土壤因子对阿特拉津吸附动力学及其污染土壤微生物修复的影响

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0218

中国农学通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 97-104.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0218

所属专题：生物技术

• 资源·环境·生态·土壤 • 上一篇下一篇

土壤因子对阿特拉津吸附动力学及其污染土壤微生物修复的影响

潘洪洋¹^,²(), 张凯¹^,², 范晓旭¹^,²()

¹ 黑龙江大学，农业微生物技术教育部工程研究中心，哈尔滨 150500
² 黑龙江大学生命科学学院，黑龙江省寒地生态修复与资源利用重点实验室，哈尔滨 150080

收稿日期:2022-03-23 修回日期:2022-06-03 出版日期:2023-02-25 发布日期:2023-02-22
通讯作者: 范晓旭，女，1983年出生，山西芮城人，正高级实验师，博士，研究方向：丛枝菌根修复污染土壤研究。通信地址：150080 黑龙江省哈尔滨市南岗区黑龙江大学生命科学学院，E-mail：fan_xiao_xu@126.com。
作者简介:
潘洪洋，女，1997年出生，河北承德人，硕士研究生在读，研究方向：丛枝菌根修复污染土壤研究。通信地址：150080 黑龙江省哈尔滨市南岗区黑龙江大学生命科学学院，E-mail：panhongyang957@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“土壤团聚体尺度下AM真菌驱动阿特拉津消除机制”(32171621); “Rhizophagus irregularis对马铃薯疮痂病防控机制的研究”(31901926); 黑龙江省自然科学基金项目“AMF修复阿特拉津污染土壤的菌丝际效应”(YQ2019C015); 黑龙江大学杰出青年科学基金项目“丛枝菌根修复除草剂污染土壤的菌丝际效应”(JCL201906); 黑龙江省博士后资助项目“丛枝菌根真菌对团聚体中阿特拉津降解细菌群落的影响”(LBH-Z21032); 黑龙江大学研究生创新科研项目“AM真菌对黑土团聚体中阿特拉津生物可利用性的影响”(YJSCX2022-242HLJU)

Effects of Soil Factors on Atrazine Adsorption Kinetics and Microbial Remediation of Contaminated Soil

PAN Hongyang¹^,²(), ZHANG Kai¹^,², FAN Xiaoxu¹^,²()

¹ Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Microbiology Technology, Ministry of Education, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150500
² Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration and 9Resource Utilization for Cold Region, School of Life Sciences, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080

Received:2022-03-23 Revised:2022-06-03 Online:2023-02-25 Published:2023-02-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

除草剂阿特拉津已经对中国北方农田土壤产生了较高的污染风险，对其有效的原位修复已成为研究热点。微生物修复技术因具备高效、廉价、生态友好等优势，利用其进行阿特拉津污染土壤的原位修复逐渐受到广泛关注。本文从土壤成分、酸碱度、物理结构、养分水平等方面，分别详尽的阐述了土壤因子对阿特拉津的吸附-解吸动力学、功能微生物的增殖与活力的影响。同时，也为今后增强微生物原位修复效果提出了一些可行的建议和方案。总之，本文可为污染土壤生物修复方式的因地制宜选择与推广奠定理论基础，也为进一步强化微生物原位修复污染土壤的效果提供理论指导。

关键词: 土壤成分, 理化性质, 生物有效性, 吸附-解吸

Abstract:

The herbicide atrazine has caused high pollution risk to farmland soil in north China, and the effective in-situ remediation of atrazine pollution has become a research hotspot. Due to the advantages of high efficiency, low cost and being environment-friendly, microbial remediation technology has received widespread attention to remediate atrazine contaminated soil in-situ. In this paper, the effects of soil factors on the kinetics of atrazine adsorption-desorption, as well as the proliferation and vitality of functional microorganisms were summarized from the aspects of soil texture, pH, physical structure, nutrient level and so on. Meanwhile, some feasible suggestions and schemes were proposed to enhance the results of in-situ microbial remediation in the future. In conclusion, this paper can lay a foundation for the selection of bioremediation measures for contaminated soil according to local conditions, and provide theoretical guidance for strengthening microbial remediation of contaminated soil in-situ.

