Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 116-122.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0481
Previous Articles Next Articles
Hu Na1(), Chen Si2(
), Hou Shixing1, Liu Dongjun1
Received:
2020-09-21
Revised:
2020-12-10
Online:
2021-01-25
Published:
2021-01-26
Contact:
Chen Si
E-mail:morinahn@sina.com;chensi@bpi.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Hu Na, Chen Si, Hou Shixing, Liu Dongjun. Resistance Research of 4 Cerasus Cultivars Under Temperature Stress in North China[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(3): 116-122.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0481
中文名称 | 拉丁文名 | 来源地 | 胸径/cm | 数量/株 |
---|---|---|---|---|
河津樱 | Cerasus× kanzakura ‘Kawazu-zakura’ | 安徽全椒 | 5 | 5 |
大寒樱 | Cerasus× kanzakura ‘Oh-kanzakura’ | 江苏溧阳 | 5 | 5 |
大渔樱 | Cerasus× kanzakura ‘Tariyo-zakura’ | 安徽全椒 | 5 | 5 |
修善寺寒樱 | Cerasus× kanzakura ‘Rubescens’ | 安徽全椒 | 5 | 5 |
中文名称 | 拉丁文名 | 来源地 | 胸径/cm | 数量/株 |
---|---|---|---|---|
河津樱 | Cerasus× kanzakura ‘Kawazu-zakura’ | 安徽全椒 | 5 | 5 |
大寒樱 | Cerasus× kanzakura ‘Oh-kanzakura’ | 江苏溧阳 | 5 | 5 |
大渔樱 | Cerasus× kanzakura ‘Tariyo-zakura’ | 安徽全椒 | 5 | 5 |
修善寺寒樱 | Cerasus× kanzakura ‘Rubescens’ | 安徽全椒 | 5 | 5 |
生理生化指标 | 品种 | 25℃ | 30℃ | 35℃ | 40℃ | 45℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶绿素 | 河津樱 | 2.69±0.33aB | 2.70±0.08aAB | 3.07±0.11aB | 5.79±0.40cC | 4.12±0.11bAB |
大寒樱 | 1.43±0.02aA | 2.90±0.29bB | 4.65±0.06dD | 3.49±0.10cA | 3.46±0.06cA | |
大渔樱 | 2.49±0.16aB | 2.53±0.02aA | 2.61±0.41aA | 5.19±0.16cB | 3.53±0.11bA | |
修缮寺寒樱 | 3.18±0.18aC | 3.33±0.09aC | 4.02±0.14bC | 5.57±0.35cBC | 4.30±0.71bB | |
脯氨酸 | 河津樱 | 37.45±3.84aC | 46.41±3.38bC | 52.80±2.40bcC | 54.98±5.86cB | 117.97±2.66dB |
大寒樱 | 17.68±0.96aA | 21.80±1.40bA | 25.14±0.48cA | 36.49±0.39eA | 27.72±1.65dA | |
大渔樱 | 69.69±0.51aD | 104.45±2.94bD | 120.93±1.76cD | 126.06±5.39cC | 132.76±1.35dD | |
修缮寺寒樱 | 30.79±0.29aB | 32.65±1.20aB | 43.33±2.80bB | 48.17±2.46cB | 125.53±2.88dC |
生理生化指标 | 品种 | 25℃ | 30℃ | 35℃ | 40℃ | 45℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶绿素 | 河津樱 | 2.69±0.33aB | 2.70±0.08aAB | 3.07±0.11aB | 5.79±0.40cC | 4.12±0.11bAB |
大寒樱 | 1.43±0.02aA | 2.90±0.29bB | 4.65±0.06dD | 3.49±0.10cA | 3.46±0.06cA | |
大渔樱 | 2.49±0.16aB | 2.53±0.02aA | 2.61±0.41aA | 5.19±0.16cB | 3.53±0.11bA | |
修缮寺寒樱 | 3.18±0.18aC | 3.33±0.09aC | 4.02±0.14bC | 5.57±0.35cBC | 4.30±0.71bB | |
脯氨酸 | 河津樱 | 37.45±3.84aC | 46.41±3.38bC | 52.80±2.40bcC | 54.98±5.86cB | 117.97±2.66dB |
大寒樱 | 17.68±0.96aA | 21.80±1.40bA | 25.14±0.48cA | 36.49±0.39eA | 27.72±1.65dA | |
大渔樱 | 69.69±0.51aD | 104.45±2.94bD | 120.93±1.76cD | 126.06±5.39cC | 132.76±1.35dD | |
修缮寺寒樱 | 30.79±0.29aB | 32.65±1.20aB | 43.33±2.80bB | 48.17±2.46cB | 125.53±2.88dC |
生理生化指标 | 品种 | 0℃ | -5℃ | -10℃ | -15℃ | -20℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丙二醛/[nmol/(g·鲜重)] | 河津樱 | 4.39±2.56aAB | 6.11±0.83bA | 8.43±0.29cA | 8.92±0.62cA | 9.64±1.06cA |
