The Relationships Between Flag Leaf Angles of Various Rice Germplasms and Their Nitrogen Nutrition Efficiencies

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2826

Abstract

Abstract: Flag leaf angleofrice was important component of the ideal rice architecture, and the important affecting factor of gaining rice yield. The relationships between flag leaf angles of variouss rice germplasms and their nitrogen nutrition efficiencies were studied to provide the theoretical foundations and technological approaches for establishing ideal rice architecture and improving nitrogen nutrition efficiencies. In this study, nine typical rice germplasms bred in different years were used as the experimental materials in pot experiments and grown under low nitrogen (0 kg/hm² urea), medium nitrogen (240 kg/hm² urea) and high nitrogen (480 kg/hm² urea) levels. During mature stage, flag leaf angle, nitrogen contents of each organ in rice germplasms and soil were determined to analyze the correlations and fit function on the flag leaf angle and their nitrogen nutrition efficiencies including nitrogen utilization efficiency(NUE), nitrogen recovery efficiency (NAE), nitrogen translocation efficiency(NTE), nitrogen productivity of soil(NPS), nitrogen productivity of plant (NPP), nitrogen flow efficiency (NFE), nitrogen harvest index(NHI). The results showed that flag leaf angles and nitrogen nutrition efficiencies of various rice germplasms existed significant genotypic differences, which varied with different nitrogen levels. Flag leaf angles increased rapidly with the increasing of nitrogen, their genotypic differences among various rice germplasms under low nitrogen were obviously lower than those under medium and high nitrogen. The correlations between flag leaf angle and NUE, NPS, NPP or NHI were significantly negative, their descending deceased with logarithm function and the order of NPP＞NHI＞NUE＞NPS; and the correlations between flag leaf angle and NAE, NTE and NFE were not significantly negative,but the correlations among nitrogen nutrition efficiencies were markedly significantly negative or positive. So, nitrogen nutrition efficiencies of rice were predicted according to flag leaf angle inpractice, which provided the basis for regulating nitrogen application in real-time to accomplish high nitrogen utilization.

References

[1] Donald C M. The breeding of crop ideotypes[J].Euphytica,1968,17: 385-403.
[2] Li Z K, Paterson A H, Pinson S R M, et al. RFLP facilitated analysis of tillerand leaf angle sinrice(OryzasativaL.)[J].Euphytica, 1999,109:79-84.
[3] Donald C M, Hamblin J. The biological yield and harvest index of cerealsasagronomic and plant breeding criteria[J].Advances in Agronomics,1976,28:361-405.
[4] 李仕贵,何平,王玉平,等.水稻剑叶性状的遗传分析和基因定位[J].作物学报,2000,26(3):261-265.
[5] 岳兵,薛为亚,罗利军,等.水稻剑叶部分形态生理特性 QTL分析以及它们与产量、产量性状的关系[J].遗传学报,2006,33(9):824-832.
[6] Sadasivam R, Arjunan A, Mohandass S, et al .Relationship between grain yield and flag leaf angle in rice[J].Int Rice Res Newsl,1989,14 (4):14.
[7] Yan Y M. Genetics tudies of flag leaf angle in indica and japonica rice crosses[J].Int Rice Res Newsl,1991,16(5):5.
[8] 王晓梅,崔坤,郭树义,等.水稻株型对产量影响的研究[J].吉林农业科学,1996,(1):54-56.
[9] 董国军,藤本宽,滕胜,等.水稻剑叶角度的 QTL分析[J].中国水稻科学,2003,17(3):219-222.
[10] 张克勤,戴伟民,樊叶杨,等.水稻剑叶角度与主穗产量的遗传剖析[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(9):186-192.
[11] 沈福成.水稻剑叶长、宽、角度及比叶重的遗传[J].贵州农业科学, 1983(6):18-25.
[12] 张毅,秦华,沈福成.水稻株型性状的配合力分析[J].西南农业大学学报,2002,11(1):17-20.
[13] 任亮,郑家奎,蒋强.长江上游地区高产杂交水稻品种部分株型因子及生理特征研究[J].西南农业学报,2008,21(6):1551-1554.
[14] 张亚丽,樊剑波,段英华,等.不同基因型水稻氮利用效率的差异及评价[J].土壤学报,2008,45(2):267-273.
[15] 彭少兵,黄见良,钟旭华,等.提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略[J].中国农业科学,2002,35(9):1095-1103.
[16] 朱兆良,张绍林,尹斌,等.太湖地区单季晚稻产量—氮肥施用量反应曲线的历史比较[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(1):1-5.
[17] GaoX J, Hu X F, Wang S P, et al. Nitrogen losses from flooded rice field. Pedosphere,2002,12(2):151-156.
[18] 闫德智,王德建,林静慧.太湖地区氮肥用量对土壤供氮、水稻吸氮和地下水的影响[J].土壤学报,2005,42(3):440-446.
[19] Singh U, Ladha J K, Castillo E G, et al. Genotypic variation in nitro genuse efficiency inmedium- andlong- durationrice[J].Field Crops Res,1998,58:35-53.
[20] 江立庚,戴廷波,韦善清,等.南方水稻氮素吸收与利用效率的基因型差异及评价[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(4):466-471.
[21] 程建峰,戴廷波,曹卫星,等.不同类型水稻种质氮素营养效率的变异分析[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2007,13(2):175-183.
[22] 程建峰,蒋海燕,潘晓云,等.施氮量对不同氮效率水稻花后干物质和氮积累与转运的影响[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(6):150-156.
[23] 宋智勇,吕凯,罗凤,等.施氮量对不同基因型水稻品种氮素吸收利用的影响[J].华中农业大学学报,2012,31(2):165-170.
[24] 刘桃菊,朱冰,王润寒,等.施氮量对超级双季早稻产量及氮肥吸收利用的影响[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(12):30-34.
[25] 吴文革,张四海,赵决建,等.氮肥运筹模式对双季稻北缘水稻氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2007,13(5):757- 764.
[26] 张秀芝,易琼,朱平,等.氮肥运筹对水稻农学效应和氮素利用的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(4):782-788.
[27] 孙园园,孙永健,杨志远,等.不同形态氮肥与结实期水分胁迫对水稻氮素利用及产量的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(3):274- 281.
[28] 李敏,郭熙盛,叶舒娅,等.硫膜和树脂膜控释尿素对水稻产量、光合特性及氮肥利用率的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(4): 808-815.
[29] 应存山.中国稻种质资源[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2002.
[30] Martin M, Fitzgerald M A. Proteins in rice grains in fluence cooking properties[J].Journal of Cereal Science,2004,36(3):285-294.
[31] 陈平雁,黄浙明.IBMSPSS19统计软件应用教程[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012.
[32] 沈福成.水稻株型改良的理论和实践[M].贵阳:贵州科学技术出版社,1990.
[33] Murchie E H, Chen Y Z, Hubbart S, et al. Interaction between senescence and leaf orientation determine in situ patterns of photosynthesis and photo inhibition in field grown rice[J].Plant Physiology,1999,119:553-563.
[34] 单长生,沙兵译.水稻的营养诊断与施肥[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1982:55-57,133.
[35] 《国外农学——水稻》编辑部译.水稻的生理生态[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1981:1-14,15-27,92.
[36] 杜永,王艳,王学红,等.黄淮地区不同粳稻品种株型、产量与品质的比较分析[J].作物学报,2007,33(7):1079-1085.
[37] 袁媛,唐亮,王嘉宇,等.北方粳稻叶型特征及最优叶型模式的探索[J].种子,2008,27(2):1-7.