
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 151-156.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0881
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2025-10-23
Revised:2026-01-13
Online:2026-03-18
Published:2026-03-18
CLC Number:
SUN Yongsheng. Nutrient Analysis and Fertilization Recommendation of Facility Soil in Western Liaoning[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(5): 151-156.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0881
| 指标 | 极丰富 | 丰富 | 较丰富 | 适量 | 贫乏 | 极贫乏 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 全氮 | >2 | 1.5~2 | 1~1.5 | 0.75~1 | 0.5~0.75 | <0.5 |
| 全磷 | >1 | 0.8~1 | 0.6~0.8 | 0.4~0.6 | 0.2~0.4 | <0.2 |
| 全钾 | >25 | 20~25 | 15~20 | 10~15 | 5~10 | <5 |
| 交换性钙含量 | >3.5 | 3.0~3.5 | 2.0~3.0 | 1.0~2.0 | ≤1.0 | |
| 交换性镁含量 | >0.15 | 0.1~0.15 | 0.05~0.1 | 0.025~0.05 | ≤0.025 |
| 指标 | 极丰富 | 丰富 | 较丰富 | 适量 | 贫乏 | 极贫乏 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 全氮 | >2 | 1.5~2 | 1~1.5 | 0.75~1 | 0.5~0.75 | <0.5 |
| 全磷 | >1 | 0.8~1 | 0.6~0.8 | 0.4~0.6 | 0.2~0.4 | <0.2 |
| 全钾 | >25 | 20~25 | 15~20 | 10~15 | 5~10 | <5 |
| 交换性钙含量 | >3.5 | 3.0~3.5 | 2.0~3.0 | 1.0~2.0 | ≤1.0 | |
| 交换性镁含量 | >0.15 | 0.1~0.15 | 0.05~0.1 | 0.025~0.05 | ≤0.025 |
| 指标 | 临界值 | 极低 | 低 | 中 | 较高 | 高 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 有机质/(g/kg) | 20 | <10 | 10~20 | 20~30 | 30~40 | ≥40 |
| 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 50 | <25 | 25~50 | 50-100 | 100~150 | ≥150 |
| 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 50 | <25 | 25~50 | 50~100 | 100-150 | ≥150 |
| 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 150 | <100 | 100~150 | 150~200 | 200-300 | ≥300 |
| 指标 | 临界值 | 极低 | 低 | 中 | 较高 | 高 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 有机质/(g/kg) | 20 | <10 | 10~20 | 20~30 | 30~40 | ≥40 |
| 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 50 | <25 | 25~50 | 50-100 | 100~150 | ≥150 |
| 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 50 | <25 | 25~50 | 50~100 | 100-150 | ≥150 |
| 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 150 | <100 | 100~150 | 150~200 | 200-300 | ≥300 |
| 指标 | pH | 全氮/ (g/kg) | 全磷/ (g/kg) | 全钾/ (g/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 交换性钙/ (g/kg) | 交换性镁/ (g/kg) | 全盐/ (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 | 7.06 | 2.41 | 1.55 | 21.26 | 227.55 | 34.15 | 142.38 | 22.48 | 1.95 | 0.24 | 3.65 |
| 标准差 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.45 | 1.74 | 100.02 | 11.63 | 50.19 | 7.65 | 1.08 | 0.15 | 1.24 |
| 变异系数/% | 8 | 28 | 29 | 8 | 44 | 34 | 35 | 34 | 55 | 63 | 34 |
| 指标 | pH | 全氮/ (g/kg) | 全磷/ (g/kg) | 全钾/ (g/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 交换性钙/ (g/kg) | 交换性镁/ (g/kg) | 全盐/ (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 | 7.06 | 2.41 | 1.55 | 21.26 | 227.55 | 34.15 | 142.38 | 22.48 | 1.95 | 0.24 | 3.65 |
| 标准差 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.45 | 1.74 | 100.02 | 11.63 | 50.19 | 7.65 | 1.08 | 0.15 | 1.24 |
| 变异系数/% | 8 | 28 | 29 | 8 | 44 | 34 | 35 | 34 | 55 | 63 | 34 |
| 指标 | pH | 全氮/ (g/kg) | 全磷/ (g/kg) | 全钾/ (g/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 交换性钙/ (g/kg) | 交换性镁/ (g/kg) | 全盐/ (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 | 6.88 | 2.66 | 2.22 | 20.55 | 177.57 | 86.92 | 495.24 | 40.27 | 1.65 | 0.33 | 3.78 |
