Changes of physical properties of flue-cured tobacco of different years in Ankang tobacco growing area

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17040169

Abstract

Abstract: To explore the change regularity of physical properties of flue-cured tobacco of different years from Ankang tobacco growing area, physical properties of different parts of flue-cured tobacco from 2011 to 2016 were analyzed. Results showed that there were differences in physical properties by years, stem ratio of lower leaves rose in 2014-2015 and declined in 2016. Stem ratio of middle leaves was high except in 2013 and 2016. Stem ratio of upper leaves declined from 2011 to 2013, and then rose year by year till 2015, and declined again in 2016. There were no significant changes in single leaf weight of lower leaves from 2011 to 2016, but single leaf weight of middle leaves significantly increased in 2016. Single leaf weight of upper leaves in 2011 and 2016 was higher than those in other years. Unit leaf area weight of lower leaves rose year by year, unit leaf area weight of middle leaves rose year by year from 2011 to 2013, and then declined slowly till 2015, and rose again in 2016. Unit leaf area weight of upper leaves rose from 2011 to 2012, and then declined year by year till 2015, and rose again in 2016. There were no significant changes in leaf width-length ratio of lower leaves from 2011 to 2016. Leaf width-length ratio of middle leaves declined year by year from 2011 to 2014, and then increased quickly till 2016. Leaf width-length ratio of upper leaves declined year by year from 2011 to 2014, and then increased in 2015, and declined again in 2016. There were no significant changes of leaf tensile strength of lower and middle leaves from 2011 to 2012, but declined in 2013 and then kept the same level till 2015, and rose sharply in 2016. There were no significant changes of leaf tensile strength of upper leaves from 2011 to 2012, but declined in 2013, and increased year by year till 2015, and then kept the same level till 2016.

CLC Number:

S572.01

References

[1] 付秋娟, 张忠锋, 窦家宇, 等. 烤烟物理特性与常规化学成分及外观质量的关系[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2014,35(1):117－122.
[2] 薛超群, 尹启生, 王广山, 等. 烤烟烟叶物理特性的变化及其与评吸质量的关系[J]. 烟草科技, 2008, (7):52－55.
[3] 罗海燕, 方文青, 杨林波, 等. 叶中含梗率与相关打叶质量指标的关系[J]. 烟草科技, 2005,(7):11－13.
[4] 闫克玉, 袁志永, 吴殿信, 等. 烤烟质量评价指标体系研究[J]. 郑州轻工业学院学报(自然科学版),2001,16(12):57－61.
[5] 李瑞丽, 张保林, 王建民, 等. 河南烤烟综合物理特性的因子分析及规律性研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2014,20(6):90－96.
[6] 邓小华, 陈冬林, 周冀衡, 等. 湖南烤烟物理性状比较及聚类评价[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2009,30(3):63－68.
[7] 李洪勋, 潘文杰, 李建伟, 等. 贵州烟叶主要物理性状的分析与评价[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2011,39(7):51－54.
[8] 杨虹琦, 周冀衡, 李永平, 等. 云南不同产区主栽烤烟品种烟叶物理特性的分析[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2008,14(6):30－36.
[9] 马继良, 肖雅, 刘彦中, 等. 曲靖烟叶物理性状与海拔及经纬度的关系分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2011,(8):79－83.
[10]董高峰, 黄韡, 张强, 等. 昭通烤烟物理特性的因子分析和聚类分析[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2013,28(3):360－365.
[11]尹启生, 张艳玲, 薛超群, 等. 中国烤烟主要物理特性及其产区差异[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2009,15(4):33－38.
[12]郭建华, 宋纪真, 王广山, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析的烟叶物理特性区域归类[J]. 烟草科技, 2014,(8):14－17.
[13]朱峰, 沈始权, 孙福山, 等. 安康烤烟的烘烤特性及适宜成熟度研究[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,39(2):145－149.
[14]马爱国, 宋德伟, 孙在明, 等.不同部位烟叶外观特征与内在质量分析研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2009,(5) : 48－51.
[15]朱云燕, 陈雪. 毕节地区烤烟不同叶位烟叶化学成分和物理特性的差异分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007,35 (31): 9953－9954.
[16]屈剑波, 闫克玉, 李兴波, 等. 烤烟国家标准(40级)河南烟叶含梗率的测定[J]. 烟草科技, 1997,(2):8－9.
[17]李文娟, 王娟, 朱聿振, 等. 昆明不同烤烟品种初烤烟叶物理特性差异研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2014,43 (4): 43－47.
[18]査勇, 佘世科, 陈闯, 等. 皖南地区烟叶主要物理特性的分析[J]. 芜湖职业技术学院学报, 2010,12(3):42－44.
[19]窦玉青, 汤朝起, 沈钢, 等. 中国烤烟烟叶含梗率研究初探[J]. 西南农业学报, 2009, 22(6):1532－1535.
[20]徐兴阳, 欧阳进, 张俊文. 烤烟品种数量性状与烟叶产量和产值灰色关联度分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2008,29(2):23－26.
[21]王杉杉, 范艺宽, 朱金峰, 等. 关于烤烟单叶重的研究进展[J]. 江西农业学报, 2015,27(11):27－30.
[22]于庆涛, 张光利, 邓小华, 等. 优化烟叶结构措施对烤烟物理特性影响的多指标模糊评价[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2016,31(3):950－954.
[23]邓小华, 周冀衡, 陈新联, 等. 烟叶质量评价指标间的相关性研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2008,14(2):1－8.
[24]邓小华, 蔡兴, 于庆涛, 等. 增密和减氮对稻茬烤烟物理性状的效应分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2016,49(10):23－30.