Ecological Compensation Standard for Agricultural Products and Farmers ’Willingness to Accept in Water Conservation Area: A Case Study on Kiwifruit Production in Xixia County.

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17110134

Abstract

Abstract: Green production plays a key role in maintaining ecological safety of ecologically sensitive areas. This study established a synthetic index system of ecological compensation standard by calculating the evaluation of ecosystem service values, environmental cost and extra cost based on the ecological, economic, environmental and social dimensions. This paper calculated the compensation standard of conventional and ecological kiwifruit in water conservation area of South-to-North Water Diversion Project in 2015. A face to face questionnaire’s investigation of the willingness to accept (WTA) was conducted focused on the ecological compensation of kiwifruit planting with option of half of both fertilizer and pesticide and option of zero fertilizer and zero pesticide. Then comparing the compensation standard values with the WTA values by contingent value method, the results showed that the WTA value with fewer fertilizers and fewer pesticides was 16524 yuan/(hm2·a), which is much smaller than the compensation standard value 24105.5 yuan/(hm2·a), while the WTA value with zero fertilizer and pesticide was 28983.9 yuan/(hm2·a), which is higher than the compensation standard value. It is clear that the WTA expectation of farmers for organic planting pattern was much more than the green planting pattern. More financial and technical input should be considered to fulfill the conversion from conventional agriculture to organic agriculture.