| 标准差 | 0.40 | 0.74 | 1.09 | 0.61 | 101.69 | 26.74 | 166.36 | 13.23 | 1.66 | 0.13 | 1.82 |
| 变异系数/% | 6 | 28 | 49 | 3 | 57 | 31 | 34 | 33 | 101 | 38 | 48 |
| 指标 | pH | 全氮/ (g/kg) | 全磷/ (g/kg) | 全钾/ (g/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 交换性钙/ (g/kg) | 交换性镁/ (g/kg) | 全盐/ (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 | 6.88 | 2.66 | 2.22 | 20.55 | 177.57 | 86.92 | 495.24 | 40.27 | 1.65 | 0.33 | 3.78 |
| 标准差 | 0.40 | 0.74 | 1.09 | 0.61 | 101.69 | 26.74 | 166.36 | 13.23 | 1.66 | 0.13 | 1.82 |
| 变异系数/% | 6 | 28 | 49 | 3 | 57 | 31 | 34 | 33 | 101 | 38 | 48 |
| 指标 | pH | 全氮/ (g/kg) | 全磷/ (g/kg) | 全钾/ (g/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 交换性钙/ (g/kg) | 交换性镁/ (g/kg) | 全盐/ (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 | 7.26 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 22.74 | 111.40 | 38.29 | 145.33 | 27.97 | 1.85 | 0.28 | 3.99 |
| 标准差 | 0.91 | 0.66 | 0.40 | 2.04 | 52.89 | 14.75 | 80.08 | 12.29 | 2.01 | 0.24 | 2.03 |
| 变异系数/% | 13 | 36 | 32 | 9 | 47 | 39 | 55 | 44 | 109 | 87 | 51 |
| 指标 | pH | 全氮/ (g/kg) | 全磷/ (g/kg) | 全钾/ (g/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 交换性钙/ (g/kg) | 交换性镁/ (g/kg) | 全盐/ (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 | 7.26 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 22.74 | 111.40 | 38.29 | 145.33 | 27.97 | 1.85 | 0.28 | 3.99 |
| 标准差 | 0.91 | 0.66 | 0.40 | 2.04 | 52.89 | 14.75 | 80.08 | 12.29 | 2.01 | 0.24 | 2.03 |
| 变异系数/% | 13 | 36 | 32 | 9 | 47 | 39 | 55 | 44 | 109 | 87 | 51 |
| 指标 | pH | 全氮/ (g/kg) | 全磷/ (g/kg) | 全钾/ (g/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 交换性钙/ (g/kg) | 交换性镁/ (g/kg) | 全盐/ (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 | 6.75 | 2.84 | 0.94 | 25.66 | 179.46 | 54.20 | 290.80 | 37.92 | 2.04 | 0.16 | 5.45 |
| 标准差 | 0.40 | 0.74 | 1.09 | 0.61 | 101.69 | 26.74 | 166.36 | 13.23 | 1.66 | 0.13 | 1.82 |
| 变异系数/% | 6 | 28 | 49 | 3 | 57 | 31 | 34 | 33 | 101 | 38 | 48 |
| 指标 | pH | 全氮/ (g/kg) | 全磷/ (g/kg) | 全钾/ (g/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 交换性钙/ (g/kg) | 交换性镁/ (g/kg) | 全盐/ (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 | 6.75 | 2.84 | 0.94 | 25.66 | 179.46 | 54.20 | 290.80 | 37.92 | 2.04 | 0.16 | 5.45 |
| 标准差 | 0.40 | 0.74 | 1.09 | 0.61 | 101.69 | 26.74 | 166.36 | 13.23 | 1.66 | 0.13 | 1.82 |
| 变异系数/% | 6 | 28 | 49 | 3 | 57 | 31 | 34 | 33 | 101 | 38 | 48 |
| [1] |
董莉, 董文阁, 刘念, 等. 辽西地区设施蔬菜灰霉病菌对4种杀菌剂的抗性检测[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2023(4):69-71.
|
| [2] |
王颖. 辽宁省设施蔬菜施肥现状及建议[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2015(3):49-50.
|
| [3] |
王静, 张玉龙, 张玉玲, 等. 辽宁地区保护地土壤有机质含量及其影响因素的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(2):330-335.
|
| [4] |
范庆锋, 张玉龙, 张玉玲, 等. 辽宁地区保护地土壤酸化现状研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2013(22):173-176.
|
| [5] |
杨淑涵. 辽宁省设施蔬菜施肥现状与土壤肥力状况调研[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学,2018:10.
|
| [6] |
苏敏, 张玉龙, 张玉玲, 等. 辽宁省保护地土壤盐渍化特征的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(2):402-406.
|
| [7] |
黄绍文, 王玉军, 金继运, 等. 我国主要菜区土壤盐分、酸碱性和肥力状况[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(4):906-918.
