Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (20): 53-59.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0691
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Yong1(), XU Chunlin2, YU Haiqin1, HAN Gang2, YANG Liping2, GUI Jichun2, FENG Xiaozhong2, WANG Jialiang2, REN Qin2, MU Chahua2
Received:
2024-11-14
Revised:
2025-05-20
Online:
2025-07-15
Published:
2025-07-21
LIU Yong, XU Chunlin, YU Haiqin, HAN Gang, YANG Liping, GUI Jichun, FENG Xiaozhong, WANG Jialiang, REN Qin, MU Chahua. Demonstration of New Flue-cured Tobacco Variety ‘Yunyan 121’ in Qujing Tobacco Area[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(20): 53-59.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0691
地点 | 详细地点 | 海拔/m | 土壤类型 |
---|---|---|---|
会泽 | 会泽县迤车镇 | 1915 | 红壤 |
宣威 | 宣威市热水镇 | 1932 | 红壤 |
沾益 | 沾益区大坡乡 | 1974 | 红壤 |
马龙 | 马龙区月望乡 | 2104 | 红壤 |
麒麟 | 麒麟区越州镇 | 1830 | 沙壤 |
富源 | 富源县中安街道 | 2070 | 红壤 |
陆良 | 陆良县大莫古镇 | 1838 | 红壤 |
师宗 | 师宗县彩云镇 | 1846 | 沙壤 |
罗平 | 罗平县罗雄街道 | 1431 | 黄壤 |
地点 | 详细地点 | 海拔/m | 土壤类型 |
---|---|---|---|
会泽 | 会泽县迤车镇 | 1915 | 红壤 |
宣威 | 宣威市热水镇 | 1932 | 红壤 |
沾益 | 沾益区大坡乡 | 1974 | 红壤 |
马龙 | 马龙区月望乡 | 2104 | 红壤 |
麒麟 | 麒麟区越州镇 | 1830 | 沙壤 |
富源 | 富源县中安街道 | 2070 | 红壤 |
陆良 | 陆良县大莫古镇 | 1838 | 红壤 |
师宗 | 师宗县彩云镇 | 1846 | 沙壤 |
罗平 | 罗平县罗雄街道 | 1431 | 黄壤 |
地点 | 年度 | 品种名称 | 株高/cm | 叶数/片 | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | 腰叶长/cm | 腰叶宽/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
会泽 | 2018—2020 | 云烟121 | 121.7 | 19.7 | 10.3 | 6.1 | 80.5 | 31.4 |
云烟97 | 119.8 | 20.5 | 10.0 | 6.2 | 78.7 | 33.9 | ||
沾益 | 2019—2020 | 云烟121 | 122.5 | 21.5 | 10.5 | 5.3 | 63.8 | 23.8 |
云烟97 | 109.5 | 18.4 | 9.6 | 5.8 | 67.5 | 29.6 | ||
师宗 | 2020 | 云烟121 | 120.0 | 20.0 | 11.0 | 9.0 | 75.0 | 25.0 |
云烟97 | 110.0 | 17.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 68.0 | 33.0 | ||
麒麟 | 2019—2020 | 云烟121 | 90.0 | 22.0 | 10.7 | 4.0 | 71.4 | 27.5 |
云烟97 | 106.7 | 18.5 | 11.2 | 5.6 | 75.9 | 32.0 | ||
平均 | 云烟121 | 113.5 | 20.8 | 10.6 | 6.1 | 72.7 | 26.9 | |
云烟97 | 111.5 | 18.6 | 10.2 | 6.1 | 72.5 | 32.1 |
地点 | 年度 | 品种名称 | 株高/cm | 叶数/片 | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | 腰叶长/cm | 腰叶宽/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
会泽 | 2018—2020 | 云烟121 | 121.7 | 19.7 | 10.3 | 6.1 | 80.5 | 31.4 |
云烟97 | 119.8 | 20.5 | 10.0 | 6.2 | 78.7 | 33.9 | ||
沾益 | 2019—2020 | 云烟121 | 122.5 | 21.5 | 10.5 | 5.3 | 63.8 | 23.8 |
云烟97 | 109.5 | 18.4 | 9.6 | 5.8 | 67.5 | 29.6 | ||
师宗 | 2020 | 云烟121 | 120.0 | 20.0 | 11.0 | 9.0 | 75.0 | 25.0 |
云烟97 | 110.0 | 17.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 68.0 | 33.0 | ||
麒麟 | 2019—2020 | 云烟121 | 90.0 | 22.0 | 10.7 | 4.0 | 71.4 | 27.5 |
云烟97 | 106.7 | 18.5 | 11.2 | 5.6 | 75.9 | 32.0 | ||
平均 | 云烟121 | 113.5 | 20.8 | 10.6 | 6.1 | 72.7 | 26.9 | |
云烟97 | 111.5 | 18.6 | 10.2 | 6.1 | 72.5 | 32.1 |
