Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (15): 104-110.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0457
Previous Articles Next Articles
XU Xingyang1(), ZHANG Xiaowei2, LIU Zhonghua3, YU Xiaofen4, QIU Xueli4, JIAO Zhongyun1, ZHANG Lianqiao1, YANG Shuming4()
Received:
2022-05-30
Revised:
2022-08-02
Online:
2023-05-25
Published:
2023-05-22
XU Xingyang, ZHANG Xiaowei, LIU Zhonghua, YU Xiaofen, QIU Xueli, JIAO Zhongyun, ZHANG Lianqiao, YANG Shuming. Effects of Organic and Inorganic Compound Fertilizer Combined with Potassium Feldspar Soil Conditioner on Yield, Quality and Nutrient Utilization Rate of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(15): 104-110.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0457
处理 | 土壤调理剂 | 纯氮 | 磷(P2O5) | 钾(K2O) |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (CK) | 0 | 56.25 | 112.50 | 168.75 |
T2 | 0 | 56.25 | 112.50 | 168.75 |
T3 | 900 | 56.25 | 112.50 | 168.75 |
T4 | 900 | 45.00 | 90.00 | 135.00 |
T5 | 900 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
T6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
处理 | 土壤调理剂 | 纯氮 | 磷(P2O5) | 钾(K2O) |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (CK) | 0 | 56.25 | 112.50 | 168.75 |
T2 | 0 | 56.25 | 112.50 | 168.75 |
T3 | 900 | 56.25 | 112.50 | 168.75 |
T4 | 900 | 45.00 | 90.00 | 135.00 |
T5 | 900 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
T6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
处理 | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 水解性氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 总有机碳/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | C/N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (CK) | 5.24±0.17c | 26.27±1.37d | 101.92±24.47b | 28.11±7.13c | 235.51±28.19c | 14.28±0.31c | 1.73±0.03b | 8.24±0.62b |
T2 | 5.75±0.21b | 31.46±3.32b | 115.19±32.28a | 34.94±8.01b | 296.15±30.14b | 16.18±0.23a | 1.92±0.02a | 8.41±0.45b |
T3 | 5.93±0.19a | 33.71±4.46a | 118.04±19.03a | 37.83±9.72a | 337.91±24.26a | 16.55±0.13a | 1.75±0.04b | 9.56±0.38a |
T4 | 5.82±0.15b | 30.45±3.14a | 102.97±23.36b | 27.36±10.16c | 221.45±20.38d | 15.21±0.29b | 1.63±0.05c | 9.33±0.34a |
T5 | 5.61±0.23b | 27.90±2.53c | 51.67±6.35c | 13.02±6.83d | 157.31±26.47e | 7.62±0.45d | 0.92±0.06d | 8.28±0.28b |
T6 | 5.22±0.11c | 24.64±2.69e | 47.88±8.18d | 9.42±5.14e | 117.20±13.79f | 6.48±0.17d | 1.05±0.07d | 6.18±0.56c |
处理 | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 水解性氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 总有机碳/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | C/N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (CK) | 5.24±0.17c | 26.27±1.37d | 101.92±24.47b | 28.11±7.13c | 235.51±28.19c | 14.28±0.31c | 1.73±0.03b | 8.24±0.62b |
T2 | 5.75±0.21b | 31.46±3.32b | 115.19±32.28a | 34.94±8.01b | 296.15±30.14b | 16.18±0.23a | 1.92±0.02a | 8.41±0.45b |
T3 | 5.93±0.19a | 33.71±4.46a | 118.04±19.03a | 37.83±9.72a | 337.91±24.26a | 16.55±0.13a | 1.75±0.04b | 9.56±0.38a |
