欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 73-79.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0345

所属专题: 生物技术 园艺

• 林学·园艺·园林 • 上一篇    下一篇

砧木种类对‘红香1号’番石榴生长和果实产质量的影响

黄婉莉1(), 张冬敏1, 符喜喜2, 陈心怡2, 张朝坤1, 郑诚乐2   

  1. 1 漳州市农业科学研究所,福建漳州 363005
    2 福建农林大学,福州 350002
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-28 修回日期:2025-01-15 出版日期:2025-02-25 发布日期:2025-02-24
  • 作者简介:

    黄婉莉,女,1990年出生,福建泉州人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向:热带和亚热带果树引种、育种及栽培技术。通信地址:363005 福建省漳州市龙文区朝阳镇物华路20号 漳州市农业科学研究所,E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    福建省科技计划项目“番石榴杂交优株选育和主要性状遗传规律研究”(2022N0045); 漳州市自然科学基金项目“无籽番石榴种子败育类型鉴定及败育机理研究”(ZZ2024J02)

Effects of Types of Rootstocks on Growth, Fruit Yield and Quality of Guava ‘Hongxiang No.1’

HUANG Wanli1(), ZHANG Dongmin1, FU Xixi2, CHEN Xinyi2, ZHANG Chaokun1, ZHENG Chengle2   

  1. 1 Zhangzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Zhangzhou, Fujian 363005
    2 Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002
  • Received:2024-05-28 Revised:2025-01-15 Published:2025-02-25 Online:2025-02-24

摘要:

探究不同品系番石榴作嫁接砧木对‘红香1号’番石榴生长、果实产量和品质的影响,筛选出适宜作‘红香1号’番石榴嫁接砧木的品系。通过田间对比试验,2018年春秋季播种,2019年分别以‘袖珍’、‘郭坑’、‘彩虹’和‘红香1号’的实生苗作砧木,‘红香1号’优株作接穗,培育嫁接苗,2020年春季定植,2021—2023年持续观测‘红香1号’番石榴营养生长(茎粗、株高和冠幅)、果实产量(单果质量和单株产量)、果实外观品质(纵径、横径和果形指数)和生理指标(可溶性固形物、可溶性糖、还原糖、维生素C和可滴定酸)的变化。结果显示:在营养生长方面,前期‘彩虹’砧茎粗最大,且显著大于其他处理,随着生长期的延长,‘彩虹’砧、‘郭坑’砧和‘红香1号’砧在茎粗指标上差异不显著;‘彩虹’株高显著高于其他处理,‘袖珍’砧株高最低;‘彩虹’砧冠幅显著高于其他处理,‘袖珍’砧冠幅最低,且显著低于其他处理。综合3年4批次果实,‘彩虹’砧单果质量和单株产量最高,均显著高于其他处理,‘袖珍’砧的单果质量和单株产量最低。4种砧木对‘红香1号’番石榴的外观品质和生理指标均具有一定的影响,‘彩虹’砧的果实纵、横径和果形指数最高,‘袖珍’砧的果实纵径最低,‘郭坑’砧和‘红香1号’砧的外观品质指标差异不显著,‘彩虹’砧果实可溶性固形物、可溶性糖、还原糖、维生素C和可滴定酸含量等生理指标综合表现好于其他处理。研究发现,不同砧木对番石榴的影响存在显著差异,‘彩虹’/‘红香1号’砧穗组合植株在营养生长、果实产量和品质等方面的表现优于其他处理,因此‘彩虹’实生苗适宜作为‘红香1号’番石榴的嫁接砧木。

关键词: 番石榴, 嫁接, 砧木, 砧穗组合, 生长, 产量, 果实品质

Abstract:

The paper aims to explore the effects of different strains of guava as grafting rootstocks on the growth, fruit yield and quality of ‘Hongxiang No.1’ guava, and to screen out suitable strains for grafting rootstocks of ‘Hongxiang No.1’ guava. Through field comparative experiments, in the autumn of 2019, the seedlings of ‘Pocket’, ‘Guokeng’, ‘Rainbow’, and ‘Hongxiang No.1’ were used as rootstocks, and the superior plant of ‘Hongxiang No.1’ was used as scions. Grafted seedlings were cultivated and planted in the spring of 2020. From 2021 to 2023, the nutritional growth (stem diameter, plant height, and crown width), fruit yield (single fruit quality and single plant yield), fruit appearance quality (longitudinal diameter, transverse diameter, and fruit type index), and physiological indicators (soluble solids, soluble sugars, reducing sugars, vitamin C, and titratable acid) of ‘Hongxiang No.1’ were continuously observed. In terms of nutritional growth, ‘Rainbow’ rootstock had the largest stem diameter in the early stage and was significantly larger than other treatments. As the growth period extended, there was no significant difference in stem diameter indicators among ‘Rainbow’ rootstock, ‘Guokeng’ rootstock, and ‘Hongxiang No.1’ rootstock. The height of ‘Rainbow’ rootstock was significantly higher than other treatments, while the height of ‘Pocket’ rootstock was the lowest. The crown width of ‘Rainbow’ rootstock was significantly higher than other treatments, while the crown width of ‘Pocket’ rootstock was the lowest and significantly lower than other treatments. Taking into account four batches of fruits over a period of three years, the ‘Rainbow’ rootstock had the highest single fruit quality and single plant yield, both significantly higher than those of other treatments. The ‘Pocket’ rootstock had the lowest single fruit quality and single plant yield. The four rootstocks had a certain impact on the appearance quality and physiological indicators of ‘Hongxiang No.1’ guava. Among the four batches of fruits in three years, ‘Rainbow’ rootstock had the highest vertical and horizontal diameter and fruit shape index, while ‘Pocket’ rootstock had the lowest vertical diameter. There was no significant difference in appearance quality indicators between ‘Guokeng’ rootstock and ‘Hongxiang No.1’ rootstock. The comprehensive performance of physiological indicators such as soluble solids, soluble sugars, reducing sugars, vitamin C, and titratable acid content in ‘Rainbow’ rootstock fruits was better than other treatments. The combination of ‘Rainbow’/‘Hongxiang No.1’ rootstock and panicle showed better nutritional growth, fruit yield, and quality than other treatments. Therefore, ‘Rainbow’ seedling was suitable as grafting rootstocks for ‘Hongxiang No.1’ guava.

Key words: guava, grafting, rootstock, combination of rootstock and scion, growth, yield, fruit quality