
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (21): 112-121.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1080
Previous Articles Next Articles
					
													HAN Xuchen( ), DONG Yan, HAN Haojie, TAN Yanping, LIU Xuequn, LIU Xinqiong, XU Xin, LI Kai, WANG Chuntai(
), DONG Yan, HAN Haojie, TAN Yanping, LIU Xuequn, LIU Xinqiong, XU Xin, LI Kai, WANG Chuntai( )
)
												  
						
						
						
					
				
Received:2021-11-11
															
							
																	Revised:2022-02-05
															
							
															
							
																	Online:2022-07-25
															
							
																	Published:2022-08-23
															
						Contact:
								WANG Chuntai   
																	E-mail:1033719683@qq.com;wangchuntai@mail.scuec.edu.cn
																					CLC Number:
HAN Xuchen, DONG Yan, HAN Haojie, TAN Yanping, LIU Xuequn, LIU Xinqiong, XU Xin, LI Kai, WANG Chuntai. Study on Dynamic Changes of AVR-Pia of Magnaporthe grisea in Southwestern Hubei[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 112-121.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1080
| 序号 | 水稻品种 | 序号 | 水稻品种 | 序号 | 水稻品种 | 序号 | 水稻品种 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IRBLA-A | 26 | 草笛(Pik, Pish) | 51 | Pi20 | 76 | 杨优1号 | 
| 2 | IRBLA-C | 27 | 梅雨明(Pikm) | 52 | ZD11 | 77 | 黔香优302 | 
| 3 | IRBLI-F5 (Pii) | 28 | 福锦(PiZ, Pish) | 53 | ZD12 | 78 | T优1655 | 
| 4 | IRBLks-F5 | 29 | K1 (Pita) | 54 | ZD16 | 79 | C两优755 | 
| 5 | IRBLKS-F5 | 30 | Pi4号 (Pita2) | 55 | YTB | 80 | 深优9516 | 
| 6 | IRBLK-KA | 31 | 砦1号 (Pizt) | 56 | 9311 | 81 | 全优2689 | 
| 7 | IRBLKP-K60(Pikp) | 32 | K60 | 57 | kahei | 82 | 宜香优62 | 
| 8 | IRBLKH-K3(Pikh) | 33 | BL1 | 58 | 骏优522 | 83 | 谷优92 | 
| 9 | IRBLZ-FU (Piz) | 34 | K59 | 59 | 丰城优质米 | 84 | 中9优恩66 | 
| 10 | IRBLZT-T(Pizt) | 35 | IRBLKM-TS | 60 | 华占 | 85 | 宜香107 | 
| 11 | IRBLTA-CT2 | 36 | IRBLTA2-RE | 61 | 418B | 86 | 中9优591 | 
| 12 | IRBLTA-CP1 | 37 | 特特普 | 62 | R527 | 87 | 楚梗28 | 
| 13 | IRBLB-B(Pib) | 38 | 珍龙13 | 63 | 骏1B | 88 | T优583 | 
| 14 | IRBLT-K59(Pit) | 39 | 四丰43 | 64 | R964 | 89 | 山珍 | 
| 15 | IRBLSH-S(Pish) | 40 | 东农363 | 65 | R522 | 90 | ZJ1 | 
| 16 | IRBLSH-B | 41 | 关东51 | 66 | R172 | 91 | ZJ2 | 
| 17 | F80-1 | 42 | 合江18 | 67 | 骏优172 | 92 | ZJ3 | 
| 18 | F98-7 | 43 | 丽江 | 68 | 荣优华占 | 93 | ZJ4 | 
| 19 | F124-1 | 44 | IRBL1-CL (Pi1) | 69 | T优191 | 94 | ZJ5 | 
| 20 | F128-1(Pita2) | 45 | IRBLZ5-CA (Piz5) | 70 | 日本晴 | 95 | ZJ6 | 
| 22 | F145-2 | 47 | C104PKt | 72 | 两优6206 | 97 | ZJ8 | 
| 23 | 新2号(Pish) | 48 | IRBL5-M | 73 | C两优651 | 98 | ZJ9 | 
| 24 | 爱知旭(Pia) | 49 | IRBL7-M | 74 | 渝香203 | 99 | ZJ10 | 
| 25 | 藤坂5号(Pii) | 50 | IRBL9-W (Pi9) | 75 | 陆267 两优267 | 100 | 华优8830 | 
| 序号 | 水稻品种 | 序号 | 水稻品种 | 序号 | 水稻品种 | 序号 | 水稻品种 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IRBLA-A | 26 | 草笛(Pik, Pish) | 51 | Pi20 | 76 | 杨优1号 | 
| 2 | IRBLA-C | 27 | 梅雨明(Pikm) | 52 | ZD11 | 77 | 黔香优302 | 
| 3 | IRBLI-F5 (Pii) | 28 | 福锦(PiZ, Pish) | 53 | ZD12 | 78 | T优1655 | 
| 4 | IRBLks-F5 | 29 | K1 (Pita) | 54 | ZD16 | 79 | C两优755 | 
| 5 | IRBLKS-F5 | 30 | Pi4号 (Pita2) | 55 | YTB | 80 | 深优9516 | 
| 6 | IRBLK-KA | 31 | 砦1号 (Pizt) | 56 | 9311 | 81 | 全优2689 | 
| 7 | IRBLKP-K60(Pikp) | 32 | K60 | 57 | kahei | 82 | 宜香优62 | 
| 8 | IRBLKH-K3(Pikh) | 33 | BL1 | 58 | 骏优522 | 83 | 谷优92 | 
| 9 | IRBLZ-FU (Piz) | 34 | K59 | 59 | 丰城优质米 | 84 | 中9优恩66 | 
