Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (21): 112-121.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1080
Previous Articles Next Articles
HAN Xuchen(), DONG Yan, HAN Haojie, TAN Yanping, LIU Xuequn, LIU Xinqiong, XU Xin, LI Kai, WANG Chuntai(
)
Received:
2021-11-11
Revised:
2022-02-05
Online:
2022-07-25
Published:
2022-08-23
Contact:
WANG Chuntai
E-mail:1033719683@qq.com;wangchuntai@mail.scuec.edu.cn
CLC Number:
HAN Xuchen, DONG Yan, HAN Haojie, TAN Yanping, LIU Xuequn, LIU Xinqiong, XU Xin, LI Kai, WANG Chuntai. Study on Dynamic Changes of AVR-Pia of Magnaporthe grisea in Southwestern Hubei[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 112-121.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1080
序号 | 水稻品种 | 序号 | 水稻品种 | 序号 | 水稻品种 | 序号 | 水稻品种 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | IRBLA-A | 26 | 草笛(Pik, Pish) | 51 | Pi20 | 76 | 杨优1号 |
2 | IRBLA-C | 27 | 梅雨明(Pikm) | 52 | ZD11 | 77 | 黔香优302 |
3 | IRBLI-F5 (Pii) | 28 | 福锦(PiZ, Pish) | 53 | ZD12 | 78 | T优1655 |
4 | IRBLks-F5 | 29 | K1 (Pita) | 54 | ZD16 | 79 | C两优755 |
5 | IRBLKS-F5 | 30 | Pi4号 (Pita2) | 55 | YTB | 80 | 深优9516 |
6 | IRBLK-KA | 31 | 砦1号 (Pizt) | 56 | 9311 | 81 | 全优2689 |
7 | IRBLKP-K60(Pikp) | 32 | K60 | 57 | kahei | 82 | 宜香优62 |
8 | IRBLKH-K3(Pikh) | 33 | BL1 | 58 | 骏优522 | 83 | 谷优92 |
9 | IRBLZ-FU (Piz) | 34 | K59 | 59 | 丰城优质米 | 84 | 中9优恩66 |
10 | IRBLZT-T(Pizt) | 35 | IRBLKM-TS | 60 | 华占 | 85 | 宜香107 |
11 | IRBLTA-CT2 | 36 | IRBLTA2-RE | 61 | 418B | 86 | 中9优591 |
12 | IRBLTA-CP1 | 37 | 特特普 | 62 | R527 | 87 | 楚梗28 |
13 | IRBLB-B(Pib) | 38 | 珍龙13 | 63 | 骏1B | 88 | T优583 |
14 | IRBLT-K59(Pit) | 39 | 四丰43 | 64 | R964 | 89 | 山珍 |
15 | IRBLSH-S(Pish) | 40 | 东农363 | 65 | R522 | 90 | ZJ1 |
16 | IRBLSH-B | 41 | 关东51 | 66 | R172 | 91 | ZJ2 |
17 | F80-1 | 42 | 合江18 | 67 | 骏优172 | 92 | ZJ3 |
18 | F98-7 | 43 | 丽江 | 68 | 荣优华占 | 93 | ZJ4 |
19 | F124-1 | 44 | IRBL1-CL (Pi1) | 69 | T优191 | 94 | ZJ5 |
20 | F128-1(Pita2) | 45 | IRBLZ5-CA (Piz5) | 70 | 日本晴 | 95 | ZJ6 |
22 | F145-2 | 47 | C104PKt | 72 | 两优6206 | 97 | ZJ8 |
23 | 新2号(Pish) | 48 | IRBL5-M | 73 | C两优651 | 98 | ZJ9 |
24 | 爱知旭(Pia) | 49 | IRBL7-M | 74 | 渝香203 | 99 | ZJ10 |
25 | 藤坂5号(Pii) | 50 | IRBL9-W (Pi9) | 75 | 陆267 两优267 | 100 | 华优8830 |
序号 | 水稻品种 | 序号 | 水稻品种 | 序号 | 水稻品种 | 序号 | 水稻品种 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | IRBLA-A | 26 | 草笛(Pik, Pish) | 51 | Pi20 | 76 | 杨优1号 |
2 | IRBLA-C | 27 | 梅雨明(Pikm) | 52 | ZD11 | 77 | 黔香优302 |
3 | IRBLI-F5 (Pii) | 28 | 福锦(PiZ, Pish) | 53 | ZD12 | 78 | T优1655 |
4 | IRBLks-F5 | 29 | K1 (Pita) | 54 | ZD16 | 79 | C两优755 |
5 | IRBLKS-F5 | 30 | Pi4号 (Pita2) | 55 | YTB | 80 | 深优9516 |
6 | IRBLK-KA | 31 | 砦1号 (Pizt) | 56 | 9311 | 81 | 全优2689 |
7 | IRBLKP-K60(Pikp) | 32 | K60 | 57 | kahei | 82 | 宜香优62 |
8 | IRBLKH-K3(Pikh) | 33 | BL1 | 58 | 骏优522 | 83 | 谷优92 |
9 | IRBLZ-FU (Piz) | 34 | K59 | 59 | 丰城优质米 | 84 | 中9优恩66 |
10 | IRBLZT-T(Pizt) | 35 | IRBLKM-TS | 60 | 华占 | 85 | 宜香107 |
11 | IRBLTA-CT2 | 36 | IRBLTA2-RE | 61 | 418B | 86 | 中9优591 |
12 | IRBLTA-CP1 | 37 | 特特普 | 62 | R527 | 87 | 楚梗28 |
13 | IRBLB-B(Pib) | 38 | 珍龙13 | 63 | 骏1B | 88 | T优583 |
14 | IRBLT-K59(Pit) | 39 | 四丰43 | 64 | R964 | 89 | 山珍 |
