Evaluation Index System of Leisure Agricultural Landscape Based on AHP

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18050060

Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (22): 77-81.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18050060

Special Issue: 现代农业发展与乡村振兴

Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluation Index System of Leisure Agricultural Landscape Based on AHP

Received:2018-05-12 Revised:2018-06-12 Accepted:2018-06-22 Online:2018-08-07 Published:2018-08-07

Abstract

Abstract: To establish an evaluation system of leisure agricultural landscape and understand the role of various indicators in the construction of agricultural landscape, we built the evaluation index system of agricultural landscape based on the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). The judgment matrix was constructed by the expert consultation method and 1-9 scale method, and the weight value of each index was calculated. The results showed that the weight value of the item was natural landscape> production landscape> humanistic landscape. The heavy weight value factors were the overall senses of the farmland, the regional culture and the organic eco- environmental protection. Among the indicator, promoting tourism income generation had the maximum weight value, road accessibility, natural ecological experience, agricultural operation participation, sustainability and ecosystem diversity also occupied a certain position. The results will provide references for further improvement of agricultural landscape evaluation system.

References

[1] 王浩.农业观光园景观规划与经营 [M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003,25.
[2] 唐东芹, 杨学军, 许东新. 园林植物景观评价方法及其应用[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2001, 18(4):394-397.
[3] Hull R B, Buhyoff GJ, Daniel TC. Measurement of scenic beauty: the law of comparative judgment and scenicbeauty estimation process [J].For Sci,1984, 30(4):30-38.
[4] Viles RL,Rosier DJ. How to use road in the creation of greenways: case studies in three New Zealandlandscape [J].Landscape Urban Planning , 2001,55.
[5] Fabos, J. G . Introduction and overview: the greenway movement, use and potentials of greenways[J].Landscape and Urban Planning , 1995,33(1-3):1-13.
[6] Naveh Z. Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes[J]. Landscape UrbanPlanning, 2001, 57(3–4):269-284.
[7] Bastian O. Landscape Ecology – towards a unified discipline?[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2001, 16(8):757-766.
[8] O?ate J J, Andersen E, Peco B, et al. Agri-environmental schemes and the European agricultural landscapes:the role of indicators as valuing tools for evaluation[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2000, 15(3):271-280.
[9] 胡永宏,贺思辉.综合评价方法 [M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[10] 谢花林,刘黎明.乡村景观评价研究进展及其指标体系初探 [J]. 生态学杂志,2003,22(6):97-101.
[11] 熊辉,彭重华,朱明.湘西侗族村寨旅游资源评价及可持续发展对策[J].湖南林业科技 ,2007,34(1):44-46.
[12] 杨洋.基于层次分析法的绿道景观评价模型的构建与应用[D]. 广东:华南农业大学,2016.
[13] 郜春丽,翁殊斐,赵宝玉.基于AHP法的滨水绿道植物景观评价体系构建[J].西北林学院学报,2013, 28(3):206-209.
[14] 康秀琴,李海防.基于层次分析法的桂林市“两江四湖”景区植物景观评价 [J].中南林业科技大学学报.2016,36(3):129-140.
[15] 宁惠娟,邵峰,孙茜茜,等.基于AHP法的杭州花港观鱼公园植物景观评价[J].浙江农业学报,2011,23(4):717-724.
[16] 齐安国,乔丽芳,李保印.基于AHP的园林植物景观评价研究——以河南科技学院为例 [J].中南林业科技大学学报.2012,32(7):69-71,85.
[17] 陈翠玉,杨善云,严莉,等.基于AHP的柳州市居住区植物景观评价体系构建 [J].中南林业科技大学学报.2014,34(6):134-140.
[18] 陈勇,孙冰,廖绍波,等.城市森林林内景观评价指标筛选研究 [J].中国农学通报.2013,29(16):32-36.
[19] 魏洪斌,罗明,鞠正山,等.中国土地整治“十二五”研究重点评述与“十三五”研究展望[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):371-376.
[20] 章兵,殷巧,汪天.生态农业观光园景观评价体系研究[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(1):278-382.
[21] 肖武,李素萃,梁苏妍,等.土地整治生态景观效应评价方法及应用 [J].中国农业大学学报.2017,22(7):152-162.
[22] 祝斌.试谈城郊观光农业与农业结构调整[J]. 中国农学通报,2000,16(4):56-58.
[23] Weinstoerffer J, Girardin P. Assessment of the contribution of land use pattern and intensity to landscape quality: Use of a landscape indicator [J]. Ecological Modelling,2000,130(1/3):95-109.
[24] 程邦谊.美国田纳西流域治理的成功经验对湖北汉江流域中下游现代水利建设的启示 [J]. 南水北调与水利科技,2007,(1):99-101.

Evaluation Index System of Leisure Agricultural Landscape Based on AHP

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

For authors

For reviewers

Reader center

Contact us