于MODIS数据重点分析了汾河流域2000—2015年GPP、NPP和CUE的时空特征及影响因素。结果表明：汾河流域整体上GPP和NPP呈现增加的趋势,而CUE则表现为减少趋势,平均值为GPP 665.88 g C/(m²·a),NPP 252.77 g C/(m²·a),CUE 0.36。GPP、NPP和CUE南部高于北部地区,流域边缘两侧山地与其他区域明显不同。汾河流域植被生产力状况主要受降水的影响较大。北部GPP、NPP、CUE与气温主要呈现负相关关系,而在流域南部,GPP与气温呈正相关关系,NPP、CUE与气温呈负相关关系。汾河流域北部对水热条件变化比南部更加敏感,同时汾河流域气温和降水的增加导致了CUE降低。

关键词: 生态系统, 植被生产力, 碳利用率, 时空变异, 汾河流域

Abstract:

Vegetation productivity (GPP, NPP) and carbon use efficiency (CUE) are important indicators for monitoring and assessing ecosystems, which can effectively reflect changes in the ecosystem environment. The Fen River Basin is an important watershed in the typical ecologically fragile area of the Loess Plateau, and a key area for soil erosion control and ecological protection in China. This study took the basin scale as the basis and focused on analyzing the temporal and spatial characteristics and influencing factors of GPP, NPP and CUE based on MODIS data in the Fen River Basin from 2000 to 2015. The results showed that GPP and NPP presented increasing trends in the Fen River Basin as a whole, while CUE had a decreasing tendency, with an average value of GPP 665.88 g C/(m²·a), NPP 252.77 g C/(m²·a) and CUE 0.36. The southern part of the basin had higher GPP, NPP and CUE than the northern part, and the mountains on both sides of the basin edge were obviously different from other areas. The vegetation productivity of the Fen River Basin was mainly affected by precipitation. In the north, GPP, NPP, and CUE were negatively correlated with temperature, while in the southern part of the basin, GPP was positively correlated with temperature, and NPP and CUE were negatively correlated with temperature. The northern part of the Fen River Basin was more sensitive to the changes of water and heat condition than the southern part, and the increase of temperature and precipitation in the Fen River Basin led to the decrease of CUE.

Key words: ecosystem, vegetation productivity, carbon use efficiency, spatiotemporal variation, Fen River Basin

中图分类号:

Q149

朱小聪. 汾河流域植被生产力时空变异特征分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 86-93.

ZHU Xiaocong. Spatial and Temporal Variation Characteristics of Vegetation Productivity in Fen River Basin[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 86-93.

