Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 11-18.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18110023
Special Issue: 马铃薯
Previous Articles Next Articles
Chen Lili1, Wang Haoying2, Gong Xiaochen2, Xue Xuzhang3, Hu Yuegao2()
Received:
2018-11-07
Revised:
2019-02-20
Online:
2020-02-25
Published:
2020-02-22
Contact:
Hu Yuegao
E-mail:huyuegao@cau.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Chen Lili, Wang Haoying, Gong Xiaochen, Xue Xuzhang, Hu Yuegao. Effects of LED Spectrum Treatments at in vitro Culture Stage on the Growth and Minituber Production of Potato Plantlets After Transplanting in Greenhouse[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(6): 11-18.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18110023
日期 | 处理 | 植株鲜重 | 植株干重 | 叶片鲜重 | 叶片干重 | 茎秆鲜重 | 茎秆干重 | 地下鲜重 | 地下干重 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10月15日 | R | 9.13±0.59b | 0.96±0.01b | 4.69±0.12b | 0.52±0.01b | 3.36±0.12b | 0.31±0.01b | 1.08±0.01ab | 0.20±0.01ab |
B | 16.3±0.98a | 1.68±0.01a | 7.87±0.14a | 0.78±0.00a | 6.35±0.23a | 0.49±0.01a | 2.16±0.28a | 0.41±0.01a | |
G | 8.37±0.34b | 0.72±0.01b | 3.79±0.11b | 0.34±0.01b | 3.99±0.32b | 0.25±0.01b | 0.60±0.03b | 0.12±0.01b | |
CK | 10.2±0.87b | 0.96±0.01b | 4.34±0.17b | 0.39±0.01b | 4.37±0.28b | 0.29±0.01b | 1.52±0.02ab | 0.28±0.01ab | |
RB | 8.58±0.57b | 1.02±0.01b | 3.78±0.15b | 0.34±0.01b | 3.74±0.27b | 0.25±0.01b | 1.06±0.01ab | 0.20±0.01ab | |
RBG | 11.0±0.87b | 1.09±0.01b | 4.84±0.10b | 0.46±0.01b | 4.47±0.19b | 0.30±0.01b | 1.74±0.02ab | 0.32±0.01ab | |
10月30日 | R | 16.46±1.02bc | 2.02±0.16cd | 5.54±0.21ab | 0.35±0.01ab | 5.34±0.41ab | 0.29±0.01ab | 5.58±0.54cd | 0.89±0.01cd |
B | 27.32±2.04a | 3.66±0.12a | 7.08±0.58a | 0.59±0.01a | 5.86±0.34a | 0.37±0.01a | 14.39±1.12a | 2.71±0.01a | |
G | 9.48±0.98c | 1.02±0.02d | 3.14±0.38b | 0.22±0.01b | 2.77±0.39c | 0.15±0.01c | 3.58±0.43d | 0.58±0.01d | |
CK | 21.55±2.27ab | 2.85±0.15ab | 6.30±0.28a | 0.45±0.01ab | 4.23±0.58bc | 0.26±0.01b | 11.02±2.15bc | 2.08±0.34ab | |
RB | 17.38±1.58b | 2.20±0.11bc | 5.98±0.83ab | 0.39±0.01ab | 3,76±0.78bc | 0.22±0.01bc | 8.23±0.89bc | 1.49±0.01bc | |
RBG | 21.05±2.06ab | 2.80±0.21ab | 5.83±0.24ab | 0.45±0.01ab | 3.80±0.56bc | 0.24±0.01bc | 11.43±1.12bc | 2.10±0.01ab | |
11月15日 | R | 17.14±1.20bc | 2.06±0.02cd | 2.57±0.38bc | 0.22±0.01cd | 1.90±0.24c | 0.12±0.01c | 6.67±1.22c | 1.30±0.23cd |
B | 30.63±3.29a | 5.71±0.32a | 6.64±0.49a | 0.58±0.01a | 4.81±0.57a | 0.38±0.01a | 19.38±1.54a | 4.48±0.27a | |
G | 9.10±1.12c | 1.21±0.01d | 1.76±0.21c | 0.14±0.01d | 1.78±0.24c | 0.12±0.01c | 5.56±0.78c | 0.96±0.01d | |
CK | 22.80±2.34b | 4.07±0.21bc | 3.77±0.24b | 0.34±0.01b | 2.85±0.26b | 0.21±0.01b | 14.17±2.23ab | 3.53±0.89ab | |
RB | 17.57±1.27bc | 3.95±0.01bc | 3.75±0.49b | 0.31±0.01bc | 2.59±0.35bc | 0.18±0.01bc | 10.23±1.23bc | 2.46±0.97c | |
RBG | 22.49±2.13bc | 4.40±0.12b | 4.46±0.57ab | 0.41±0.01ab | 2.13±0.25bc | 0.15±0.01bc | 13.01±1.24ab | 3.27±0.45ab |
日期 | 处理 | 植株鲜重 | 植株干重 | 叶片鲜重 | 叶片干重 | 茎秆鲜重 | 茎秆干重 | 地下鲜重 | 地下干重 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10月15日 | R | 9.13±0.59b | 0.96±0.01b | 4.69±0.12b | 0.52±0.01b | 3.36±0.12b | 0.31±0.01b | 1.08±0.01ab | 0.20±0.01ab |
B | 16.3±0.98a | 1.68±0.01a | 7.87±0.14a | 0.78±0.00a | 6.35±0.23a | 0.49±0.01a | 2.16±0.28a | 0.41±0.01a | |
G | 8.37±0.34b | 0.72±0.01b | 3.79±0.11b | 0.34±0.01b | 3.99±0.32b | 0.25±0.01b | 0.60±0.03b | 0.12±0.01b | |
