
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 14-21.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0851
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Chunlin(
), YANG Meili(
), WANG Bangtai, LU Hongwei, CHENG Cui, QIN Guiwen
Received:2025-10-09
Revised:2025-12-11
Online:2026-03-25
Published:2026-03-30
LI Chunlin, YANG Meili, WANG Bangtai, LU Hongwei, CHENG Cui, QIN Guiwen. Adaptive Preliminary Screening of Summer Sowing Maize Varieties (Lines) Suitable for Machine Harvest in Northern Henan Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(6): 14-21.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0851
| 编号 | 品种名称 | 编号 | 品种名称 | 编号 | 品种名称 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 中单1172 | 9 | 圣泰81 | 17 | 郑单358 |
| 2 | 九圣禾5813 | 10 | 百玉1369 | 18 | 鲁单651 |
| 3 | 陇单632 | 11 | 浚单806 | 19 | 新单120 |
| 4 | 鲁单6228 | 12 | 郑单115 | 20 | Q3761 |
| 5 | 百玉5272 | 13 | 九圣禾5815 | 21 | 郑单112 |
| 6 | DK225 | 14 | 鲁单632 | 22 | 郑单958(对照1) |
| 7 | 浚单816 | 15 | 漯玉728 | 23 | 京农科728(对照2) |
| 8 | Q3762 | 16 | 存玉758 |
| 编号 | 品种名称 | 编号 | 品种名称 | 编号 | 品种名称 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 中单1172 | 9 | 圣泰81 | 17 | 郑单358 |
| 2 | 九圣禾5813 | 10 | 百玉1369 | 18 | 鲁单651 |
| 3 | 陇单632 | 11 | 浚单806 | 19 | 新单120 |
| 4 | 鲁单6228 | 12 | 郑单115 | 20 | Q3761 |
| 5 | 百玉5272 | 13 | 九圣禾5815 | 21 | 郑单112 |
| 6 | DK225 | 14 | 鲁单632 | 22 | 郑单958(对照1) |
| 7 | 浚单816 | 15 | 漯玉728 | 23 | 京农科728(对照2) |
| 8 | Q3762 | 16 | 存玉758 |
| 性状 | 平均值 | 极大值 | 极小值 | 标准差 | 变异系数/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 生育期/d | 105.61 | 107.00 | 104.00 | 0.99 | 0.94 |
| 株高/cm | 258.20 | 296.33 | 223.67 | 21.21 | 8.21 |
| 穂位高/cm | 101.67 | 132.17 | 81.00 | 14.87 | 14.63 |
| 茎粗/cm | 2.20 | 2.51 | 1.96 | 0.14 | 6.27 |
| 穿刺强度/N/mm2 | 54.82 | 74.57 | 42.66 | 7.62 | 13.90 |
| 雄穗分枝数 | 10.93 | 24.39 | 5.50 | 3.86 | 35.32 |
| 穗长/cm | 17.01 | 18.85 | 15.60 | 0.95 | 5.59 |
| 穗粗/cm | 4.70 | 5.05 | 4.35 | 0.18 | 3.92 |
| 穗行数 | 15.64 | 18.60 | 13.6 | 1.28 | 8.19 |
| 行粒数 | 33.62 | 39.50 | 27.2 | 2.57 | 7.64 |
| 秃尖长/cm | 0.71 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 89.65 |
| 穗粒数 | 520.38 | 611.94 | 418.88 | 56.29 | 10.82 |
| 百粒重/g | 31.42 | 37.94 | 26.27 | 2.81 | 8.94 |
| 破碎率/% | 4.97 | 6.87 | 4.02 | 0.69 | 13.95 |
| 杂质率/% | 2.66 | 3.82 | 2.19 | 0.40 | 15.25 |
| 籽粒水分/% | 26.07 | 29.43 | 23.57 | 1.85 | 7.08 |
| 理论产量/(kg/hm2) | 10435.01 | 12394.10 | 8282.28 | 1065.98 | 10.22 |
| 性状 | 平均值 | 极大值 | 极小值 | 标准差 | 变异系数/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 生育期/d | 105.61 | 107.00 | 104.00 | 0.99 | 0.94 |
| 株高/cm | 258.20 | 296.33 | 223.67 | 21.21 | 8.21 |
| 穂位高/cm | 101.67 | 132.17 | 81.00 | 14.87 | 14.63 |
| 茎粗/cm | 2.20 | 2.51 | 1.96 | 0.14 | 6.27 |
| 穿刺强度/N/mm2 | 54.82 | 74.57 | 42.66 | 7.62 | 13.90 |
| 雄穗分枝数 | 10.93 | 24.39 | 5.50 | 3.86 | 35.32 |