大寒樱 | 5.42±0.52aB | 16.42±0.30bC | 18.58±1.81cB | 18.66±1.05cB | 27.44±1.29dC | |
大渔樱 | 6.88±0.79aC | 7.58±0.40abB | 8.07±0.31bcA | 8.66±0.28cA | 14.48±0.77dB | |
修缮寺寒樱 | 3.53±0.50aA | 5.38±0.48bA | 6.64±0.59cA | 10.00±0.59dA | 13.83±0.50eB | |
超氧化物歧化酶/[U/(g·鲜重)] | 河津樱 | 507.25±11.47aD | 876.14±12.11bD | 1013.92±9.29cC | 1330.67±7.45dD | 506.47±9.75aC |
大寒樱 | 338.83±13.01aB | 757.82±20.13cC | 1110.66±14.61eD | 884.99±9.21dC | 590.46±8.39bD | |
大渔樱 | 237.70±18.67aA | 450.09±16.34cA | 451.63±8.99cA | 787.48±15.16dB | 379.71±6.85bB | |
修缮寺寒樱 | 372.92±4.03bC | 682.34±7.16dB | 864.89±12.36eB | 450.32±6.68cA | 221.77±17.32aA |
生理生化指标 | 品种 | 0℃ | -5℃ | -10℃ | -15℃ | -20℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丙二醛/[nmol/(g·鲜重)] | 河津樱 | 4.39±2.56aAB | 6.11±0.83bA | 8.43±0.29cA | 8.92±0.62cA | 9.64±1.06cA |
大寒樱 | 5.42±0.52aB | 16.42±0.30bC | 18.58±1.81cB | 18.66±1.05cB | 27.44±1.29dC | |
大渔樱 | 6.88±0.79aC | 7.58±0.40abB | 8.07±0.31bcA | 8.66±0.28cA | 14.48±0.77dB | |
修缮寺寒樱 | 3.53±0.50aA | 5.38±0.48bA | 6.64±0.59cA | 10.00±0.59dA | 13.83±0.50eB | |
超氧化物歧化酶/[U/(g·鲜重)] | 河津樱 | 507.25±11.47aD | 876.14±12.11bD | 1013.92±9.29cC | 1330.67±7.45dD | 506.47±9.75aC |
大寒樱 | 338.83±13.01aB | 757.82±20.13cC | 1110.66±14.61eD | 884.99±9.21dC | 590.46±8.39bD | |
大渔樱 | 237.70±18.67aA | 450.09±16.34cA | 451.63±8.99cA | 787.48±15.16dB | 379.71±6.85bB | |
修缮寺寒樱 | 372.92±4.03bC | 682.34±7.16dB | 864.89±12.36eB | 450.32±6.68cA | 221.77±17.32aA |
品种 | 叶绿素 | 脯氨酸 | 超氧化物歧化酶 | 丙二醛 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最大值温度/℃ | 对应得分 | 最大值温度/℃ | 对应得分 | 最大值温度/℃ | 对应得分 | 增长率/% | 对应得分 | ||||
河津樱 | 40 | 4 | 45 | 5 | -15 | 4 | 119.59 | 4 | |||
大寒樱 | 35 | 3 | 40 | 4 | -10 | 3 | 406.27 | 1 | |||
大渔樱 | 40 | 4 | 45 | 5 | -15 | 4 | 110.47 | 4 | |||
修善寺寒樱 | 40 | 4 | 45 | 5 | -10 | 3 | 291.78 | 3 |
品种 | 叶绿素 | 脯氨酸 | 超氧化物歧化酶 | 丙二醛 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最大值温度/℃ | 对应得分 | 最大值温度/℃ | 对应得分 | 最大值温度/℃ | 对应得分 | 增长率/% | 对应得分 | ||||
河津樱 | 40 | 4 | 45 | 5 | -15 | 4 | 119.59 | 4 | |||
大寒樱 | 35 | 3 | 40 | 4 | -10 | 3 | 406.27 | 1 | |||
大渔樱 | 40 | 4 | 45 | 5 | -15 | 4 | 110.47 | 4 | |||
修善寺寒樱 | 40 | 4 | 45 | 5 | -10 | 3 | 291.78 | 3 |
[1] | 魏云华, 林魁, 林清. 福建山樱花研究现状及其园林应用[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2011,17(19):136-137. |
[2] | 叶超宏. 珠江地区樱花适应性调查研究[D]. 广州:仲恺农业工程学院, 2016: 52-54. |
[3] | 马祥宾, 徐大鹏, 周春玲. 10个樱属种和品种抗寒性研究[A].中国观赏园艺研究进展[M]. 2016: 9-13. |
[4] | 郭学民, 刘建珍, 肖啸, 等. 桃、杏和樱桃树抗寒性研究进展[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2016,30(1):1-9. |
[5] | 张生智, 孙俊宝, 张未仲, 等. 樱桃优良品种枝条抗寒性生理生化指标分析[J]. 农业工程技术:综合版, 2019,5:31-31. |
[6] | 多摩森林科学园. 樱の新しい系统保全[M]. 东京都八王子市:多摩森林科学园, 2013: 35. |
[7] | 王学奎, 黄见良. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2015: 131-133. |
[8] | 白宝璋. 植物生理学测试技术[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1995: 55-59. |
[9] | 李和生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000: 23-26. |
[10] | 邱勇波, 罗凤霞, 白瑞琴, 等. 热胁迫下矮牵牛幼苗的形态和生理变化[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2002,31(1):88-92. |