| 10 | IRBLZT-T(Pizt) | 35 | IRBLKM-TS | 60 | 华占 | 85 | 宜香107 | 
| 11 | IRBLTA-CT2 | 36 | IRBLTA2-RE | 61 | 418B | 86 | 中9优591 | 
| 12 | IRBLTA-CP1 | 37 | 特特普 | 62 | R527 | 87 | 楚梗28 | 
| 13 | IRBLB-B(Pib) | 38 | 珍龙13 | 63 | 骏1B | 88 | T优583 | 
| 14 | IRBLT-K59(Pit) | 39 | 四丰43 | 64 | R964 | 89 | 山珍 | 
| 15 | IRBLSH-S(Pish) | 40 | 东农363 | 65 | R522 | 90 | ZJ1 | 
| 16 | IRBLSH-B | 41 | 关东51 | 66 | R172 | 91 | ZJ2 | 
| 17 | F80-1 | 42 | 合江18 | 67 | 骏优172 | 92 | ZJ3 | 
| 18 | F98-7 | 43 | 丽江 | 68 | 荣优华占 | 93 | ZJ4 | 
| 19 | F124-1 | 44 | IRBL1-CL (Pi1) | 69 | T优191 | 94 | ZJ5 | 
| 20 | F128-1(Pita2) | 45 | IRBLZ5-CA (Piz5) | 70 | 日本晴 | 95 | ZJ6 | 
| 22 | F145-2 | 47 | C104PKt | 72 | 两优6206 | 97 | ZJ8 | 
| 23 | 新2号(Pish) | 48 | IRBL5-M | 73 | C两优651 | 98 | ZJ9 | 
| 24 | 爱知旭(Pia) | 49 | IRBL7-M | 74 | 渝香203 | 99 | ZJ10 | 
| 25 | 藤坂5号(Pii) | 50 | IRBL9-W (Pi9) | 75 | 陆267 两优267 | 100 | 华优8830 | 
| 采集地 | 2017年 | 2018年 | 2019年 | 2020年 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | ||||
| 咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 31 | 23 | 0 | 42 | 15 | |||
| 宣恩 | 16 | 17 | 37 | 18 | 88 | 11 | 77 | 69 | |||
| 柏杨 | 69 | 31 | 30 | 49 | 38 | 15 | 65 | 69 | |||
| 建始 | 51 | 27 | 23 | 3 | 51 | 55 | 24 | 1 | |||
| 鹤峰 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 24 | 26 | 23 | |||
| 来凤 | 14 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 34 | 47 | 33 | 22 | |||
| 忠路 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 24 | |||
| 贺家坪 | 16 | 18 | 13 | 10 | 46 | 0 | 70 | 37 | |||
| 野三关 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 28 | 9 | 3 | 0 | |||
| 总计 | 204 | 106 | 136 | 134 | 317 | 161 | 416 | 260 | |||
| 采集地 | 2017年 | 2018年 | 2019年 | 2020年 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | 感病水稻 品种数 | 分离菌 株数 | ||||
| 咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 31 | 23 | 0 | 42 | 15 | |||
| 宣恩 | 16 | 17 | 37 | 18 | 88 | 11 | 77 | 69 | |||
| 柏杨 | 69 | 31 | 30 | 49 | 38 | 15 | 65 | 69 | |||
| 建始 | 51 | 27 | 23 | 3 | 51 | 55 | 24 | 1 | |||
| 鹤峰 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 24 | 26 | 23 | |||
| 来凤 | 14 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 34 | 47 | 33 | 22 | |||
| 忠路 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 24 | |||
| 贺家坪 | 16 | 18 | 13 | 10 | 46 | 0 | 70 | 37 | |||
| 野三关 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 28 | 9 | 3 | 0 | |||
| 总计 | 204 | 106 | 136 | 134 | 317 | 161 | 416 | 260 | |||
| 引物名称 | 引物序列 | 目的片段长度/bp | NCBI GenBank number | 
|---|---|---|---|
| AVR-Pia F1 | TTATTGCTACCACCTTCCTC | 463 | AB498873.1 | 
| AVR-Pia R1 | GTAGTAACTGAGTTGGCGTT | ||
| AVR-Pia F2 | TCAGAGAAACGGACTTGGAGG | 993 | |
| AVR-Pia R2 | GTAATAGTCGCTGTAGTGCCG | 
| 引物名称 | 引物序列 | 目的片段长度/bp | NCBI GenBank number | 
|---|---|---|---|
| AVR-Pia F1 | TTATTGCTACCACCTTCCTC | 463 | AB498873.1 | 
| AVR-Pia R1 | GTAGTAACTGAGTTGGCGTT | ||
| AVR-Pia F2 | TCAGAGAAACGGACTTGGAGG | 993 | |
| AVR-Pia R2 | GTAATAGTCGCTGTAGTGCCG | 
| 地区 | 2017年 | 2018年 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | 总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | |||||||
| 咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 宣恩 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 柏杨 | 31 | 7 | 22.6 | 49 | 11 | 22.4 | ||||||
| 建始 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 太平 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 来凤 | 7 | 1 | 14.3 | 13 | 7 | 53.8 | ||||||