| 穗长/cm | 17.01 | 18.85 | 15.60 | 0.95 | 5.59 |
| 穗粗/cm | 4.70 | 5.05 | 4.35 | 0.18 | 3.92 |
| 穗行数 | 15.64 | 18.60 | 13.6 | 1.28 | 8.19 |
| 行粒数 | 33.62 | 39.50 | 27.2 | 2.57 | 7.64 |
| 秃尖长/cm | 0.71 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 89.65 |
| 穗粒数 | 520.38 | 611.94 | 418.88 | 56.29 | 10.82 |
| 百粒重/g | 31.42 | 37.94 | 26.27 | 2.81 | 8.94 |
| 破碎率/% | 4.97 | 6.87 | 4.02 | 0.69 | 13.95 |
| 杂质率/% | 2.66 | 3.82 | 2.19 | 0.40 | 15.25 |
| 籽粒水分/% | 26.07 | 29.43 | 23.57 | 1.85 | 7.08 |
| 理论产量/(kg/hm2) | 10435.01 | 12394.10 | 8282.28 | 1065.98 | 10.22 |
| 指标 | 主成分 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 因子1 | 因子 2 | 因子 3 | 因子4 | |
| 生育期 | 0.6344 | -0.2319 | 0.6698 | 0.2533 |
| 株高 | -0.6376 | 0.6354 | 0.2131 | 0.2645 |
| 穂位 | -0.5817 | 0.6358 | 0.21 | 0.3844 |
| 穗粒数 | -0.4124 | -0.565 | 0.611 | 0.0142 |
| 百粒重 | 0.093 | -0.046 | -0.8931 | 0.2993 |
| 破碎率 | 0.715 | 0.2727 | 0.1068 | 0.4226 |
| 杂质率 | 0.2168 | 0.7585 | 0.0716 | -0.2479 |
| 籽粒水分 | 0.877 | 0.0062 | 0.064 | 0.2533 |
| 理论产量 | -0.5736 | -0.5728 | -0.1457 | 0.4551 |
| 特征值 | 2.9824 | 2.1608 | 1.6271 | 0.8829 |
| 贡献率/% | 33.1381 | 24.0085 | 18.0786 | 9.8102 |
| 累计贡献率/% | 33.14 | 57.15 | 75.23 | 85.04 |
| 指标 | 主成分 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 因子1 | 因子 2 | 因子 3 | 因子4 | |
| 生育期 | 0.6344 | -0.2319 | 0.6698 | 0.2533 |
| 株高 | -0.6376 | 0.6354 | 0.2131 | 0.2645 |
| 穂位 | -0.5817 | 0.6358 | 0.21 | 0.3844 |
| 穗粒数 | -0.4124 | -0.565 | 0.611 | 0.0142 |
| 百粒重 | 0.093 | -0.046 | -0.8931 | 0.2993 |
| 破碎率 | 0.715 | 0.2727 | 0.1068 | 0.4226 |
| 杂质率 | 0.2168 | 0.7585 | 0.0716 | -0.2479 |
| 籽粒水分 | 0.877 | 0.0062 | 0.064 | 0.2533 |
| 理论产量 | -0.5736 | -0.5728 | -0.1457 | 0.4551 |
| 特征值 | 2.9824 | 2.1608 | 1.6271 | 0.8829 |
| 贡献率/% | 33.1381 | 24.0085 | 18.0786 | 9.8102 |
| 累计贡献率/% | 33.14 | 57.15 | 75.23 | 85.04 |
| 性状 | 生育期 | 株高 | 穂位 | 穗粒数 | 百粒重 | 破碎率 | 杂质率 | 籽粒水分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 | -0.35 | 1 | ||||||
| 穂位 | -0.27 | 0.88** | 1 | |||||
| 穗粒数 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 1 | ||||
| 百粒重 | -0.29 | -0.18 | -0.15 | -0.48* | 1 | |||
| 破碎率 | 0.43* | -0.18 | -0.11 | -0.39 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
| 杂质率 | -0.05 | 0.25 | 0.25 | -0.33 | -0.06 | 0.22 | 1 | |
| 籽粒水分 | 0.63** | -0.46* | -0.39 | -0.24 | 0.13 | 0.62** | 0.17 | 1 |
| 理论产量 | -0.23 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.52** | 0.23 | -0.36 | -0.53** | -0.35 |
| 性状 | 生育期 | 株高 | 穂位 | 穗粒数 | 百粒重 | 破碎率 | 杂质率 | 籽粒水分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 | -0.35 | 1 | ||||||
| 穂位 | -0.27 | 0.88** | 1 | |||||
| 穗粒数 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 1 | ||||
| 百粒重 | -0.29 | -0.18 | -0.15 | -0.48* | 1 | |||
| 破碎率 | 0.43* | -0.18 | -0.11 | -0.39 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
