Effect of Soil Type and Water Content on the Development and Eclosion of Frankliniella Intonsa Pseudopupa

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0910

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the current knowledge that Frankliniella intonsa (Trybom) prefers pupating in soil, the effects of soil types and water contents on the pupation and eclosion of F. intonsa were examined to provide some important evidence for controlling F. intonsa pseudopupae. The clay, loam and sandy soils were collected and dried at 105℃. Then the pure water was added till the water contents of the three types of soil reached 3.00%, 5.00%, 10.00%, 15.00%, 20.00%, and 25.00%. Subsequently, the 2^nd-instar nymphs were put into the three types of soil with different water contents to observe the pupation and eclosion of F. intonsa. Soil type and water content significantly affected the eclosion of F. intonsa, and their interactions were significant (P<0.05). In all tested soils, the eclosion rate of F. intonsa first increased and then decreased with the increase of soil water content. Hereinto, the eclosion rate of F. intonsa was highest in the sandy soil with 10.00% water content, which was up to 77.50%, followed by the 63.33% eclosion rate in the clay soil with 15.00% water content. However, the eclosion rate of F. intonsa was highest in the loam soil with 15.00% and 20.00% water content, which were 50.00% and 47.50%, respectively. In addition, the eclosion peak of F. intonsa occurred on the 4^th day in the sandy soil with 15.00% water content, but the peak appeared on the 3^rd day in the sandy soil with other water contents, and the clay and loam soil with all water contents. The pupation and eclosion of F. intonsa are restricted by the soil type and water content. Their pupation and eclosion can be interfered by controlling the soil moisture in the field.

Key words: Frankliniella intonsa (Trybom), soil types, soil water content, eclosion rate, developmental time

PAN Rundong, LI Peizheng, HAN Dongyin, FU Yueguan, ZHAN Canlan, LI Lei. Effect of Soil Type and Water Content on the Development and Eclosion of Frankliniella Intonsa Pseudopupa[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(30): 138-143.

Figures/Tables 4

References 23

[1]	WANG C L, LIN F C, CHIU Y C, et al. Species of frankliniella trybom (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) from the Asian-Pacific Area[J]. Zoological studies, 2010, 49(6):824-838.
[2]	谢永辉, 李正跃, 张宏瑞. 广西省植食性蓟马种类及花蓟马属一中国新记录种记述[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2011, 48(3):757-763.
[3]	CHIAKI Y, KUBOTA K, TOMITAKA Y, et al. Transmission of capsicum chlorosis virus by Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)[J]. Applied entomology and zoology, 2020, 55(1):31-35. doi: 10.1007/s13355-019-00649-7
[4]	ROTENBERG D, JACOBSON A L, SCHNEWEIS D J, et al. Thrips transmission of tospoviruses[J]. Current opinion in virology, 2015, 15:80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2015.08.003 pmid: 26340723
[5]	张蓓蓓, 何海芳, 张泽龙, 等. 蓟马传播的瓜菜病毒病及其防控研究进展[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021, 34(6):1-10.
[6]	韩冬银, 邢楚明, 李磊, 等. 海南芒果蓟马种群的活动及消长规律[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015, 36(7):1297-1301.
[7]	党利红. 中国花蓟马属Frankliniella和齿蓟马属Odontothrips分类研究(缨翅目:锯尾亚目:蓟马科)[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2010.
[8]	龚碧涯, 欧阳革成, 刘慧, 等. 湖南地区柑橘大实蝇幼虫入土化蛹规律研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(16):119-124. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0438
[9]	胡青, 白义川, 胡霞, 等. 不同物料基质对冷藏亮斑扁角水虻预蛹化蛹和羽化的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2022, 28(1):54-58.
[10]	郑霞林, 王攀, 丛晓平, 等. 土壤含水量及蛹室对甜菜夜蛾蛹越冬的影响[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2011, 48(1):126-131.
[11]	李立坤, 王晓辉, 刘佳文, 等. 土壤湿度对粘虫入土化蛹和羽化出土的影响[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2019, 56(6):1324-1330.
[12]	赵康. 柑橘大实蝇化蛹和羽化特性的研究[D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2012.
[13]	SUSANTO A, FARADILLA M G, SUMEKAR Y, et al. Effect of various depths of pupation on adult emergence of interspecific hybrid of Bactrocera carambolae and Bactrocera dorsalis[J]. Scientific reports, 2022, 12(1):4235-4235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08295-w
[14]	WEN Y Z, JIN X F, ZHU C Q, et al. Effect of substrate type and moisture on pupation and emergence of Heortia vitessoides (Lepidoptera:Crambidae): choice and no-choice studies[J]. Journal of insect behavior, 2016, 29(4):473-489. doi: 10.1007/s10905-016-9572-2 URL
[15]	DIMOU I, KOUTSIKOPOULOS C. ECONOMOPOULOS A P, et al. Depth of pupation of the wild olive fruit fly, Bactrocera (Dacus) oleae (Gmel.) (Dipt., Tephritidae), as affected by soil abiotic factors[J]. Journal of applied entomology, 2003, 127(1):200-205. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0418.2003.00744.x URL
[16]	孟国玲, 唐国文. 不同土壤含水量对蓟马化蛹的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2002(6):35-36.
[17]	CHANG N T. Impact soft soil physical factors on the pupation of bean flower thrips Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)[J]. Plant protection bulletin, 1989, 31(4):377-386.
[18]	杨波, 王晓双, 周镇, 等. 不同化蛹基质对普通大蓟马蛹期、羽化率及性比的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2019, 40(4):47-51.
[19]	韩云, 唐良德, 付步礼, 等. 土壤含水量和土壤类型对豆大蓟马蛹期发育和羽化的影响[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2015, 37(4):710-714.
[20]	张玲, 赵莉, 马燕. 花蓟马发育起点温度和有效积温的研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2008(1):102-104.
[21]	CHEN M, SHELTON A M. Impact of soil type, moisture, and depth on swede midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) pupation and emergence[J]. Environmental entomology, 2007, 36(6):1349-1355. pmid: 18284762
[22]	丁春霞. 芒果蓟马的发生情况以及花蓟马的生物化学防控技术研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2011.
[23]	姬越, 任德珠, 叶明强, 等. 黑水虻对食料中pH值、辣度及盐度的耐受性[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(3):636-639.

