Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 16-21.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0068
Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Fang(), QIAO Shuai, YANG Songtao, SONG Wei, LIAO Anzhong, TAN Wenfang(
)
Received:
2022-02-11
Revised:
2022-09-13
Online:
2023-01-05
Published:
2022-12-27
Contact:
TAN Wenfang
E-mail:253283656@qq.com;zwstwf414@163.com
CLC Number:
WANG Fang, QIAO Shuai, YANG Songtao, SONG Wei, LIAO Anzhong, TAN Wenfang. Starch Type Sweet Potato Cultivar ‘Chuanshu231’: Breeding and Superior Characteristics[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 16-21.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0068
年份 | 株数/株 | 总开花数/朵 | 蒴果数/个 | 种子粒数/粒 | 平均花数/朵 | 结实率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | 30 | 5764 | 1904 | 2687 | 192 | 33 |
2018 | 30 | 6872 | 1797 | 2456 | 229 | 26 |
2019 | 50 | 12482 | 2547 | 3492 | 250 | 20 |
2020 | 50 | 13106 | 3044 | 3841 | 262 | 23 |
年份 | 株数/株 | 总开花数/朵 | 蒴果数/个 | 种子粒数/粒 | 平均花数/朵 | 结实率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | 30 | 5764 | 1904 | 2687 | 192 | 33 |
2018 | 30 | 6872 | 1797 | 2456 | 229 | 26 |
2019 | 50 | 12482 | 2547 | 3492 | 250 | 20 |
2020 | 50 | 13106 | 3044 | 3841 | 262 | 23 |
年份 | 指标 | 品系 | 成都 | 南充 | 绵阳 | 万州 | 合川 | 贵阳 | 平均 | 增幅/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017年 | 鲜薯产量/(t/hm2) | 川薯231 | 30.03 | 30.42 | 39.99 | 31.67 | 35.70 | 32.28 | 33.84 | 7.3 |
徐薯22 | 28.27 | 36.90 | 50.23 | 28.75 | 15.38 | 28.66 | 31.36 | |||
薯干产量/(t/hm2) | 川薯231 | 9.85 | 11.46 | 13.25 | 11.16 | 14.17 | 11.36 | 11.87 | 17.4 | |
徐薯22 | 9.44 | 11.59 | 14.79 | 8.09 | 5.60 | 9.28 | 9.80 | |||
淀粉产量/(t/hm2) | 川薯231 | 6.66 | 8.03 | 8.98 | 7.69 | 10.05 | 7.82 | 8.20 | 20.5 | |
徐薯22 | 6.41 | 7.73 | 9.67 | 5.21 | 3.89 | 6.24 | 6.52 | |||
干率/% | 川薯231 | 32.80 | 37.67 | 33.14 | 35.24 | 39.68 | 35.18 | 35.62 | 30.9** | |
徐薯22 | 22.18 | 26.41 | 22.47 | 24.30 | 28.16 | 24.24 | 24.63 | |||
2018年 | 鲜薯产量/(t/hm2) | 川薯231 | 23.24 | 26.09 | 22.38 | 30.49 | 15.22 | 25.07 | 23.75 | -1.85 |
徐薯22 | 27.23 | 29.76 | 23.45 | 27.83 | 9.62 | 27.28 | 24.19 | |||
薯干产量/(t/hm2) | 川薯231 | 8.00 | 8.62 | 6.29 | 10.99 | 5.59 | 8.59 | 8.01 | 9.0 | |
徐薯22 | 9.59 | 8.65 | 6.03 | 8.28 | 3.14 | 8.07 | 7.29 | |||