| 杂质率 | -0.05 | 0.25 | 0.25 | -0.33 | -0.06 | 0.22 | 1 | |
| 籽粒水分 | 0.63** | -0.46* | -0.39 | -0.24 | 0.13 | 0.62** | 0.17 | 1 |
| 理论产量 | -0.23 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.52** | 0.23 | -0.36 | -0.53** | -0.35 |
| 品种编号 | 生育期 | 破碎率 | 杂质率 | 籽粒水分 | 综合评价值 | 排序 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.3804 | 0.1932 | 0.143 | 23 |
| 2 | 0.6667 | 0.6930 | 0.8098 | 0.8750 | 0.761 | 6 |
| 3 | 0.3333 | 0.8526 | 0.3497 | 0.5625 | 0.525 | 15 |
| 4 | 0.6667 | 0.8368 | 0.8282 | 0.9148 | 0.812 | 5 |
| 5 | 0.3333 | 0.9456 | 0.8528 | 0.7676 | 0.725 | 7 |
| 6 | 0.6667 | 0.6193 | 0.4724 | 0.8693 | 0.657 | 11 |
| 7 | 0.6667 | 0.8316 | 0.9509 | 0.8125 | 0.815 | 4 |
| 8 | 0.0000 | 0.7333 | 0.8221 | 0.7557 | 0.578 | 13 |
| 9 | 0.0000 | 0.5632 | 0.7485 | 0.5170 | 0.457 | 18 |
| 10 | 0.3333 | 0.6088 | 0.4908 | 0.0909 | 0.381 | 20 |
| 11 | 0.3333 | 0.9140 | 0.8896 | 0.6591 | 0.699 | 8 |
| 12 | 0.3333 | 0.3070 | 0.8834 | 0.4091 | 0.483 | 16 |
| 13 | 0.3333 | 0.6895 | 0.6380 | 0.6307 | 0.573 | 14 |
| 14 | 0.3333 | 0.2719 | 1.0000 | 0.2159 | 0.455 | 19 |
| 15 | 1.0000 | 0.7632 | 0.0000 | 0.6705 | 0.608 | 12 |
| 16 | 0.6667 | 0.7175 | 0.8405 | 0.4205 | 0.661 | 10 |
| 17 | 0.3333 | 0.6667 | 0.8466 | 0.0000 | 0.462 | 17 |
| 18 | 1.0000 | 0.8000 | 0.9509 | 0.9830 | 0.933 | 2 |
| 19 | 0.3333 | 0.2702 | 0.4601 | 0.1534 | 0.304 | 22 |
| 20 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.8344 | 1.0000 | 0.959 | 1 |
| 21 | 0.3333 | 0.8211 | 0.9755 | 0.6136 | 0.686 | 9 |
| 22 | 0.0000 | 0.6579 | 0.7239 | 0.1402 | 0.380 | 21 |
| 23 | 1.0000 | 0.6988 | 0.6810 | 0.9347 | 0.829 | 3 |
| 品种编号 | 生育期 | 破碎率 | 杂质率 | 籽粒水分 | 综合评价值 | 排序 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.3804 | 0.1932 | 0.143 | 23 |
| 2 | 0.6667 | 0.6930 | 0.8098 | 0.8750 | 0.761 | 6 |
| 3 | 0.3333 | 0.8526 | 0.3497 | 0.5625 | 0.525 | 15 |
| 4 | 0.6667 | 0.8368 | 0.8282 | 0.9148 | 0.812 | 5 |
| 5 | 0.3333 | 0.9456 | 0.8528 | 0.7676 | 0.725 | 7 |
| 6 | 0.6667 | 0.6193 | 0.4724 | 0.8693 | 0.657 | 11 |
| 7 | 0.6667 | 0.8316 | 0.9509 | 0.8125 | 0.815 | 4 |
| 8 | 0.0000 | 0.7333 | 0.8221 | 0.7557 | 0.578 | 13 |
| 9 | 0.0000 | 0.5632 | 0.7485 | 0.5170 | 0.457 | 18 |
| 10 | 0.3333 | 0.6088 | 0.4908 | 0.0909 | 0.381 | 20 |
| 11 | 0.3333 | 0.9140 | 0.8896 | 0.6591 | 0.699 | 8 |
| 12 | 0.3333 | 0.3070 | 0.8834 | 0.4091 | 0.483 | 16 |
| 13 | 0.3333 | 0.6895 | 0.6380 | 0.6307 | 0.573 | 14 |
| 14 | 0.3333 | 0.2719 | 1.0000 | 0.2159 | 0.455 | 19 |
| 15 | 1.0000 | 0.7632 | 0.0000 | 0.6705 | 0.608 | 12 |
| 16 | 0.6667 | 0.7175 | 0.8405 | 0.4205 | 0.661 | 10 |
| 17 | 0.3333 | 0.6667 | 0.8466 | 0.0000 | 0.462 | 17 |
| 18 | 1.0000 | 0.8000 | 0.9509 | 0.9830 | 0.933 | 2 |
| 19 | 0.3333 | 0.2702 | 0.4601 | 0.1534 | 0.304 | 22 |
| 20 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.8344 | 1.0000 | 0.959 | 1 |