T4 | 5.82±0.15b | 30.45±3.14a | 102.97±23.36b | 27.36±10.16c | 221.45±20.38d | 15.21±0.29b | 1.63±0.05c | 9.33±0.34a |
T5 | 5.61±0.23b | 27.90±2.53c | 51.67±6.35c | 13.02±6.83d | 157.31±26.47e | 7.62±0.45d | 0.92±0.06d | 8.28±0.28b |
T6 | 5.22±0.11c | 24.64±2.69e | 47.88±8.18d | 9.42±5.14e | 117.20±13.79f | 6.48±0.17d | 1.05±0.07d | 6.18±0.56c |
处理 | 株高/cm | 茎围/cm | 叶片数 | 叶面积/cm2 | 叶面积系数 | 上等烟比例/% | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (CK) | 114.8±12.37b | 11.6±0.96c | 18.3±2.59a | 1382.68±9.15b | 3.38±1.15b | 52.1±5.34b | 2080.5±4.58c | 55881.90±16.41d |
T2 | 118.6±11.49b | 12.9±0.63b | 18.5±3.18a | 1411.81±7.94a | 3.63±2.18a | 56.2±3.75a | 2125.5±5.26b | 62450.55±10.35b |
T3 | 126.7±13.28a | 13.5±0.87a | 18.9±2.55a | 1444.92±8.42a | 4.19±1.39a | 61.3±6.21a | 2391.0±9.17a | 72293.10±14.52a |
T4 | 109.3±12.95b | 12.3±0.74b | 17.6±3.01b | 1272.32±9.56c | 3.06±1.16c | 58.5±4.93a | 2093.5±7.25c | 59697.70±12.85c |
T5 | 92.4±9.26c | 9.4±0.55d | 13.7±2.94c | 645.55±6.48d | 1.23±1.03d | 23.7±2.36c | 753.0±4.39d | 18273.15±8.73e |
T6 | 71.5±8.54d | 7.5±0.81e | 9.4±2.67d | 459.93±7.01e | 0.61±0.97e | 18.5±1.98d | 562.5±4.12e | 15189.75±5.27f |
处理 | 株高/cm | 茎围/cm | 叶片数 | 叶面积/cm2 | 叶面积系数 | 上等烟比例/% | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (CK) | 114.8±12.37b | 11.6±0.96c | 18.3±2.59a | 1382.68±9.15b | 3.38±1.15b | 52.1±5.34b | 2080.5±4.58c | 55881.90±16.41d |
T2 | 118.6±11.49b | 12.9±0.63b | 18.5±3.18a | 1411.81±7.94a | 3.63±2.18a | 56.2±3.75a | 2125.5±5.26b | 62450.55±10.35b |
T3 | 126.7±13.28a | 13.5±0.87a | 18.9±2.55a | 1444.92±8.42a | 4.19±1.39a | 61.3±6.21a | 2391.0±9.17a | 72293.10±14.52a |
T4 | 109.3±12.95b | 12.3±0.74b | 17.6±3.01b | 1272.32±9.56c | 3.06±1.16c | 58.5±4.93a | 2093.5±7.25c | 59697.70±12.85c |
T5 | 92.4±9.26c | 9.4±0.55d | 13.7±2.94c | 645.55±6.48d | 1.23±1.03d | 23.7±2.36c | 753.0±4.39d | 18273.15±8.73e |
T6 | 71.5±8.54d | 7.5±0.81e | 9.4±2.67d | 459.93±7.01e | 0.61±0.97e | 18.5±1.98d | 562.5±4.12e | 15189.75±5.27f |
处理 | 单叶重/g | 含梗率/% | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 叶片厚度/mm | 拉力/N | 叶面密度/(g/m2) | 填充值/(cm3/g) | 平衡含水率/% | 得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (CK) | 18.10a | 30.17a | 61.21b | 27.32c | 0.11b | 1.32c | 148.01c | 2.91b | 16.32b | 78.65d |
T2 | 16.71b | 30.40a | 64.23b | 29.55b | 0.12a | 1.58a | 156.06b | 3.37a | 17.38a | 83.29b |
T3 | 15.87b | 30.06a | 69.71a | 33.30a | 0.13a | 1.62a | 165.71a | 3.60a | 17.67a | 85.68a |
T4 | 14.34c | 26.43b | 59.82b | 30.64b | 0.11b | 1.45b | 158.12b | 3.28a | 15.86b | 80.94c |
T5 | 9.06d | 18.60c | 49.20c | 21.65d | 0.08c | 1.27d | 91.39d | 2.76c | 10.94c | 34.27e |
T6 | 8.49d | 16.36d | 45.63c | 18.86e | 0.07c | 0.94e | 82.96d | 2.77c | 9.53c | 28.41f |
处理 | 单叶重/g | 含梗率/% | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 叶片厚度/mm | 拉力/N | 叶面密度/(g/m2) | 填充值/(cm3/g) | 平衡含水率/% | 得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (CK) | 18.10a | 30.17a | 61.21b | 27.32c | 0.11b | 1.32c | 148.01c | 2.91b | 16.32b | 78.65d |
