苗期水稻吸收和转运砷的基因型差异研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用营养液培养的方法，研究了在根表无铁氧化物膜形成的情况下，苗期水稻对生长介质中三价砷和五价砷吸收及向地上部转运的基因型差异。水稻植株分别暴露在含20 mM五价砷和含五价砷、三价砷各10 mM的营养介质中14d，对水稻生物量的影响存在显著的基因型差异，在6个水稻基因型中，砷处理促进了根系的生长，但抑制了地上部的正常生长，只有基因型94D-22除外，2周的砷暴露对其生长虽然有抑制作用，但这种抑制效应并不显著；不同程度的砷暴露并没有对根中砷浓度、地上部砷浓度产生明显影响(94D-22除外)，但基因型之间砷浓度的变化趋势与有铁膜形成时相比存在明显差异。营养液中三价砷和五价砷共存时，基因型94D-22茎叶中砷浓度最高（69.5 mg/kg），是其他基因型的1.8~3.1倍，并且94D-22对砷的吸收能力和转移能力也最大，KY1360和94D-64对砷的转移能力最弱，这与有铁膜形成且经过整个生长季的水稻对砷吸收和转运能力的影响结果不同。

关键词: 小麦, 小麦, 施氮量, 产量, 品质

Abstract: A hydroponic experiment was conducted to investigate arsenic uptake by and translocation in rice seedlings among six genotypes. Arsenic exposure enhanced the growth of rice root and inhibited shoot growth of different genotypes, except for 94D-22. There was no significant difference in arsenic concentrations in roots and shoots between control plants and rice plants exposed to nutrient solutions with arsenate or with arsenite-arsenate respectively. However, there were significant differences in arsenic levels in roots and shoots among six genotypes. Arsenic exposure did not affect Specific Arsenic Uptake (SAU) by rice root. In addition, SAU and translocation factor were the highest for genotype 94D-22, which was different from the situation with iron plaque formed on the rice root surface.

刘文菊,,胡莹,毕淑芹,李玉敏,朱永官,刘向辉. 苗期水稻吸收和转运砷的基因型差异研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(6): 356-356.

Liu Wenju,, Hu Ying, Bi Shuqin, Li Yumin, Zhu Yongguan ,Liu xianghui. Study of Genotypic Differences on Arsenic Uptake by and Translocation in Rice Seedlings[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 22(6): 356-356.

参考文献

1 Meharg A A. Arsenic in rice – understanding a new disaster for South-East Asia. Trends Plant Sci,2004,9: 415~417
2 Meharg A A, Rahman M. Arsenic contamination of Bangladesh paddy soils:Implications for rice contribution to arsenic consumption. Environ Sci Technol, 2003, 37: 229~234
3 Xie Z M, Huang C Y. Control of arsenic toxicity in rice plants grown on an arsenic-polluted paddy soil. Commu Soil Sci Plant Anal, 1998, 29: 2471~2477
4 Cullen W R, Reimer K J. Arsenic speciation in the environment. Chem Rev, 1989, 89: 713~764
5 Chen C J, Wang C J. Ecological correlation between arsenic level in well water and age- adjusted mortality from malignant neoplasms. Can. Res. 1990, 50:5470~5474
6 Smith E, Naidu R, Alston A M. Arsenic in the soil environment: A review. Adv Agron. 1998,64:149~195
7 Onken B M, Hossner L R. Plant uptake and determination of arsenic species in soil solution under flooded conditions. J Environ Qual. 1995,24:373~381
8 Onken B M, Hossner L R. Determination of arsenic species in soil solution under flooded conditions. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1996, 60:1385~1392
9 Marin A R, Masscheleyn P H, Patrick W H Jr. Soil redox-pH stability of arsenic species and its influence on arsenic uptake by rice. Plant Soil. 1993, 152: 245~253
10 Masscheleyn P H, Dlaune R D Patrick W H Jr. Effect of redox potential and pH on arsenic speciation and solubility in a contaminated soil. Environ Sci Technol. 1991,25:1414~1419
11 Abedin M J, Feldmann J, Meharg A A. Uptake kinetics of arsenic species in rice plants. Plant Physiol. 2002,128: 1120~1128
12 Chen Z, Zhu Y G, Liu W J, et al. Direct evidence showing the effect of root surface iron plaque on arsenite and arsenate uptake into rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots. New Phytol. 2005,165: 91~97
13 Hewitt E J. Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition, 2ed. Commonwealth Agriculture Bureaux. Farnham Royal, Buckinghamshire.Technical Communication No.22. 1966.50~89
14 Liu W J, Zhu Y G, Smith F A. Effects of iron and manganese plaques on arsenic uptake of by rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.) grown in solution culture supplied with arsenate and arsenite. Plant Soil, 2005,277:127~138
15 Carbonell A A, Aarabi M A, Delaune R D, et al. Arsenic in wetland vegetation: Availability, phytotoxicity, uptake and effects on plant growth and nutrition. Sci Total Environ. 1998. 217: 189~199
16 刘文菊.根表铁膜对水稻吸收和转运砷的影响机制研究:[学位论文].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2005.7