Key words: soil constituent, physicochemical property, bioavailability, adsorption-desorption

潘洪洋, 张凯, 范晓旭. 土壤因子对阿特拉津吸附动力学及其污染土壤微生物修复的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(6): 97-104.

PAN Hongyang, ZHANG Kai, FAN Xiaoxu. Effects of Soil Factors on Atrazine Adsorption Kinetics and Microbial Remediation of Contaminated Soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 97-104.

图/表 1

参考文献 91

[1]	ZHU C, YANG W L, HE H, et al. Preparation, performances and mechanisms of magnetic Saccharomyces cerevisiae bionanocomposites for atrazine removal[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 200:380-387. doi: S0045-6535(18)30220-0 pmid: 29499518
[2]	FAN X, SONG F. Bioremediation of atrazine: recent advances and promises[J]. Journal of soils and sediments, 2014, 14(10):1727-1737. doi: 10.1007/s11368-014-0921-5 URL
[3]	PRADO B, DUWIG C, HIDALGO C, et al. Transport, sorption and degradation of atrazine in two clay soils from Mexico: Andosol and Vertisol[J]. Geoderma, 2014, 232(234):628-639.
[4]	ÁLVAREZ N B, AVIGLIANO L, LOUGHLIN C M, et al. The adverse effect of the herbicide atrazine on the reproduction in the intertidal varunid crab Neohelice granulata (Dana, 1851)[J]. Regional studies in marine science, 2015, 1:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2014.12.001 URL
[5]	VONBERG D, VANDERBORGHT J, CREMER N, et al. 20 years of long-term atrazine monitoring in a shallow aquifer in western Germany[J]. Water research, 2014, 50:294-306. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.032 pmid: 24188580
[6]	徐雄, 李春梅, 孙静, 等. 我国重点流域地表水中29种农药污染及其生态风险评价[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2016, 11(2):347-354.
[7]	KOMTCHOU S, DIRANY A, DROGUI P, et al. Removal of atrazine and its by-products from water using electrochemical advanced oxidation processes[J]. Water research, 2017, 125:91-103. doi: S0043-1354(17)30698-X pmid: 28837868
[8]	SAGARKAR S, NOUSIAINEN A, SHALIGRAM S, et al. Soil mesocosm studies on atrazine bioremediation[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2014, 139:208-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.016 pmid: 24721596
[9]	ZHANG C, LI H, QIN L, et al. Nuclear receptor AHR-mediated xenobiotic detoxification pathway involves in atrazine-induced nephrotoxicity in quail (Coturnix C. coturnix)[J]. Environmental pollution, 2019, 253:889-898. doi: S0269-7491(19)31011-5 pmid: 31349198
[10]	毛萌, 任理. 阿特拉津的主要降解产物在土壤中转化与运移的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(5):1690-1697.
[11]	吴奇, 宋福强. 土壤中阿特拉津生物降解的研究进展[J]. 土壤与作物, 2017, 6(2):153-160.
[12]	JIANG Z, ZHANG X, WANG Z, et al. Enhanced biodegradation of atrazine by Arthrobacter sp. DNS 10 during co-culture with a phosphorus solubilizing bacteria: Enterobacter sp. P1[J]. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2019, 172:159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.070 URL
[13]	宋福强, 范晓旭, 常伟, 等. 苜蓿菌根对土壤中阿特拉津降解及酶活性影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(30):182-187.
[14]	BERENDSEN R L, PIETERSE C, BAKKER P. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health[J]. Trends in plant science, 2012, 17(8):478-486. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 pmid: 22564542
[15]	乔沙沙, 周永娜, 柴宝峰, 等. 关帝山森林土壤真菌群落结构与遗传多样性特征[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(6):2502-2512.
[16]	GOMES M A F, MOURA M A M, FRANCO D A S, et al. Sorption of s-triazines in Brazilian rainforest soils[J]. Pesticidas: revista de ecotoxicologia e meio ambiente, 2008, 18:17-26.
[17]	邓建才, 蒋新, 王代长, 等. 农田生态系统中除草剂阿特拉津的环境行为及其模型研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2005,(12):3359-3367.
[18]	李昉泽, 冯丹, 邓惠, 等. 阿特拉津在5种农业土壤中的吸附解吸特性分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2015, 24(12):2056-2061.
[19]	YUE L, GE C J, FENG D, et al. Adsorption-desorption behavior of atrazine on agricultural soils in China[J]. Journal of environmental sciences, 2017, 57:180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2016.11.002 URL
[20]	DOR M, EMMANUEL S, BRUMFELD V, et al. Microstructural changes in soils induced by wetting and drying: Effects on atrazine mobility[J]. Land degradation & development, 2019, 30(7):746-755. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3256 URL
[21]	HUANG W, PENG P A, YU Z, et al. Effects of organic matter heterogeneity on sorption and desorption of organic contaminants by soils and sediments[J]. Applied geochemistry, 2003, 18(7):955-972. doi: 10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00205-6 URL
[22]	LIU J, ZHOU J H, GUO Q N, et al. Physiochemical assessment of environmental behaviors of herbicide atrazine in soils associated with its degradation and bioavailability to weeds[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 262:127830. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127830 URL
[23]	孙静, 马秀兰, 刘鑫, 等. 莠去津在吉林省不同土壤类型中的解吸特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(4):315-320.
[24]	LENNARTZ B, LOUCHART X. Effect of drying on the desorption of diuron and terbuthylazine from natural soils[J]. Environmental pollution, 2007, 146(1):180-187. pmid: 16949711
[25]	WANG X, GUO X, YANG Y, et al. Sorption mechanisms of phenanthrene, lindane, and atrazine with various humic acid fractions from a single soil sample[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2011, 45(6):2124-2130. doi: 10.1021/es102468z URL
[26]	REN X, ZENG G, TANG L, et al. Sorption, transport and biodegradation- an insight into bioavailability of persistent organic pollutants in soil[J]. Science of the total environment, 2018,610-611:1154-1163.
[27]	WU Q, YANG Q, ZHOU W, et al. Sorption characteristics and contribution of organic matter fractions for atrazine in soil[J]. Journal of soils and sediments, 2015, 15(11):2210-2219. doi: 10.1007/s11368-015-1162-y URL
[28]	黄玉芬, 刘忠珍, 李衍亮, 等. 土壤矿物和胡敏酸对阿特拉津的吸附-解吸作用研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(1):155-165.