地点 | 年度 | 品种名称 | 株高/cm | 叶数/片 | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | 腰叶长/cm | 腰叶宽/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宣威 | 2018—2020 | 云烟121 | 122.6 | 20.0 | 9.8 | 6.3 | 73.1 | 30.6 |
云烟87 | 122.1 | 20.8 | 10.2 | 5.7 | 74.0 | 29.1 | ||
马龙 | 2020 | 云烟121 | 102.3 | 19.5 | 9.9 | 6.2 | 71.6 | 30.2 |
云烟87 | 90.1 | 18.9 | 8.7 | 5.5 | 71.5 | 25.5 | ||
麒麟 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 110.0 | 20.0 | 9.7 | 5.4 | 65.8 | 25.1 |
云烟87 | 116.3 | 21.0 | 11.3 | 4.4 | 72.6 | 28.6 | ||
富源 | 2019 | 云烟121 | 128.5 | 20.2 | 10.7 | 4.2 | 71.3 | 31.0 |
云烟87 | 118.9 | 19.6 | 9.6 | 4.1 | 68.0 | 27.9 | ||
陆良 | 2018—2020 | 云烟121 | 115.4 | 21.1 | 11.2 | 5.5 | 72.3 | 30.0 |
云烟87 | 106.4 | 21.2 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 72.3 | 26.9 | ||
师宗 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 92.0 | 18.0 | 11.0 | 5.1 | 69.0 | 25.0 |
云烟87 | 90.0 | 21.0 | 10.0 | 5.5 | 73.0 | 28.5 | ||
罗平 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 121.0 | 20.0 | 11.5 | 5.9 | 69.6 | 33.5 |
云烟87 | 122.0 | 19.0 | 11.6 | 6.3 | 72.6 | 33.4 | ||
平均 | 云烟121 | 116.6 | 20.1 | 10.4 | 5.6 | 70.6 | 30.1 | |
云烟87 | 112.6 | 20.1 | 10.4 | 5.2 | 71.8 | 28.6 |
地点 | 年度 | 品种名称 | 株高/cm | 叶数/片 | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | 腰叶长/cm | 腰叶宽/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宣威 | 2018—2020 | 云烟121 | 122.6 | 20.0 | 9.8 | 6.3 | 73.1 | 30.6 |
云烟87 | 122.1 | 20.8 | 10.2 | 5.7 | 74.0 | 29.1 | ||
马龙 | 2020 | 云烟121 | 102.3 | 19.5 | 9.9 | 6.2 | 71.6 | 30.2 |
云烟87 | 90.1 | 18.9 | 8.7 | 5.5 | 71.5 | 25.5 | ||
麒麟 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 110.0 | 20.0 | 9.7 | 5.4 | 65.8 | 25.1 |
云烟87 | 116.3 | 21.0 | 11.3 | 4.4 | 72.6 | 28.6 | ||
富源 | 2019 | 云烟121 | 128.5 | 20.2 | 10.7 | 4.2 | 71.3 | 31.0 |
云烟87 | 118.9 | 19.6 | 9.6 | 4.1 | 68.0 | 27.9 | ||
陆良 | 2018—2020 | 云烟121 | 115.4 | 21.1 | 11.2 | 5.5 | 72.3 | 30.0 |
云烟87 | 106.4 | 21.2 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 72.3 | 26.9 | ||
师宗 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 92.0 | 18.0 | 11.0 | 5.1 | 69.0 | 25.0 |
云烟87 | 90.0 | 21.0 | 10.0 | 5.5 | 73.0 | 28.5 | ||
罗平 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 121.0 | 20.0 | 11.5 | 5.9 | 69.6 | 33.5 |
云烟87 | 122.0 | 19.0 | 11.6 | 6.3 | 72.6 | 33.4 | ||
平均 | 云烟121 | 116.6 | 20.1 | 10.4 | 5.6 | 70.6 | 30.1 | |
云烟87 | 112.6 | 20.1 | 10.4 | 5.2 | 71.8 | 28.6 |
地点 | 年份 | 品种名称 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 上等烟比例/% | 中等烟比例/% | 中部叶单叶重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
会泽 | 2018—2020 | 云烟121 | 2391.0 | 63333.0 | 60.6 | 33.7 | 12.4 |
云烟97 | 2700.0 | 63975.0 | 55.6 | 34.8 | 12.8 | ||
沾益 | 2019—2020 | 云烟121 | 2265.0 | 51757.5 | 40.0 | 39.5 | 11.6 |
云烟97 | 2569.5 | 66532.5 | 52.0 | 30.5 | 13.4 | ||
麒麟 | 2019—2020 | 云烟121 | 2970.0 | 69954.0 | 50.5 | 39.0 | 10.8 |
云烟97 | 2902.5 | 59274.0 | 43.0 | 26.0 | 12.0 | ||
师宗 | 2020 | 云烟121 | 2565.0 | 75660.0 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 12.0 |