CK | 10.2±0.87b | 0.96±0.01b | 4.34±0.17b | 0.39±0.01b | 4.37±0.28b | 0.29±0.01b | 1.52±0.02ab | 0.28±0.01ab | |
RB | 8.58±0.57b | 1.02±0.01b | 3.78±0.15b | 0.34±0.01b | 3.74±0.27b | 0.25±0.01b | 1.06±0.01ab | 0.20±0.01ab | |
RBG | 11.0±0.87b | 1.09±0.01b | 4.84±0.10b | 0.46±0.01b | 4.47±0.19b | 0.30±0.01b | 1.74±0.02ab | 0.32±0.01ab | |
10月30日 | R | 16.46±1.02bc | 2.02±0.16cd | 5.54±0.21ab | 0.35±0.01ab | 5.34±0.41ab | 0.29±0.01ab | 5.58±0.54cd | 0.89±0.01cd |
B | 27.32±2.04a | 3.66±0.12a | 7.08±0.58a | 0.59±0.01a | 5.86±0.34a | 0.37±0.01a | 14.39±1.12a | 2.71±0.01a | |
G | 9.48±0.98c | 1.02±0.02d | 3.14±0.38b | 0.22±0.01b | 2.77±0.39c | 0.15±0.01c | 3.58±0.43d | 0.58±0.01d | |
CK | 21.55±2.27ab | 2.85±0.15ab | 6.30±0.28a | 0.45±0.01ab | 4.23±0.58bc | 0.26±0.01b | 11.02±2.15bc | 2.08±0.34ab | |
RB | 17.38±1.58b | 2.20±0.11bc | 5.98±0.83ab | 0.39±0.01ab | 3,76±0.78bc | 0.22±0.01bc | 8.23±0.89bc | 1.49±0.01bc | |
RBG | 21.05±2.06ab | 2.80±0.21ab | 5.83±0.24ab | 0.45±0.01ab | 3.80±0.56bc | 0.24±0.01bc | 11.43±1.12bc | 2.10±0.01ab | |
11月15日 | R | 17.14±1.20bc | 2.06±0.02cd | 2.57±0.38bc | 0.22±0.01cd | 1.90±0.24c | 0.12±0.01c | 6.67±1.22c | 1.30±0.23cd |
B | 30.63±3.29a | 5.71±0.32a | 6.64±0.49a | 0.58±0.01a | 4.81±0.57a | 0.38±0.01a | 19.38±1.54a | 4.48±0.27a | |
G | 9.10±1.12c | 1.21±0.01d | 1.76±0.21c | 0.14±0.01d | 1.78±0.24c | 0.12±0.01c | 5.56±0.78c | 0.96±0.01d | |
CK | 22.80±2.34b | 4.07±0.21bc | 3.77±0.24b | 0.34±0.01b | 2.85±0.26b | 0.21±0.01b | 14.17±2.23ab | 3.53±0.89ab | |
RB | 17.57±1.27bc | 3.95±0.01bc | 3.75±0.49b | 0.31±0.01bc | 2.59±0.35bc | 0.18±0.01bc | 10.23±1.23bc | 2.46±0.97c | |
RBG | 22.49±2.13bc | 4.40±0.12b | 4.46±0.57ab | 0.41±0.01ab | 2.13±0.25bc | 0.15±0.01bc | 13.01±1.24ab | 3.27±0.45ab |
处理 | 薯块分级占比/% | 结薯数目/(粒/株) | 最大薯鲜重/g | 最大薯干重/g | 单株薯鲜重/(g/株) | 单株薯干重/(g/株) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<20 mm | >20 mm | ||||||
R | 79.08±2.23a | 20.92±2.23c | 3.42±0.67a | 3.32±0.84c | 0.96±0.02c | 5.14±0.68c | 1.98±0.25c |
B | 4.18±1.46d | 95.82±1.46a | 2.24±0.54b | 9.17±1.23a | 3.19±0.32a | 13.94±1.01b | 3.06±0.35b |
G | 82.12±4.89a | 17.88±4.89d | 2.03±0.71b | 3.13±0.86c | 0.82±0.25c | 4.35±0.47d | 1.02±0.07d |
CK | 15.11±3.47b | 84.89±3.47b | 2.50±0.59b | 6.32±1.48b | 2.19±0.93b | 17.57±1.84ab | 4.46±0.82a |
RB | 16.27±3.53b | 83.73±3.53b | 2.45±0.81b | 5.36±1.19b | 2.05±0.26b | 16.81±2.17ab | 3.87±0.74ab |
RBG | 12.79±4.09c | 87.21±4.09b | 2.33±0.92b | 5.25±1.06b | 2.08±0.52b | 18.86±2.01a | 4.98±0.85a |
处理 | 薯块分级占比/% | 结薯数目/(粒/株) | 最大薯鲜重/g | 最大薯干重/g | 单株薯鲜重/(g/株) | 单株薯干重/(g/株) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<20 mm | >20 mm | ||||||
R | 79.08±2.23a | 20.92±2.23c | 3.42±0.67a | 3.32±0.84c | 0.96±0.02c | 5.14±0.68c | 1.98±0.25c |
B | 4.18±1.46d | 95.82±1.46a | 2.24±0.54b | 9.17±1.23a | 3.19±0.32a | 13.94±1.01b | 3.06±0.35b |
G | 82.12±4.89a | 17.88±4.89d | 2.03±0.71b | 3.13±0.86c | 0.82±0.25c | 4.35±0.47d | 1.02±0.07d |
CK | 15.11±3.47b | 84.89±3.47b | 2.50±0.59b | 6.32±1.48b | 2.19±0.93b | 17.57±1.84ab | 4.46±0.82a |
RB | 16.27±3.53b | 83.73±3.53b | 2.45±0.81b | 5.36±1.19b | 2.05±0.26b | 16.81±2.17ab | 3.87±0.74ab |
RBG | 12.79±4.09c | 87.21±4.09b | 2.33±0.92b | 5.25±1.06b | 2.08±0.52b | 18.86±2.01a | 4.98±0.85a |
[1] | 王秀丽, 马云倩, 郭燕枝 , 等. 马铃薯的世界传播及对中国主食产业开发的启示[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(35):227-231. |
[2] | 范国权, 吕典秋, 高艳玲 , 等. 中国马铃薯种薯质量检测认证现状及建议[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2018,32(3):184-190. |
