
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (13): 86-92.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0639
Previous Articles Next Articles
JIANG Shuangfeng1(
), CHEN Zhiyun1, DANG Yongchao1, CAI Yiming1, ZHU Deyan1, WANG Xiao2, GAO Fengguang1, ZHAO Haili1, ZHONG Sizhi1(
)
Received:2025-07-28
Revised:2026-05-02
Online:2026-07-15
Published:2026-07-09
CLC Number:
JIANG Shuangfeng, CHEN Zhiyun, DANG Yongchao, CAI Yiming, ZHU Deyan, WANG Xiao, GAO Fengguang, ZHAO Haili, ZHONG Sizhi. Green Tea Quality Characteristics of Four Albino/ Etiolation Tea Tree Varieties in Xinyang Area[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(13): 86-92.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0639
| 茶样 | 外形(25%) | 汤色(10%) | 香气(25%) | 滋味(30%) | 叶底(10%) | 得分 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | ||||||
| 白叶1号 | 尚紧、微有毫、较翠绿 | 87 | 黄绿、尚明亮 | 85 | 尚高鲜 | 86 | 较醇、较甘厚 | 87 | 嫩、尚匀、较嫩绿 | 89 | 86.75 | ||||
| 中黄1号 | 尚紧、黄绿 | 89 | 黄、明亮 | 87 | 较高爽、有栗香 | 90 | 较醇爽 | 85 | 嫩、尚匀、嫩黄鲜亮 | 90 | 87.95 | ||||
| 中黄2号 | 尚紧、略卷曲、黄绿 | 88 | 黄绿、明亮 | 87 | 尚高鲜 | 86 | 尚浓、较醇 | 86 | 软、尚匀、嫩黄 | 89 | 86.9 | ||||
| 苏玉黄 | 尚细紧、略有毫、翠绿 | 89 | 黄、泛红 | 83 | 清香、略闷酵 | 84 | 青、酵 | 84 | 嫩、绿、有红茎 | 83 | 85.05 | ||||
| 茶样 | 外形(25%) | 汤色(10%) | 香气(25%) | 滋味(30%) | 叶底(10%) | 得分 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | ||||||
| 白叶1号 | 尚紧、微有毫、较翠绿 | 87 | 黄绿、尚明亮 | 85 | 尚高鲜 | 86 | 较醇、较甘厚 | 87 | 嫩、尚匀、较嫩绿 | 89 | 86.75 | ||||
| 中黄1号 | 尚紧、黄绿 | 89 | 黄、明亮 | 87 | 较高爽、有栗香 | 90 | 较醇爽 | 85 | 嫩、尚匀、嫩黄鲜亮 | 90 | 87.95 | ||||
| 中黄2号 | 尚紧、略卷曲、黄绿 | 88 | 黄绿、明亮 | 87 | 尚高鲜 | 86 | 尚浓、较醇 | 86 | 软、尚匀、嫩黄 | 89 | 86.9 | ||||
| 苏玉黄 | 尚细紧、略有毫、翠绿 | 89 | 黄、泛红 | 83 | 清香、略闷酵 | 84 | 青、酵 | 84 | 嫩、绿、有红茎 | 83 | 85.05 | ||||
| 成分 | 白叶1号 | 中黄1号 | 中黄2号 | 苏玉黄 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 茶多酚/% | 15.21±0.17b | 15.00±0.36b | 16.58±0.22a | 16.01±0.42a |
| 氨基酸/% | 4.50±0.06d | 5.18±0.67b | 5.36±0.35a | 4.71±0.15c |
| 水浸出物/% | 46.12±0.36 | 45.83±0.62 | 46.16±0.40 | 46.65±0.07 |
| 咖啡碱/% | 3.77±0.51b | 4.29±0.14a | 3.98±0.57b | 3.81±0.02b |
| 酚氨比 | 3.38±0.01a | 2.89±0.10c | 3.09±0.06b | 3.40±0.01a |
| +C/% | 0.17±0.02d | 0.51±0.02a | 0.42±0.06b | 0.39±0.02c |
| EC/% | 0.46±0.04b | 0.27±0.01c | 0.42±0.03b | 0.68±0.05a |
| ECG/% | 1.44±0.03d | 1.98±0.04b | 2.29±0.03a | 1.68±0.07c |
| EGC/% | 1.65±0.04b | 0.58±0.01d | 0.70±0.01c | 2.28±0.06a |
| EGCG/% | 7.23±0.2b | 6.63±0.04c | 7.78±0.08a | 6.84±0.17c |
| 非酯型儿茶素/% | 2.28±0.08b | 1.36±0.04d | 1.54±0.03c | 3.35±0.12a |
| 酯型儿茶素/% | 8.67±0.23b | 8.61±0.06b | 10.06±0.12a | 8.53±0.24b |
| 儿茶素总量/% | 10.95±0.31b | 9.97±0.08c | 11.60±0.14a | 11.88±0.36a |
| 收敛性指数 | 0.79±0.15c | 0.86±0.27b | 0.87±0.07a | 0.72±0.19d |