T2 | 16.71b | 30.40a | 64.23b | 29.55b | 0.12a | 1.58a | 156.06b | 3.37a | 17.38a | 83.29b |
T3 | 15.87b | 30.06a | 69.71a | 33.30a | 0.13a | 1.62a | 165.71a | 3.60a | 17.67a | 85.68a |
T4 | 14.34c | 26.43b | 59.82b | 30.64b | 0.11b | 1.45b | 158.12b | 3.28a | 15.86b | 80.94c |
T5 | 9.06d | 18.60c | 49.20c | 21.65d | 0.08c | 1.27d | 91.39d | 2.76c | 10.94c | 34.27e |
T6 | 8.49d | 16.36d | 45.63c | 18.86e | 0.07c | 0.94e | 82.96d | 2.77c | 9.53c | 28.41f |
处理 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 氧化钾/% | 水溶性氯/% | CCUI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (CK) | 30.01b | 24.49c | 2.61b | 2.34b | 2.17c | 0.13b | 79.51d |
T2 | 28.70b | 18.63f | 2.94a | 2.71a | 2.77a | 0.22a | 86.32b |
T3 | 28.68b | 21.82e | 2.90a | 2.53a | 2.95a | 0.24a | 88.25a |
T4 | 29.54b | 23.21d | 2.01c | 2.18b | 2.51b | 0.28a | 82.94c |
T5 | 31.92a | 26.49b | 1.59d | 1.43c | 1.17d | 0.13b | 30.18e |
T6 | 32.09a | 28.62a | 1.31d | 1.32c | 1.13d | 0.19b | 27.43e |
处理 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 氧化钾/% | 水溶性氯/% | CCUI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (CK) | 30.01b | 24.49c | 2.61b | 2.34b | 2.17c | 0.13b | 79.51d |
T2 | 28.70b | 18.63f | 2.94a | 2.71a | 2.77a | 0.22a | 86.32b |
T3 | 28.68b | 21.82e | 2.90a | 2.53a | 2.95a | 0.24a | 88.25a |
T4 | 29.54b | 23.21d | 2.01c | 2.18b | 2.51b | 0.28a | 82.94c |
T5 | 31.92a | 26.49b | 1.59d | 1.43c | 1.17d | 0.13b | 30.18e |
T6 | 32.09a | 28.62a | 1.31d | 1.32c | 1.13d | 0.19b | 27.43e |
处理 | 表观利用率 | 生理利用率 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | ||
T1 (CK) | 31.28c | 8.92d | 29.21d | 27.16b | 7.54c | 25.92c | |
T2 | 37.15a | 12.71b | 32.68b | 28.75a | 9.25a | 28.37b | |
T3 | 38.83a | 13.29a | 35.14a | 30.08a | 10.17a | 30.81a | |
T4 | 35.47b | 10.37c | 31.45c | 28.19b | 8.56b | 26.48c | |
T5 | 14.12d | 4.56e | 9.37e | 6.57d | 4.02d | 7.15d |
处理 | 表观利用率 | 生理利用率 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | ||
T1 (CK) | 31.28c | 8.92d | 29.21d | 27.16b | 7.54c | 25.92c | |
T2 | 37.15a | 12.71b | 32.68b | 28.75a | 9.25a | 28.37b | |
T3 | 38.83a | 13.29a | 35.14a | 30.08a | 10.17a | 30.81a | |
T4 | 35.47b | 10.37c | 31.45c | 28.19b | 8.56b | 26.48c | |
T5 | 14.12d | 4.56e | 9.37e | 6.57d | 4.02d | 7.15d |
[1] |
王日俊, 黄成东, 徐照丽, 等. 基于中国知网的有机无机配施对烤烟产量与品质影响的整合分析[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(6):1185-1191.
|
[2] |
何明洁. 烟草K326、红花大金元对NO3和NH4的吸收利用的生理学研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2017:5.
|
[3] |
罗倩, 芶剑渝, 彭玉龙, 等. 氮、磷、钾失调对土壤有效性及烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2019(11):46-51.
|
[4] |
汪健, 王松峰, 毕庆文, 等. 氮磷钾用量对烤烟红花大金元产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2009, 30(5):19-23.
|
[5] |
李健铭. 不同有机肥料对烤烟生长、养分吸收与土壤碳氮矿化的影响[D]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2020.
