Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 47-52.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0649
Previous Articles Next Articles
YUAN Tao(), AN Qi, NIU Yanbo, MENG Liqiang, WU Haoqiong, FAN Chuan, CAO Yabin()
Received:
2023-09-05
Revised:
2024-01-08
Online:
2024-02-01
Published:
2024-02-01
YUAN Tao, AN Qi, NIU Yanbo, MENG Liqiang, WU Haoqiong, FAN Chuan, CAO Yabin. Effects of Corn Stalks Composting on Soil Properties of Black Soil Region[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(5): 47-52.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0649
深度/cm | 有机质/(g/kg) | 总氮/(g/kg) | 总磷/(g/kg) | 总钾/(g/kg) | 速效氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 容重/(g/cm3) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~20 | 23.42 | 0.86 | 0.62 | 21.31 | 105.2 | 24.6 | 146.0 | 1.37 | 6.67 |
深度/cm | 有机质/(g/kg) | 总氮/(g/kg) | 总磷/(g/kg) | 总钾/(g/kg) | 速效氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 容重/(g/cm3) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~20 | 23.42 | 0.86 | 0.62 | 21.31 | 105.2 | 24.6 | 146.0 | 1.37 | 6.67 |
采样时间(年.月) | 有机质/(mg/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 容重/(g/cm3) | 田间持水量/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021.04 | 28.15±3.24a | 133.20±2.63b | 28.32±1.64a | 108.46±4.86b | 1.28±0.0a3 | 44.31±2.64b |
2022.10 | 29.64±3.06a | 146.51±2.47a | 31.89±1.75a | 129.37±4.53a | 1.14±0.05b | 49.43±2.1a5 |
采样时间(年.月) | 有机质/(mg/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 容重/(g/cm3) | 田间持水量/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021.04 | 28.15±3.24a | 133.20±2.63b | 28.32±1.64a | 108.46±4.86b | 1.28±0.0a3 | 44.31±2.64b |
2022.10 | 29.64±3.06a | 146.51±2.47a | 31.89±1.75a | 129.37±4.53a | 1.14±0.05b | 49.43±2.1a5 |
采样时间(年.月) | 有机质/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 容重/(g/cm3) | 田间持水量/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021.03 | 34.15±3.84 | 222.67±2.3b8 | 40.58±1.51a | 123.52±4.42b | 1.32±0.05a | 42.56±3.83 |
2022.07 | 33.62±4.11 | 231.24±2.5a6 | 41.63±1.64a | 142.58±4.7a7 | 1.16±0.06b | 52.33±4.11 |
采样时间(年.月) | 有机质/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 容重/(g/cm3) | 田间持水量/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021.03 | 34.15±3.84 | 222.67±2.3b8 | 40.58±1.51a | 123.52±4.42b | 1.32±0.05a | 42.56±3.83 |
2022.07 | 33.62±4.11 | 231.24±2.5a6 | 41.63±1.64a | 142.58±4.7a7 | 1.16±0.06b | 52.33±4.11 |
[11] |
孙园园, 张桥, 孙永健, 等. 秸秆还田与水氮管理对水稻氮素利用及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 48(1):65-74.
|
[12] |
张旭, 邢思文, 吴玉德. 不同秸秆还田方式对农田生态环境的影响综述[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(7):31-33.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
陈薇. 黑龙江秸秆堆腐还田与黑土肥力协同研究[J]. 黑龙江环境通报, 2020, 33(3):76-77.
|
[15] |
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.03.025 URL |
[16] |
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94209-1 |
[17] |
doi: S0960-8524(18)30234-7 pmid: 29459320 |
[18] |
王雪鑫. 还田模式和腐熟剂对玉米秸秆腐解特征及土壤养分含量的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2020.
|
[19] |
刘慧屿, 何志刚, 董环, 等. 秸秆堆腐还田对风沙土土壤性质和玉米产量的影响[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2021(3):78-80.
|
[20] |
范作伟, 陈帅民, 李阳阳, 等. 玉米秸秆不同还田方式下腐解菌剂的应用效果研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2021, 29(2):109-116.
|
[21] |
宋时丽, 吴昊, 黄鹏伟, 等. 秸秆还田土壤改良培肥基质和复合菌剂配施对土壤生态的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(11):4562-4576.
|
[22] |
陈帅民, 梁晓斐, 李阳阳, 等. 秸秆还田配施腐解菌剂对土壤团聚体及其有机碳固持的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2022, 30(6):110-117.
|
[23] |
朱容辰, 王文升, 王玲, 等. 秸秆腐熟剂在冬小麦上的应用试验[J]. 现代农村科技, 2023(63):778-78.
|
[24] |
杨琼会. 轮作和秸秆还田对水稻土团聚体及固碳特征的影响[D]. 成都: 西南科技大学, 2021.
|
[25] |
高洪军, 彭畅, 张秀芝, 等. 秸秆还田量对黑土区土壤及团聚体有机碳变化特征和固碳效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(22):4613-4622.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.22.008 |
[26] |
代文才, 高明, 兰木羚, 等. 不同作物秸秆在旱地和水田中的腐解特性及养分释放规律[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(2):188-199.