| 忠路 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 贺家坪 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 20.0 | ||||||
| 野三关 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 30.0 | ||||||
| 总计 | 106 | 8 | 7.5 | 134 | 23 | 16.0 | ||||||
| 地区 | 2019年 | 2020年 | ||||||||||
| 总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | 总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | |||||||
| 咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 宣恩 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 69 | 7 | 10.1 | ||||||
| 柏杨 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 69 | 6 | 8.7 | ||||||
| 建始 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 太平 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 来凤 | 47 | 5 | 10.6 | 22 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 忠路 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 贺家坪 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 野三关 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 总计 | 161 | 5 | 3.1 | 260 | 13 | 5.0 | ||||||
| 地区 | 2017年 | 2018年 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | 总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | |||||||
| 咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 宣恩 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 柏杨 | 31 | 7 | 22.6 | 49 | 11 | 22.4 | ||||||
| 建始 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 太平 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 来凤 | 7 | 1 | 14.3 | 13 | 7 | 53.8 | ||||||
| 忠路 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 贺家坪 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 20.0 | ||||||
| 野三关 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 30.0 | ||||||
| 总计 | 106 | 8 | 7.5 | 134 | 23 | 16.0 | ||||||
| 地区 | 2019年 | 2020年 | ||||||||||
| 总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | 总数 | 检出数 | 比例/% | |||||||
| 咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 宣恩 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 69 | 7 | 10.1 | ||||||
| 柏杨 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 69 | 6 | 8.7 | ||||||
| 建始 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 太平 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 来凤 | 47 | 5 | 10.6 | 22 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 忠路 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 贺家坪 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 野三关 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 总计 | 161 | 5 | 3.1 | 260 | 13 | 5.0 | ||||||
| 地点 | 2017年 | 2018年 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | 菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | ||
| 咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 27 | 87.1 | |
| 宣恩 | 17 | 16 | 94.1 | 18 | 14 | 77.8 | |
| 柏杨 | 31 | 22 | 80.0 | 49 | 37 | 75.5 | |
| 建始 | 27 | 22 | 81.5 | 3 | 3 | 100 | |
| 太平 | 6 | 5 | 83.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 来凤 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 53.8 | |
| 忠路 | 7 | 6 | 85.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 贺家坪 | 18 | 18 | 100 | 10 | 8 | 80.0 | |
| 野三关 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 70.0 | |
| 总计 | 106 | 89 | 84.0 | 134 | 103 | 76.9 | |
| 地点 | 2019年 | 2020年 | |||||
| 菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | 菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | ||