15 | IRBLSH-S(Pish) | 40 | 东农363 | 65 | R522 | 90 | ZJ1 |
16 | IRBLSH-B | 41 | 关东51 | 66 | R172 | 91 | ZJ2 |
17 | F80-1 | 42 | 合江18 | 67 | 骏优172 | 92 | ZJ3 |
18 | F98-7 | 43 | 丽江 | 68 | 荣优华占 | 93 | ZJ4 |
19 | F124-1 | 44 | IRBL1-CL (Pi1) | 69 | T优191 | 94 | ZJ5 |
20 | F128-1(Pita2) | 45 | IRBLZ5-CA (Piz5) | 70 | 日本晴 | 95 | ZJ6 |
22 | F145-2 | 47 | C104PKt | 72 | 两优6206 | 97 | ZJ8 |
23 | 新2号(Pish) | 48 | IRBL5-M | 73 | C两优651 | 98 | ZJ9 |
24 | 爱知旭(Pia) | 49 | IRBL7-M | 74 | 渝香203 | 99 | ZJ10 |
25 | 藤坂5号(Pii) | 50 | IRBL9-W (Pi9) | 75 | 陆267 两优267 | 100 | 华优8830 |
采集地 | 2017年 | 2018年 | 2019年 | 2020年 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | ||||
咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 31 | 23 | 0 | 42 | 15 | |||
宣恩 | 16 | 17 | 37 | 18 | 88 | 11 | 77 | 69 | |||
柏杨 | 69 | 31 | 30 | 49 | 38 | 15 | 65 | 69 | |||
建始 | 51 | 27 | 23 | 3 | 51 | 55 | 24 | 1 | |||
鹤峰 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 24 | 26 | 23 | |||
来凤 | 14 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 34 | 47 | 33 | 22 | |||
忠路 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 24 | |||
贺家坪 | 16 | 18 | 13 | 10 | 46 | 0 | 70 | 37 | |||
野三关 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 28 | 9 | 3 | 0 | |||
总计 | 204 | 106 | 136 | 134 | 317 | 161 | 416 | 260 |
采集地 | 2017年 | 2018年 | 2019年 | 2020年 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | ||||
咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 31 | 23 | 0 | 42 | 15 | |||
宣恩 | 16 | 17 | 37 | 18 | 88 | 11 | 77 | 69 | |||
柏杨 | 69 | 31 | 30 | 49 | 38 | 15 | 65 | 69 | |||
建始 | 51 | 27 | 23 | 3 | 51 | 55 | 24 | 1 | |||
鹤峰 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 24 | 26 | 23 | |||
来凤 | 14 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 34 | 47 | 33 | 22 | |||
忠路 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 24 | |||
贺家坪 | 16 | 18 | 13 | 10 | 46 | 0 | 70 | 37 | |||
野三关 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 28 | 9 | 3 | 0 | |||
总计 | 204 | 106 | 136 | 134 | 317 | 161 | 416 | 260 |
引物名称 | 引物序列 | 目的片段长度/bp | NCBI GenBank number |
---|---|---|---|
AVR-Pia F1 | TTATTGCTACCACCTTCCTC | 463 | AB498873.1 |
AVR-Pia R1 | GTAGTAACTGAGTTGGCGTT | ||
AVR-Pia F2 | TCAGAGAAACGGACTTGGAGG | 993 | |
AVR-Pia R2 | GTAATAGTCGCTGTAGTGCCG |
引物名称 | 引物序列 | 目的片段长度/bp | NCBI GenBank number |
---|---|---|---|
AVR-Pia F1 | TTATTGCTACCACCTTCCTC | 463 | AB498873.1 |
AVR-Pia R1 | GTAGTAACTGAGTTGGCGTT | ||
AVR-Pia F2 | TCAGAGAAACGGACTTGGAGG | 993 | |
AVR-Pia R2 | GTAATAGTCGCTGTAGTGCCG |
地区 | 2017年 | 2018年 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | 总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | |||||||
咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
宣恩 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
柏杨 | 31 | 7 | 22.6 | 49 | 11 | 22.4 | ||||||
建始 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
太平 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
来凤 | 7 | 1 | 14.3 | 13 | 7 | 53.8 | ||||||
忠路 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
贺家坪 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 20.0 | ||||||
野三关 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 30.0 | ||||||