|
[27] |
周正萍, 田宝庚, 陈婉华, 等. 不同耕作方式与秸秆还田对土壤养分及小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021(3):78-83.
|
[1] |
周映平. 农作物秸秆还田技术应用及前景[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2021, 24(2):72-73.
|
[2] |
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.076 URL |
[3] |
魏伟业. 农作物秸秆还田技术应用及前景[J]. 种子科技, 2021, 39(16):42-43.
|
[4] |
严东权, 薛颖昊, 徐志宇, 等. 我国农作物秸秆直接还田利用现状、技术模式及发展建议[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023, 44(4):12-14.
|
[5] |
陈婉华, 袁伟, 王子阳. 作物秸秆还田研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(21):54-58.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0545 |
[6] |
石祖梁, 王飞, 王久臣, 等. 我国农作物秸秆资源利用特征、技术模式及发展建议[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(5):8-16.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2018.0314 |
[7] |
张经廷, 张丽华, 吕丽华, 等. 还田作物秸秆腐解及其养分释放特征概述[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(11):2274-2280.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.11.2274 |
[8] |
朱金霞, 孔德杰, 尹志荣. 农作物秸秆主要化学组成及还田后对土壤质量提升影响的研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(5):146-153.
|
[9] |
doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10914-w |
[10] |
刘慧屿, 何志刚, 刘艳, 等. 低温堆腐与秸秆深翻还田对玉米产量及土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(4):874-884.
|
[1] | GAO Bohang, XIA Tongyong, WANG Guangfei, MA Yan, XU Yehong. Application Effect of Organic Fertilizer Combined with Chemical Fertilizer Reduction on Xinyi Honey Peach [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 33-39. |
[2] | BIAN Jianwen, WANG Meng, LIU Baoyou, WANG Xueying, ZHANG Xingang, WANG Wenrui. Effects of Chlorella on Wheat Growth and Soil Properties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(12): 8-12. |
[3] | LI Xiang, WANG Yongping, WANG Yaofeng, CHU Chunnian, SUN Xijun, KE Xiheng, ZENG Qiao. Study on the Best Composting Parameters and Fertilization Effect of Branch Organic Fertilizer [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 63-68. |
[4] | REN Xvrui, WANG Yihui, YANG Hongyu, YUAN Liang, ZHAO Yue. Resource Utilization System of Agricultural Organic Waste After Centralized Recovery and Treatment: A Case Study of Xingxian Village in Gannan County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 74-79. |
[5] | ZENG Quan, SHI Guoying, SU Lin, YE Xuelian, HU Chunjin. Organic Fertilizer Production with Fermentation and Composting of Chicken Manure Promoted by Flammulina Chaff [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 44-50. |
[6] | NIE Xiaoyu, YU Chunjing, LU Qian, CUI Jizhe. The Effects of Microorganisms in Aerobic Composting of Crop Straw: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 76-81. |
[7] | SONG Yun, FAN Ping, WANG Min, WANG Qiang, XUE Pengfei. Comparative Analysis of Decomposition Factors of Aerobic Composting with Several Waste Substrates [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(11): 53-57. |
[8] | Li Ting, Wang Yue, Liu Zhongshan, Liu Qi, Xu Henan, Li Chongwei. A Novel Low Temperature Cellulose-degrading Strain Streptomyces azureus and Its Enzymatic Production Condition Optimization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(32): 25-33. |
[9] | Qiu Meihua, Guo Dejie, Ma Yan, Wang Guangfei, Liang Yonghong. The Technology of Reducing Chemical Fertilizer and Increasing Economic Benefit of Protected Peach in Sandy Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(17): 58-64. |
[10] | Lu Jiawei, Wang Mingze, Wang Qi, Wei Zongyou, Zhang Yanli, Wang Feng. Effects of Different Excipients and Microbial Agents on Aerobic Composting of Sheep Manure [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(15): 39-46. |
[11] | Wang Guangfei, Guo Dejie, Ma Yan, Luo Jia. Effects of Chinese Medicine Residue Compost on Tomato Greenhouse Soils with High Nutrient Concentrations [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(1): 84-89. |
[12] | Wang Yue, Liu Zhongshan, Liu Qi, Xu Henan, Yuan Runze, Li Chongwei, Song Fuqiang. Co-composting of Agaric Fungus Chaff and Chicken Manure: Improving Effect on the Saline-alkali Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(26): 77-82. |
[13] | Huang Yanyan, Yang Xu, Yang Hongzhu, Bei Meirong, Cha Zhengzao, Luo Wei, Lin Qinghuo. C/N Ratio: Effect on Composting of Mixtures of Chicken Manure and Bagasse in Tropical Areas [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(21): 61-68. |
[14] | Zhou Jiashun, Yu Hongxi, Yang Jie, Sun Wenqing, Gao Wenwen, Zhong Yamin, Shi Yujie. Effect of Biochar Amendment Levels on the Yield and Quality of Chinese Cabbage and Garlic [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(13): 59-64. |
[15] | . Microbial Inoculum Affects the Industrial Composting of Chicken Manure and Rice Husk [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(35): 87-93. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||