[29]	BÁEZ M E, FUENTES E, ESPINOZA J. Characterization of the atrazine sorption process on Andisol and Ultisol volcanic ash-derived soils: kinetic parameters and the contribution of humic fractions[J]. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2013, 61(26):6150-6160. doi: 10.1021/jf400950d pmid: 23711282
[30]	WANG P, LIU X, YU B, et al. Characterization of peanut-shell biochar and the mechanisms underlying its sorption for atrazine and nicosulfuron in aqueous solution[J]. Science of the total environment, 2020, 702:134767. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134767 URL
[31]	ZHANG P, SUN H, REN C, et al. Sorption mechanisms of neonicotinoids on biochars and the impact of deashing treatments on biochar structure and neonicotinoids sorption[J]. Environmental pollution, 2018, 234:812-820. doi: S0269-7491(17)32594-0 pmid: 29247944
[32]	LIU N, CHARRUA A B, WENG C-H, et al. Characterization of biochars derived from agriculture wastes and their adsorptive removal of atrazine from aqueous solution: a comparative study[J]. Bioresource technology, 2015, 198:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.129 pmid: 26364228
[33]	ZHOU J, CHEN H, HUANG W, et al. Sorption of atrazine, 17α-estradiol, and phenanthrene on wheat straw and peanut shell biochars[J]. Water, air, & soil pollution, 2015, 227(1):7.
[34]	汤家喜, 李景阳, 何苗苗, 等. 玉米芯生物炭对河岸带土壤中乙草胺和阿特拉津的吸附性能[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(12):3440-3447.
[35]	孙涛, 杨再磊, 蒋靖佰伦, 等. 生物炭对土壤中阿特拉津吸附特征的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2021, 40(3):687-695.
[36]	YANG F, ZHANG W, LI J, et al. The enhancement of atrazine sorption and microbial transformation in biochars amended black soils[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 189:507-516. doi: S0045-6535(17)31437-6 pmid: 28961536
[37]	PLANTE A F, CONANT R T, STEWART C E, et al. Impact of soil texture on the distribution of soil organic matter in physical and chemical fractions[J]. Soil science society of America journal, 2006, 70(1).
[38]	XIAO K Q, NIE S A, BAO P, et al. Rhizosphere effect has no effect on marker genes related to autotrophic CO₂ fixation in paddy soils?[J]. Journal of soils and sediments, 2014, 14(6):1082-1087. doi: 10.1007/s11368-014-0864-x URL
[39]	吴克宁, 赵瑞. 土壤质地分类及其在我国应用探讨[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(1):227-241.
[40]	王群艳, 吴小红, 祝贞科, 等. 土壤质地对自养固碳微生物及其同化碳的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(10):3987-3995.
[41]	NAVEED M, HERATH L, MOLDRUP P, et al. Spatial variability of microbial richness and diversity and relationships with soil organic carbon, texture and structure across an agricultural field[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2016, 103:44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.03.004 URL
[42]	SESSITSCH A, WEILHARTER A, GERZABEK MARTIN H, et al. Microbial population structures in soil particle size fractions of a long-term fertilizer field experiment[J]. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2001, 67(9):4215-4224. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.9.4215-4224.2001 pmid: 11526026
[43]	严永旺. 不同质地土壤微生物种群、酶活性对烟叶品质的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2011.
[44]	SEATON F M, GEORGE P B L, LEBRON I, et al. Soil textural heterogeneity impacts bacterial but not fungal diversity[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2020, 144: 07766.
[45]	CHAU J F, BAGTZOGLOU A C, WILLIG M R. The effect of soil texture on richness and diversity of bacterial communities[J]. Environmental forensics, 2011, 12(4):333-3341. doi: 10.1080/15275922.2011.622348 URL
[46]	SILVER W L, NEFF J, MCGRODDY M, et al. effects of soil texture on belowground carbon and nutrient storage in a lowland Amazonian forest ecosystem[J]. Ecosystems, 2000, 3(2):193-209. doi: 10.1007/s100210000019 URL
[47]	蔡燕飞, 廖宗文, 罗洁, 等. 不同质地土壤抑病性和微生物特征[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2003(5):553-556.
[48]	陈国潮, 何振立, 黄昌勇. 红壤微生物生物量C周转及其研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2002,(2):152-160.
[49]	ALBERTSEN A, RAVNSKOV S, GREEN H, et al. Interactions between the external mycelium of the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices and other soil microorganisms as affected by organic matter[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2006, 38(5):1008-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.015 URL
[50]	WANG Y, ZHANG X, ZHANG X, et al. Characterization of spectral responses of dissolved organic matter (DOM) for atrazine binding during the sorption process onto black soil[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 180:531-539. doi: S0045-6535(17)30599-4 pmid: 28432890
[51]	LIN Z, ZHEN Z, LIANG Y, et al. Changes in atrazine speciation and the degradation pathway in red soil during the vermiremediation process[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2019, 364:710-719. doi: S0304-3894(18)30269-3 pmid: 30412844
[52]	赵昕悦, 马放, 杨基先, 等. 阿特拉津降解菌Pseudomonas sp. ZXY-1的分离鉴定及降解动力学[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2018, 50(2):82-88.
[53]	杨惟薇, 潘丽萍, 张超兰, 等. 生物质炭对污染土壤中的镉生物有效性及阿特拉津消解的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(12):6141-6146.
[54]	ENNIS C J, EVANS A G, ISLAM M, et al. Biochar: carbon sequestration, land remediation, and impacts on soil microbiology[J]. Critical reviews in environmental science and technology, 2012, 42(22):2311-2364. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2011.574115 URL
[55]	MEYNET P, HALE S E, DAVENPORT R J, et al. Effect of activated carbon amendment on bacterial community structure and functions in a PAH impacted urban soil[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2012, 46(9):5057-5066. doi: 10.1021/es2043905 URL
[56]	XU H J, WANG X H, LI H, et al. Biochar Impacts soil microbial community composition and nitrogen cycling in an acidic soil planted with rape[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2014, 48(16):9391-9399. doi: 10.1021/es5021058 URL
[57]	郭火生, 王志刚, 孟冬芳, 等. 阿特拉津降解菌株DNS32的降解特性及分类鉴定与降解途径研究[J]. 微生物学通报, 2012, 39(9):1234-1241.
