Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 149-154.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0246
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2020-07-07
Revised:
2020-09-28
Online:
2021-03-25
Published:
2021-04-09
CLC Number:
Li Wei. A New Herbicide Flurochloridone in Potato Field on Qinghai Plateau: Application and Safety[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(9): 149-154.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0246
处理 | 剂量/ (g a.i./hm2) | 苗期 | 后期 | 马铃薯 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株防效/% | 株防效/% | 鲜重效/% | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% | ||||
25%氟咯草酮EC | 200.00 | 68.15±5.73cC | 65.06±3.01eE | 63.01±4.42eE | 40794.00 | 7.69±2.02dD | ||
25%氟咯草酮EC | 350.00 | 78.25±1.18cC | 66.26±1.08eE | 70.68±2.04dD | 41728.50 | 10.15±2.55cC | ||
25%氟咯草酮EC | 500.00 | 86.07±2.69bB | 85.15±0.98cC | 87.11±4.23cC | 44016.75 | 16.19±2.19bB | ||
25%氟咯草酮EC | 650.00 | 90.42±0.23bB | 88.01±1.67cC | 88.66±1.04cC | 45692.25 | 20.62±1.08bB | ||
25%氟咯草酮EC | 800.00 | 92.43±0.69bB | 90.55±1.87bB | 92.67±3.29bB | 42471.75 | 12.12±2.33bcBC | ||
25%氟咯草酮EC | 900.00 | 95.51±3.34bB | 92.05±2.11bB | 94.76±3.99bB | 41856.75 | 10.49±1.73cC | ||
48%氟乐灵EC 33%施田补EC | 1440.00 | 58.34±3.18dD | 57.44±3.19fF | 62.18±4.22eE | 40399.50 | 6.64±0.76eE | ||
990.00 | 57.51±2.31dD | 57.29±5.65fF | 60.67±7.16eE | 40288.50 | 6.35±1.82eE | |||
人工除草 | 0 | 92.40±1.52bB | 72.43±4.24dD | 70.16dD | 41034.75 | 8.32±0.32dD | ||
空白对照 | 0 | 0.00aA | 0.00aA | 0.00aA | 37881.75 | 0.00 aA |
处理 | 剂量/ (g a.i./hm2) | 苗期 | 后期 | 马铃薯 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株防效/% | 株防效/% | 鲜重效/% | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% | ||||
25%氟咯草酮EC | 200.00 | 68.15±5.73cC | 65.06±3.01eE | 63.01±4.42eE | 40794.00 | 7.69±2.02dD | ||
25%氟咯草酮EC | 350.00 | 78.25±1.18cC | 66.26±1.08eE | 70.68±2.04dD | 41728.50 | 10.15±2.55cC | ||
25%氟咯草酮EC | 500.00 | 86.07±2.69bB | 85.15±0.98cC | 87.11±4.23cC | 44016.75 | 16.19±2.19bB | ||
25%氟咯草酮EC | 650.00 | 90.42±0.23bB | 88.01±1.67cC | 88.66±1.04cC | 45692.25 | 20.62±1.08bB | ||
25%氟咯草酮EC | 800.00 | 92.43±0.69bB | 90.55±1.87bB | 92.67±3.29bB | 42471.75 | 12.12±2.33bcBC | ||
25%氟咯草酮EC | 900.00 | 95.51±3.34bB | 92.05±2.11bB | 94.76±3.99bB | 41856.75 | 10.49±1.73cC | ||
48%氟乐灵EC 33%施田补EC | 1440.00 | 58.34±3.18dD | 57.44±3.19fF | 62.18±4.22eE | 40399.50 | 6.64±0.76eE | ||
990.00 | 57.51±2.31dD | 57.29±5.65fF | 60.67±7.16eE | 40288.50 | 6.35±1.82eE | |||
人工除草 | 0 | 92.40±1.52bB | 72.43±4.24dD | 70.16dD | 41034.75 | 8.32±0.32dD | ||
空白对照 | 0 | 0.00aA | 0.00aA | 0.00aA | 37881.75 | 0.00 aA |