| 21 | 0.3333 | 0.8211 | 0.9755 | 0.6136 | 0.686 | 9 |
| 22 | 0.0000 | 0.6579 | 0.7239 | 0.1402 | 0.380 | 21 |
| 23 | 1.0000 | 0.6988 | 0.6810 | 0.9347 | 0.829 | 3 |
| [1] |
李少昆, 王崇桃. 中国玉米生产技术的演变与发展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(6):1941-1951.
|
| [2] |
王向东. 玉米育种学的发展回顾与展望[J]. 玉米科学, 2004, 12:5-6.
|
| [3] |
林静, 陈鹏, 刘明国. 玉米收获机械化的发展模式与对农业产出贡献率分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2004, 22(4):153-158.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
谢瑞芝, 雷晓鹏, 王克如, 等. 黄淮海夏玉米籽粒机械收获研究初报[J]. 作物杂志, 2014(2):76-79.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00024-2 URL |
| [8] |
王振华, 鲁晓民, 张新, 等. 我国玉米全程机械化育种目标浅析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2011, 40(11):1-3,21.
|
| [9] |
李淑芳, 张春宵, 路明, 等. 玉米籽粒自然脱水速率研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2014, 12(4):825-829.
|
| [10] |
肖红, 王芳, 段春华, 等. 不同扁蓿豆种质孕蕾期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(5):62-68.
|
| [11] |
罗英舰. 贵州春玉米耐密植宜机收品种生态适应性研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2019.
|
| [12] |
朱丽丽, 张业猛, 李万才, 等. 39个我国不同生态区培育的青贮玉米品种在青海高原适应性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(4):68-78.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2022148 |
| [13] |
马立平. 由多指标向少数几个综合指标的转化:主成分分析法[J]. 北京统计, 2000, 12(6):37-38.
|
| [14] |
何雪银, 文仁来, 吴翠荣, 等. 模糊隶属函数法对玉米苗期抗旱性的分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2008(1):52-56.
|
| [15] |
魏秀俭. 玉米自交系耐旱性的模糊隶属函数法分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2005(2):25-27.
|
| [16] |
周颖, 顾万荣, 赵猛, 等. 黑龙江省不同熟期春玉米品种茎秆特性及机收指标差异[J]. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(S1):140-146.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2017.S1.025 |
| [17] |
尚赏, 胡启国, 郭书亚, 等. 种植密度对黄淮海夏玉米品种倒伏率与茎秆抗倒特性的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2018, 46(8):1282-1285.
|
| [18] |
杨锦越, 宋碧, 罗英舰, 等. 不同玉米品种机械粒收质量评价及其鉴定指标初步筛选[J]. 河南农业科学, 2018, 47(11):25-31.
|
| [19] |
doi: 10.2134/agronj2002.1020 URL |
| [20] |
李璐璐, 雷晓鹏, 谢润芝, 等. 夏玉米机械粒收质量影响因素分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11):2044-2051.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.010 |
| [21] |
柳枫贺, 王克如, 李健, 等. 影响玉米机械收粒质量因素的分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2013(4):116-119.
|
| [22] |
卫晓轶, 王稼苜, 马毅, 等. 玉米机械化籽粒收获组合鉴定与主成分分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(2):48-53.
|
| [23] |
李川, 乔江方, 谷利敏, 等. 影响玉米籽粒直接机械化收获质量的生物学性状分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2015, 30(6):164-169.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2015.06.025 |
| [24] |
王克如, 李少昆. 玉米机械粒收破碎率研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11):2018-2026.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.007 |
| [25] |
孔凡磊, 赵波, 吴雅薇, 等. 收获时期对四川春玉米机械粒收质量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(1):50-56.