总计 | 106 | 8 | 7.5 | 134 | 23 | 16.0 | ||||||
地区 | 2019年 | 2020年 | ||||||||||
总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | 总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | |||||||
咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
宣恩 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 69 | 7 | 10.1 | ||||||
柏杨 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 69 | 6 | 8.7 | ||||||
建始 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
太平 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
来凤 | 47 | 5 | 10.6 | 22 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
忠路 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
贺家坪 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
野三关 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
总计 | 161 | 5 | 3.1 | 260 | 13 | 5.0 |
地区 | 2017年 | 2018年 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | 总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | |||||||
咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
宣恩 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
柏杨 | 31 | 7 | 22.6 | 49 | 11 | 22.4 | ||||||
建始 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
太平 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
来凤 | 7 | 1 | 14.3 | 13 | 7 | 53.8 | ||||||
忠路 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
贺家坪 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 20.0 | ||||||
野三关 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 30.0 | ||||||
总计 | 106 | 8 | 7.5 | 134 | 23 | 16.0 | ||||||
地区 | 2019年 | 2020年 | ||||||||||
总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | 总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | |||||||
咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
宣恩 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 69 | 7 | 10.1 | ||||||
柏杨 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 69 | 6 | 8.7 | ||||||
建始 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
太平 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
来凤 | 47 | 5 | 10.6 | 22 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
忠路 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
贺家坪 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
野三关 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
总计 | 161 | 5 | 3.1 | 260 | 13 | 5.0 |
地点 | 2017年 | 2018年 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | 菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | ||
咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 27 | 87.1 | |
宣恩 | 17 | 16 | 94.1 | 18 | 14 | 77.8 | |
柏杨 | 31 | 22 | 80.0 | 49 | 37 | 75.5 | |
建始 | 27 | 22 | 81.5 | 3 | 3 | 100 | |
太平 | 6 | 5 | 83.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
来凤 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 53.8 | |
忠路 | 7 | 6 | 85.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
贺家坪 | 18 | 18 | 100 | 10 | 8 | 80.0 | |
野三关 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 70.0 | |
总计 | 106 | 89 | 84.0 | 134 | 103 | 76.9 | |
地点 | 2019年 | 2020年 | |||||
菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | 菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | ||
咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 100 | |
宣恩 | 11 | 10 | 91.0 | 69 | 61 | 88.4 | |
柏杨 | 15 | 12 | 80.0 | 69 | 59 | 85.5 | |
建始 | 55 | 49 | 89.1 | 1 | 1 | 100 | |
太平 | 24 | 22 | 91.7 | 23 | 20 | 87.0 | |
来凤 | 47 | 41 | 87.2 | 22 | 20 | 90.9 | |
忠路 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 20 | 83.3 | |
贺家坪 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 37 | 100 | |
野三关 | 9 | 9 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
总计 | 161 | 143 | 88.8 | 260 | 235 | 90.4 |
地点 | 2017年 | 2018年 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | 菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | ||
咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 27 | 87.1 | |
宣恩 | 17 | 16 | 94.1 | 18 | 14 | 77.8 | |
柏杨 | 31 | 22 | 80.0 | 49 | 37 | 75.5 | |
建始 | 27 | 22 | 81.5 | 3 | 3 | 100 | |
太平 | 6 | 5 | 83.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
来凤 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 53.8 | |
忠路 | 7 | 6 | 85.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
贺家坪 | 18 | 18 | 100 | 10 | 8 | 80.0 | |
野三关 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 70.0 | |
总计 | 106 | 89 | 84.0 | 134 | 103 | 76.9 | |
地点 | 2019年 | 2020年 | |||||
菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | 菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | ||
咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 100 | |
宣恩 | 11 | 10 | 91.0 | 69 | 61 | 88.4 | |
柏杨 | 15 | 12 | 80.0 | 69 | 59 | 85.5 | |
建始 | 55 | 49 | 89.1 | 1 | 1 | 100 | |
太平 | 24 | 22 | 91.7 | 23 | 20 | 87.0 | |
来凤 | 47 | 41 | 87.2 | 22 | 20 | 90.9 | |
忠路 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 20 | 83.3 | |
贺家坪 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 37 | 100 | |
野三关 | 9 | 9 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
总计 | 161 | 143 | 88.8 | 260 | 235 | 90.4 |
调控元件 | 核心序列 | 位置 | 功能 |
---|---|---|---|
TATA box | TATA/TATAA/TATACA/ATTATA | +356/-678/-354/+49 | core promoter element around -30 of transcription start |
Unnamed__4 | CTCC | -117/+148/+602/643/+717/+758 | |
ABRE | GCAACGTGTC/CACGTG/ACGTG | -87/-543/+544/+555 | cis-acting element involved in the abscisic acid responsiveness |
CAAT-box | CAAT/CAAAT/CCAAT | +47/+83/+221/++277/-320/+473/+572/+854 | common cis-acting element in promoter and enhancer regions |
MRE | AACCTAA | -440 | MYB binding site |
TCT-motif | TCTTAC | +396 | part of a light responsive element |
Box 4 | ATTAAT | +229/+374 | part of a conserved DNA module involved in light responsiveness |
WUN-motif | AAATTACT | -179 | |
LTR | CCGAAA | -310 | cis-acting element involved in low-temperature responsiveness |
调控元件 | 核心序列 | 位置 | 功能 |
---|---|---|---|
TATA box | TATA/TATAA/TATACA/ATTATA | +356/-678/-354/+49 | core promoter element around -30 of transcription start |
Unnamed__4 | CTCC | -117/+148/+602/643/+717/+758 | |
ABRE | GCAACGTGTC/CACGTG/ACGTG | -87/-543/+544/+555 | cis-acting element involved in the abscisic acid responsiveness |
CAAT-box | CAAT/CAAAT/CCAAT | +47/+83/+221/++277/-320/+473/+572/+854 | common cis-acting element in promoter and enhancer regions |
MRE | AACCTAA | -440 | MYB binding site |