| 咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 100 | |
| 宣恩 | 11 | 10 | 91.0 | 69 | 61 | 88.4 | |
| 柏杨 | 15 | 12 | 80.0 | 69 | 59 | 85.5 | |
| 建始 | 55 | 49 | 89.1 | 1 | 1 | 100 | |
| 太平 | 24 | 22 | 91.7 | 23 | 20 | 87.0 | |
| 来凤 | 47 | 41 | 87.2 | 22 | 20 | 90.9 | |
| 忠路 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 20 | 83.3 | |
| 贺家坪 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 37 | 100 | |
| 野三关 | 9 | 9 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 总计 | 161 | 143 | 88.8 | 260 | 235 | 90.4 | |
| 地点 | 2017年 | 2018年 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | 菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | ||
| 咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 27 | 87.1 | |
| 宣恩 | 17 | 16 | 94.1 | 18 | 14 | 77.8 | |
| 柏杨 | 31 | 22 | 80.0 | 49 | 37 | 75.5 | |
| 建始 | 27 | 22 | 81.5 | 3 | 3 | 100 | |
| 太平 | 6 | 5 | 83.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 来凤 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 53.8 | |
| 忠路 | 7 | 6 | 85.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 贺家坪 | 18 | 18 | 100 | 10 | 8 | 80.0 | |
| 野三关 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 70.0 | |
| 总计 | 106 | 89 | 84.0 | 134 | 103 | 76.9 | |
| 地点 | 2019年 | 2020年 | |||||
| 菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | 菌株数 | 感病菌株数 | 比例/% | ||
| 咸丰 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 100 | |
| 宣恩 | 11 | 10 | 91.0 | 69 | 61 | 88.4 | |
| 柏杨 | 15 | 12 | 80.0 | 69 | 59 | 85.5 | |
| 建始 | 55 | 49 | 89.1 | 1 | 1 | 100 | |
| 太平 | 24 | 22 | 91.7 | 23 | 20 | 87.0 | |
| 来凤 | 47 | 41 | 87.2 | 22 | 20 | 90.9 | |
| 忠路 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 20 | 83.3 | |
| 贺家坪 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 37 | 100 | |
| 野三关 | 9 | 9 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 总计 | 161 | 143 | 88.8 | 260 | 235 | 90.4 | |
| 调控元件 | 核心序列 | 位置 | 功能 | 
|---|---|---|---|
| TATA box | TATA/TATAA/TATACA/ATTATA | +356/-678/-354/+49 | core promoter element around -30 of transcription start | 
| Unnamed__4 | CTCC | -117/+148/+602/643/+717/+758 | |
| ABRE | GCAACGTGTC/CACGTG/ACGTG | -87/-543/+544/+555 | cis-acting element involved in the abscisic acid responsiveness | 
| CAAT-box | CAAT/CAAAT/CCAAT | +47/+83/+221/++277/-320/+473/+572/+854 | common cis-acting element in promoter and enhancer regions | 
| MRE | AACCTAA | -440 | MYB binding site | 
| TCT-motif | TCTTAC | +396 | part of a light responsive element | 
| Box 4 | ATTAAT | +229/+374 | part of a conserved DNA module involved in light responsiveness | 
| WUN-motif | AAATTACT | -179 | |
| LTR | CCGAAA | -310 | cis-acting element involved in low-temperature responsiveness | 
| 调控元件 | 核心序列 | 位置 | 功能 | 
|---|---|---|---|
| TATA box | TATA/TATAA/TATACA/ATTATA | +356/-678/-354/+49 | core promoter element around -30 of transcription start | 
| Unnamed__4 | CTCC | -117/+148/+602/643/+717/+758 | |
| ABRE | GCAACGTGTC/CACGTG/ACGTG | -87/-543/+544/+555 | cis-acting element involved in the abscisic acid responsiveness | 
| CAAT-box | CAAT/CAAAT/CCAAT | +47/+83/+221/++277/-320/+473/+572/+854 | common cis-acting element in promoter and enhancer regions | 
| MRE | AACCTAA | -440 | MYB binding site | 
| TCT-motif | TCTTAC | +396 | part of a light responsive element | 