[58]	代先祝, 蒋建东, 李荣, 等. Arthrobacter sp. AG1菌株降解土壤中阿特拉津研究[J]. 土壤, 2008(5):754-759.
[59]	张庆媛, 葛世杰, 姜昭, 等. 高效阿特拉津降解菌株DNS10降解条件优化[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(3):1169-1174.
[60]	李明锐, 祖艳群, 陈建军, 等. 阿特拉津降解菌FM326(Arthrobacter sp.)的分离筛选、鉴定和生物学特性[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011, 30(11):2242-2248.
[61]	李文帅, 段玉春, 范文艳, 等. 阿特拉津降解菌MSD6鉴定及其降解特性研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2018, 24(20):45-48,72.
[62]	李红梅, 张新建, 李纪顺, 等. 阿特拉津降解菌SD41的分离鉴定及土壤修复[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2014, 37(4):38-41,129.
[63]	刘春光, 杨峰山, 卢星忠, 等. 阿特拉津降解菌T₃AB₁的分离鉴定及土壤修复[J]. 微生物学报, 2010, 50(12):1642-1650.
[64]	周宁, 王荣娟, 孟庆娟, 等. 寒地黑土中阿特拉津降解菌的筛选及降解特性[J]. 环境工程学报, 2008(11):1560-1563.
[65]	杨晓燕, 李艳苓, 魏环宇, 等. 阿特拉津降解菌CS3的分离鉴定及其降解特性的研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(6):1149-1158.
[66]	YANG X, WEI H, ZHU C, et al. Biodegradation of atrazine by the novel Citricoccus sp. strain TT3[J]. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2018, 147:144-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.046 URL
[67]	李阳阳, 张金波, 沙君雪, 等. 阿特拉津降解菌LY-2的分离鉴定及其对污染土壤的修复[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2018, 26(6):987-994.
[68]	张阳, 陶思源, 潘晶, 等. 阿特拉津降解菌SYSA的分离筛选和鉴定[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2008(4):61-64.
[69]	李阳阳, 范作伟, 张立明, 等. 阿特拉津降解菌W11的分离鉴定及降解特性研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(4):165-171.
[70]	XU X, ZARECKI R, MEDINA S, et al. Modeling microbial communities from atrazine contaminated soils promotes the development of biostimulation solutions[J]. The ISME journal, 2019, 13(2):494-508. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0288-5 URL
[71]	KONG X, JIANG J, MA J, et al. Degradation of atrazine by UV/chlorine: efficiency, influencing factors, and products[J]. Water research, 2016, 90:15-23. doi: S0043-1354(15)30394-8 pmid: 26724435
[72]	GAO N, ZHANG J, PAN Z, et al. Biodegradation of atrazine by mixed bacteria of Klebsiella variicola strain FH-1 and Arthrobacter sp. NJ-1[J]. Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2020, 105(3):481-489. doi: 10.1007/s00128-020-02966-y URL
[73]	章明奎, 常跃畅. 近50年浙江省耕作土壤有机质和酸碱度的变化特征[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(11):4399-4404.
[74]	QASWAR M. 长期施肥对不同类型稻田土壤碳氮磷化学计量比及磷平衡的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2020.
[75]	SAGARKAR S, MUKHERJEE S, NOUSIAINEN A, et al. Monitoring bioremediation of atrazine in soil microcosms using molecular tools[J]. Environmental pollution, 2013, 172:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.07.048 pmid: 23022948
[76]	HUNTER W J, SHANER D L. Nitrogen limited biobarriers remove atrazine from contaminated water: laboratory studies[J]. Journal of contaminant hydrology, 2009, 103(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.08.004 URL
[77]	GARCÉS R A G, HANSEN A M, VAN AFFERDEN M. Mineralization of atrazine in agricultural soil: inhibition by nitrogen[J]. Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2007, 26(5):844-850. pmid: 17521128
[78]	王志刚, 张颖, 郭火生, 等. 阿特拉津降解菌Acinetobacter sp.DNS32对无机氮源的响应[J]. 微生物学通报, 2014, 41(8):1541-1546.
[79]	YANG C, LI Y, ZHANG K, et al. Atrazine degradation by a simple consortium of Klebsiella sp. A1 and Comamonas sp. A2 in nitrogen enriched medium[J]. Biodegradation, 2010, 21(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s10532-009-9284-9 URL
[80]	胡扬. 不同氮肥对Arthrobacter sp. DNS10消减玉米农田黑土中阿特拉津残留的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2019.
[81]	李涛, 何春娥, 葛晓颖, 等. 秸秆还田施氮调节碳氮比对土壤无机氮、酶活性及作物产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(12):1633-1642.
[82]	宋福强, 丁明玲, 董爱荣, 等. 丛枝菌根(AM)真菌对土壤中阿特拉津降解的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(3):189-193.
[83]	HUANG H, ZHANG S, WU N, et al. Influence of Glomus etunicatum/Zea mays mycorrhiza on atrazine degradation, soil phosphatase and dehydrogenase activities, and soil microbial community structure[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2009, 41(4):726-734. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.01.009 URL
[84]	THIOUB M, EWUSI-MENSAH N, SARKODIE-ADDO J, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation enhances phosphorus use efficiency and soybean productivity on a Haplic Acrisol[J]. Soil and tillage research, 2019, 192:174-186. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2019.05.001 URL
[85]	FORNARA D A, FLYNN D, CARUSO T. Improving phosphorus sustainability in intensively managed grasslands: the potential role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi[J]. Science of the total environment, 2020, 706:135744. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135744 URL
[86]	RILLIG M C, MARDATIN N F, LEIFHEIT E F, et al. Mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increases soil water repellency and is sufficient to maintain water-stable soil aggregates[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2010, 42(7):1189-1191. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.03.027 URL
[87]	JIANG Y, LIU M, ZHANG J, et al. Nematode grazing promotes bacterial community dynamics in soil at the aggregate level[J]. The ISME journal, 2017, 11(12):2705-2717. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.120 URL
[88]	郑凤君, 王雪, 李生平, 等. 免耕覆盖下土壤水分、团聚体稳定性及其有机碳分布对小麦产量的协同效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 4(3):596-607.
[89]	SILLON J F, RICHARD G, COUSIN I. Tillage and traffic effects on soil hydraulic properties and evaporation[J]. Geoderma, 2003, 116(1):29-46. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00092-2 URL
[90]	卢蕾. 土壤容重和根区增氧对苹果根区土壤环境及平邑甜茶幼苗根系的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019.
[91]	CHEN S, ZHANG K, JHA R K, et al. Impact of atrazine concentration on bioavailability and apparent isotope fractionation in Gram-negative Rhizobium sp. CX-Z[J]. Environmental pollution, 2020, 257:113614. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113614 URL