[1]	周冬冬, 张军, 葛梦婕, 刘忠红, 朱晓欢, 李春燕. 不同氮肥处理对稻茬晚播小麦‘淮麦36’产量、氮素利用率和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 1-7.
[2]	高文瑞, 孙艳军, 韩冰, 费聪, 王显生, 徐刚. 弱光对西瓜果实品质及蔗糖代谢的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 56-61.
[3]	金梅娟, 佘旭东, 沈明星, 陆长婴, 陶玥玥, 王海候. 稻田构建垄型土槽耦合基质栽培草莓的生产效应研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 71-76.
[4]	马猛, 王克华, 曲亮, 窦套存, 郭军, 王星果, 胡玉萍, 卢建. 不同品种肉鸡屠宰性能、胸肌肉品质和成分测定及分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 137-142.
[5]	武迪, 张锋, 隋春莹, 师君慧, 万雪洁, 刘义国, 韩伟, 师长海. 外源活性物质对小麦苗期抗逆性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 14-19.
[6]	王福玉, 陈贵菊, 孙雷明, 黄玲, 邵敏敏, 赵凯, 杨本洲, 张玉丹, 闫璐, 王霖. 耕作方式与施氮量互作对小麦生长、产量与品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 20-26.
[7]	陈英花, 白如霄, 王娟, 张新疆, 刘玲慧, 刘小龙, 冯国瑞, 危常州. 叶面喷施烯效唑和硼对塔额盆地甜菜产量和含糖率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 41-48.
[8]	李兴华, 王欢, 张盛, 蔡星星, 周强, 周楠. 氮肥用量与运筹方式对晚籼稻产量及花后干物质积累与转运的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 6-13.
[9]	王强强, 杨自辉, 郭树江, 张剑挥, 王多泽. 灌水量对民勤干旱沙区骏枣生长和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 71-74.
[10]	周小红. 基于多元回归分析的农作物产量估测模型研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 152-156.
[11]	秦乃群, 马巧云, 高敬伟, 杨璞, 蔡金兰, 郝迎春, 李艳梅, 冀洪策, 廖祥政. 沼渣施用对花生小麦轮作作物产量及土壤养分和重金属含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 58-63.
[12]	武志斌, 黄超, 雷媛, 敬峰, 刘战东. 不同产量水平下冬小麦水肥利用特性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 64-71.
[13]	王一凡, 劳晓璨, 余丽萍, 叶海龙. 水稻‘甬优15’分期播种的气象条件适宜性试验研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 106-109.
[14]	郑碧霞, 戢小梅, 李长林, 龚林忠, 方林川. 不同复合保鲜处理对‘夏黑’果实贮藏效果的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 135-143.
[15]	彭程, 邓林萍, 蒙万聪, 常晓晓, 张增文, 罗贱良, 邱继水, 陆育生. 套袋对柰李果实外观及香气物质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 45-51.