| Box 4 | ATTAAT | +229/+374 | part of a conserved DNA module involved in light responsiveness | 
| WUN-motif | AAATTACT | -179 | |
| LTR | CCGAAA | -310 | cis-acting element involved in low-temperature responsiveness | 
| 调控元件 | 核心序列 | 位置 | 
|---|---|---|
| SW15 | GGCTGG | -97/-724/-814 | 
| ADR1 | TCTCC | +147 | 
| GCN4 | TGATTT | -157/+255/-365/-539 | 
| GCR1 | CTTCC | +713/+861/+934 | 
| BAS2 | TAATGA | -187/-227/+376 | 
| AP-1 | TTATTAA | +227 | 
| STE12 | TGAAACA | +523 | 
| CPF1 | TCACGTG | +542 | 
| PHO4 | CACGTG | +543/+944 | 
| ABF1 | TCACGTATTACG | +549/-915 | 
| REB1 | CTACCCG | +807 | 
| SCB | CACGAAA | +825 | 
| STRE | AGGGG | -864 | 
| MSE | CGCAAAA | -910 | 
| 调控元件 | 核心序列 | 位置 | 
|---|---|---|
| SW15 | GGCTGG | -97/-724/-814 | 
| ADR1 | TCTCC | +147 | 
| GCN4 | TGATTT | -157/+255/-365/-539 | 
| GCR1 | CTTCC | +713/+861/+934 | 
| BAS2 | TAATGA | -187/-227/+376 | 
| AP-1 | TTATTAA | +227 | 
| STE12 | TGAAACA | +523 | 
| CPF1 | TCACGTG | +542 | 
| PHO4 | CACGTG | +543/+944 | 
| ABF1 | TCACGTATTACG | +549/-915 | 
| REB1 | CTACCCG | +807 | 
| SCB | CACGAAA | +825 | 
| STRE | AGGGG | -864 | 
| MSE | CGCAAAA | -910 | 
| [1] | VASUDEVAN K, VERA CRUZ C, GRUISSEM W, et al. Geographically distinct and domain-specific sequence variations in the alleles of rice blast resistance gene Pib[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2016, 7:915. | 
| [2] | 曹妮, 陈渊, 季芝娟, 等. 水稻抗稻瘟病分子机制研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6):489-498. doi: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.8126 | 
| [3] | FLOR H H. Cunrent status of the gene-for-gene concept[J]. Annual review of genetics, 1971, 9:275-296. | 
| [4] | HUANG J, SI W, DENG Q, et al.  Rapid evolution of avirulence genes in rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. BMC genetics, 2014, 15:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-45 URL | 
| [5] | DAI Y, JIA Y, CORRELL J, et al.  Diversification and evolution of the avirulence gene AVR-Pita1 in field isolates of Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Fungal genet biol, 2010, 47(12):973-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.08.003 URL | 
| [6] | CHUMA I, ISOBE C, HOTTA Y, et al.  Multiple translocation of the AVR-Pita effector gene among chromosomes of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae and related species[J]. Plos pathol, 2011, 7:e1002147. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002147 URL | 
| [7] | ORBACH M J, FARRALL L, SWEIGARD J A, et al.  A telomeric avirulence gene determines efficacy for the rice blast resistance gene Pi-ta[J]. Plant cell, 2000, 12(11):2019-2032. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.11.2019 URL | 
| [8] | LI W, WANG B, WU J, et al.  The Magnaporthe oryzae avirulence gene AVR-Pizt encodes a predicted secreted protein that triggers the immunity in rice mediated by the blast resistance gene Piz-t[J]. Molecular plant-microbe interactions, 2009, 22(4):411-420. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-4-0411 URL | 
| [9] | FARMAN M L, LEONG S A. Chromosome walking to the AVR1-CO39avirulence gene of Magnaporthe grisea: discrepancy between the physical and genetic maps[J]. Genetics, 1998, 150(3):1049-1058. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.3.1049 URL | 