|
| [26] |
GB/T 21962-2008,玉米收获机械技术条件[S]. 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局和中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2008.
|
| [27] |
李少昆, 王克如, 杨利华, 等. 河北夏播区玉米机械粒收质量及影响因素研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(2):120-128.
|
| [28] |
高尚, 明博, 慕兰, 等. 黄淮海平原南部玉米机械粒收现状及技术应用前景的生态分析-以河南省为例[J]. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(2):129-137.
|
| [1] | LI Zhengkui, XIA Yuhong, ZHAO Sha, HAN Tiankai, SUN Long, LIU Jiaxin, CHEN Min. Effect of Yellow River Water Drip Irrigation Coordinated with Soil Regulation Technology on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Maize Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(6): 102-110. |
| [2] | CHAI Junfa, SONG Shuang, LYU Jiandong, ZHANG Yi. Screening and Application of Herbicides in Dryland Maize-Soybean Belt Compound Planting Field in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(6): 187-194. |
| [3] | LI Dongbo, ZHAO Xiaoyu, QING Geer, ZHAO Wenshan, HAN Xuke, LI Min, QU Jiawei, MA Daling, GAO Julin, YU Xiaofang. Research on Mechanism of Salt-Tolerant and Alkali-Tolerant Compound Bacterial Strains for Enhancing Stress Resistance and Promoting Growth in Maize Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(6): 22-30. |
| [4] | LI Shimeng, NAN Zhiqiang, BAIMA Yangzhen, WANG Jinxiong. Comprehensive Evaluation and Adaptability Analysis of Rapeseed Agronomic Traits in Xizang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(6): 31-40. |
| [5] | ZHENG Xiaoyuan, CHEN Jingyu, WANG Huicong, WANG Zhenjiang, WANG Dan. Fruit Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of 38 Mulberry Germplasm Resources [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(6): 72-84. |
| [6] | LI Xingxing, OU Huan, YANG Jian, ZHANG Yongjie, CHEN Juan, LI Chunyan, MA Hui, LIU Rongsen, LI Jinhong. Adaptability Screening Test of Maize Varieties for Spring Sowing in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 1-7. |
| [7] | CUI Ling, JIANG Chenyang, NIU Shiduo, ZHOU Ping, GUO Jian, LU Dalei, LI Guanghao. Quality Difference Analysis of Fresh Waxy and Sweet-waxy Maize with Different Colors [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 20-27. |
| [8] | LUO Jing, DU Shanshan, YAO Qingqing, WANG Dongli, HE Zhongsheng, SUN Huijian, WANG Ruijun. Effect of NaCl and Na2SO4 Salt Stress on the Germination of Upland Cotton Seeds and Screening of Salt-tolerant Germplasm [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 48-56. |
| [9] | LIU Guimin, SU Lei, ZHENG Xiaoning, CHEN Di, LIU Binghua, SUN Mingjie, LIU Xinghong, XU Yingmei. Effects of Inoculating Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Physiological Characteristics of Maize Leaves in Medium- and Low-yield Soils [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 119-124. |
| [10] | ZHANG Qiming, GUO Shuilian, OUYANG Dongmei. Variation Analysis of Climate Condition for Double-cropping Rice in Yichun Based on GIS [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 133-143. |
| [11] | XU Mingjie, LI Nian, GUO Shulei, HAN Zanping. Regulation of Stress Resistance in Maize by ERF Transcription Factors: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 1-9. |
| [12] | QI Shuokun, ZHANG Yiyang, MA Yu, LIU Haolin, SHI Juncong, WU Longguo. Effect of Brackish Water on Growth and Quality of Cherry Tomatoes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 56-69. |
| [13] | XU Cunfa, SUN Yiwen, WANG Ning, WANG Jialei, YANG Chenye, CHEN Liyang, SHAN Chengjun. Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Different Varieties of Small Fruit Watermelon [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 70-76. |
| [14] | HUANG Rong, TANG Ling, WANG Weicheng, CHANG Qiang, LI Kuanying, HE Huan, PAN Yanhua. Response of Morphological Traits and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Paeonia lactiflora Leaves to Drought Stress and Evaluation of Drought Resistance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 92-102. |
| [15] | REN Qingguo, WU Guangjun, LIN Ping, ZHANG Jiyu, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Yongshan, HAI Tao. Study of Yield and Quality Traits of New Wheat Cultivar ‘Hemai 26’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 32-37. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||