References

[1] Tognetti, S., G. Mendoza, B. Aylward, et al. A Knowledge and Assessment Guide to Support the Development of Payment Arrangements for Watershed Ecosystem Services[M]. Netherlands: World Bank, 2002: 1-87.
[2] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment(MA).Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment[R]. Washington: Island Press, 2003, 56-70.
[3] Wunder, S. 2005. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts[R]. CIFOR Occasional Paper 42. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
[4] 王金南,万军,张惠远. 关于我国生态补偿机制与政策的几点认识[J]. 环境保护, 2006 (19): 24-28.
[5] 俞海,任勇. 流域生态补偿机制的关键问题分析——以南水北调中线水源涵养区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2007 (02): 28-33.
[6]房庆方,杨细平,蔡瀛.区域协调和可持续发展──珠江三角洲经济区城市群规划及其实施[J]. 城市规划, 1997(01):7-10+60.
[7]徐福留,曹军,陶澍,傅明先,王维清. 区域生态系统可持续发展敏感因子及敏感区分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2000(04):361-365.
[8]李团胜,石铁矛,肖笃宁.大城市区域的景观生态规划理论与方法[J].地理学与国土研究, 1999(02):53-56.
[9]蒋国富,陈小幸.南水北调中线工程水源区生态敏感区保护与利用[J].河南大学学报(自然科学版), 2007(06):612-616.
[10] 俞海,马赟,冯东方, 等. 南水北调中线水源涵养区生态补偿[J]. 环境经济, 2006 (10): 41-45.
[11] MITCHELL R, CARSON R. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method[M]. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1989.
[12] MACDONALD D H, MORRISON M D, BARNES M B. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept compensation for changes in urban water customer service standards[J]. Water Resources Management, 2010 (12): 3145-3158.
[13] 李怀恩,史淑娟,党志良, 等. 南水北调中线工程陕西水源区生态补偿机制研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009 (10): 1764-1771.
[14] 史淑娟,李怀恩,刘利年, 等. 南水北调中线陕西水源区生态补偿量模型研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2009 (5): 147-151.
[15] 周晨,李国平. 流域生态补偿的支付意愿及影响因素——以南水北调中线工程受水区郑州市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2015 (6): 38-46.
[16] 周晨,丁晓辉,李国平,等. 流域生态补偿中的农户受偿意愿研究——以南水北调中线工程陕南水源区为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2015 (8): 63-72.
[17] LI Y, XIONG W, ZHANG W, et al.. Life cycle assessment of water supply alternatives in water-receiving areas of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China[J]. Water Research, 2016 (89): 9-19.
[18] WEI Y, TANG D, DING Y, et al. Incorporating water consumption into crop water footprint: A case study of China''s South–North Water Diversion Project[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016 (545–546): 601–608.
[19] 李亦秋. 基于 3S 技术的丹江口库区及上游生态系统服务价值评价[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2009.
[20] 韩德梁. 丹江口库区生态系统服务价值化研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2010.
[21] 谭秋成. 丹江口库区化肥施用控制与农田生态补偿标准[J]. 中国人口.资源与环境, 2012 (3): 124-129.
[22] 张永勋,刘某承,闵庆文,等. 农业文化遗产地有机生产转换期农产品价格补偿测算——以云南省红河县哈尼梯田稻作系统为例[J].自然资源学报, 2015 (3): 374-383.
[23] VASILE A J, POPESCU C, ION R. A, et al. From conventional to organic in Romanian agriculture – Impact assessment of a land use changing paradigm[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015 (46): 258–266.
[24] ESCOBAR M M, HOLLAENDER R, WEFFER C P. Institutional durability of payments for watershed ecosystem services: Lessons from two case studies from Colombia and Germany[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013 (6): 46–53.
[25] BARATAUD F, AUBRY C, WEZEL A, et al. Management of drinking water catchment areas in cooperation with agriculture and the specific role of organic farming. Experiences from Germany and France[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014 (36): 585–594.
[26] 赵桂慎,李彩恋,彭澎,冯丹阳,梁龙. 生态敏感区有机板栗生态补偿标准及其估算——以北京市密云水库库区为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(06): 50-56.
[27] Jaarsveld, A. S. Van, R. Biggs, R. J. Scholes, et al. Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: The Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) Experience[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series Biological Sciences, 2005 (1454): 425-441.
[28] 李金昌,姜文来,靳乐山,等. 生态价值论[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社, 1999, 31.
[29] 付静尘.丹江口库区农田生态系统服务价值核算及影响因素的情景模拟研究[D].北京林业大学博士学位论文, 2010, 25-27.
[30] 梁龙,王大鹏,吴文良,等. 基于低碳农业的清洁生产与生态补偿——以山东桓台为例[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2011 (6): 98-102.
[31] 孙新章,谢高地,成升魁,等. 中国农田生产系统土壤保持功能及其经济价值[J].水土保持学报, 2005 (4): 156-159.
[32] 孙新章,周海林,谢高地. 中国农田生态系统的服务功能及其经济价值[J].中国人口资源与环境, 2007 (04): 55-60.
[33] 李亦秋. 基于3s技术的丹江口库区及上游生态系统服务价值评价[D]. 北京林业大学博士学位论文, 2009.
[34] 薛达元,包浩生,李文华.长白山自然保护区森林生态系统间接经济价值评估[J].中国环境科学, 1999 (03): 247-252.
[35] 汪为青. 鄱阳湖湿地生态系统服务价值与退田还湖生态补偿研究[D].江西师范大学博士学位论文, 2009: 20-21.
[36] Goedkoop, M., R. Heijungs, M. Huijbregts, et al. ReCiPe 2008[R]. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, 2009, 1.
[37] 王一超.华北高产农田生态系统可持续性评价[D].中国农业大学硕士学位论文, 2015, 27-36.
[38] Diamond, P.A., Hausman, J.A., 1993. On contingent valuation measurement of nonuse values, in: Hausman J.A. (Ed.), Contingent Valuation[M]. A Critical Assessment. Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 3-38.
[39] Amigues, J.P., Boulatoff C., Desaigues, B., Gauthier, C., Keith, J.E., 2002. The benefits and costs of riparian analysis habitat preservation: a willingness to accept/willingness to pay contingent valuation approach[J]. Ecological Economics. 43: 17-31.
[40] Lindhjem, H., Mitani, Y., 2012. Forest owners’ willingness to accept compensation for voluntary conservation: a contingent valuation approach[J]. Journal of Forest Economics. 4: 290-302.
[41] He, K., Zhang, J.B., Zeng, Y.M., Zhang, L., 2016. Households'' willingness to accept compensation for agricultural waste recycling: taking biogas production from livestock manure waste in Hubei, P. R. China as an example[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production. 131: 410-420.
[42] 欧阳志云,王如松,赵景柱. 生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J]. 应用生态学报,1999,(05):635-640.
[43] Tietenberg, T., Lynne, L., 2012. Environment and Natural Resource Economics[M], ninth ed. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
[44] Wooldridge, J.M., 2014. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach[M], fifth ed. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, OH.
[45] 郑海霞. 北京市对周边水源区的生态补偿机制与协调对策研究[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2013.