Study on Yielding Ability, Stability and Adaptability in Maize Based on GGE-Biplot

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0431

Abstract

Abstract:

The aims were to explore the main functions and characteristics of GGE double plot, and to select new maize varieties with high and stable yield. In this study, the yield data of 5 new maize combinations in 7 experimental sites were analyzed by GGE-biplot, the high yield, stable yield and adaptability of maize varieties tested at high altitudes in northwest Guizhou were evaluated, and the discrimination and representativeness of the test sites were analyzed. The results showed that the experimental sites could be divided into two ecological zones, with Panzhou as an ecological zone and Liupanshui, Hezhang, Dafang, Nayong, Shuicheng and Weining as an ecological zone. ‘Huinongdan No.5’ performed well in high and stable yield. The results showed that Panzhou and Dafang were the best experimental sites with high discrimination and good representativeness. This study provided a theoretical basis for comprehensive evaluation of new maize varieties and selection of experimental sites.

Key words: maize, adaptability, genotype and environment interaction, representativeness, GGE-biplot, high yield, stable yield, ecological zoning

TANG Yi, LIU Jianxin, LI Qingchao, GE Pingzhen. Study on Yielding Ability, Stability and Adaptability in Maize Based on GGE-Biplot[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(18): 9-13.

Figures/Tables 5

References 26

[1]	黄勇, 成马丽, 蒋燕, 等. 毕节地区玉米生产条件分析与发展对策[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2008(2):54-55.
[2]	许乃银, 陈旭升, 狄佳春, 等. 长江流域棉花纤维品质的区域特征研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2003, 15(4):221-226.
[3]	魏常敏, 许卫猛, 邢永锋, 等. AMMI模型和GGE双标图在黄淮海甜玉米中的应用[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(17):5909-5916.
[4]	YAN W, HUNT L A, SHENG Q L, et al. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot[J]. Crop science, 2000, 40(3):597-605.
[5]	YAN W. GGEbiplot - A windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two-way data[J]. Agronomy journal, 2001, 93(5):1111-1118.
[6]	YAN W, KANG M S. GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists[M]. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2003.
[7]	李武, 谢德意, 赵付安, 等. GGE双标图对短季棉新品系和试点的评价及产量相关性状分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2014(8):1157-1159, 1162.
[8]	王磊, 程本义, 鄂志国, 等. 基于GGE双标图的水稻区试品种丰产性、稳产性和适应性评价[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(4):408-416. doi: 10．3969/j．issn．1001G7216．2015．04．010
[9]	崔同霞, 张保军, 姚友旭, 等. 基于GGE双标图法的甘肃省西片区域春小麦新品种的丰产性及适应性评价[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2022, 57(3):58-65.
[10]	肖继兵, 刘志, 孔凡信, 等. 基于GGE双标图的高粱品种农艺性状和稳产性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2023(2):36-45.
[11]	余泽恩, 罗莉霞, 张芳, 等. 基于GGE双标图的国家冬油菜区试长江中游区环境及品种适应性评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(6):20-27.
[12]	谢文锦, 李方明, 李宁, 等. 基于R语言双标图的青贮玉米丰产稳产性评价[J]. 中国种业, 2023(2):90-94.
[13]	王磊, 程本义, 鄂之国, 等. 基于GGE双标图的水稻区试品种丰产性、稳产性和适应性评价[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(4):408-416. doi: 10．3969/j．issn．1001G7216．2015．04．010
[14]	张群远, 孔繁玲, 廖琴, 等. 作物品种区域试验的评价体系及评价方法[J]. 农业系统科学与综合研究, 2000, 16(2):81-86.
[15]	杨仕华, 廖琴. 中国水稻品种试验与审定[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学出版社, 2005.
[16]	曾旭辉, 彭宏, 蒋厚良, 等. 利用R语言GGE双标图评价玉米区域试验——以2018年江苏淮北玉米区域试验为例[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(5):60-66.
[17]	张祯勇, 高明文, 徐国伦, 等. 基于R语言的GGE双标图在玉米品种区域试验中的应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(34):238-243. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-1448
[18]	金石桥, 许乃银. GGE双标图在中国农作物品种试验中应用的必要性探讨[J]. 种子, 2012, 31(12):89-92.
[19]	严威凯, 盛庆来, 胡跃高, 等. GGE叠图法分析品种环境互作模式的理想方法[J]. 作物学报, 2001, 27(1):21-28.
[20]	吴珊珊, 张春原, 毛振武, 等. 基于双标图的京津冀早熟夏玉米品种区域试验综合分析[J]. 种子, 2021, 40(11):74-81.
[21]	余泽恩, 罗莉霞, 张芳, 等. 基于GEE的2018年我国冬油菜长江下游区域试验试点与品种评价[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(1):122-131.
[22]	张志芬, 付晓峰, 刘俊青, 等. GGE双标图分析燕麦区域试验品系产量稳定性及试点代表性[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(8):1377-1385.
[23]	常磊, 柴守玺. GGE双标图在我国旱地春小麦稳产性分析中的应用[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(5):988-994.
[24]	周长军, 李泽宇, 王迪, 等. GGE双标图分析黑龙江省联合体玉米试验品种适应性和稳定性[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2020(8):1-5.
[25]	崔顺立, 何美敬, 侯名语, 等. 利用GGE双标图分析花生品质性状的基因型―环境互作[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2021, 43(4):617-626.
[26]	杨天育, 常磊, 郭二虎, 等. 应用GGE双标图评价谷子区试品种稳产性及试点代表性[J]. 作物杂志, 2013(5):51-54.

品种	各试点的平均产量/(kg/hm²)							平均值/(kg/hm²)
品种	E1	E2	E3	E4	E5	E6	E7	平均值/(kg/hm²)
g1	-444.39	-133.45	-775.87	-258.5	421.75	-397.84	318.08	-181.46
g2	725.06	795.35	-226.37	-1926.4	222.35	-638.14	-952.47	-285.8
g3	-109.29	513.5	586.98	1520.4	588.15	-60.89	366.13	486.43
g4	1391.46	-90.7	877.08	1057.9	500.45	1715.71	885.63	905.36
g5	-1562.84	-1084.7	-461.82	-393.4	-1732.7	-618.84	-617.37	-924.52

品种	各试点的平均产量/(kg/hm²)							平均值/(kg/hm²)
品种	E1	E2	E3	E4	E5	E6	E7	平均值/(kg/hm²)
g1	-444.39	-133.45	-775.87	-258.5	421.75	-397.84	318.08	-181.46
g2	725.06	795.35	-226.37	-1926.4	222.35	-638.14	-952.47	-285.8
g3	-109.29	513.5	586.98	1520.4	588.15	-60.89	366.13	486.43
g4	1391.46	-90.7	877.08	1057.9	500.45	1715.71	885.63	905.36
g5	-1562.84	-1084.7	-461.82	-393.4	-1732.7	-618.84	-617.37	-924.52