云烟97 | 2520.0 | 73080.0 | 58.0 | 42.0 | 12.0 | ||
平均 | 云烟121 | 2548.5 | 65176.5 | 52.8 | 38.1 | 11.7 | |
云烟97 | 2673.0 | 65715.0 | 52.1 | 33.3 | 12.5 |
地点 | 年份 | 品种名称 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 上等烟比例/% | 中等烟比例/% | 中部叶单叶重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
会泽 | 2018—2020 | 云烟121 | 2391.0 | 63333.0 | 60.6 | 33.7 | 12.4 |
云烟97 | 2700.0 | 63975.0 | 55.6 | 34.8 | 12.8 | ||
沾益 | 2019—2020 | 云烟121 | 2265.0 | 51757.5 | 40.0 | 39.5 | 11.6 |
云烟97 | 2569.5 | 66532.5 | 52.0 | 30.5 | 13.4 | ||
麒麟 | 2019—2020 | 云烟121 | 2970.0 | 69954.0 | 50.5 | 39.0 | 10.8 |
云烟97 | 2902.5 | 59274.0 | 43.0 | 26.0 | 12.0 | ||
师宗 | 2020 | 云烟121 | 2565.0 | 75660.0 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 12.0 |
云烟97 | 2520.0 | 73080.0 | 58.0 | 42.0 | 12.0 | ||
平均 | 云烟121 | 2548.5 | 65176.5 | 52.8 | 38.1 | 11.7 | |
云烟97 | 2673.0 | 65715.0 | 52.1 | 33.3 | 12.5 |
地点 | 年份 | 品种名称 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 上等烟比例/% | 中等烟比例/% | 中部叶单叶重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宣威 | 2018—2019 | 云烟121 | 2167.5 | 62823.0 | 58.0 | 29.9 | 9.4 |
云烟87 | 2485.5 | 75670.5 | 70.1 | 22.1 | 11.2 | ||
沾益 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 2520.0 | 68040.0 | 47.9 | 49.7 | 8.6 |
云烟87 | 2445.0 | 66015.0 | 46.8 | 49.4 | 8.1 | ||
马龙 | 2018—2020 | 云烟121 | 2914.5 | 59578.5 | 38.4 | 41.5 | 15.5 |
云烟87 | 2268.0 | 38434.5 | 25.5 | 38.6 | 10.0 | ||
麒麟 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 3552.0 | 78424.5 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 10.6 |
云烟87 | 3673.5 | 81588.0 | 53.0 | 33.0 | 10.8 | ||
富源 | 2018—2019 | 云烟121 | 2683.5 | 78655.5 | 71.0 | 21.5 | 12.2 |
云烟87 | 2367.0 | 47160.0 | 37.1 | 30.8 | 9.4 | ||
陆良 | 2018—2019 | 云烟121 | 3010.5 | 69595.5 | 44.3 | 41.5 | 10.5 |
云烟87 | 3024.0 | 78084.0 | 63.2 | 25.8 | 11.2 | ||
师宗 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 2100.0 | 52500.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 10.0 |
云烟87 | 2400.0 | 67500.0 | 70.0 | 30.0 | 12.0 | ||
罗平 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 2205.0 | 64209.0 | 42.3 | ||
云烟87 | 1980.0 | 55855.5 | 39.6 | ||||
平均 | 云烟121 | 2644.5 | 66729.0 | 50.2 | 37.7 | 11.0 | |
云烟87 | 2580.0 | 63789.0 | 50.7 | 32.8 | 10.4 |
地点 | 年份 | 品种名称 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 上等烟比例/% | 中等烟比例/% | 中部叶单叶重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宣威 | 2018—2019 | 云烟121 | 2167.5 | 62823.0 | 58.0 | 29.9 | 9.4 |
云烟87 | 2485.5 | 75670.5 | 70.1 | 22.1 | 11.2 | ||
沾益 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 2520.0 | 68040.0 | 47.9 | 49.7 | 8.6 |
云烟87 | 2445.0 | 66015.0 | 46.8 | 49.4 | 8.1 | ||
马龙 | 2018—2020 | 云烟121 | 2914.5 | 59578.5 | 38.4 | 41.5 | 15.5 |
云烟87 | 2268.0 | 38434.5 | 25.5 | 38.6 | 10.0 | ||
麒麟 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 3552.0 | 78424.5 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 10.6 |
