Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (15): 80-87.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0502
Previous Articles Next Articles
YIN Meili1(), ZHANG Kaiyu1(
), KANG Furen1, ZHANG Xin1, ZHANG Sheng2, ZHANG Yan2, LI Qiang1, ZHENG Jiewen1, CAO Taotao1
Received:
2023-07-04
Revised:
2023-11-08
Online:
2024-05-23
Published:
2024-05-23
YIN Meili, ZHANG Kaiyu, KANG Furen, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Sheng, ZHANG Yan, LI Qiang, ZHENG Jiewen, CAO Taotao. Effect of Compound Conditioner on Conditioning of Saline-alkali Soil and Growth of Tall Fescue in Northern Shaanxi[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(15): 80-87.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0502
处理 | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 6.70±0.14c | 57.67±1.53c | 21.96±1.23d | 1.03±0.09c |
HL1 | 7.18±0.13c | 198±14.42b | 29.04±1.23c | 2.75±0.25c |
HL2 | 15.63±1.17b | 250.33±43.84b | 45.57±1.64b | 16.75±2.88b |
HL3 | 34.08±4.47a | 1103.33±47.26a | 97.52±5.22a | 28.25±2.52a |
处理 | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 6.70±0.14c | 57.67±1.53c | 21.96±1.23d | 1.03±0.09c |
HL1 | 7.18±0.13c | 198±14.42b | 29.04±1.23c | 2.75±0.25c |
HL2 | 15.63±1.17b | 250.33±43.84b | 45.57±1.64b | 16.75±2.88b |
HL3 | 34.08±4.47a | 1103.33±47.26a | 97.52±5.22a | 28.25±2.52a |
处理 | 出苗率/% | 株高/cm | 茎粗/mm | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 89.3±2.17a | 35±1.06c | 3.08±0.46b | 22.18±1.81c | 5.01±0.43c |
HL1 | 89.3±1.79a | 41.14±3.56b | 3.41±0.32ab | 27.6±2.17b | 6.07±0.38b |
HL2 | 90.7±2.77a | 41.2±2.68b | 3.91±0.40a | 24.88±2.44bc | 7.16±0.75a |
HL3 | 31.3±6.23b | 48.6±1.64a | 3.92±0.58a | 31.74±1.82a | 7.17±1.12a |
处理 | 出苗率/% | 株高/cm | 茎粗/mm | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 89.3±2.17a | 35±1.06c | 3.08±0.46b | 22.18±1.81c | 5.01±0.43c |
HL1 | 89.3±1.79a | 41.14±3.56b | 3.41±0.32ab | 27.6±2.17b | 6.07±0.38b |
HL2 | 90.7±2.77a | 41.2±2.68b | 3.91±0.40a | 24.88±2.44bc | 7.16±0.75a |
HL3 | 31.3±6.23b | 48.6±1.64a | 3.92±0.58a | 31.74±1.82a | 7.17±1.12a |
指标 | pH | 有机质 | 速效钾 | 碱解氮 | 有效磷 | 总碱度 | SAR | 出苗率 | 株高 | 茎粗 | 叶长 | 叶宽 | 地上部干重 | 地下部干重 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1 | -0.25 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.30 | -0.08 | 0.13 | -0.28 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.21 | 0.10 |
Y2 | 0.29 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 0.13 | -0.28 | 0.01 | -0.15 | 0.03 | -0.19 | -0.40 | -0.47 |
指标 | pH | 有机质 | 速效钾 | 碱解氮 | 有效磷 | 总碱度 | SAR | 出苗率 | 株高 | 茎粗 | 叶长 | 叶宽 | 地上部干重 | 地下部干重 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1 | -0.25 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.30 | -0.08 | 0.13 | -0.28 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.21 | 0.10 |
Y2 | 0.29 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 0.13 | -0.28 | 0.01 | -0.15 | 0.03 | -0.19 | -0.40 | -0.47 |
[1] |
勤瑞. 盐碱化对土壤物理及水动力学性质的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2011.
|
[2] |
胡一, 韩霁昌, 杜宜春, 等. 陕西盐碱地分布成因与开发造田模式分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(11):301-303.