属名	种名	pH范围	最适pH
Acinetobacter	Acinetobacter lwoffii DNS32^[57]	7.0~8.0	7.0
Arthrobacter	Arthrobacter sp. AG1^[58]	3.0~11.0	8.0
	Arthrobacter sp. DNS10^[59]	5.0~8.0	7.5
	Arthrobacter sp. FM326^[60]	5.0~9.0	6.0
	Arthrobacter sp.MSD6^[61]	6.0~7.0
	Arthrobacter sp.SD41^[62]	7.0~10.0
	Arthrobacter sp. T3AB1^[63]	7.0~8.0
	Arthrobacter sp. Z42^[64]	6.0~8.0	8.0
	Arthrobacter sp.ZXY-2^[52]	4.0~10.0	8.0~9.0
	Arthrobacter ureafaciens CS3^[65]	5.0~11.0	7.0
Citricoccus	Citricoccus sp. strain TT3^[66]	6.0~11.0	7.0
Enterobacter	Enterobacter sp. LY-2^[67]	6.0~9.0	7.0
Enterobacter	Enterobacter cloacae SYSA^[68]	7.0~8.0
Microbacterium	Microbacterium sp. Z9^[64]	6.0~10	7.0
Paenarthrobacter	Paenarthrobacter sp. W11^[69]	6.0~9.0	7.0
Pseudomonas	Pseudomonas sp. ZXY－1^[52]	5.0~9.0	8.0