| 成分 | 白叶1号 | 中黄1号 | 中黄2号 | 苏玉黄 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 茶多酚/% | 15.21±0.17b | 15.00±0.36b | 16.58±0.22a | 16.01±0.42a |
| 氨基酸/% | 4.50±0.06d | 5.18±0.67b | 5.36±0.35a | 4.71±0.15c |
| 水浸出物/% | 46.12±0.36 | 45.83±0.62 | 46.16±0.40 | 46.65±0.07 |
| 咖啡碱/% | 3.77±0.51b | 4.29±0.14a | 3.98±0.57b | 3.81±0.02b |
| 酚氨比 | 3.38±0.01a | 2.89±0.10c | 3.09±0.06b | 3.40±0.01a |
| +C/% | 0.17±0.02d | 0.51±0.02a | 0.42±0.06b | 0.39±0.02c |
| EC/% | 0.46±0.04b | 0.27±0.01c | 0.42±0.03b | 0.68±0.05a |
| ECG/% | 1.44±0.03d | 1.98±0.04b | 2.29±0.03a | 1.68±0.07c |
| EGC/% | 1.65±0.04b | 0.58±0.01d | 0.70±0.01c | 2.28±0.06a |
| EGCG/% | 7.23±0.2b | 6.63±0.04c | 7.78±0.08a | 6.84±0.17c |
| 非酯型儿茶素/% | 2.28±0.08b | 1.36±0.04d | 1.54±0.03c | 3.35±0.12a |
| 酯型儿茶素/% | 8.67±0.23b | 8.61±0.06b | 10.06±0.12a | 8.53±0.24b |
| 儿茶素总量/% | 10.95±0.31b | 9.97±0.08c | 11.60±0.14a | 11.88±0.36a |
| 收敛性指数 | 0.79±0.15c | 0.86±0.27b | 0.87±0.07a | 0.72±0.19d |
| 成分 | 第1主成分(PC1) | 第2主成分(PC2) | 第3主成分(PC3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 茶多酚 | 0.291 | 0.471 | 0.791 |
| 氨基酸 | 0.885 | -0.313 | 0.331 |
| 水浸出物 | -0.032 | 0.840 | 0.102 |
| 咖啡碱 | 0.734 | -0.540 | -0.334 |
| EGC | -0.575 | 0.775 | -0.198 |
| +C | 0.967 | -0.029 | -0.191 |
| EGCG | -0.070 | -0.063 | 0.976 |
| EC | -0.306 | 0.916 | 0.086 |
| ECG | 0.859 | -0.197 | 0.463 |
| 特征值 | 4.695 | 2.464 | 1.258 |
| 方差贡献率/% | 52.167 | 27.380 | 13.975 |
| 累计方差贡献率/% | 52.167 | 79.547 | 93.522 |
| 权重/% | 41.7 | 33.27 | 25.03 |
| 成分 | 第1主成分(PC1) | 第2主成分(PC2) | 第3主成分(PC3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 茶多酚 | 0.291 | 0.471 | 0.791 |
| 氨基酸 | 0.885 | -0.313 | 0.331 |
| 水浸出物 | -0.032 | 0.840 | 0.102 |
| 咖啡碱 | 0.734 | -0.540 | -0.334 |
| EGC | -0.575 | 0.775 | -0.198 |
| +C | 0.967 | -0.029 | -0.191 |
| EGCG | -0.070 | -0.063 | 0.976 |
| EC | -0.306 | 0.916 | 0.086 |
| ECG | 0.859 | -0.197 | 0.463 |
| 特征值 | 4.695 | 2.464 | 1.258 |
| 方差贡献率/% | 52.167 | 27.380 | 13.975 |
| 累计方差贡献率/% | 52.167 | 79.547 | 93.522 |
| 权重/% | 41.7 | 33.27 | 25.03 |
| 茶样 | F1 | F2 | F3 | 综合得分 | 平均得分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白叶1号-1 | -1.80334 | -0.89420 | -0.20000 | -109.96 | -78.46 |
| 白叶1号-2 | -1.40713 | -0.26219 | 0.25041 | -61.13 | |
| 白叶1号-3 | -1.42060 | -0.22238 | 0.09386 | -64.29 | |
| 中黄1号-1 | 0.59203 | -1.28467 | -0.82866 | -38.79 | -19.53 |
| 中黄1号-2 | 1.08167 | -0.91916 | -1.37283 | -19.84 | |
| 中黄1号-3 | 0.90769 | -0.38106 | -1.00437 | 0.03 | |
| 中黄2号-1 | 0.82570 | 0.14119 | 1.55688 | 78.10 | 58.40 |
| 中黄2号-2 | 0.49868 | -0.68327 | 1.30069 | 30.62 | |
| 中黄2号-3 | 0.68760 | -0.05250 | 1.57990 | 66.47 | |
| 苏玉黄-1 | -0.00263 | 1.42098 | -0.63569 | 31.26 | 39.60 |
| 苏玉黄-2 | 0.04616 | 1.64543 | -0.27367 | 49.82 | |