[3] | Tadesse M, Lommen W J M, Struik P C . Effects of temperature pre-treatment of transplants from in vitro produced potato plantlets on transplant growth and yield in the field[J]. Potato Research, 2001,44(2):173-185. |
[4] | Seabrook J E A, Percy J E, Douglass L K , et al. Photoperiod in vitro affects subsequent yield of greenhouse-grown potato tubers[J]. American Potato Journal, 1995,72(6):365-373. |
[5] | Milinkovic M, Horstra C B, Rodoni B C , et al. Effects of age and pretreatment of tissue-cultured potato plants on subsequent minituber production[J]. Potato Research, 2012,55(1):15-25. |
[6] | Seabrook J E A . Light effects on the growth and morphogenesis of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in vitro a review[J]. American Journal of Potato Research, 2005,82(5):353-367. |
[7] | Miyashita Y, Kitaya Y, Kozai T . Effects of red and far-red light on the growth and morphology of potato plantlets in vitro using light emitting diode as a light source for micropropagation[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 1995,393(418):189-194. |
[8] | Vinterhalter D, Vinterhalter B, Orbović V . Photo- and gravitropic bending of potato plantlets obtained in vitro from single-node explants[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2012,31(4):560-569. |
[9] | Aksenova N P, Konstantinova T N, Sergeeva L I , et al. Morphogenesis of potato plants in vitro I. effect of light quality and hormones[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 1994,13(3):143-146. |
[10] | Chen L L, Xue X Z, Yang Y D , et al. Effects of red and blue LEDs on in vitro growth and microtuberization of potato single-node cuttings[J]. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2018,5(2):197-205. |
[11] | Ma X F, Wang Y P, Liu M X , et al. Effects of green and red lights on the growth and morphogenesis of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plantlets in vitro[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2015,190:104-109. |
[12] | Murashige T, Skoog F . A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1962,15(3):473-497. |
[13] | 任媛媛, 朱延林, 张江涛 , 等. 盐胁迫对刺槐幼苗叶绿素荧光及叶片解剖学结构的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018,34(18):29-35. |
[14] | 钱永强, 周晓星, 韩蕾 , 等. Cd 2+胁迫对银芽柳PSⅡ叶绿素荧光响应曲线的影响 [J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(20):6134-6142. |
[15] | 向芬, 周强, 田向荣 , 等. 不同生境吉首蒲儿根叶片形态和叶绿素荧光特征的比较[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(2):337-344. |
[16] | 内蒙古大学内蒙古工程技术研究中心, 中国标准化研究院, 中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所, 等. GB/T 29378—2012.马铃薯脱毒种薯生产技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012: 4. |
[17] | Van D J, Kooman P L, Struik P C . Effects of temperature and photoperiod on early growth and final number of tubers in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)[J]. Potato Research, 1996,39(1):51-62. |
[18] | 乔建磊, 于海业, 宋述尧 , 等. 氮素形态对马铃薯叶片光合色素及其荧光特征的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2013,3:39-44. |
[19] | Hazarika B N . Morpho-physiological disorders in in vitro culture of plants[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2006,108(2):105-120. |
[20] | Maxwell K, Johnson G N . Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2000,51(345):659-668. |
[21] | 张晓勇, 杨友联, 李树江 , 等. 外源激素对低温胁迫下脱毒马铃薯扦插苗早衰的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018,4:95-101. |
[22] | 王玉萍, 周晓洁, 卢潇 , 等. 土壤紧实度对马铃薯根系、匍匐茎、产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016,36(6):1590-1596. |