变因	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	P值	贡献度/%
土壤类型	0.1542	2	0.0771	18.0361	<0.0001	4.52
土壤含水量	1.6854	5	0.3371	78.8570	<0.0001	49.47
土壤类型×含水量	1.5669	10	0.1567	36.6556	<0.0001	46.01
误差	0.2308	54	0.0043	—	—	—
修正后总计	3.6374	71	—	—	—	—

变因	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	P值	贡献度/%
土壤类型	0.1542	2	0.0771	18.0361	<0.0001	4.52
土壤含水量	1.6854	5	0.3371	78.8570	<0.0001	49.47
土壤类型×含水量	1.5669	10	0.1567	36.6556	<0.0001	46.01
误差	0.2308	54	0.0043	—	—	—
修正后总计	3.6374	71	—	—	—	—

含水量/%	土壤类型
含水量/%	沙土	壤土	黏土
3.00	3.11±0.25Aa	3.06±1.08Aa	2.75±0.08Aa
5.00	3.34±0.10Aa	4.21±0.64Aa	3.61±0.50Aa
10.00	3.05±0.08Aa	3.47±0.07Aa	3.59±0.10Aa
15.00	3.68±0.11Aa	3.43±0.04Aa	3.08±0.05Aa
20.00	3.56±0.16Aa	3.37±0.03Aa	3.44±0.12Aa
25.00	3.13±0.13Aa	3.10±0.20Aa	3.41±0.17Aa

含水量/%	土壤类型
含水量/%	沙土	壤土	黏土
3.00	3.11±0.25Aa	3.06±1.08Aa	2.75±0.08Aa
5.00	3.34±0.10Aa	4.21±0.64Aa	3.61±0.50Aa
10.00	3.05±0.08Aa	3.47±0.07Aa	3.59±0.10Aa
15.00	3.68±0.11Aa	3.43±0.04Aa	3.08±0.05Aa
20.00	3.56±0.16Aa	3.37±0.03Aa	3.44±0.12Aa
25.00	3.13±0.13Aa	3.10±0.20Aa	3.41±0.17Aa