
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 92-96.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0805
Previous Articles Next Articles
XIAO Yufan1(
), YIN Shaohe2, QIN Ruping2, SHI Huaiping2, JIN Fengxiang2, ZHAO Ruizhi2, TIAN Jing1, YUAN Sanhong1, LI Dewen3, LUO Qipeng3(
)
Received:2025-09-14
Revised:2026-02-24
Online:2026-05-15
Published:2026-05-15
CLC Number:
XIAO Yufan, YIN Shaohe, QIN Ruping, SHI Huaiping, JIN Fengxiang, ZHAO Ruizhi, TIAN Jing, YUAN Sanhong, LI Dewen, LUO Qipeng. Study on Changes of Soil Nutrients and Microbial Stoichiometry in Tobacco Planting Soil with Different Continuous Cropping Years in Malong of Qujing[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 92-96.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0805
| 连作年限/a | 全氮/% | 全磷/% | 全钾/% | 水解性氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.57a | 1.17a | 10.55c | 123.18b | 53.58c | 362.00d |
| 3 | 1.52a | 1.22a | 13.80b | 127.87b | 66.83b | 400.33cd |
| 6 | 1.58a | 1.39a | 13.86b | 128.13b | 78.36a | 584.17b |
| 9 | 1.77a | 1.31a | 16.09a | 153.35a | 79.44a | 651.33a |
| 连作年限/a | 全氮/% | 全磷/% | 全钾/% | 水解性氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.57a | 1.17a | 10.55c | 123.18b | 53.58c | 362.00d |
| 3 | 1.52a | 1.22a | 13.80b | 127.87b | 66.83b | 400.33cd |
| 6 | 1.58a | 1.39a | 13.86b | 128.13b | 78.36a | 584.17b |
| 9 | 1.77a | 1.31a | 16.09a | 153.35a | 79.44a | 651.33a |
| 连作年限/a | 有效硫/(mg/kg) | 交换性钙/(mg/kg) | 交换性镁/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 158.85b | 1217.32c | 174.91d |
| 3 | 151.80b | 1247.19c | 243.15bc |
| 6 | 164.86b | 1826.06a | 389.21a |
| 9 | 226.60a | 1680.60ab | 273.04b |
| 连作年限/a | 有效硫/(mg/kg) | 交换性钙/(mg/kg) | 交换性镁/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 158.85b | 1217.32c | 174.91d |
| 3 | 151.80b | 1247.19c | 243.15bc |
| 6 | 164.86b | 1826.06a | 389.21a |
| 9 | 226.60a | 1680.60ab | 273.04b |
| 连作年限/a | 有效硼/(mg/kg) | 氯离子/(mg/kg) | 有效铜/(mg/kg) | 有效锌/(mg/kg) | 有效铁/(mg/kg) | 有效锰/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.60a | 22.69b | 1.88a | 2.46a | 45.70a | 54.76a |
| 3 | 0.33b | 31.76a | 0.92b | 1.60b | 43.22a | 41.47b |
| 6 | 0.23c | 33.54a | 1.04b | 1.50b | 22.75b | 31.41c |
| 9 | 0.19c | 17.80c | 0.84b | 1.09b | 27.59b | 13.29d |
| 连作年限/a | 有效硼/(mg/kg) | 氯离子/(mg/kg) | 有效铜/(mg/kg) | 有效锌/(mg/kg) | 有效铁/(mg/kg) | 有效锰/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.60a | 22.69b | 1.88a | 2.46a | 45.70a | 54.76a |
| 3 | 0.33b | 31.76a | 0.92b | 1.60b | 43.22a | 41.47b |
| 6 | 0.23c | 33.54a | 1.04b | 1.50b | 22.75b | 31.41c |
| 9 | 0.19c | 17.80c | 0.84b | 1.09b | 27.59b | 13.29d |
| 连作年限/a | 细菌数/(×107 cfu/g) | 真菌数/(×103 cfu/g) | 放线菌数/(×105 cfu/g) | 总数/(×105 cfu/g) | 黑胫病菌数/(cfu/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5.07ab | 2.12a | 0.95a | 507.97 | 0.170a |
| 3 | 4.71b | 2.47a | 1.08a | 472.10 | 0.195a |
| 6 | 5.29ab | 2.83a | 1.27a | 530.30 | 0.234a |
| 9 | 5.38a | 3.39a | 1.35a | 539.38 | 0.250a |
| 连作年限/a | 细菌数/(×107 cfu/g) | 真菌数/(×103 cfu/g) | 放线菌数/(×105 cfu/g) | 总数/(×105 cfu/g) | 黑胫病菌数/(cfu/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5.07ab | 2.12a | 0.95a | 507.97 | 0.170a |
| 3 | 4.71b | 2.47a | 1.08a | 472.10 | 0.195a |
| 6 | 5.29ab | 2.83a | 1.27a | 530.30 | 0.234a |
| 9 | 5.38a | 3.39a | 1.35a | 539.38 | 0.250a |
| 连作年限/a | 脲酶/(mg/g) | 蔗糖酶/(mg/g) | 酸性磷酸酶/(mg/g) | 过氧化氢酶/(mL/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.64a | 0.35a | 1.66a | 0.48a |
| 3 | 0.58a | 0.24b | 1.73a | 0.45a |
| 6 | 0.47b | 0.22b | 1.68a | 0.43a |
| 9 | 0.41b | 0.19b | 1.61a | 0.39a |
| 连作年限/a | 脲酶/(mg/g) | 蔗糖酶/(mg/g) | 酸性磷酸酶/(mg/g) | 过氧化氢酶/(mL/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.64a | 0.35a | 1.66a | 0.48a |
| 3 | 0.58a | 0.24b | 1.73a | 0.45a |
| 6 | 0.47b | 0.22b | 1.68a | 0.43a |
| 9 | 0.41b | 0.19b | 1.61a | 0.39a |
| [1] |
李柘锦, 黄坤, 张加研, 等. 不同连作年限对烤烟品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2021, 49(4):9-17.