| [10] | FUDAL I, BöHNERT H U, THARREAU D, et al.  Transposition of MINE, a composite retrotransposon, in the avirulence gene ACE1 of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea[J]. Fungal genetics and biology, 2005, 42(9):761-772. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.05.001 URL | 
| [11] | YASUDA N, MITSUNAGA T, HAYASHI K, et al.  Effects of pyramiding quantitative resistance genes Pi21, Pi34, and Pi35 on rice leaf blast disease[J]. Plant disease, 2015, 99(7):904-909. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-14-0214-RE URL | 
| [12] | KANG S, SWEIGARD J A, VALENT B. The PWL host specificity gene family in the blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea[J]. Molecular plant-microbe interactions, 1995, 8(6):939-948. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-8-0939 URL | 
| [13] | SWEIGARD J A, CARROLL A M, KANG S, et al. Identification, cloning, and characterization of PWL2, a gene for host species specificity in the rice blast fungus[J]. Plant cell, 1995, 7(8):1221-1233. | 
| [14] | ZHANG S, WANG L, WU W, et al.  Function and evolution of Magnaporthe oryzae avirulence gene AvrPib responding to the rice blast resistance gene Pib[J]. Scientific reports, 2015, 5:11642. doi: 10.1038/srep11642 URL | 
| [15] | WU J, KOU Y, BAO J, et al. Comparative genomics identifies the Magnaporthe oryzae avirulence effector AvrPi9 that triggers Pi9-mediated blast resistance in rice[J]. The new phytologist, 2015, 206(4):463-1475. | 
| [16] | RAY S, SINGH P K, GUPTA D K, et al. Analysis of Magnaporthe oryzae genome reveals a fungal effector, which is able to induce resistance response in transgenic rice line containing resistance gene, Pi54[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2016, 7:1140. | 
| [17] | CÉSARI S, KANZAKI H, FUJIWARA T, et al.  The NB-LRR proteins RGA4 and RGA5 interact functionally and physically to confer disease resistance[J]. The embo j, 2014, 33(17):1941-1959. doi: 10.15252/embj.201487923 URL | 
| [18] | ORTIZ D, DE GUILLEN K, CESARI S, et al.  Recognition of the Magnaporthe oryzae effector AVR-Pia by the decoy domain of the rice NLR immune receptor RGA5[J]. Plant cell, 2017, 29(1):156-168. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00435 URL | 
| [19] | 杨军, 马惠, 陈博聪, 等. 山东省稻瘟病病菌无毒基因鉴定及分析[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2020, 40(7):22-26. | 
| [20] | 王群, 陆琳, 何成兴, 等. 云南省水稻稻瘟病菌无毒基因AVR-Pia变异及水稻抗性基因Pia的有效性[J]. 植物保护学报, 2020, 47(3):562-571. | 
| [21] | XU X, YANG W, TIAN K, et al.  Genetic diversity and pathogenicity dynamics of Magnaporthe oryzae in the Wuling Mountain area of China[J]. Eur j plant patho, 2018, 153(3):731-742. doi: 10.1007/s10658-018-1587-4 URL | 
| [22] | 蒋金芬, 韩红萍, 梁友方. 滤纸片法低温冷冻保存菌种的实验室应用[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2006, 22(3):310. | 
| [23] | 杨武. 鄂西南地区2016-2017年稻瘟病菌群体多态性分析[D]. 武汉: 中南民族大学, 2019. | 
| [24] | 刘伟. 辽宁省稻瘟病菌种群动态监测及无毒基因Avr-pi9功能的初探[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2020. | 
| [25] | 孟峰, 张亚玲, 靳学慧. 黑龙江省稻瘟病菌无毒基因的检测[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(3):197-200. | 
| [26] | SONE T, TAKEUCHI S, MIKI S, et al.  Homologous recombination causes the spontaneous deletion of AVR-Pia in Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. FEMS microbiology letters, 339(2):102-109. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12058 URL | 
| Viewed | ||||||
| Full text |  | |||||
| Abstract |  | |||||