属名	种名	pH范围	最适pH
Acinetobacter	Acinetobacter lwoffii DNS32^[57]	7.0~8.0	7.0
Arthrobacter	Arthrobacter sp. AG1^[58]	3.0~11.0	8.0
	Arthrobacter sp. DNS10^[59]	5.0~8.0	7.5
	Arthrobacter sp. FM326^[60]	5.0~9.0	6.0
	Arthrobacter sp.MSD6^[61]	6.0~7.0
	Arthrobacter sp.SD41^[62]	7.0~10.0
	Arthrobacter sp. T3AB1^[63]	7.0~8.0
	Arthrobacter sp. Z42^[64]	6.0~8.0	8.0
	Arthrobacter sp.ZXY-2^[52]	4.0~10.0	8.0~9.0
	Arthrobacter ureafaciens CS3^[65]	5.0~11.0	7.0
Citricoccus	Citricoccus sp. strain TT3^[66]	6.0~11.0	7.0
Enterobacter	Enterobacter sp. LY-2^[67]	6.0~9.0	7.0
Enterobacter	Enterobacter cloacae SYSA^[68]	7.0~8.0
Microbacterium	Microbacterium sp. Z9^[64]	6.0~10	7.0
Paenarthrobacter	Paenarthrobacter sp. W11^[69]	6.0~9.0	7.0
Pseudomonas	Pseudomonas sp. ZXY－1^[52]	5.0~9.0	8.0