云烟87 | 3673.5 | 81588.0 | 53.0 | 33.0 | 10.8 | ||
富源 | 2018—2019 | 云烟121 | 2683.5 | 78655.5 | 71.0 | 21.5 | 12.2 |
云烟87 | 2367.0 | 47160.0 | 37.1 | 30.8 | 9.4 | ||
陆良 | 2018—2019 | 云烟121 | 3010.5 | 69595.5 | 44.3 | 41.5 | 10.5 |
云烟87 | 3024.0 | 78084.0 | 63.2 | 25.8 | 11.2 | ||
师宗 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 2100.0 | 52500.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 10.0 |
云烟87 | 2400.0 | 67500.0 | 70.0 | 30.0 | 12.0 | ||
罗平 | 2018 | 云烟121 | 2205.0 | 64209.0 | 42.3 | ||
云烟87 | 1980.0 | 55855.5 | 39.6 | ||||
平均 | 云烟121 | 2644.5 | 66729.0 | 50.2 | 37.7 | 11.0 | |
云烟87 | 2580.0 | 63789.0 | 50.7 | 32.8 | 10.4 |
地点 | 年份 | 部位 | 品种 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 糖碱比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
会泽 | 2018—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 34.61 | 24.46 | 2.00 | 2.45 | 14.11 |
云烟97 | 37.01 | 25.05 | 1.84 | 2.14 | 17.31 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 37.82 | 26.86 | 1.72 | 2.07 | 18.30 | ||
云烟97 | 34.98 | 26.81 | 1.66 | 1.60 | 21.90 | |||
沾益 | 2019—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 38.52 | 25.44 | 2.02 | 2.47 | 15.62 |
云烟97 | 36.85 | 22.93 | 2.10 | 2.60 | 14.20 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 38.76 | 27.37 | 1.86 | 2.15 | 18.04 | ||
云烟97 | 38.46 | 26.59 | 1.73 | 2.19 | 17.55 | |||
麒麟 | 2018—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 34.70 | 22.03 | 2.31 | 2.64 | 13.16 |
云烟97 | 31.64 | 19.03 | 2.48 | 3.31 | 9.57 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 34.08 | 22.18 | 2.07 | 2.91 | 11.72 | ||
云烟97 | 37.31 | 25.18 | 1.99 | 2.79 | 13.35 | |||
师宗 | 2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 22.54 | 15.38 | 2.80 | 4.23 | 5.33 |
云烟97 | 21.80 | 15.45 | 2.83 | 4.15 | 5.26 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 31.84 | 20.74 | 2.27 | 4.11 | 7.75 | ||
云烟97 | 16.62 | 12.27 | 2.83 | 4.45 | 3.73 |
地点 | 年份 | 部位 | 品种 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 糖碱比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
会泽 | 2018—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 34.61 | 24.46 | 2.00 | 2.45 | 14.11 |
云烟97 | 37.01 | 25.05 | 1.84 | 2.14 | 17.31 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 37.82 | 26.86 | 1.72 | 2.07 | 18.30 | ||
云烟97 | 34.98 | 26.81 | 1.66 | 1.60 | 21.90 | |||
沾益 | 2019—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 38.52 | 25.44 | 2.02 | 2.47 | 15.62 |
云烟97 | 36.85 | 22.93 | 2.10 | 2.60 | 14.20 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 38.76 | 27.37 | 1.86 | 2.15 | 18.04 | ||
云烟97 | 38.46 | 26.59 | 1.73 | 2.19 | 17.55 | |||
麒麟 | 2018—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 34.70 | 22.03 | 2.31 | 2.64 | 13.16 |
云烟97 | 31.64 | 19.03 | 2.48 | 3.31 | 9.57 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 34.08 | 22.18 | 2.07 | 2.91 | 11.72 | ||