|
[3] |
齐雁冰. 陕北农牧交错带荒漠化土壤发生特性与演变机制研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2006.
|
[4] |
姜龙. 燃煤电厂粉煤灰综合利用现状及发展建议[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2020, 26(4):31-39.
|
[5] |
赵江, 王云康, 王建友, 等. 榆林市工业固体废弃物现状与应用进展[J]. 工业催化, 2022, 30(3):1-7.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1143.2022.03.001 |
[6] |
榆林市2021年度固体废物污染环境防治信息[OL]. 榆林市生态环境局, 2022.
|
[7] |
韩晓芳, 田晓明, 杨永利, 等. 2种土壤复合改良剂对滨海盐渍土的改良及肥力作用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5):54-59.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0486 |
[8] |
|
[9] |
黄河. 不同改良剂对盐碱土的影响研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2015.
|
[10] |
武琳, 郑永红, 张治国, 等. 粉煤灰用作土壤改良剂的养分和污染风险评价[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(9):219-227.
|
[11] |
郭霞, 张凯. 木醋液在农业方面的应用研究[J]. 农业科技与装备, 2017(11):66-67.
|
[12] |
周红娟, 耿玉清, 丛日春, 等. 木醋液对盐碱土化学性质、酶活性及相关性的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2016, 47(1):105-111.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
梁凤臣, 张丽丽, 李艳, 等. 木醋液浸种对西葫芦种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(16):51-55.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16020035 |
[16] |
马梦谣, 马红媛, 李绍阳, 等. 木醋液引发对盐胁迫下羊草种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(8):1588-1593.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
李玉晨. 不同类型黄腐酸对土壤性质及生菜生长特征的影响研究[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2021.
|
[19] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第三版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
[20] |
中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社.
|
[21] |
高惠敏, 王相平, 屈忠义, 等. 不同改良剂对河套灌区土壤盐碱指标及作物产量的影响研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2020, 51(5):1172-1179.
|
[22] |
李燕青, 车升国, 李壮, 等. 粪肥类型影响苹果苗定植成活率因素初探[J]. 北方园艺, 2019(7):101-106.
|
[23] |
邹璐. 盐碱地施用脱硫石膏对土壤理化性质和油葵生长的影响[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2012.
|
[24] |
孙金龙. 木醋液对盐碱土水盐运移的影响及应用研究[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2016.
|
[25] |
于雷, 沈威, 王敏, 等. 木醋液在盐碱地土壤改良中的应用[J]. 温带林业研究, 2022, 5(3):60-64.
|
[26] |
唐晓倩. 木醋液和牛粪配施对盐碱土化学性质和微生物群落结构的影响[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2019.
|
[27] |
王鼎. 复合土壤调理剂对内蒙古河套灌区盐碱土治理效果研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2020.
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
于菲, 赵硕, 赵影, 等. 长期施用有机肥对松嫩平原西部盐碱土肥力和玉米产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2022, 40(2):172-180.
|
[33] |
范春丽, 雷志华, 曲金柱. 灌施石榴皮木醋液对盐碱地土壤性质及石榴果实品质的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2018, 47(1):97-100,103.
|
[34] |
杨宇, 金强, 卢国政, 等. 生化黄腐酸土壤改良剂对盐碱菜田土壤改良效果研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(4):1931-1932.
|
[35] |
朱天奇, 鲁泽宇, 胡桑源, 等. 盐胁迫对两个高羊茅品种幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8):2082-2088.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.08.019 |
[36] |
|
[37] |
欧彦君. 粉媒灰基新型多功能土埴调理剂增产提质机理[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2021.
|
[38] |
高子栋, 展琳琳. 浅谈我国脱硫石膏环保资源化综合利用现状[J]. 砖瓦, 2022(6):44-46,49.
|
[39] |
王蒙. 神东矿区脱硫石膏和粉煤灰改良盐碱地的配比模式研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2021.
