Effect of Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Alfalfa in Saline-alkali Soil

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16110035

Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (29): 66-71.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16110035

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effect of Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Alfalfa in Saline-alkali Soil

Wu Bo¹, Zhang Qingping¹, Zhang Jinhong¹, Wang Guoliang¹, He Feng², Sheng Yibing¹

(¹Key Laboratory of East China Urban Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Shandong Institute of Agriculture Sustainable Development, Jinan 250100;²Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094)

Received:2016-11-07 Revised:2017-09-25 Accepted:2016-12-23 Online:2017-10-24 Published:2017-10-24

Abstract

Abstract: Field experiments were conducted to study the effect of combined application of humic acid, diammonium phosphate and microelement on alfalfa (Medicago sativa) growth, and to analyze and evaluate 12 main nutritive indexes by gray relational analysis grade method. The results showed that the total yield of alfalfa increased by 39.6% with humic acid, diammonium phosphate and microelement applied as base fertilizer. Topdressing in seedling establishment period had little effect on yield. Fertilization could improve plant height of alfalfa, and the plant height in first cut and second cut was higher than that of third cut. The results of the weighted correlation degree and the equal right correlation degree of alfalfa nutrition were the same under different treatments, the effect followed the order of T3 (base fertilizer), T1 (base fertilizer + topdressing in seedling establishment period), T2 (topdressing in seedling establishment period) and T4 (without fertilization), the comprehensive evaluation correlation degree of weighted and equal relation were 0.2175 and 0.2156 under T3 treatment.

Wu Bo,Zhang Qingping,Zhang Jinhong,Wang Guoliang,He Feng and Sheng Yibing. Effect of Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Alfalfa in Saline-alkali Soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(29): 66-71.

References

[1] 王日鑫,秦慧娟.腐植酸的增氮解磷促钾作用[J].腐植酸,2008,4:27-32.
[2] 柳洪娟,李作梅,史春余,等.腐植酸提高食用型甘薯块根可溶性糖含量的生理基础[J].作物学报,2011,37(4):711-716.
[3] 杜会英,薛世川,孙忠富,等.腐植酸复混肥对葡萄养分吸收利用的影响[J].土壤通报,2006,37(3):546-549.
[4] 周毓华.微肥施用对烟叶产品质量的影响研究[J].中国烟草科学,2000,4:29-31.
[5] 胡华锋,介晓磊,刘世亮,等.喷施微肥对苜蓿微量元素含量及积累量的影响[J].草业学报,2008,17(1):15-19.
[6] 张立权,张凤英,哈斯阿古拉.紫花苜蓿耐盐性研究进展[J].草业学报,2012,21(6):296-305.
[7] 孙彦,龙瑞才,张铁军,等.紫花苜蓿皂苷研究进展[J].2013,22(3):274-283.
[8] 胡华锋,杨建平,介晓磊,等.氮磷钾肥配施对紫花苜蓿饲草产量及微量元素营养的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2010,33(1):17-20.
[9] 姜慧新,刘栋,翟桂玉,等.氮,磷,钾配合施肥对紫花苜蓿产草量的影响[J].草业科学,2012,29(9):1441-1445.
[10] 陈萍,沈振荣,迟海峰,等.不同施肥处理对紫花苜蓿产量和株高的影响[J].作物杂志,2013,1:91-94.
[11] 谢勇,孙洪仁,张新全,等.坝上地区紫花苜蓿氮、磷、钾肥料效应与推荐施肥量[J].中国草地学报,2012,34(2):52-57.
[12] 胡华锋,介晓磊,郭孝,等.氮磷钾及微量元素与有机肥配施对紫花苜蓿饲草产量及品质的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2010-02,41(1):98-101.
[13] Moore J E, Brant M H, Kunkle W E, et al. Effects of supplementation on voluntary forage intake, diet digestibility, and animal performance[J].Journal of Animal Science,1999,77(Suppl.2):122-135.
[14] Moore J E, Undersander D J. Relative forage quality: An alternative to relative feed value and quality index[C].Proceedings 13^th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium,2002:16-32.
[15] Rohweder D A, Barnes R F, Jorgensen N. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analysis for evaluating quality[J].Animal Science Journal,1978,47:747-759.
[16] 张吉鹍,卢德勋,胡明,等.不同粗饲料分级指数混合日粮对绵羊饲料转化效率的影响研究[J].江西农业学报,2007,19(2):81-83.
[17] 于健龙,石红霄.高寒草甸主要乡土牧草营养成分的灰色关联综合评价及利用潜力[J].家畜生态学报,2011,32(4):58-64.
[18] 王桃,徐长林,姜文清,等.高寒草甸区饲用燕麦品种营养价值综合评价研究[J].中国草地学报,2010(3):68-75.
[19] 许涛,祁娟,蒲小鹏,等.甘南玛曲七种主要饲草营养价值比较[J].中国草地学报,2012,34(3):113-116.
[20] 张清平,吴波,张进红,等.不同施肥处理对盐碱地紫花苜蓿生长特性及产量的影响[J].山东农业科学,2016,48(6):71-73.
[21] 邓聚龙.灰色系统基本方法[M].武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1987:35-47.
[22] 李月芬,汤洁,林年丰,等.灰色关联度法在草原土壤质量评价中的应用[J].吉林农业大学学报,2003,25(5):551-556.
[23] 程亮,张保林,王杰,等.腐植酸肥料的研究进展[J].中国土壤与肥料,2011,5:1-6.
[24] 张冬梅,张丽娟,霍秀娟,等.紫花苜蓿施用腐殖酸肥效应的研究[J].内蒙古民族大学学报:自然科学版,2010(4):390-393.
[25] 林杉,位蓓蕾,胡振琪,等.紫花苜蓿苗期对腐殖酸改良露天矿表土替代材料的响应[J].河南农业科学,2013,42(8):48-52.
[26] Aydin A, Kant C, Turan M. Humic acid application alleviates salinity stress of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants decreasing membrane leakage[J].African Journal of Agriculture Research,2012,7(7):1073-1086.
[27] Caballero R, Goieoechea E L, Hemaiz P J. Forage yields and quality of common vetch and oat sown at varying seeding ratios and seeding rates of common vetch[J].Field Crops Research,1995,41:35-140.
[28] Lithourgidis A S, Vasilakoglou I B, Dhima K V, et al. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios[J].Field Crop Research,2006(99):106–113.
[29] 谭学瑞,邓聚龙.灰色关联分析:多因素统计分析新方法[J].统计研究,1995,65(3):46-48.
[30] 蒋文伟,俞益武,姜培坤.湖州主要森林类型土壤肥力的灰色关联度分析与评价[J].生态学杂志,2002,21(4):18-21.
[31] 莫本田,罗天琼,唐成斌.贵州主要野生禾本科牧草营养价值灰色分析[J].贵州农业科学,1995,3:42-46.

Effect of Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Alfalfa in Saline-alkali Soil

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

For authors

For reviewers

Reader center

Contact us