土壤因子对阿特拉津吸附动力学及其污染土壤微生物修复的影响

Effects of Soil Factors on Atrazine Adsorption Kinetics and Microbial Remediation of Contaminated Soil

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 91

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	朱令, 邓世鑫, 雷璐嘉, 桂仁意. 竖管通气对覆盖栽培雷竹生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(5): 55-62.
[2]	唐卫东, 魏林源, 康才周, 王多泽, 邱晓娜, 张卫星, 张晓娟. 民勤不同林龄樟子松人工林土壤理化性质[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(4): 93-98.
[3]	关体坤, 刘子璐, 李小玉, 王建立, 侯霜影, 刘栩杉, 徐诗毅, 陈青君, 张国庆. 工厂化杏鲍菇菌渣生物炭制备及质量评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(3): 71-79.
[4]	曾婕, 余浪, 达布希拉图, 李云驹. 磷基土壤调理剂在低磷红壤上对小白菜生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 81-87.
[5]	王丽娜, 杨瑛, 杜苏. 生物炭施入对盐碱土壤影响的研究现状[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 81-87.
[6]	韩晓芳, 田晓明, 杨永利, 张敬智, 张清, 张凯, 张涛, 贾林. 2种土壤复合改良剂对滨海盐渍土的改良及肥力作用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 54-59.
[7]	刘琪, 高志强, 杨珍平, 乔月静. 合理氮肥用量改善冬小麦土壤耕层细菌群落结构及理化性质研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(30): 77-84.
[8]	黄雅丽, 马风云, 王霞, 郝军, 杜振宇, 刘方春, 石群, 马丙尧. 滴灌水量对核桃幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(22): 62-68.
[9]	曹彩红, 曹玲玲, 祝宁, 陈加和, 赵立群, 田雅楠, 张宝杰, 何秉青. 不同农业措施对草莓连作土壤状况的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(18): 107-112.
[10]	柴春荣, 倪红伟, 刘赢男, 张荣涛, 杨基先. 模拟雪被变化下三江平原湿地土壤理化性质的动态响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(5): 31-37.
[11]	任静, 葛春辉. 生物炭对灰漠土铬Cr(Ⅲ)污染的钝化及生物有效性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(28): 76-80.
[12]	杨国航, 李琼, 和利钊, 顾静, 牛婧, 张海欧, 郑子健, 赵振. 晚稻全生育期Cd的迁移转化规律及预测模型研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(25): 1-10.
[13]	张美芝, 耿煜函, 张薇, 林昕, 温佳旭, 陈雪丽, 肖洋. 秸秆生物炭在农田中的应用研究综述[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(21): 59-65.
[14]	任海英, 王剑, 郑锡良, 张淑文, 邹秀琴, 俞浙萍, 戚行江. 生物有机肥对衰弱病杨梅营养改良及强壮树势的作用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(16): 127-137.
[15]	王梓默, 林士杰, 张大伟, 何怀江, 陈思羽, 包广道, 贾庆彬, 张忠辉. 吉林省西部盐碱地5种林分类型土壤改良效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(15): 55-62.