淀粉产量/(t/hm2) | 川薯231 | 5.48 | 5.84 | 4.05 | 7.62 | 3.90 | 5.88 | 5.46 | 12.08 | |
徐薯22 | 6.61 | 5.63 | 3.76 | 5.43 | 2.12 | 5.28 | 4.80 | |||
干率/% | 川薯231 | 34.44 | 33.07 | 28.13 | 36.06 | 36.77 | 34.27 | 33.79 | 10.21 | |
徐薯22 | 35.22 | 29.07 | 25.75 | 29.76 | 32.65 | 29.59 | 30.34 |
年份 | 指标 | 品系 | 成都 | 南充 | 绵阳 | 万州 | 合川 | 贵阳 | 平均 | 增幅/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017年 | 鲜薯产量/(t/hm2) | 川薯231 | 30.03 | 30.42 | 39.99 | 31.67 | 35.70 | 32.28 | 33.84 | 7.3 |
徐薯22 | 28.27 | 36.90 | 50.23 | 28.75 | 15.38 | 28.66 | 31.36 | |||
薯干产量/(t/hm2) | 川薯231 | 9.85 | 11.46 | 13.25 | 11.16 | 14.17 | 11.36 | 11.87 | 17.4 | |
徐薯22 | 9.44 | 11.59 | 14.79 | 8.09 | 5.60 | 9.28 | 9.80 | |||
淀粉产量/(t/hm2) | 川薯231 | 6.66 | 8.03 | 8.98 | 7.69 | 10.05 | 7.82 | 8.20 | 20.5 | |
徐薯22 | 6.41 | 7.73 | 9.67 | 5.21 | 3.89 | 6.24 | 6.52 | |||
干率/% | 川薯231 | 32.80 | 37.67 | 33.14 | 35.24 | 39.68 | 35.18 | 35.62 | 30.9** | |
徐薯22 | 22.18 | 26.41 | 22.47 | 24.30 | 28.16 | 24.24 | 24.63 | |||
2018年 | 鲜薯产量/(t/hm2) | 川薯231 | 23.24 | 26.09 | 22.38 | 30.49 | 15.22 | 25.07 | 23.75 | -1.85 |
徐薯22 | 27.23 | 29.76 | 23.45 | 27.83 | 9.62 | 27.28 | 24.19 | |||
薯干产量/(t/hm2) | 川薯231 | 8.00 | 8.62 | 6.29 | 10.99 | 5.59 | 8.59 | 8.01 | 9.0 | |
徐薯22 | 9.59 | 8.65 | 6.03 | 8.28 | 3.14 | 8.07 | 7.29 | |||
淀粉产量/(t/hm2) | 川薯231 | 5.48 | 5.84 | 4.05 | 7.62 | 3.90 | 5.88 | 5.46 | 12.08 | |
徐薯22 | 6.61 | 5.63 | 3.76 | 5.43 | 2.12 | 5.28 | 4.80 | |||
干率/% | 川薯231 | 34.44 | 33.07 | 28.13 | 36.06 | 36.77 | 34.27 | 33.79 | 10.21 | |
徐薯22 | 35.22 | 29.07 | 25.75 | 29.76 | 32.65 | 29.59 | 30.34 |
检测项目 | 测定值 | 测定方法 |
---|---|---|
干率 | 38.1% | GB 5009.3—2016 |
淀粉率 | 23.01% | NY/T 11—1985 |
粗蛋白 | 2.08 g/100 g | GB 5009.5—2016 |
还原糖 | 1.2 g/100 g | GB 5009.7—2016 |
可溶性糖 | 5.82 g/100 g | NY/T 1278—2007 |
β-胡萝卜素 | 0.5 μg/100 g | GB 5009.83—2016 |
检测项目 | 测定值 | 测定方法 |
---|---|---|
干率 | 38.1% | GB 5009.3—2016 |
淀粉率 | 23.01% | NY/T 11—1985 |
粗蛋白 | 2.08 g/100 g | GB 5009.5—2016 |
还原糖 | 1.2 g/100 g | GB 5009.7—2016 |
可溶性糖 | 5.82 g/100 g | NY/T 1278—2007 |
β-胡萝卜素 | 0.5 μg/100 g | GB 5009.83—2016 |
[1] |
LIU Q C. Improvement for agronomically important traits by gene engineering in sweetpotato[J]. Breeding science, 2017, 67(1):15-26.
doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.16126 pmid: 28465664 |
[2] | BOVELL-BENJAMIN A C. Sweet potato: A review of its past, present, and future role in human nutrition[J]. Advances in food and nutrition research, 2007, 52:1-59. |
[3] |
MUKHOPADHYAY S K, CHATTOPADHYAY A, CHAKRABORTY I, et al. Crops that feed the world 5. Sweetpotato. Sweetpotatoes for income and food security[J]. Food security, 2011, 3(3):283-305.
doi: 10.1007/s12571-011-0134-3 URL |
[4] |
AMAGLOH F C, YADA B, TUMUHIMBISE G A, et al. The potential of sweetpotato as a functional food in sub-Saharan Africa and its implications for health: A review[J]. Molecules, 2021, 26(10):2791.
doi: 10.3390/molecules26092791 URL |
[5] | KIM H J, KOO K A, PARK W S, et al. Anti-obesity activity of anthocyanin and carotenoid extracts from color-fleshed sweet potatoes[J]. Journal of food biochemistry, 2020, 44(10):e13438. |
[6] | ATUNA R A, ACHAGLINKAME M A, ACCORLEY T A S, et al. Cassava orange-fleshed sweetpotato composite gari: a potential source of dietary vitamin A[J]. Frontiers in nutrition, 2021, 8:646051. |
[7] |
ESCOBAR-PUENTES A A, PALOMO I, RODRÍGUEZ L, et al. Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) phenotypes: from agroindustry to health effects[J]. Foods, 2022, 11(7):1058.
doi: 10.3390/foods11071058 URL |
[8] | 商丽丽, 赵德虎, 杜清福, 等. 甘薯的营养成分及开发利用研究进展综述[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2012, 18(9):73-74. |
[9] |
KWAK S S. Biotechnology of the sweetpotato: ensuring global food and nutrition security in the face of climate change[J]. Plant cell reports, 2019, 38(11):1361-1363.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-019-02468-0 URL |
[10] | 陆国权. 开发系列甘薯产品促进甘薯食品多样化[J]. 农产品加工, 2012(5):6-8. |
[11] | 唐虹, 范金华, 李怀情, 等. 地方优良甘薯紫云红芯薯及脱毒薯苗配套栽培技术[J]. 中国种业, 2015(9):69-70. |
[12] | 张雄坚, 陈景益, 黄立飞, 等. 富含胡萝卜素鲜食型甘薯新品种广薯72的选育[J]. 广东农业科学, 2020, 47(3):9-15. |
[13] | 后猛, 张允刚, 刘亚菊, 等. 优质鲜食及加工型甘薯新品种徐紫薯8号生产力及特性鉴定[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(1):21-25. |
[14] | 谢一芝, 贾赵东, 边小峰, 等. 食用甘薯品种选育及系谱分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(30):32-38. |
[15] | 郭其茂. 甘薯新品种龙薯9号选育研究[J]. 中国种业, 2007(11):61-62. |
[16] | 何素兰, 李育明, 杨洪康, 等. 高淀粉甘薯新品种“西成薯007”优化栽培技术研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2011, 24(2):481-485. |
[17] | 马大夫. 中国甘薯产业技术创新与发展[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2019:16-17. |
[18] | 郭德章. 优质紫肉甘薯新品种‘榕紫薯5号’的选育及栽培技术[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(8):32-37. |
[19] | 马佩勇, 贾赵东, 边小峰, 等. 不同砧木与嫁接方式对甘薯开花结实的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2014, 26(6):1425-1430. |
[20] | 杨冬静, 谢逸萍, 孙厚俊, 等. 一种苗期甘薯黑斑病精准抗性鉴定方法[J]. 江苏师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 37(2):35-36. |
[21] | 谢逸萍, 马代夫, 李洪民, 等. 甘薯茎线虫病抗性鉴定方法及评价[J]. 杂粮作物, 2002(1):50-51. |
[22] | 杨松涛, 乔帅, 王芳, 等. 川紫薯6号的选育及栽培要点[J]. 四川农业科技, 2021(9):5-9. |
[23] | 秦建军, 汪翔, 徐雪高, 等. 科技支撑下的产业扶贫实践与路径优化——来自甘薯产业技术体系扶贫的经验[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(15):15-20. |
[24] | 王欣, 李强, 曹清河, 等. 中国甘薯产业和种业发展现状与未来展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3):483-492. |
[25] | 翟红, 何绍贞, 赵宁, 等. 甘薯生物技术育种研究进展[J]. 江苏师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(1):25-29. |
[26] |