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
黄春琼, 刘国道, 白昌军. 41份结缕草属种质资源耐盐性评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2017, 38(7):1260-1266.
|
[44] |
李忠徽, 王旭东. 灌施木醋液对土壤性质和植物生长的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(2):510-516.
|
[45] |
常青, 王永亮, 杨治平, 等. 木醋液对土壤pH、EC与茄子叶片光合特性及根系发育的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(3):322-328.
|
[46] |
|
[1] | CHEN Rui, CUI Zeyuan, LI Zhi, GENG Gui, YU Lihua. The Effect of AM Fungi on Crop Growth in Continuous Cropping Soils: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 1-8. |
[2] | DONG Yao, YU Huwei, LIU Zhishuo, ZHAO Xiufang, RONG Yuping. Research on the Characteristics of River Substrates in Dongguan and Their Feasibility as Greening Planting Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(5): 69-73. |
[3] | LIAO Yimin, ZHENG Mingjie, ZHANG Mingkui. Effects of Topography and Land-use Modes on Properties of Purple Soils [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 81-86. |
[4] | LIU Qingsong, JIA Yanli, XU Yupeng, XIAO Yu, LIU Guixia, TENG Xiao, QU Xinyue, LI Hongbo, YAN Xudong. Effects of Different Amounts of Cow Manure Returning to Field on Alfalfa Growth, Soil Physical and Chemical Properties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(15): 159-164. |
[5] | HUANG Lei, ZHONG Shuai, LUO Zhigang, LI Yimeng, YANG Xiaodong, SHEN Si, YUAN Yanhua, GAO Qunyu. Effect of Antioxidants on the Storage Quality of Tobacco Leaves After Nitrogen-enriched Air Conditioning and Dispersion [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(1): 112-117. |
[6] | LIU Yu, LI Ping, ZHAO Kaili, YAN Shi, LIU Jipei, LIU Lei, GUO Ning. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Application of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrients of Celery [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 63-68. |
[7] | ZHENG Wei, YUAN Longzhen, WANG Jianhua, YANG Yao, WU Chuanguang, HUANG Ying, YOU Ping, XUE Xiaohui. Culturable Microorganism Diversity and Physicochemical Properties of Soil in the Reclamation Area of Coal Mine Wasteland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 81-87. |
[8] | ZHU Ling, DENG Shixin, LEI Lujia, GUI Renyi. Effect of Vertical Pipe Aeration on Phyllostachys violascens Growth Under Mulching [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 55-62. |
[9] | TANG Weidong, WEI Linyuan, KANG Caizhou, WANG Duoze, QIU Xiaona, ZHANG Weixing, ZHANG Xiaojuan. Soil Physicochemical Properties of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica Plantations of Different Ages in Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 93-98. |
[10] | GUAN Tikun, LIU Zilu, LI Xiaoyu, WANG Jianli, HOU Shuangying, LIU Xushan, XU Shiyi, CHEN Qingjun, ZHANG Guoqing. Biochar from Spent Mushroom Substrate of Industrial Pleurotus eryngii: Preparation Process and Quality Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 71-79. |
[11] | YANG Maoqi, GUO Xiaowen, ZHOU Yongxue, GUO Huijuan, MIN Wei. Effects of Returning Cotton Straw and Biochar to Cotton Field on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Water-nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of Cotton [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(26): 76-85. |
[12] | ZENG Jie, YU Lang, DABU Xilatu, LI Yunju. Effects of Phosphorus-based Soil Conditioner on Growth of Chinese Cabbage in Low-phosphorus Red Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 81-87. |
[13] | WANG Lina, YANG Ying, Du Su. Effects of Biochar Application on Saline-alkali Soil: Research Status [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 81-87. |
[14] | HUANG Hao, XIE Jin, YUAN Wenbin, WANG Chuliang, CHEN Kunhua, ZENG Fandong, LIANG Zengfa, SU Zhao, WANG Wei. Effects of Different Organic Materials on Root Characteristics and Accumulation of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 51-57. |
[15] | HAN Xiaofang, TIAN Xiaoming, YANG Yongli, ZHANG Jingzhi, ZHANG Qing, ZHANG Kai, ZHANG Tao, JIA Lin. Two Soil Compound Amendments: Improvement and Fertility Effect on Coastal Saline Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 54-59. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||