|
[6] |
刘洋. 有机肥料对植烟土壤NPK转化及烤烟香气物质的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2015.
|
[7] |
戴勋, 王月悦, 谢新乔, 等. 氨化-硝化复合菌剂对油枯有机肥氮氨化和硝化作用的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2020, 36(4):942-948.
|
[8] |
杨旭, 刘海林, 黄艳艳, 等. 有机无机复混肥施用量对热带水稻土壤微生物群落和酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(4):619-629.
|
[9] |
李健铭, 李志宏, 王鹏, 等. 不同碳源对植烟土壤碳平衡的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(1):124-130.
|
[10] |
余小芬, 杨树明, 邹炳礼, 等. 菜籽油枯有机无机复混肥对烤烟产质量及养分利用率的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(6):1564-1574.
|
[11] |
沈延彬. 钾长石综合利用技术研究[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2016.
|
[12] |
李荣. 利用钾长石(类)资源开发肥料(土壤调理剂)肥效试验[C]. 中国无机盐工业协会钾盐(肥)行业分会第七届年会, 2012.
|
[13] |
刘建明, 刘善科, 翟媛媛, 等. 钾硅钙矿物肥在柑橘上的应用[J]. 农资与市场, 2016(16):67-69.
|
[14] |
王建康, 李小玲, 陈海宁, 等. 硅钙钾镁肥对果蔗产量品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2016(4):42-45.
|
[15] |
赵风兰, 候怀恩, 刘彩玲, 等. 硅钙钾镁肥在黑龙江垦区寒地水稻上的施用效果[J]. 河南农业科学, 2010(11):57-62.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2010.11.015 |
[16] |
陶远征, 李海平, 丁梦娇, 等. 不同配方富钾土壤调理剂施用对土壤钾素及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(1):94-99.
|
[17] |
王炽, 李枝武, 倪明, 等. 碳基土壤调理剂对昭通冷凉山区植烟黄壤培肥改良研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(2):347-353.
|
[18] |
云南省统计局. 云南统计年鉴(2020)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020:368.
|
[19] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农业化学分析(第3版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
[20] |
国家烟草专卖局. 烟草农艺性状调查测量方法:YC/T 142-2010[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010:1-10.
|
[21] |
国家技术监督局. 烤烟: GB 2635-92[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1992:7-8.
|
[22] |
杨超群, 姜轶瑶, 高梓峰, 等. 种植密度与钾素用量对烤烟化学成分、物理特性和中性香气物质的影响[J]. 延边大学学报, 2021, 43(3):30-37.
|
[23] |
国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品-水溶性糖的测定-连续流动法:YC/T 159-2002[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2002:397-401.
|
[24] |
国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品-总氮的测定-连续流动法:YC/T 161-2002[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2002:409-413.
|
[25] |
国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品-总植物碱的测定-连续流动(硫氰酸钾)法: YC/T 468-2013[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013:1-4.
|
[26] |
国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品-钾的测定-连续流动法:YC/T 217-2007[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007:1-4.
|
[27] |
国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品-氯的测定-连续流动法:YC/T 162-2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011:1-5.
|
[28] |
中华人民和国农业部. 植物中氮、磷、钾的测定: NY/T 2017-2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011:1-7.
|
[29] |
季璇, 冯长春, 郑学博, 等. 饼肥等氮替代化肥对植烟土壤养分、酶活性和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2019, 40(5):23-29.
|
[30] |
李圆宾, 李鹏, 王舒华, 等. 稻麦轮作体系下有机肥施用对作物产量和土壤性质影响的整合分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9):3231-3239.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202109.024 |
[31] |
刘丽媛. 有机肥配施对稻田土壤环境质量的影响及驱动机制研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2021.
|
[32] |
白娜玲, 吕卫光, 李双喜, 等. 施肥方式对稻麦轮作土壤团聚体分布的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(3):88-93,100.
|
[33] |
李亮, 张佩佳, 张翔, 等. 不同饼肥配比对烟田土壤生物学特性及氮素转化的影响[J]. 土壤, 2019, 51(4):648-657.
|
[34] |
李鑫, 周冀衡, 张毅, 等. 枸溶性钾肥与硫酸钾配施对烤烟生长及钾素积累与分配的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 42(5):480-483.
|
[35] |
宋建群, 徐智, 汤利, 等. 不同有机肥对烤烟养分吸收及化肥利用率的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2015, 30(3):471-476.