| 苏玉黄-3 | -0.00583 | 1.49184 | -0.46653 | 37.71 |
| 茶样 | F1 | F2 | F3 | 综合得分 | 平均得分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白叶1号-1 | -1.80334 | -0.89420 | -0.20000 | -109.96 | -78.46 |
| 白叶1号-2 | -1.40713 | -0.26219 | 0.25041 | -61.13 | |
| 白叶1号-3 | -1.42060 | -0.22238 | 0.09386 | -64.29 | |
| 中黄1号-1 | 0.59203 | -1.28467 | -0.82866 | -38.79 | -19.53 |
| 中黄1号-2 | 1.08167 | -0.91916 | -1.37283 | -19.84 | |
| 中黄1号-3 | 0.90769 | -0.38106 | -1.00437 | 0.03 | |
| 中黄2号-1 | 0.82570 | 0.14119 | 1.55688 | 78.10 | 58.40 |
| 中黄2号-2 | 0.49868 | -0.68327 | 1.30069 | 30.62 | |
| 中黄2号-3 | 0.68760 | -0.05250 | 1.57990 | 66.47 | |
| 苏玉黄-1 | -0.00263 | 1.42098 | -0.63569 | 31.26 | 39.60 |
| 苏玉黄-2 | 0.04616 | 1.64543 | -0.27367 | 49.82 | |
| 苏玉黄-3 | -0.00583 | 1.49184 | -0.46653 | 37.71 |
| [1] |
薄佳慧, 张杨玲, 宫连瑾, 等. 多组学视角下白化茶树次生代谢产物的研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2023, 21(6):1884-1889.
|
| [2] |
张琛, 韩兆岚, 房婉萍, 等. 茶树叶色变异研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2024, 22(6):2069-2079.
|
| [3] |
沈周高, 谢应华, 范晓娟, 等. 叶色变异茶树生理生化特征及其变异机制的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2023, 50(4):582-594.
|
| [4] |
尹鹏, 卫艺炜, 王静, 等. 清香型信阳毛尖茶关键呈香成分鉴定[J]. 食品科学, 2024, 45(21):222-228.
|
| [5] |
张清改. 信阳茶文化、茶产业、茶科技融合发展路径初探[J]. 中国茶叶, 2024, 46(4):66-71.
|
| [6] |
胡晓云, 魏春丽, 单子昊. 2024中国茶叶区域公用品牌价值评估报告[J]. 中国茶叶, 2025, 47(5):30-42.
|
| [7] |
缪伊雯, 周静芸, 杨春明, 等. 不同茶树品种寿眉白茶品质分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2024, 45(15):283-294.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
徐玉婕, 戴晓晶, 吴纪忠, 等. 白化和黄化茶树品种绿茶游离氨基酸、儿茶素类及咖啡碱差异分析[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2023, 31(5):643-652.
|
| [10] |
毛娟, 王文海, 洛英, 等. 西藏墨脱县6个茶树品种春夏两季化学品质差异分析[J]. 食品科学, 2024, 45(10):167-174.
|
| [11] |
陈凌芝, 孔亚帅, 王晶晶, 等. 不同焙火程度对信阳毛尖茶感官品质与主要化学成分的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2024, 49(9):67-73.
|
| [12] |
陈义, 王治会, 郭桂义. 信阳红品质与化学成分相关性的研究[J]. 食品科技, 2015, 40(1):36-39.
|
| [13] |
doi: 10.1080/09670874.2020.1857882 URL |
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03463-9 |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
师大亮, 敖存, 腾瑞敏, 等. 浙江主栽品种加工黄茶的适制性研究[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(12):3021-3024.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240131 |
| [19] |
徐梦婷, 谷梦雅, 陈静, 等. 基于代谢组学的‘金牡丹’和‘金观音’高香红茶风味品质解析[J]. 食品科学, 2024, 45(19):150-161.
|
| [20] |
陈志云, 李杰, 冯雨, 等. 茶多酚生物活性及作用机制研究进展[J]. 食品工业科技, 2024, 45(13):333-341.
|
| [21] |
doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100989 URL |
| [22] |
doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1552245 URL |
| [23] |
孔晓君, 尚晓阳, 李玉胜, 等. 减少化肥配施有机肥对茶叶产量和品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(11):94-99.