云烟97 | 37.31 | 25.18 | 1.99 | 2.79 | 13.35 | |||
师宗 | 2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 22.54 | 15.38 | 2.80 | 4.23 | 5.33 |
云烟97 | 21.80 | 15.45 | 2.83 | 4.15 | 5.26 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 31.84 | 20.74 | 2.27 | 4.11 | 7.75 | ||
云烟97 | 16.62 | 12.27 | 2.83 | 4.45 | 3.73 |
地点 | 年份 | 部位 | 品种 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 糖碱比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宣威 | 2018—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 33.56 | 24.06 | 1.79 | 2.20 | 15.25 |
云烟87 | 34.74 | 24.20 | 1.76 | 2.29 | 15.17 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 36.58 | 25.85 | 1.58 | 1.79 | 20.44 | ||
云烟87 | 34.50 | 23.83 | 1.80 | 1.85 | 18.67 | |||
马龙 | 2019—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 31.83 | 23.16 | 2.31 | 2.97 | 10.72 |
云烟87 | 29.02 | 21.82 | 2.40 | 2.73 | 10.63 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 32.57 | 23.70 | 1.95 | 2.52 | 12.90 | ||
云烟87 | 30.91 | 21.59 | 2.38 | 2.65 | 11.66 | |||
富源 | 2018—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 35.46 | 25.24 | 1.78 | 2.53 | 14.03 |
云烟87 | 22.31 | 24.38 | 2.03 | 2.32 | 9.64 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 37.91 | 27.63 | 1.54 | 1.46 | 25.93 | ||
云烟87 | 38.86 | 27.63 | 1.70 | 1.84 | 21.16 | |||
陆良 | 2018—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 29.52 | 19.93 | 2.48 | 4.30 | 6.87 |
云烟87 | 28.85 | 20.29 | 2.41 | 4.02 | 7.17 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 28.63 | 21.90 | 1.94 | 3.04 | 9.43 | ||
云烟87 | 31.78 | 23.17 | 2.04 | 3.02 | 10.52 |
地点 | 年份 | 部位 | 品种 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 糖碱比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宣威 | 2018—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 33.56 | 24.06 | 1.79 | 2.20 | 15.25 |
云烟87 | 34.74 | 24.20 | 1.76 | 2.29 | 15.17 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 36.58 | 25.85 | 1.58 | 1.79 | 20.44 | ||
云烟87 | 34.50 | 23.83 | 1.80 | 1.85 | 18.67 | |||
马龙 | 2019—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 31.83 | 23.16 | 2.31 | 2.97 | 10.72 |
云烟87 | 29.02 | 21.82 | 2.40 | 2.73 | 10.63 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 32.57 | 23.70 | 1.95 | 2.52 | 12.90 | ||
云烟87 | 30.91 | 21.59 | 2.38 | 2.65 | 11.66 | |||
富源 | 2018—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 35.46 | 25.24 | 1.78 | 2.53 | 14.03 |
云烟87 | 22.31 | 24.38 | 2.03 | 2.32 | 9.64 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 37.91 | 27.63 | 1.54 | 1.46 | 25.93 | ||
云烟87 | 38.86 | 27.63 | 1.70 | 1.84 | 21.16 | |||
陆良 | 2018—2020 | 上部叶 | 云烟121 | 29.52 | 19.93 | 2.48 | 4.30 | 6.87 |
云烟87 | 28.85 | 20.29 | 2.41 | 4.02 | 7.17 | |||
中部叶 | 云烟121 | 28.63 | 21.90 | 1.94 | 3.04 | 9.43 | ||
云烟87 | 31.78 | 23.17 | 2.04 | 3.02 | 10.52 |
[1] |
徐安传. 烤烟品种种植结构对烟叶原料和卷烟产品的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2009, 15(5):82-86.