|
| [8] |
黄绍文, 高伟, 唐继伟, 等. 我国主要菜区耕层土壤盐分总量及离子组成[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(4):965-977.
|
| [9] |
程明琨, 闵炬, 巨昇容, 等. 不同土壤改良措施对大棚菜地高度盐渍化土壤改良效果研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(4)9-16.
|
| [10] |
杨世梅, 王世余, 王翠丽, 等. 不同黄沙、土壤配比对土壤理化性状与番茄生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2025, 38(7):93-100.
|
| [11] |
张福锁, 陈新平. 中国主要作物施肥指南[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社,2009:63-66.
|
| [1] | LI Zihan, MA Yangmin, MA Siyue, SHANG Menghua, WANG Kai, ZHANG Shanshan, WANG Heda, ZHANG Yanhui. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils from Five Different Artemisia Species [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 155-162. |
| [2] | ZHAO Wenhui, JING Yudan, WANG Xiao, WANG Ying, WANG Jiajia. Impact of Organic Alternatives on Soybean Yield and Soil Fertility [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 24-30. |
| [3] | TIAN Qin, DING Xinhui, FENG Xiao, HAN Hongjiang, GOU Chenyang. Comparative Study on Soil-Microbial Biomass Contents and Its Stoichiometry of Different Vegetation Types [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 40-47. |
| [4] | HUANG Yingmei, WU Jialong, LIANG Yongxin, LIANG Chunmei, ZHANG Juntao. Effects of Different Fish Protein Fertilizers on Growth of Bougainvillea and Soil Nutrients [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 48-58. |
| [5] | XU Mingwei, FENG Guojun, LIU Dajun, LIU Chang, YAN Zhishan, ZHANG Taifeng, XU Di, YANG Xiaoxu. Selection of Salt-tolerant Growth-promoting Bacteria and Their Effects on Growth of Common Beans Under Salt Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 59-67. |
| [6] | XIAO Yufan, YIN Shaohe, QIN Ruping, SHI Huaiping, JIN Fengxiang, ZHAO Ruizhi, TIAN Jing, YUAN Sanhong, LI Dewen, LUO Qipeng. Study on Changes of Soil Nutrients and Microbial Stoichiometry in Tobacco Planting Soil with Different Continuous Cropping Years in Malong of Qujing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 92-96. |
| [7] | MA Deli, JU Yingqin, CHEN Cheng. Research on Tea Yield Prediction Based on AquaCrop Model [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 97-106. |
| [8] | XIE Wenlong. Classification of Comprehensive Climatic Index for Cold and Freezing Injury of Passion Fruit in Fujian Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 90-94. |
| [9] | ZHANG Jie, SHAO Wenqi, Ma Hongbo, CHEN Chuan, ZHANG Ankang, LI Chuanzhe. Effect of Slow-release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Fertilizer Utilization Efficiency in Jiangsu Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 104-109. |
| [10] | YAN Hong, CHEN Taichun, FENG Zhizhen, CHEN Zhijie, XU Jin, XU Ximei, DONG Zhen, FU Bo. Effects of Tillage Practices on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Microbial Communities and Yield of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 110-119. |
| [11] | JIN Xuelan, HU Shengyuan, SHI Lin, MA Yaoyu, YANG Ting, WU Hongliang, KANG Jianhong, FENG Haiping. Effects of Different Fertilization Practices on Organic Carbon and Enzyme Activity in Soil of Continuous Cropping Celery [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 120-127. |
| [12] | WANG Zhiping, SHI Yantong, NIE Qing, HU Xiaoyi, AN Shunwei, WANG Fuli, QU Mingshan, XU Jin, XIAO Ting, GAO Fei, ZHANG Chunhong. Overview of Soil Nutrient Rapid Analysis Technology and Application [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 133-141. |
| [13] | LIANG Ping, LI Wei, WEI Bo, LONG Xianju, SHU Ziqian, XU Lian'e. Optimum Temperature Indicators for Sowing Period of Waxy Foxtail Millet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 150-155. |
| [14] | LI Guolong, LU Zhaohua, YAO Jieling, MA Liuyin, YANG Deming, XU Jianmin, HU Zhikang, ZHANG Yundong, XIONG Shan, LI Guangyou. Effect of Pruning on Growth and Carbon Sequestration Benefits of Eucalyptus 107 Clone [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 70-76. |
| [15] | GUAN Xilin, TIAN Shenzhong, LIU Zhentian, DONG Qinde, DONG Liang, LI Qiang, GAO Xinhao, BIAN Wenfan, ZHANG Yufeng. Effects of Different Application Rates of Soybean Phospholipid Amendments on Yield and Nutrients Uptake in Maize-Wheat Rotation System [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 8-14. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