|
| [2] |
王峰吉, 尤垂淮, 刘朝科, 等. 不同连作年限植烟土壤对烤烟生长发育及产质量的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2014, 29(5):443-448.
|
| [3] |
付仲毅, 张晓远, 张晓帆, 等. 烤烟连作对植烟土壤碳库及烤后烟叶品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 46(8):17-22.
|
| [4] |
刘勇军, 滕凯, 陈前锋, 等. 烟草连作障碍与土壤理化性质及微生物多样性特征的关联[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(9):2848-2856.
|
| [5] |
李湘伟, 赵宇霞, 白寿光, 等. 功能炭基有机肥配施微生物菌剂改善烤烟产质量及相关因素分析[J]. 土壤与作物, 2026, 15(1):119-132.
|
| [6] |
陈丹梅, 段玉琪, 杨宇虹, 等. 轮作模式对植烟土壤酶活性及真菌群落的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(8):9.
|
| [7] |
虞轶俊, 徐青山, 张均华, 等. 土壤培肥技术对土壤健康的影响途径与作用机制[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(2):220-227.
|
| [8] |
王智, 杨胜刚, 范业晨, 等. 重庆市石柱县烟田土壤养分空间异质性分布及评价[J]. 西南大学学报:自然科学版, 2023, 45(11):42-52.
|
| [9] |
关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986.
|
| [10] |
潘义宏, 周丽娟, 王娟, 等. 烟叶安全性影响因素及其关键农业控制技术研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2013, 42(5):47-51.
|
| [11] |
马文富, 邓小鹏, 杜杏蓉, 等. 连作年限对植烟土壤化学特性及烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报:自然科学, 2021, 36(6):993-999.
|
| [12] |
白羽祥, 蔺忠龙, 邓小鹏, 等. 基于逐步回归模型的连作植烟土壤化学性状和酶活性关系分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(12):2387-2393.
|
| [13] |
杜杏蓉, 李运国, 邓小鹏, 等. 连作对不同类型植烟土壤化学性状,酶活性及细菌群落的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(5):30-35.
|
| [14] |
代方秀, 杜杏蓉, 李运国, 等. 烤烟连作下不同植烟土壤化学性状与酶活性变化及其相关性[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(16):233-239.
|
| [15] |
陈玉冰, 俞世康, 李富程, 等. 长期烤烟连作对土壤团聚体有机碳稳定性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(21):260-265.
|
| [16] |
刘勇成, 俞世康, 李富程, 等. 长期连作下石灰性紫色土植烟土壤养分与酶活性变化[J]. 广东农业科学, 2022, 49(12):74-81.
|
| [17] |
彭友, 陈代荣, 阳显斌, 等. 不同连作年限植烟土壤养分含量分析[J]. 天津农业科学, 2017, 23(5):31-34.
|
| [18] |
刘方, 何腾兵, 刘元生, 等. 长期连作黄壤烟地养分变化及其施肥效应分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2002(6):30-33.
|
| [19] |
王茂胜, 姜超英, 潘文杰, 等. 不同连作年限的植烟土壤理化性质与微生物群落动态研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008(12):5033-5034.
|
| [20] |
赵松辉. 烤烟连作障碍调控措施研究进展[J]. 现代农业科技, 2014(8):199-201.
|
| [21] |
王灿, 母婷婷, 朱黔, 等. 轮作和连作模式下烟草根际土壤细菌群落比较分析[J]. 工业微生物, 2025, 55(3):164-166.
|
| [22] |
高林, 王新伟, 申国明, 等. 不同连作年限植烟土壤细菌和真菌群落结构差异[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(8):147-152.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2018.0660 |
| [23] |
张翔, 范艺宽, 毛家伟, 等. 不同种植制度和施肥措施对烟田土壤养分及微生物的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2008, 23(4):208-212.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2008.04.047 |
| [24] |
朱金峰, 樊祖清, 陈启龙, 等. 不同连作年限对烟草根际土壤微生物区系的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2019, 47(1):42-48.
|
| [25] |
王瑞宝, 吴剑, 曹深岭, 等. 曲靖市烟田根区微生态障碍因子调查[J]. 中南农业科技, 2024, 45(9):1-4.