|
[2] |
陈敬悦, 何彬, 高宪辉, 等. 配方打叶技术提高云南烟叶卷烟工业适用性的讨论[J]. 云南化工, 2023, 50(9):86-89.
|
[3] |
唐远驹. 试论特色烟叶的形成和开发[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2004, 25(1):10-13.
|
[4] |
曹景林, 程君奇, 李亚培, 等. 从品种角度试论提高中国烤烟质量的途径[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(22):75-87.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14100110 |
[5] |
徐晓武, 李静超, 余铭华, 等. 同种植密度对烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2009,(1):12-14,18.
|
[6] |
马文广, 周义和, 刘相甫, 等. 我国烤烟品种的发展现状及对策展望[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2018, 24(1):116-122.
|
[7] |
刘仁祥, 夏志林, 崔庆伟, 等. 贵州烤烟育种工作进展与对策探讨[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2016, 35(4):1-5.
|
[8] |
徐照丽. 云南生态环境与云南烤烟香气品质关系的探讨[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(8):196-200.
|
[9] |
徐安传, 胡巍耀, 李佛琳, 等. 中国烤烟种植品种现状分析与展望[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2011, 26(S2):104-109.
|
[10] |
常寿荣, 吴涛, 罗华元, 等. 烤烟品种、部位及生态环境对烟叶致香物质的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2010, 25(1):58-62.
|
[11] |
李晓闯, 权佳锋, 王得强, 等. 曲靖地区云烟系列品种间品质差异分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(17):163-166.
|
[12] |
史航, 王国军, 郭启超, 等. 三个烤烟品种在曲靖烟区的适应性比较[J]. 中南农业科技, 2024, 45(11):26-30.
|
[13] |
王聪, 郑宏斌, 王昕, 等. 曲靖烟区适宜"利群"品牌需求的烤烟新品种筛选与评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(11):16-20.
|
[14] |
袁国议, 牛新春, 代惠娟, 等. 不同氮钾运筹对云烟121产质量的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2023, 35(11):80-86.
|
[15] |
郑宏斌, 王聪, 席奇亮, 等. 施氮量对云烟121上部烟叶代谢及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(10):215-225.
|
[16] |
喻奇伟, 皮凯, 康俊, 等. 云烟121在毕节烟区的适应性评价[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2023, 42(5):58-61.
|
[17] |
曾帅波, 姜超英, 皮凯, 等. 施氮量、种植密度和留叶数对云烟121产质量的影响[J]. 特产研究, 2023, 45(2):40-46.
|
[18] |
胡日鹏, 吴剑, 宗郭心安, 等. 云烟121叶柄机械承受能力与根系的关系研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2024, 30(3):75-84.
|
[19] |
彭宇, 姜超英, 焦剑, 等. 贵州省烤烟品种工作的现状及对策展望[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2024, 45(2):116-121.
|
[20] |
周敏, 张忠武, 杨景华, 等. 云南曲靖不同生态区域云烟97烟叶品质差异评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(22):198-202.
