On the Status Quo and the Prospect of Eco-compensation Research in China

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-0493

Abstract

Abstract: By applying quantitative analysis toward the papers related to Eco-compensation selected from core journals of CNKI and the projects which have been sponsored by the National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science and the National Fund of Natural Science, which concerned the number of papers, research areas, author affiliation and project number, project content, to review the development of 23 years of Eco-compensation, it is found out that Chinese Eco-compensation research is characterized by substantial papers, steady growth of thesis, comprehensive research domain, stable research team, strong teamwork, projects growth, more youth projects, developing new research fields. Also, there are still some problems to be settled, such as high quality papers not much, the research is not thorough enough, compared with abroad, research is relatively slowly, inadequate follow-up study, the discipline on projects is not wise. Based on above-mentioned analysis, the Eco-compensation study direction for the future is brought forward.

References

[1] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis[M].Washington, DC: Island Press,2005.
[2] Sven Wunder. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts[R].Occasional paper No.42, Center for International Forestry Research, Nairobi,Kenya,2005.
[3] Stefanie Engel, Stefano Pagiola, Sven Wunder. Designing Payments for Environmental Services in Theory and Practice: An Overview of the Issues[J].Ecological Economic,2008,65(4):663-674.
[4] Wunder S, Engel S, Pagiola S. Taking Stock: A Comparative Analysis of Payments for Environmental Services Programs in Developed and Developing Countries[J]. Ecological Economic, 2008,65(4):834-852.
[5] 中国生态补偿机制与政策研究课题组.中国生态补偿机制与政策研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
[6] Wünscher T ,Engel S ,Wunder S. Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: a tool for boosting conservation benefits[J]. Ecological Economics,2008,65(4):822-8331.
[7] 戴其文.生态补偿对象的空间选择研究——以甘南藏族自治州草地生态系统的水源涵养服务为例[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(3): 1772-1784.
[8] Antic J M, Diagana B, Stoorvogel J J, et al. Minimum-Data Analysis of Ecosystem Service Supply in Semi-Subsistence Agricultural Systems: Evidence from Kenya and Senegal[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economies,2010,54 (4):601-617.
[9] 刘玉龙,胡鹏.基于帕累托最优的新安江流域生态补偿标准[J].水利学报,2009,40(6):703-708.
[10] 赵雪雁,董霞,范君君,等.甘南黄河水源补给区生态补偿方式的选择[J].冰川冻土,2010,32(1):204-210.
[11] 黄昌硕,耿雷华,王淑云.水源区生态补偿的方式和政策研究[J].生态经济,2009(3):169-172.
[12] 孔凡斌,张利国,陈建成.我国生态补偿政策法律制度的特征、体系与评价研究[J].北京林业大学学报:社会科学版,2010,9(1):41-47.
[13] 高清.生态补偿法律制度略论[J].河北法学.2008,26(9):112-116.
[14] 李宁,丁四保,赵伟.关于我国区域生态补偿财政政策局限性的探讨[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(6):74-79.
[15] 冷永生,李敏.生态补偿机制建设的财政思考——基于对太原市生态修复和补偿机制建设的调研[J].财政研究, 2012(4):76-78.
[16] Dietschi S, Holderegger R, Schmidt S G, et al. Agri-environment incentive payments and plant species richness under different management intensities in mountain meadows of Switzerland[J]. Acta Oecologica,2007,31(2):216-222.
[17] 戴其文,赵雪雁.生态补偿机制中若干关键科学问题——以甘南藏族自治州草地生态系统为例[J].地理学报,2010,65(4):494-506.
[18] Mahanty S, Suich H, Tacconi L. Access and benefits in payments for environmental services and implications for REDD + : Lessons from seven PES schemes[J].Land Use Policy,2013,31:38-47.
[19] 侯成成,赵雪雁,张丽,等.生态补偿对区域发展的影响——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(1):50-61.
[20] 甄霖,刘雪林,李芬,等.脆弱生态区生态系统服务消费与生态补偿研究:进展与挑战[J].资源科学,2010,32(5):797-803.
[21] 王立安,钟方雷,苏芳.西部生态补偿与缓解贫困关系的研究框架[J].经济地理,2009,29(9):1552-1557.
[22] 李文华,刘某承.关于中国生态补偿机制建设的几点思考[J].资源科学,2010,32(5):791-796.
[23] 徐中民,钟方雷,赵雪雁,等.生态补偿研究进展综述[J].财会研究, 2008,23:67-72.
[24] 赵雪雁,徐中民.生态系统服务付费的研究框架与应用进展[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2009,19(4):112-118.
[25] 郭建卿,靳乐山.中国生态补偿研究综述[J].林业经济问题,2008,28 (4):371-376.
[26] 秦艳红,康慕谊.国内外生态补偿现状及其完善措施[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(4):557-567.
[27] 俞海,任勇.中国生态补偿:概念、问题类型与政策路径选择[J].中国软科学,2008(6):7-15.
[28] 冯艳芬,刘毅华,王芳,等.国内生态补偿实践进展[J].生态经济, 2009 (8):85-89.