银杏树体茎流变化及其对环境因子的响应

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了动态地掌握银杏的蒸腾耗水规律，并揭示其生态、生理作用机理，采用热扩散式液流探针（TDP）监测银杏树体不同生长阶段的茎流变化，并通过气象站同步测定环境因子参数。结果表明：在典型的晴天、多云、阴雨天气下，银杏树干茎流的日变化差异显著，日累积茎流通量为晴天>多云天气>阴雨天气；银杏茎流的季节变化趋势呈现为先上升后下降的态势，在新梢生长期的蒸腾耗水量最大，日耗水量可达23L左右。在叶速生期、新梢生长期和叶黄期银杏日蒸腾耗水量的波动明显，其中以新梢生长期最为显著，日间差异最大可达20L。以各阶段日均耗水量来估算，12年生银杏年耗水量大约为2580L；银杏在年生长周期中茎流通量的变化趋势与气温、土壤湿度、土壤温度、相对湿度、光合有效辐射以及降雨量的季节变化趋势基本一致，逐步回归分析表明银杏年生长周期中大气温度是茎流最为主要的影响因子，回归方程达到极显著水平。

关键词: 海南, 海南, 甜椒, 杂交制种

Abstract: In order to be master of the rule of water transpiration of gingkgo(G. biloba), and open out the mechanism of physiology action, The Thermal Dissipation Probe (TDP) was used in this experiment to monitor the dynamics of gingkgo (G. biloba) trunk sap flow in different growing periods, and an Automatic Weather Station was synchronously applied to measure the environmental parameters. The results indicated that change of sap flow was shown significantly different in fine day, cloudy day and in rainy day, daily cumulative flux of fine day>cloudy day’s>rainy day’s; The seasonal change trend of sap flow revealed that transpiration flux was the most in Jul., daily sap flow flux could reach around 23L.Daily sap flow flux fluctuating was relatively distinct in May, July and Sep., most distinct in Jul, discrepancy could reach 20L.According to average daily sap flow flux of different growth phases, transpiration flux of gingkgo of 12a was 2580L during 2006-growth season; Changes of sap flow flux in a growing season accorded with seasonal changes of temperature, soil relative humidity, soil temperature, relative humidity, PAR and rainfall. Stepwise regression analyses revealed that temperature was the main environmental factor influencing on sap flow, stepwise regression equation shows it reaches significant level.

中图分类号:

S718
S715.4

刘健,赖娜娜,赵炳祥,边秀举. 银杏树体茎流变化及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(6): 232-232.

Liu Jian，Lai Nana，Zhao Bingxiang，Bian Xiuju. Change of Trunk Sap Flow of Gingkgo（Ginkgo biloba L.）and its Response to Environmental Factors[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(6): 232-232.

参考文献

[1] 马履一,王华田,林平.北京地区几个造林树种耗水性比较研究.北京林业大学学报,2003,25(2):1-7.
[2] 王沙生,高荣孚,吴贯明.植物生理学,2版.北京:中国林业出版社,1991:1-32.
[3] 聂立水,李吉跃.应用TDP技术研究油松树干液流速率.北京林业大学学报,2004,26(6):49-56.
[4] 李海涛,陈灵芝.利用热脉冲技术对棘皮桦和五角枫树干液流的研究.北京林业大学学报,1998,20(1):1-6.
[5] 鲁小珍.马尾松、栓皮栎生长盛期树干液流的研究.安徽农业大学学报,2001,28(4):401-404.
[6] 孙慧珍,孙龙,王传宽.东北东部山区主要树种树干液流研究.林业科学,2005,41(3):36-42.
[7] 孙慧珍,周晓峰,赵惠勋.白桦树干液流的动态研究.生态学报,2002,22(9):1387-1391.
[8] 马李一,孙鹏森,马履一.油松、刺槐单木与林分水平耗水量的尺度转换.北京林业大学学报,2001,23(4):1-5.
[9] 王华田,马履一,孙鹏森.油松、侧柏深秋边材木质部液流变化规律的研究.林业科学, 2002,38(5):31-37.
[10] 张金池,黄夏银,鲁小珍.徐淮平原农田防护林带杨树树干液流研究.中国水土保持科学, 2004,2(4):21-36.
[11] 马玲,赵平,饶兴权,等.马占相思树干液流特征及其与环境因子的关系.生态学报,2005,25(9):2146-2151.
[12] 王华田,马履一.利用热扩式边材液流探针(TDP)测定树木整株蒸腾耗水量的研究.植物生态学报,2002,26(6):661-667.
[13] Granier A. Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiology, 1987,7:309-320.
[14] Kostner B, Granier A, Cermak J. Sapflow measurements in forest stands: methods and uncertainties. Ann Forest Sci, 1998,55:13-27.
[15] James S A, Clearwater M J, Meinzer F C. Heat dissipation sensors of variable length for the measurement of sap flow in trees with deep sapwood. Tree Physiology, 2002,22:277-283.
[16] Huber B. Beobachtung and Messung pflanzlicher Safrstrme. Berichteder Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft, 1935,50:89-109.