TCT-motif | TCTTAC | +396 | part of a light responsive element |
Box 4 | ATTAAT | +229/+374 | part of a conserved DNA module involved in light responsiveness |
WUN-motif | AAATTACT | -179 | |
LTR | CCGAAA | -310 | cis-acting element involved in low-temperature responsiveness |
调控元件 | 核心序列 | 位置 |
---|---|---|
SW15 | GGCTGG | -97/-724/-814 |
ADR1 | TCTCC | +147 |
GCN4 | TGATTT | -157/+255/-365/-539 |
GCR1 | CTTCC | +713/+861/+934 |
BAS2 | TAATGA | -187/-227/+376 |
AP-1 | TTATTAA | +227 |
STE12 | TGAAACA | +523 |
CPF1 | TCACGTG | +542 |
PHO4 | CACGTG | +543/+944 |
ABF1 | TCACGTATTACG | +549/-915 |
REB1 | CTACCCG | +807 |
SCB | CACGAAA | +825 |
STRE | AGGGG | -864 |
MSE | CGCAAAA | -910 |
调控元件 | 核心序列 | 位置 |
---|---|---|
SW15 | GGCTGG | -97/-724/-814 |
ADR1 | TCTCC | +147 |
GCN4 | TGATTT | -157/+255/-365/-539 |
GCR1 | CTTCC | +713/+861/+934 |
BAS2 | TAATGA | -187/-227/+376 |
AP-1 | TTATTAA | +227 |
STE12 | TGAAACA | +523 |
CPF1 | TCACGTG | +542 |
PHO4 | CACGTG | +543/+944 |
ABF1 | TCACGTATTACG | +549/-915 |
REB1 | CTACCCG | +807 |
SCB | CACGAAA | +825 |
STRE | AGGGG | -864 |
MSE | CGCAAAA | -910 |
[1] | VASUDEVAN K, VERA CRUZ C, GRUISSEM W, et al. Geographically distinct and domain-specific sequence variations in the alleles of rice blast resistance gene Pib[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2016, 7:915. |
[2] |
曹妮, 陈渊, 季芝娟, 等. 水稻抗稻瘟病分子机制研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6):489-498.
doi: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.8126 |
[3] | FLOR H H. Cunrent status of the gene-for-gene concept[J]. Annual review of genetics, 1971, 9:275-296. |
[4] |
HUANG J, SI W, DENG Q, et al. Rapid evolution of avirulence genes in rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. BMC genetics, 2014, 15:45.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-45 URL |
[5] |
DAI Y, JIA Y, CORRELL J, et al. Diversification and evolution of the avirulence gene AVR-Pita1 in field isolates of Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Fungal genet biol, 2010, 47(12):973-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.08.003 URL |
[6] |
CHUMA I, ISOBE C, HOTTA Y, et al. Multiple translocation of the AVR-Pita effector gene among chromosomes of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae and related species[J]. Plos pathol, 2011, 7:e1002147.
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002147 URL |
[7] |
ORBACH M J, FARRALL L, SWEIGARD J A, et al. A telomeric avirulence gene determines efficacy for the rice blast resistance gene Pi-ta[J]. Plant cell, 2000, 12(11):2019-2032.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.11.2019 URL |
[8] |
LI W, WANG B, WU J, et al. The Magnaporthe oryzae avirulence gene AVR-Pizt encodes a predicted secreted protein that triggers the immunity in rice mediated by the blast resistance gene Piz-t[J]. Molecular plant-microbe interactions, 2009, 22(4):411-420.
doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-4-0411 URL |
[9] |
FARMAN M L, LEONG S A. Chromosome walking to the AVR1-CO39avirulence gene of Magnaporthe grisea: discrepancy between the physical and genetic maps[J]. Genetics, 1998, 150(3):1049-1058.
doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.3.1049 URL |
[10] |
FUDAL I, BöHNERT H U, THARREAU D, et al. Transposition of MINE, a composite retrotransposon, in the avirulence gene ACE1 of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea[J]. Fungal genetics and biology, 2005, 42(9):761-772.
doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.05.001 URL |
[11] |
YASUDA N, MITSUNAGA T, HAYASHI K, et al. Effects of pyramiding quantitative resistance genes Pi21, Pi34, and Pi35 on rice leaf blast disease[J]. Plant disease, 2015, 99(7):904-909.
doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-14-0214-RE URL |
[12] |
KANG S, SWEIGARD J A, VALENT B. The PWL host specificity gene family in the blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea[J]. Molecular plant-microbe interactions, 1995, 8(6):939-948.
doi: 10.1094/MPMI-8-0939 URL |
[13] | SWEIGARD J A, CARROLL A M, KANG S, et al. Identification, cloning, and characterization of PWL2, a gene for host species specificity in the rice blast fungus[J]. Plant cell, 1995, 7(8):1221-1233. |
[14] |
ZHANG S, WANG L, WU W, et al. Function and evolution of Magnaporthe oryzae avirulence gene AvrPib responding to the rice blast resistance gene Pib[J]. Scientific reports, 2015, 5:11642.
doi: 10.1038/srep11642 URL |
[15] | WU J, KOU Y, BAO J, et al. Comparative genomics identifies the Magnaporthe oryzae avirulence effector AvrPi9 that triggers Pi9-mediated blast resistance in rice[J]. The new phytologist, 2015, 206(4):463-1475. |
[16] | RAY S, SINGH P K, GUPTA D K, et al. Analysis of Magnaporthe oryzae genome reveals a fungal effector, which is able to induce resistance response in transgenic rice line containing resistance gene, Pi54[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2016, 7:1140. |
[17] |
CÉSARI S, KANZAKI H, FUJIWARA T, et al. The NB-LRR proteins RGA4 and RGA5 interact functionally and physically to confer disease resistance[J]. The embo j, 2014, 33(17):1941-1959.
doi: 10.15252/embj.201487923 URL |
[18] |
ORTIZ D, DE GUILLEN K, CESARI S, et al. Recognition of the Magnaporthe oryzae effector AVR-Pia by the decoy domain of the rice NLR immune receptor RGA5[J]. Plant cell, 2017, 29(1):156-168.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00435 URL |
[19] | 杨军, 马惠, 陈博聪, 等. 山东省稻瘟病病菌无毒基因鉴定及分析[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2020, 40(7):22-26. |
[20] | 王群, 陆琳, 何成兴, 等. 云南省水稻稻瘟病菌无毒基因AVR-Pia变异及水稻抗性基因Pia的有效性[J]. 植物保护学报, 2020, 47(3):562-571. |
[21] |
XU X, YANG W, TIAN K, et al. Genetic diversity and pathogenicity dynamics of Magnaporthe oryzae in the Wuling Mountain area of China[J]. Eur j plant patho, 2018, 153(3):731-742.
doi: 10.1007/s10658-018-1587-4 URL |
[22] | 蒋金芬, 韩红萍, 梁友方. 滤纸片法低温冷冻保存菌种的实验室应用[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2006, 22(3):310. |
[23] | 杨武. 鄂西南地区2016-2017年稻瘟病菌群体多态性分析[D]. 武汉: 中南民族大学, 2019. |
[24] | 刘伟. 辽宁省稻瘟病菌种群动态监测及无毒基因Avr-pi9功能的初探[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2020. |
[25] | 孟峰, 张亚玲, 靳学慧. 黑龙江省稻瘟病菌无毒基因的检测[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(3):197-200. |
[26] |
SONE T, TAKEUCHI S, MIKI S, et al. Homologous recombination causes the spontaneous deletion of AVR-Pia in Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. FEMS microbiology letters, 339(2):102-109.
doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12058 URL |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||