[23] | 陈丽丽, 祁香雪, 宫晓晨 , 等. 生物菌肥对有机种植马铃薯生长和产量的影响[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2018,32(4):229-234. |
[24] | 叶怡然, 达布希拉图, 沙本才 , 等. 不同肥料对冬马铃薯光合特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018,3:135-140. |
[25] | Jao R C, Lai C C, Fang W , et al. Effects of red light on the growth of Zantedschia plantlets in vitro and tuber formation using light-emitting diodes[J]. Hortscience, 2005,40(2):436-438. |
[1] | ZENG Quan, SHI Guoying, SU Lin, YE Xuelian, HU Chunjin. Organic Fertilizer Production with Fermentation and Composting of Chicken Manure Promoted by Flammulina Chaff [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 44-50. |
[2] | Zhao Xuetong, Xu Siqi, Zhang Qi, Pan Wenzheng, Shang Haili, Wang Bin, Wang Jingxian, Zhao Rongbiao. Effect of Walnut Special Bio-organic-inorganic Compound Fertilizer on Walnut Planting [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(11): 108-113. |
[3] | Zhang Qi, Xu Siqi, Zhao Xuetong, Pan Wenzheng, Shang Haili, Wang Jingxian, Zhao Rongbiao. Special High-efficient Microorganisms for Dissolving Phosphorus, Potassium and Growth-promoting of Walnut: Screening and Compounding [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(34): 64-70. |
[4] | Wang Zhen, Yu Xiaofang, Gao Julin, Qinggeer , Hu Shuping, Han Shengcai, Naoganchaolu . Composite Microbial System GF-20 Degrading Corn Stalk: Powder Formulation and Degradation Effect [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(21): 69-74. |
[5] | . Effect of Microbial Fertilizer on Buckwheat Growth and Soil Nutrients in Tibet: Under Different Nitrogen Applications [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(32): 79-83. |
[6] | . Effects of Two Different Soil Amendments on Bacterial Communities of Strawberry Planting Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(18): 60-66. |
[7] | . Bio-organic Fertilizer: Application and Farmland Environmental Effects [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(14): 82-88. |
[8] | Li Chao,Xiao Xiaoping,Tang Haiming,Wang Ke,Cheng Kaikai,Tang Wenguang and Yang Guangli. Effects of Growing-microbial Agents on Yield, Soil Nutrients and Heavy Metal Cd of Double Cropping Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(29): 1-6. |
[9] | . Effect of Wheat Straw Returning with Different Organic Matter-decomposing Inoculants (OMIs) on the Yield of Rice, the Decomposition of Straw and Soil Nutrients [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(35): 270-276. |
[10] | . Effects of AB Biological-organic Fertilizer on Soil Biological Characteristics and Fertility [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(23): 214-219. |
[11] | . Effects of Microbial Organic Fertilizer on Saline-alkali Soil Nutrient and Maize Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(21): 182-186. |
[12] | . Effect on Water, Fertilizer and Light Use Efficiency of Maize under Biological Bacterial Fertilizer and Chemical Fertilizer Reduction [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(3): 76-79. |
[13] | . Effecet of Biological Manure Fertilizer on Yield and quality of Rice(1) [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(6): 146-150. |
[14] | Wei Jingfeng Wen Zhaoming. The Effects of Man Yuan Chun Brand Bio-organic Fertilizers on The Organic Tea Garden [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(8): 250-250. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||