Different Effects on Growth Characteristics of Tobacco Plants Infested by Bemisia tabaci Biotype B and Trialeurodes vaporariorum

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16050092

Abstract

Abstract: The paper objective is to compare the effect of growth characteristic of tobacco after feeding by Bemisia tabaci Biotype B and Trialeurodes vaporariorum respectively on tobacco plants, and to determine the difference defense response of tobacco plants and temporal effect by two whitefly induced, and to explore its role in interspecific competition between B. tabaci and T. vaporariorum and its possible mechanism. The difference effects of growth characteristic of tobacco after feeding different times by B. tabaci and T. vaporariorum respectively get though using ruler measurement and oven drying weighing method. The results showed that the significant difference of tobacco growth and exist temporal effect after feeding by B. tabaci and T. vaporariorum, respectively, under the whitefly population density of reached plant induced defense. Compared with the control of tobacco, the tobacco feeding by B. tabaci had no negative effects on growth for 5 d, and but had negative effects on plant growth start for 10 d after feeding by B. tabaci and had gradually increase the adverse effects of tobacco follow the extension of B. tabaci feeding time. The tobacco plants height were decreased by 6.9 cm and 8.5 cm, and the average internode were decreased by 0.6cm and 0.53cm, and the leaf number of tobacco plants was decreased by 2.1 leaf/plant and 2.6 leaf/plant, and the dry weight of per unit areas were decreased by 0.99 mg/cm2 and 1.01 mg/cm2 after previous feeding by B. tabaci for 15 d and 20 d, respectively. The tobacco feeding different times by T. vaporariorum had no negative effects. Compared with tobacco after feeding by T. vaporariorum, B. tabaci feeding tobacco can induce specific inhibition responses, B. tabaci -elicited declines in growth may result from the re-allocation of resources from growth to defense.

References

[1] 张芝利. 关于烟粉虱大发生的思考[J]. 北京农业科学, 2000, 18 (1): 1-3.
[2] Luo C, Wang S, Zhang Z, et al. Population dynamics of whiteflies and natural enemies in the suburbs of Beijing [A]. Contemporary Entomology Research, Proceedings of Entomology Society of China for Establishment, 2004, 60: 465-468.
[3] 褚栋, 周洪旭, 王斌, 等. 山东省烟粉虱与温室白粉虱种群动态及其地理分布调查. 山东农业科学, 2007, (2):64-66.
[4] Zhang G F, Li D C, Liu T X, et al. Interspecific Interactions between Bemisia tabaci Biotype B and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) [J]. Environmental entomology, 2011, 40 (1): 140-150.
[5] 胡海燕. B型烟粉虱诱导的烟草防御对B型烟粉虱和温室白粉虱种间竞争及解毒代谢的影响[D].泰安:山东农业大学, 2013.
[6] Glazebrook J. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens [J]. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol, 2005, 43: 205-227.
[7] 王承香, 薛明, 毕明娟, 等. B 型烟粉虱取食诱导烟草对烟蚜防御反应的时间效应 [J].昆虫学报, 2010, 53 (3): 314-322.
[8] 王洪涛. B 型烟粉虱取食烟草对斜纹夜蛾生长发育和繁殖的影响及机制探讨 [D].泰安: 山东农业大学, 2011.
[9] Inbar M, Doostdar H, Sonoda R M, et al. Elicitors of plant defensive systems reduce insect densities and disease incidence [J]. Journal of chemical ecology, 1999, 24 (1): 135-149.
[10] Mayer R T, Inbar M, McKenzie C, et al. Multitrophic interactions of the silverleaf whitefly, host plants, competing herbivores and phytopathogens [J]. Archives of insect biochemistry and physiology, 2002, 51 (4): 151-169.
[11] Zhang L P, Zhang G. Y, Zhang Y J, et al. Interspecific interactions between Bemisia tabaci (Hem., Aleyrodidae) and Liriomyza sativae (Dipt., Agromyzidae) [J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2005, 129 (8): 443-446.
[13] Antony B, Palaniswami M S. Bemisia tabaci feeding induces pathogenesis-related proteins in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) [J]. Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2006, 43: 182-185.
[14] Zhang S Z, Zhang F. 2008. Enhancement of Phenylalanine Ammonia, PolyPhenoloxidase and Peroxidase in cucumber seedlings by Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)(HemiPtera: Aleyrodidae) Infestation [J]. Agriculture Seience in China, 7(l): 82-87.
[15] 孙亚萍. 烟粉虱危害对番茄品质及生理生化影响.扬州大学硕士学位论文[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学,2008.
[16] Stotz H U, Pittendrigh B R, Kroymann J, et al. Induced plant defense responses against chewing insects Ethylene signaling reduces resistance of Arabidopsis against Egyptian cotton worm but not diamondback moth. Plant Physiology, 2000, 124 (3): 1007-1018.
[17] McAuslane H J, Chen J, Carle R B, et al. Influence of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) infestation and squash silverleaf disorder on zucchini seedling growth [J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2004, 97 (3): 1096-1105.
[18] Bezemer T M, Jones T H. Plant-insect herbivore interactions in elevated atmospheric CO2: quantitative analyses and guild effects [J]. Oikos, 1998, 212-222.
[19] Herms D A, Mattson W J. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend [J]. Quarterly Review of Biology, 1992, 67 (3): 283-335.
[20] Donovan M P, Nabity P D, DeLucia E H. Salicylic acid-mediated reductions in yield in Nicotiana attenuata challenged by aphid herbivory [J]. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 2013, 7 (1): 45-52.
[21] 王洪涛,薛明,李庆亮,等.B 型烟粉虱取食诱导的烟草对斜纹夜蛾生长发育和繁殖的影响及机制探讨. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(22): 4600-4609.
[22] 李庆亮. B 型烟粉虱为害对烟草生理生化的影响及其诱导的防御反应[D]: 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2009.
[23] Heil M, Fiala B, Baumann B, et al. Temporal, spatial and biotic variations in extrafloral nectar secretion by Macaranga tanarius [J]. Functional Ecology, 2000, 749-757.
[24]Berner J M, Westhuizen A. The selective induction of the phenylalanine ammonialyase pathway in the resistance response of wheat to the Russian wheat aphid [J]. Cereal Research Communications, 2010, 38 (4): 506-513.