图/表 7

图1. 汾河流域区位分布和高程示意图

图2. 汾河流域主要植被类型和土壤侵蚀等级

图3. 汾河流域平均GPP、NPP和CUE空间分布

图4. 汾河流域GPP、NPP和CUE变化趋势及显著性检验

图5. 汾河流域GPP、NPP和CUE距平年际变化趋势

图6. 汾河流域GPP、NPP、CUE与气温、降水相关性

图7. 汾河流域气温和降水距平年际变化趋势

参考文献 31

[1]	IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[M]. ed. by Susan Solomon, Dahe Qin, Martin Manning, Kristen Averyt and Melinda Marquis. Vol. 4 Cambridge university press: Cambridge,UK, 2013.
[2]	周天军, 陈晓龙, 吴波. 支撑“未来地球”计划的气候变化科学前沿问题[J]. 科学通报, 2019, 64(19):1967-1974.
[3]	BHASKAR J C. Carbon use efficiency, and net primary productivity of terrestrial vegetation[J]. Advances in space research, 2000, 26(7):1105-1108. doi: 10.1016/S0273-1177(99)01126-6 URL
[4]	陈智. 2000—2015年中国东北森林生产力和碳素利用率的时空变异[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(5):1625-1632.
[5]	EVAN H DeLUCIA, JOHN E Drake, Richard B Thomas, et al. Forest carbon use efficiency: is respiration a constant fraction of gross primary production[J]. Global change biology, 2007, 13(6):1157-1167. doi: 10.1111/gcb.2007.13.issue-6 URL
[6]	郑飞鸽, 易桂花, 张廷斌, 等. 三江源植被碳利用率动态变化及其对气候响应[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(1):401-413.
[7]	YANG J, ZHANG X C, LUO Z H, et al. Nonlinear variations of net primary productivity and its relationship with climate and vegetation phenology, China[J]. Forests, 2017, 8(10):361. doi: 10.3390/f8100361 URL
[8]	马腾, 沈帅, 邓娅敏, 等. 流域地球关键带调查理论方法——以长江中游江汉平原为例[J]. 地球科学:1-16.
[9]	李伯华, 郑始年. 汾河流域人居环境适宜性评价及空间分异研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(8):87-92.
[10]	田惠文, 毕如田, 朱洪芬, 等. 汾河流域植被净初级生产力的驱动因素及梯度效应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(10):3066-3074.
[11]	左海凤. 近50年汾河上中游流域径流对气候变化的响应分析[J]. 水文, 2006, 26(5):72-75.
[12]	CHENG W X, DANIEL A S, LUO Y Q, et al. Photosynjournal, respiration, and net primary production of sunflower stands in ambient and elevated atmospheric CO₂ concentrations: an invariant NPP: GPP ratio?[J]. GLOBAL change biology, 2000, 6(8):931-941. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00367.x URL
[13]	沈永平. 全国1:25万三级水系流域数据集[Z]. 国家冰川冻土沙漠科学数据中心(www.ncdc.ac.cn), 2019.
[14]	邸富宏. 基于MODIS的近10年来汾河上游植被动态变化监测[J]. 林业资源管理, 2015(4):109-114.
[15]	李晓荣, 高会, 韩立朴, 等. 太行山区植被NPP时空变化特征及其驱动力分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(4):498-508.
[16]	党跃军, 王礼霄, 严俊霞. 山西省2003—2012年植被时空变化格局及对气候因子的响应[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22(2):235-240.
[17]	谢宝妮, 秦占飞, 王洋, 等. 黄土高原植被净初级生产力时空变化及其影响因素[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(11):244-253.
[18]	史晓亮, 杨志勇, 王馨爽, 等. 黄土高原植被净初级生产力的时空变化及其与气候因子的关系[J]. 中国农业气象, 2016(4):445-453.
[19]	朴世龙, 方精云, 郭庆华. 利用CASA模型估算我国植被净第一性生产力[J]. 植物生态学报, 2001(5):603-608,644.
[20]	秦景秀, 郝兴明, 张颖, 等. 气候变化和人类活动对干旱区植被生产力的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(1):117-125.
[21]	王轶虹. 2010年中国农作物净初级生产力及其空间分布格局[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(19):6318-6327.
[22]	MA L Q, XIA H M, MENG Q M. Spatiotemporal variability of asymmetric daytime and night-time warming and its effects on vegetation in the Yellow River Basin from 1982 to 2015[J]. Sensors, 2019, 19(8):1832. doi: 10.3390/s19081832 URL
[23]	李迪强, 孙成永. 中国潜在植被生产力的分布与模拟[J]. 植物学报:英文版, 1998, 40(6):560-566.
[24]	郭帅, 裴艳茜, 胡胜, 等. 黄河流域植被指数对气候变化的响应及其与水沙变化的关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(3):1-7,13.
[25]	贾俊鹤. 气候变化与人类活动对西北地区植被NPP不同时间尺度变化影响的相对重要性[D]. 南京:南京师范大学, 2018.
[26]	ZHANG Y J, YU G R, YANG J, et al. Climate-driven global changes in carbon use efficiency[J]. Global ecology and biogeography, 2014, 23(2):144-155. doi: 10.1111/geb.2014.23.issue-2 URL
[27]	刘洋洋, 王倩, 杨悦, 等. 2000—2013年中国植被碳利用效率(CUE)时空变化及其与气象因素的关系[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(5):2,278-286.
[28]	JEFFREY Q C, EDGARD S T, LIGIA C T, et al. Respiration from a tropical forest ecosystem: partitioning of sources and low carbon use efficiency[J], Ecological applications, 2004, 14(sp4):72-88. doi: 10.1890/01-6012 URL
[29]	KADMIEL M, JOSé M G, EYAL R, et al. Respiration acclimation contributes to high carbon-use efficiency in a seasonally dry pine forest[J]. Global change biology, 2008, 14(7):1553-1567. doi: 10.1111/gcb.2008.14.issue-7 URL
[30]	ANDREW G, DAVID J C. Encyclopedia of Global Change: J Z[M]. Vol.2Oxford University Press, 2002.
[31]	HE Y, PIAO S L, LI X Y, et al. Global patterns of vegetation carbon use efficiency and their climate drivers deduced from MODIS satellite data and process-based models[J]. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 2018, 256:150-158.