|
| [26] |
胡汝晓, 赵松义, 谭周进, 等. 烟草连作对稻田土壤微生物及酶的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2007, 21(5):494-497.
|
| [27] |
刘旭辉, 覃珊, 覃勇荣, 等. 不同植被对石漠化地区土壤纤维素分解酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(18):335-340.
|
| [28] |
陈丹梅, 陈晓明, 梁永江, 等. 轮作对土壤养分,微生物活性及细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(12):56-65.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2015002 |
| [29] |
李鑫, 张秀丽, 孙冰玉, 等. 烤烟连作对耕层土壤酶活性及微生物区系的影响[J]. 土壤, 2012, 44(3):456-460.
|
| [1] | TIAN Qin, DING Xinhui, FENG Xiao, HAN Hongjiang, GOU Chenyang. Comparative Study on Soil-Microbial Biomass Contents and Its Stoichiometry of Different Vegetation Types [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 40-47. |
| [2] | HUANG Yingmei, WU Jialong, LIANG Yongxin, LIANG Chunmei, ZHANG Juntao. Effects of Different Fish Protein Fertilizers on Growth of Bougainvillea and Soil Nutrients [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 48-58. |
| [3] | JIN Xuelan, HU Shengyuan, SHI Lin, MA Yaoyu, YANG Ting, WU Hongliang, KANG Jianhong, FENG Haiping. Effects of Different Fertilization Practices on Organic Carbon and Enzyme Activity in Soil of Continuous Cropping Celery [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 120-127. |
| [4] | XU Fenfen, HAN Jinduo. Root Response Mechanism of Exogenous EBR Regulating Drought Resistance in Soybean Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 53-59. |
| [5] | HUANG Jian, JING Jiyue, LIN Haohan. Research Progress on Application of Different Types of Fertilizers in Tea [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 97-104. |
| [6] | PENG Cuixian, WANG Can, YANG Yuling, LI Ling, LI Guilin, SUN Hongwei, TAO Yonghong. Structural Characteristics of Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Communities in Wild Dendrobium denneanum with Different Growth Years [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 130-140. |
| [7] | LUO Junxia, GUO Zhigang, DUAN Lumei, ZHAO Qianqian, WANG Jing, LI Qing, ZHANG Qiang, AN Xiaoliang, ZHAO Jianbo, LIU Yanmin, LI Guijin, DONG Yajie. Research Progress on Allelopathy and Planting Mode of Garlic [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(6): 85-94. |
| [8] | LUO Guohui, YU Shikang, ZHAI Yangni, GU Huizhan, LI Fucheng, WANG Bin, WU Tao. Characteristics of Allelochemicals and Microbial Diversity in Soils with Different Types of Tobacco Continuous Cropping Obstacles [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(5): 101-108. |
| [9] | SU Yan, ZHAO Xiaoying, CHENG Risheng, XUE Shuqin, ZHANG Yinghua. Characteristics and Comprehensive Evaluation of Major Soil Nutrient Changes in Sunite Desert Grassland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(5): 109-116. |
| [10] | YANG Siqi, XUE Tingting, ZHAO Xinru, GAO Lei, CAO Lingxiao, ZHAO Zhipeng, ZHANG Liang. Structure of Carbon Sequestration Bacterial Community and Screening of Carbon Sequestration Microorganisms in Rhizosphere Soil of Wine Grapes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(5): 117-127. |
| [11] | HU Mingzhu, ZHANG Junjie, SHI Xuerui, WANG Wei, DAI Jinxia. Study on Biological Characteristics and Optimization of Culture Conditions of Two Efficient Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(5): 42-49. |
| [12] | ZHU Yao, WANG Shunwang, YUAN Luyi, LI Wanxian, LI Yonghui, WANG Changmei, WU Kai, JIANG Jinhe, ZHANG Wudi, YIN Fang. Effects of Irrigation Volume of Vegetable Residues Biogas Slurry on Yield and Quality, Soil Enzyme Activity and Nutrients of Edible Dock [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 139-145. |
| [13] | PENG Zicheng, LI Shuaihao, XIE Shirui, YANG Haichang, ZHANG Fenghua, LIU Feng, ZHOU Zhongkai, XU Yunjun. Synergistic Regulatory Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Fertilizer Interaction on Soybean Growth and Soil Nutrients in Saline-alkali Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 109-118. |
| [14] | CHEN Baozhu, HUANG Jichuan, Xu Yanggui, PENG Yiping, Li Zhuxian, LIANG Jianyi, ZHONG Wenliang, YAN Yuwei, TU Yuting. Effects of Different Crop Rotation Patterns on Soil Microbial Ecology in Late Flowering Cabbage Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 93-102. |
| [15] | GU Yu, CHEN Ge, LIU Qiongfeng, ZHOU Junyu, XIE Jian, YANG Zengping, RAO Zhongxiu, LIANG Wandong, ZHANG Li’na, SHENG Hao, WU Haiyong. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Application on Rice Yield and Soil Physicochemical Properties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 120-127. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||