|
| [1] | ZHAO Chengkun, CHEN Liang, SHI Xiangdong, LI Mengxu, LYU Shangju, CAO Chanhua, DING Songshuang, YANG Zhanwei. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rates on Growth and Development of Cigar Wrapper Tobacco and Quality of Tobacco Leaves in Greenhouse Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 48-54. |
| [2] | YANG Xin, ZHANG Mingjin, LI Bin, ZHANG Yonghui, XIE Qiang, WANG Jian’an. Effect of Different Harvesting Methods with Stems on Curing Quality of Upper Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 210-218. |
| [3] | GAO Qin, CHEN Huanhuan, ZHU Qifa, XIA Hao, YU Fei, SHEN Jia, JIANG Chaoqiang. Study on Relationship Between Chemical Composition and Sensory Quality of Tobacco Middle Leaves in Southern Anhui Tobacco Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 204-209. |
| [4] | ZHAO Hui, HE Xuemei, LI Biao, Feng Hui, DENG Li, SUN Chuanqi, MA Jie, FU Liang. Agronomic Traits and Nutritional Components Analysis of Lepista sordida E70 Cultivated with Different Raw Materials [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(5): 83-91. |
| [5] | FU Kairui, SHI Haoliang, ZHOU Shunbao, WANG Zhongyuan, ZHOU Hongxia, LI Wenting, YANG Yunli, LI Guangyang, TIAN Minghui, FU Limei, YU Lei, HUANG Feiyan, ZHOU Houfa. Effects of Different Cultivation Measures on Growth and Quality of ‘Yunyan 116’ in Shuangjiang of Yunnan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 34-45. |
| [6] | WANG Xueying, REN Sihai, ZHU Qifa, XUE Lin, TANG Jingxiang, ZHU Junjun, WANG Shengyou, GUO Fei, XU Jingnian. Analysis of Relationship Between Content of Petroleum Ether Extracts and Quality of Cured Tobacco Leaves Based on Multivariate Statistics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(12): 170-176. |
| [7] | LONG Jianlin, YANG Liu, SHEN Jia, LI Tie, HE Kunde, WANG Jirong, LI Jinxing, JIANG Chaoqiang, XIA Hao. Quality and Industrial Availability Analysis of Upper Leaves with Different Identities and Leaf Structures in Huidong Tobacco Area of Liangshan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(10): 203-210. |
| [8] | YE Tianhui, YANG Xue, JIANG Chaoqiang, YANG Jianchun, YAN Fangfang, YANG Xingyou, ZU Chaolong, YAN Yifeng. Comparative Analysis of Quality of Tobacco Leaves in Different Altitude Tobacco Growing Areas of Panzhihua [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 144-148. |
| [9] | LIU Fengfeng, BI Qingwen, ZHANG Guochao, HE Jiewang, SUN Fushan, DAI Yingpeng. Analysis of Key Influencing Factors of Upper Tobacco Leaves Quality in Stalk-Cutting and Curing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 126-133. |
| [10] | XU Shuaihua, DANG Xia, CHU Han, LI Qiujian, ZHANG Panfeng, CHEN Xi, DING Yifei, WANG Xuan, ZHANG Xianghui. Research on Re-drying Parameter Control Technology for Strong Flavor Type Tobacco Leaves in Henan Based on Sensory Quality Stability [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(34): 121-128. |
| [11] | REN Jinping, BAI Xinming, BAI Xiaodong, CHEN Yanling, FENG Wenxia, ZHANG Jimei. Quality Evaluation and Component Determination of Angelicae Pubescentis Radix in Guanshan Region of Eastern Gansu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(29): 122-129. |
| [12] | LIU Yongxiu, ZHAO Ying, XU Ling, YUAN Yuan, ANG Lei, LUO Jing, YANG Tao, ZHANG Qinghua, XU Yeju, ZHANG Shilai. Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of Perennial Rice at Seedling Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(23): 1-9. |
| [13] | GE Lijiao, QIU Liang, WANG Xiaoqiu, ZHAI Caijiao, CHENG Yujing, LIU Shuidong, SONG Yimin. Genetic Diversity of Important Agronomic Traits in Tomato Germplasms [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(12): 34-45. |
| [14] | ZOU Danrong, ZHAO Xiangjie, SHI Han, CHEN Ziyi, ZHOU Deyao, CHEN Jue. Analysis of Nutrient Composition in Fresh and Mature Seeds of Jiading ‘Sanbai’ Broad Bean and Other Fava Bean Materials [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(12): 149-157. |
| [15] | GUO Wenlong, WANG Huiqing, DING Songshuang, XING Zhuoran, LIU Feng, DENG Cheng, TANG Jie, SHI Xiangdong, DING Jianbing. Research Progress on Effect of Light Intensity on Production of Cigar Wrapper Leaves Under Shade Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(10): 38-44. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||