处理 | 剂量/ (g a.i./hm2) | 野燕麦 株防效/% | 藜 株防效/% | 密花香薷 株防效/% | 野燕麦 鲜重防效/% | 藜 鲜重防效/% | 密花香薷 鲜重防效/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25%氟咯草酮EC | 200.00 | 27.34±2.35d | 61.05±4.38e | 55.49±5.29e | 32.97±6.55e | 64.88±5.15e | 67.57±4.45d | |
25%氟咯草酮EC | 350.00 | 31.66±3.18d | 68.22±2.19d | 65.33±5.81d | 33.46±8.21e | 75.48±3.24d | 73.93±3.86cd | |
25%氟咯草酮EC | 500.00 | 37.97±4.87d | 86.33±4.15c | 75.68±6.19c | 39.04±3.27de | 82.61±1.90c | 85.46±3.03c | |
25%氟咯草酮EC | 650.00 | 41.13±1.17d | 90.99±5.09b | 79.32±3.70c | 42.00±2.01de | 90.38±1.4b | 88.14±2.88b | |
25%氟咯草酮EC | 800.00 | 55.48±3.36c | 94.68±0.97b | 85.46±2.44b | 46.35±0.73d | 92.64±0.90b | 89.66±2.64b | |
25%氟咯草酮EC | 900.00 | 57.95±1.65c | 96.13±1.08b | 89.79±1.09b | 48.67±0.51d | 98.53±0.56b | 90.31±1.23b | |
48%氟乐灵EC 33%施田补EC | 1440.00 | 61.58±5.69c | 65.91±3.82e 59.32±3.61e | 49.23±4.58f 45.06±3.95g | 62.97±4.24c 65.43±7.19c | 61.58±6.36e 62.73±5.98e | 45.65±7.68e 43.25±8.91e | |
990.00 | 62.73±4.65c | |||||||
人工除草 | 0 | 72.14±3.65b | 71.08±4.09d | 73.67±6.69c | 76.42±6.64b | 80.55±8.23c | 69.28±3.55d | |
空白对照 | 0 | 0.00aA | 0.00aA | 0.00aA | 0.00aA | 0.00aA | 0.00aA |
处理 | 剂量/ (g a.i./hm2) | 野燕麦 株防效/% | 藜 株防效/% | 密花香薷 株防效/% | 野燕麦 鲜重防效/% | 藜 鲜重防效/% | 密花香薷 鲜重防效/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25%氟咯草酮EC | 200.00 | 27.34±2.35d | 61.05±4.38e | 55.49±5.29e | 32.97±6.55e | 64.88±5.15e | 67.57±4.45d | |
25%氟咯草酮EC | 350.00 | 31.66±3.18d | 68.22±2.19d | 65.33±5.81d | 33.46±8.21e | 75.48±3.24d | 73.93±3.86cd | |
25%氟咯草酮EC | 500.00 | 37.97±4.87d | 86.33±4.15c | 75.68±6.19c | 39.04±3.27de | 82.61±1.90c | 85.46±3.03c | |
25%氟咯草酮EC | 650.00 | 41.13±1.17d | 90.99±5.09b | 79.32±3.70c | 42.00±2.01de | 90.38±1.4b | 88.14±2.88b | |
25%氟咯草酮EC | 800.00 | 55.48±3.36c | 94.68±0.97b | 85.46±2.44b | 46.35±0.73d | 92.64±0.90b | 89.66±2.64b | |
25%氟咯草酮EC | 900.00 | 57.95±1.65c | 96.13±1.08b | 89.79±1.09b | 48.67±0.51d | 98.53±0.56b | 90.31±1.23b | |
48%氟乐灵EC 33%施田补EC | 1440.00 | 61.58±5.69c | 65.91±3.82e 59.32±3.61e | 49.23±4.58f 45.06±3.95g | 62.97±4.24c 65.43±7.19c | 61.58±6.36e 62.73±5.98e | 45.65±7.68e 43.25±8.91e | |
990.00 | 62.73±4.65c | |||||||
人工除草 | 0 | 72.14±3.65b | 71.08±4.09d | 73.67±6.69c | 76.42±6.64b | 80.55±8.23c | 69.28±3.55d | |
空白对照 | 0 | 0.00aA | 0.00aA | 0.00aA | 0.00aA | 0.00aA | 0.00aA |
处理 | 剂量/(g a.i./hm2) | 粗淀粉/% | Vc/(mg/100g) | 还原糖/% | 干物质/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
25%氟咯草酮EC | 500.00 | 27.45±2.69 | 18.15±2.44 | 0.17±0.03 | 22.89±3.25 |
25%氟咯草酮EC | 650.00 | 26.97±1.89 | 18.01±1.57 | 0.19±0.05 | 24.15±1.01 |
48%氟乐灵EC 33%施田补EC | 1440.00 | 26.18±3.02 | 20.56±2.93 | 0.17±0.03 | 25.11±2.01 |