|
[21] |
余小芬, 解燕, 杨树明, 等. 减施氮磷钾肥和氮肥基追比对云南曲靖烤烟产质量及养分利用的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(4):848-854.
|
[1] | REN Qingguo, WU Guangjun, LIN Ping, ZHANG Jiyu, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Yongshan, HAI Tao. Study of Yield and Quality Traits of New Wheat Cultivar ‘Hemai 26’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 32-37. |
[2] | JIANG Yongqiang, WU Yao, FANG Zhongjian, YE Guangying, HUI Jun’ai, ZHOU Rong, WANG Zaihua. Influence of LED Light Quality on Growth and Quality of Tissue Culture Plantets of Dendrobium officinale and D. nobile [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 65-72. |
[3] | HUANG Wenyin, ZHANG Baige, CHANG Jingjing, CHEN Xiao, LI Jing, CHEN Lei, ZHAO Junhong, LUO Mouxiong, SONG Zhao. Effect of Exogenous Inositol on Yield and Quality of Tomatoes Under Salt Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 73-80. |
[4] | XU Jie, ZHANG Ya, LI Pingzhao, XU Lei, CHENG Yanxun, WEN Fangping. Research on Heavy Metal Sources and Environmental Evaluation of Soil in Yuanmou, Central Yunnan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 81-90. |
[5] | LI Lin, YAN Yun, KANG Jiangfei, MENG Qihan, FANG Shefa, CHEN Yingmin, GUO Jianqiu. The Effects of Sowing Date and Density on Growth Process, Photosynthetic Characteristics, Agronomic Traits, Yield, and Quality of ‘Luodou 1304’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 11-18. |
[6] | LI Lihua, XUE Bingjie, WANG Yale, LI Xuejun, SUN Huan, SUN Jiping. Effects of Drought-rehydration on Physiological Indexes and Drought-related Gene Expression of ‘YY021’ Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 57-62. |
[7] | MA Zhuo, ZHOU Hanbing, ZHAO Manxing, ZHANG Xia, WANG Xin, MA Danni. Effects of Fulvic Acid Potassium on Nutrient Absorption, Yield and Quality of Apples in Yan’an Mountain Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 63-68. |
[8] | WANG Cheng, LI Guorui, DI Jianjun, LUO Rui, LI Mingjing, HUANG Fenglan. Effects of Castor Bean Microbial Enzyme Biological Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Cherry Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 69-75. |
[9] | YANG Ying, FAN Li, YANG Zhichao, CAO Xinbo, GE Jingping. Application of COS and Microbial Metabolites in Agricultural Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 83-89. |
[10] | TANG Zhongjian, ZHANG Jinzhi, WANG Xiaomei, XU Wenjie, FU Yajie, ZHAO Mingyan, WU Ruyi, FAN Wenjuan, ZHANG Jie. Effects of Different Spike Trimming Length on Fruit Quality of ‘Summer Black’ Grape [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 34-39. |
[11] | DONG Jianmei, HU Jiang, LI Jing, LIU Hongming, FU Xiaomeng, LAI Xinpu, DU Yuxia. Effect of Rootstocks on Mineral Nutrient Uptake in Lemon ‘Yunning No.1’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 47-54. |
[12] | SU Dan, WANG Zicheng, JIA Junying, SUN Dezhi, LI Zhijun, GUO Yuan, ZHUANG Defeng. Effects of Water Regulation on Growth Characteristics of Atractylodes chinensis and Yield and Quality of Crude Material [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 75-83. |
[13] | WANG Lili, ZHU Shijun, LU Xiaohong, JIN Shuquan. Biological Effects of Trichoderma W1 Bio-organic Fertilizer on Coastal Tomato Planting [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 100-106. |
[14] | WANG Huanhuan, WANG Jingjing, CHEN Qiling. Application of Three Mathematical Methods in Quality Evaluation of Jujube Fruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 138-144. |
[15] | FAN Hua, CHENG Dungong, LIU Jianjun, LIU Aifeng. Changes in Physicochemical Properties of Wheat Varieties with Different Gluten Strength Under Mixed Planting and Their Effects on Bread and Noodle Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(6): 148-152. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||