侯夫云, 陈桂玲, 董顺旭, 等. 不同品种甘薯淀粉组分、物化及粉条品质的比较研究[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(2):392-401.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.02.0392 |
[27] | 王璐璐, 黄雨, 傅玉凡, 等. 甘薯淀粉相关性状变异性的分析[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(2):39-47. |
[1] | XU Shuo, LU Feng, FANG Hui, WANG Lihua. High-quality Development of Fisheries Based on Big Data of Fishery Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 144-152. |
[2] | ZHANG Zhiling, LIN Haibin, WANG Xinwang, LIN Long, CHEN Xingfeng, GAO Weimin, LIN Zubin, CHEN Qingwen. The Correlation Between the Starch Content and the Appearance Quality and Sensory Quality of Fujian Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 136-141. |
[3] | WU Wen. Effect of Root Pruning on Quality of Sapium sebiferum (L.) Roxb. Container Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 25-29. |
[4] | LI Ronglin, TANG Jun, AI Zeyi, MU Bing, YANG Yiyang, CHEN Zhengtao, SHI Haihua. The Enhancement of Stress Resistance of Tea Plants by Herb Extract and Plant Essential Oil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 111-117. |
[5] | LI Aihua, LI Jinzhu, YAN Shoaliang, XIANG Shanshan, LIN Yun. Application Research of Selenium in Chinese Chestnut Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(20): 61-66. |
[6] | XU Jingju, YANG Ying, MA Qiang, LIU Lei, JING Wenjiang, ZHANG Ying, ZHANG Hao. Effect of Water Management on Rice Starch Quality: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(11): 1-6. |
[7] | YE Wen, SUN Caixia, YE Jueyu, XU Mingfei. Analysis of Nutritional Components of Glutinous Dioscorea from Zhejiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(1): 145-148. |
[8] | Wu Yunfei, Zhang Yong, Wang Leilei, Yu Xurun, Xiong Fei. Starch Quality of Rice Grain: Research Progress on Influencing Factors and Mechanism [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(6): 1-8. |
[9] | Chen Tingmu, Wang Baoxiang, Hu Mingzhu, Chi Ming, Xu Bo, Xu Dayong. Low-amylose Rice Resources: Screening [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(5): 21-25. |
[10] | Du Ming, Fang Yu, Li Qianlong, Kang Yunhai, Wang Hui, Zhang Conghe. Regulation of Maize Starch: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(33): 8-14. |
[11] | Huang Guoqin. Discussion on the Green Development of Agriculture in the Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(30): 154-164. |
[12] | Chen Jingdu, Tang Jianpeng, Zhang Mingwei, Yao Yi, Lu Peiling, Hu Yajie, Xie Chenglin. Differences in Yield and Quality of Different Japonica Rice with Good Taste [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(3): 7-12. |
[13] | Hu Na, Chen Si, Hou Shixing, Liu Dongjun. Resistance Research of 4 Cerasus Cultivars Under Temperature Stress in North China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(3): 116-122. |
[14] | Song Weifeng, Wei Qinghui, Liu Kai, Lai Yongcai. Brassin-A Natural Plant Growth Regulator: Biological Activity and Application [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(24): 97-101. |
[15] | Ma Sishuang, Bai Haibo, Hui Jian, Wang Jingdong, Li Shuhua. Main Quality Characters of Wheat: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(24): 1-5. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||