990.00 | 27.67±2.33 | 17.93±0.98 | 0.20±0.04 | 26.16±1.65 | |
人工除草 | 0.00 | 29.04±2.10 | 18.64±1.66 | 0.18±0.03 | 25.54±1.66 |
空白对照 | 0.00 | 26.58±3.21 | 19.32±3.03 | 0.19±0.04 | 23.10±2.75 |
处理 | 剂量/(g a.i./hm2) | 粗淀粉/% | Vc/(mg/100g) | 还原糖/% | 干物质/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
25%氟咯草酮EC | 500.00 | 27.45±2.69 | 18.15±2.44 | 0.17±0.03 | 22.89±3.25 |
25%氟咯草酮EC | 650.00 | 26.97±1.89 | 18.01±1.57 | 0.19±0.05 | 24.15±1.01 |
48%氟乐灵EC 33%施田补EC | 1440.00 | 26.18±3.02 | 20.56±2.93 | 0.17±0.03 | 25.11±2.01 |
990.00 | 27.67±2.33 | 17.93±0.98 | 0.20±0.04 | 26.16±1.65 | |
人工除草 | 0.00 | 29.04±2.10 | 18.64±1.66 | 0.18±0.03 | 25.54±1.66 |
空白对照 | 0.00 | 26.58±3.21 | 19.32±3.03 | 0.19±0.04 | 23.10±2.75 |
[1] | 高士杰, 郑锦彪, 樊凯. 氟咯草酮原药主要杂质的合成[J]. 世界农药, 2016,38(1):53-55. |
[2] | 唐广新, 范金勇, 胡尊纪, 等. 氟咯草酮研究开发现状[J]. 山东化工, 2019,48:74-75. |
[3] |
Xu H, Xu L F, Yang P P, et al. Virus-induced Phytoene Desaturase(PDS) Gene Silencing Using Tobacco Rattle Virus in Lilium × formolongi[J]. Horticultural Plant Journal, 2019,5(1):31-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2018.10.002 URL |
[4] | 李永平, 王彬, 陈敏氡, 等. 黄秋葵八氢番茄红素脱氢酶基因的克隆与分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2019,39(7):1195-1202. |
[5] | 卢肖平. 马铃薯主粮化战略的意义、瓶颈与政策建议[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2015(3):1-7. |
[6] | 关佳晨, 蔡海龙. 中国马铃薯生产格局变化特征及原因分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019,40(3):92-100. |
[7] | 卢肖平, 谢开云. 国际马铃薯中心在中国[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2014. |
[8] | Wang F, Li F D, Wang J. Genetic Diversity of Chinese and CIP Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Germplasm Assessed by Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) Markers[J]. American Potato, 2013,56:167-178. |
[9] | 苏旺, 周云, 王舰. 青海马铃薯生产的比较优势分析[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019,47(9):161-164. |
[10] | 高兴祥, 李美, 高宗军, 等. 氟咯草酮的除草活性及对马铃薯和棉花的安全性[J]. 农药, 2011,51(9):683-684,695. |
[11] | 王恒智, 郭文磊, 王兆振, 等. 氟咯草酮及其混剂对棉田杂草防除效果及安全性[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(32):66-70. |
[12] | 郭文磊, 王兆振, 谭金妮, 等. 氟咯草酮与二甲戊灵或乙草胺复配的联合除草作用及其对棉花的安全性[J]. 农药学学报, 2016,18(5):605-611. |
[13] | 丛聪. 氟咯草酮活性评价及在大蒜田应用技术初步研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2014. |
[14] | 谢春晖, 李存桂. 湟中县马铃薯田间杂草发生及防除技术[J]. 植物保护, 2016,2:34-35. |
[15] | 甘迎春. 青海马铃薯病虫害发生特点及防治分析[J]. 北京农业, 2012,12:44-47. |
[16] |
Bastiaans L, Paolini R, Baumann D T. Focus on ecological weed management: What is hindering adoption?[J]. Weed Research, 2008,48:481-491.
doi: 10.1111/wre.2008.48.issue-6 URL |
[17] |
陈世国, 强胜. 生物除草剂的研究与开发的现状及未来的发展趋势[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2015,31(5):770-779.
doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2015.05.017 URL |
[18] | 张一宾. 全球马铃薯的种植和农药使用现状及发展方向[J]. 世界农药, 2016,38(2):6-11. |
[19] | 吕文河, 霍丹丹, 李勇, 等. 马铃薯块茎不同部位淀粉含量及淀粉合成关键酶活性差异比较[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2017,48(6):1-8. |
[20] | 王黎明. 马铃薯中粗淀粉含量的测定方法-旋光法[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2010(6):51-53. |
[21] | 宋芳芳, 徐艳文, 张俊, 等. 不同干燥条件对马铃薯粉品质影响的研究[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2019,32(8):79-81. |
[22] | 朱海霞, 石瑛, 张庆娜, 等. 3,5-二硝基水杨酸(DNS)比色法测定马铃薯还原糖含量的研究[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2005,19(5):266-269. |
[23] | 魏有海, 郭青云, 郭良芝, 等. 青海保护性耕作农田杂草群落组成及生物多样性[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013,31(1):219-225. |
[24] | 车玉芬. 大通地区马铃薯主要草害的发生及防除[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2011(4):64, 77-78. |
[25] |
Cong C, Wang Z Z, Li R R, et al. Evaluation of Weed Efficacy and Crop Safety of Fluorochloridone in China[J]. Weed Technology, 2014,28:721-728.
doi: 10.1614/WT-D-13-00155.1 URL |
[1] | WANG Fang, QIAO Shuai, YANG Songtao, SONG Wei, LIAO Anzhong, TAN Wenfang. Starch Type Sweet Potato Cultivar ‘Chuanshu231’: Breeding and Superior Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 16-21. |
[2] | DUAN Qingqing, HAN Meimei, TAN Yueqiang, ZHANG Zikun. Effects of Supplemental Light Quality and Duration on the Growth and Carbon Metabolism of Leaves of Greenhouse-grown Sweet Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 37-44. |
[3] | GAO Wenrui, SUN Yanjun, HAN Bing, FEI Cong, WANG Xiansheng, XU Gang. Effects of Low Light on Quality and Sucrose Metabolism of Watermelon Fruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 56-61. |
[4] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[5] | MA Meng, WANG Kehua, QU Liang, DOU Taocun, GUO Jun, WANG Xingguo, HU Yuping, LU Jian. Determination and Analysis of Slaughter Performance, Chest Muscle Quality and Composition of Different Chicken Breeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 137-142. |
[6] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[7] | JI Hongting, ZHAO Hanwei, WANG Yong, ZENG Yannan, CHENG Rundong, WANG Qingnan, ZHAO Hejuan. Effects of Two Plant Growth Retardants on Plug Seedling Quality of Sunflower [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 1-8. |
[8] | LU Lilan, WANG Yuping, YIN Xinxing, HUANG Yingkai, FAN Haikuo. Investigation and Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Fruit Coconut Orchards in Hainan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 72-80. |
[9] | WANG Yifan, LAO Xiaocan, YU Liping, YE Hailong. Rice Variety ‘Yongyou 15’: The Suitability of Meteorological Conditions for Sowing by Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 106-109. |
[10] | YU Hang, CHENG Qi, TANG Haiyun, CHEN Guoqi. Efficacy of Prometryn Against 10 Serious Wheat Weed Species [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 110-115. |
[11] | PU Yongyu, BAO Lingfeng, HE Xiang, LIU Rui, ZHANG Qing, SHI Zhufeng, HE Yonghong, YANG Peiwen. Screening, Identification and Control Efficacy of Antagonistic Bacteria Against Ralstonia solanacearum and Phytophthora parasitica [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 116-123. |
[12] | ZHENG Bixia, JI Xiaomei, LI Changlin, GONG Linzhong, FANG Linchuan. Effects of Different Compound Fresh-keeping Treatments on the Storage of ‘Summer Black’ Grape [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 135-143. |
[13] | XU Shuo, LU Feng, FANG Hui, WANG Lihua. High-quality Development of Fisheries Based on Big Data of Fishery Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 144-152. |
[14] | JING Li, ZHANG Wei, SHANGGUAN Caixia, SUN Jianjun. High-quality Development of Camellia oleifera Industry in Dabie Mountain Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 153-158. |
[15] | PENG Cheng, DENG Linping, MENG Wancong, CHANG Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Zengwen, LUO Jianliang, QIU Jishui, LU Yusheng. Effect of Bagging on Fruit Appearance and Aromatic Components of Prunus salicina var. cordata [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 45-51. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||