[11] | 李心, 张栋梁, 杨柳燕, 等. 开花期红掌耐寒性评判方法研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2020,48(10):1-11. |
[12] | 彭勇政, 刘智媛, 朱晓非, 等. 5个月季品种高温处理后生理指标变化及其耐热性评价[J]. 上海交通大学学报:农业科学版, 2019,37(5):53-58. |
[13] | 马晓娣, 彭慧茹, 汪矛, 等. 作物耐热性的评价[J]. 植物学通报, 2004,21(4):411-418. |
[14] |
Syed AdeelZafar, AmiadHameed, Muhammad Amjad Nawaz, et al. Mechanisms and molecular approaches for heat tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and climate change scenario[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018,17(4):726-738.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61718-0 URL |
[15] | 孔令接, 陈言博, 王亚琴. 不同夏菊品种的耐热性研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2019,46(12):2437-2448. |
[16] | 郑书旗, 高木旺, 周佳, 等. 不同苹果品种的耐热性评价[J]. 落叶果树, 2019,51(6):11-13. |
[17] | 徐海, 宋波, 顾宗福, 等. 植物耐热机理研究进展[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2020,36(1):243-250 |
[18] | Petolino J F, Cowen N M, Thompson S A, et al. Gamete selection for heat-stress tolerance in maize[J]. Journal of Plant Physiolofy, 1990,136(2):219-224. |
[19] | 邢景景. 淡黄花百合的引种栽培及耐热性机理探究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2017: 41-42 |
[20] | 申惠翡, 赵冰. 杜鹃花品种耐热性评价及其生理机制研究[J]. 植物生理学报, 2018,54(2):335-345. |
[21] | 宋阳. 柳树对高温胁迫的生理化影响及种质资源耐热性评价[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2015: 34. |
[22] | 蒋宝 郭春会, 梅立新, 等. 沙地植物长柄扁桃抗寒性的研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2008,36(5):92-96. |
[23] | Campos P S, Nunes M N. Electrolyte leakage and lipid degradation account for cold sensitivity in leaves of Coffea sp. Plants[J]. Journal of Plant Physiolofy, 2003,160(3):283-292. |
[24] | 张志伟. 基于主成分分析法的5种棕榈苗木抗寒性评价[J]. 种子, 2009,38(12):72-76. |
[25] |
李瑞雪, 金晓玲, 胡希军, 等. 低温胁迫下6种木兰科植物的生理响应及抗寒相关基因差异表达[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(8):2883-2898.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201801230185 URL |
[26] | 王芳, 王淇, 赵曦阳, 等. 低温胁迫下植物的表型及生理响应机制研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019,17(15):5144-5153. |
[27] | 张红梅, 金海军, 丁小涛, 等. 不同砧木黄瓜嫁接苗对温度胁迫的生理响应及抗性评价[J]. 西北植物学报, 2019,39(7):1259-1269. |
[28] | 孟诗原, 吕桂云, 张明忠, 等. 5种卫矛属植物对低温胁迫的生理响应及抗寒性评价[J]. 西北植物学报, 2020,40(4):0624-0634. |
[29] | 张迎辉. 低温胁迫下福建山樱花的生理响应与抗寒基因的表达[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2014: 31-32. |
[1] | GU Shujie, QIAN Zhenfeng, LOU Yongming, SHEN Qingqing, PU Fengya, ZENG Dan, MA Hao, HE Lilian, LI Fusheng. Physiological Effects of Inoculated Endophytes on Sugarcane Under Drought Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 42-47. |
[2] | FAN Xian, QUAN Yiji, YANG Shaolin, LI Rudan, DENG Jun, ZHANG Yuebin. Identification and Evaluation of Drought Resistance in Sugarcane Seedling Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 17-24. |
[3] | WANG Xiaochun, YANG Tianhui, WANG Chuan, YANG Weidi, GAO Ting. Effects of Mixed Saline-alkali Stress on Growth and Physiology of Alfalfa [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(19): 139-145. |