|
[36] |
佘文凯, 武丽, 芶剑渝, 等. 有机无机复混肥在山地烤烟土壤中氮素的释放迁移[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2019, 46(6):1048-1054.
|
[37] |
陈尧, 郑华, 石俊雄, 等. 施用化肥和菜籽粕对烤烟根际微生物的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(1):198-203.
|
[38] |
谢仕祺, 林正全, 陈玉蓝, 等. 不同土壤调理剂对植烟土壤养分及细菌群落的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2021, 55(3):523-530.
|
[39] |
尚海丽. 西北干旱区粘土矿物-微生物作用机理及促生效应[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2019.
|
[1] | REN Haiying, ZHENG Jingmeng, SHI Wei, WU Haodi, WANG Kangqiang, YU Mingquan, WANG Zhenshuo, WANG Qi. Effects of Micro-ecology Preparation Improving Soil on the Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Twig Blight Diseased Bayberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 153-157. |
[2] | WU Chupeng, SHENG Jiandong, HU Yutong, CHENG Zhihui, YANG Pengfei. Soil Quality Evaluation of Oasis Cotton Fields in Shaya County of Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 71-78. |
[3] | CHEN Shujian, CHEN Jingdu, YANG Chengqin, XU Meigang, GAO Jianbo. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Quality of Rice with Mechanical Sowing in Line Under Water [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 1-6. |
[4] | LIAO Heting, ZHENG Yao, WANG Ning, AN Shuwei, Gu Lingling, CHEN Jiazhang. Analysis of Plankton Community Structure Characteristics of Lotus Root-Crayfish Culture Model in Different Areas of Northern Jiangsu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 156-164. |
[5] | ZHAO Shouping, XIAO Wendan, CHEN De, YE Xuezhu, ZHANG Qi, WU Shaofu, HU Jing, GAO Na, HUANG Miaojie. Evaluation of Heavy Metal Passivation in Contaminated Paddy Fields Based on Soil Quality and Rice Safety [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 51-62. |
[6] | LIU Yu, LI Ping, ZHAO Kaili, YAN Shi, LIU Jipei, LIU Lei, GUO Ning. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Application of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrients of Celery [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 63-68. |
[7] | JIA Limin, ZHAO Xiaoyu, WANG Xuejiao, SU Erhu, LI Qiang, GUO Jiahua. Changes of Agronomic Characters, Quality and Yield of Soybean Varieties Approved in Different Years in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 10-18. |
[8] | SHAO Xuehua, KUANG Shizi, HUANG Jianhui, OUYANG Jiamin, WAN Yan, LAI Duo. Effects of On-tree Storage on the Fruit Quality of Phyllanthus emblica [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 140-145. |
[9] | NIU Xianqian, JIANG Li, LIN Qiujin, LIN Xiuxiang, LI Yongyu, SHI Qing. Division of Planting Areas for Superior Quality Passion Fruits in Fujian [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 40-45. |
[10] | ZHENG Jianchao, DONG Fei. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction on Growth Characteristics and Fertilizer Use Efficiency of Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 52-57. |
[11] | LI Yali, BAI Jing, WU Zhenghu, HALIHASH Yibati, LI Qingjun. Effects of N, P and K Application Time on Yield, Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Processing Tomato Under Chemical Fertilizer Reduction [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 58-63. |
[12] | ZHANG Kexin, YU Xiao, ZHANG Moucao. Effects of Sowing Date on Growth and Yield of Spring Maize in East Gansu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 6-12. |
[13] | YIN Liping, LIU Siyuan, CAI Chengmei, SHI Xiaoli, ZHU Xiaojuan, YUAN Guoming, WANG Jidong, ZHANG Hui, XU Cong, MA Hongbo. Effects of Jiabowen Soil Conditioner on Radish Yield and Quality and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 64-71. |
[14] | ZHOU Jie, QI Chuandong, TANG Chun, GUO Fengling, QIN Zhushan, CAI Xiaodong, WU Jinping. Application Effect of Ethephon, Medium Trace Element and Functional Fertilizer on Ginger [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 72-76. |
[15] | JING Hua, MA Aiping, KANG Xiuli, WANG Yuzhi, CUI Huanhu, HUANG Xuefang. Effect of Paclobutrazol and Micro Sprinkler Irrigation on the Quality and Dwarfing of Millet Cultivated on Wheat Stubble [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 18-25. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||