[4] | Fu Yinyin, Yan Wenxiao, Wang Youxiao, Pang Caihong, Li Shuangyun, Zhou Jilei, Min Xufeng, Liu Shengfang, Zang Zhenrong, Qi Yukun, Xia Yang. Clones of Sophora japonica: Growth and Physiological Responses to Stress and Comprehensive Evaluation on Saline-alkaline Tolerance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(34): 43-51. |
[5] | Lu Ke, Zhu Guoxu, Shi Jianguo, Chai Guaiqiang, Di Long, Zhang Gaoru, Qin Yuanyuan, Duan Yizhong. Adaptability Evaluation of Hippophae rhamnoides Varieties in Yulin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(34): 52-58. |
[6] | He Yongheng, Feng Guojun, Liu Dajun, Liu Chang, Yang Xiaoxu, Yan Zhishan. Study on the Growth, Development and Physiological Characteristics of Common Beans [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(28): 43-49. |
[7] | Guo Yandong, Fang Hailing, Tang Xingli, Zhou Yifeng, Zhang Mingxia. Effects of Water and Fertilizer Coupling on Growth and Quality of Glehnia littoralis in Rapid Growth Period [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(25): 76-84. |
[8] | Junxiu Yao, Xueliang Liu, Shanwen Li, Fei Ren, Qinghua Li, Haitao Wu, Honglian Zhai, Dejun Wu. Sambucus williamsii Clones at Seedling Stage: Response to Drought Stress and Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(9): 75-81. |
[9] | Chen Xiuping, He Manmei, Wang Wei, Li Xuwen, Zheng Yongxiao, Zhang Jifang, Dai Seping. Effects of High Temperature Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Two Species of Paphiopedilum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(28): 72-77. |
[10] | Pu Fengya, Tang Ran, Gu Shujie, Fang Zisong, Yang Zhiqing. Identification of Cold Tolerance in 16 Coix Germplasm [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(22): 5-12. |
[11] | Shen Xianyue, Xu Rong, Wu Qinglian, Xie Linyan, Meng Yu, Di Yining, Wang Xianhong, He Lilian, Li Fusheng. Saccharum spp. × Erianthus fulvus and Their Hybrid Offspring: Identification of Drought Resistance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(20): 7-13. |
[12] | Chen Xiangbo, Shen Ruixue, Lv Xiuli, Feng Jianhua, Li Pujin, Zhang Dongmei. Agapanthus praecox ssp. orientalis Seedlings Growing on Different Formula Media: Effect Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(19): 73-79. |
[13] | Chang Haixia, Guo Hongliang, Liu Yongzhong, Li Wanxing, Cao Jinjun, Jin Kunpeng, Li Dan. Effect of Row Spacing Rate on Stem Mechanic Property and Photosynthetic Physiological Indexes of Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(17): 16-20. |
[14] | . Seawater Stress on Seed Germination and Physiological-Biochemical Index in Seedling Stage of‘Black Wheat 76’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(5): 7-11. |
[15] | . Fusarium avenaceum Infection: Effects on Physiological Indexes of Leaves and Roots of Naked Barley with Different Resistance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(32): 101-107. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||